***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

10,296,313 Views | 55026 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by fullback44
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
74OA said:

F-16s are carrying an increasingly heavy load defending Ukraine. I wonder how long they can keep up the pace before readiness becomes an issue.

"Ukrainian F-16 pilots have already set records that illustrate just how far the aircraft's role in cruise missile defense has advanced. In December 2024, a Ukrainian F-16 pilot shot down six Russian cruise missiles in a single sortie, using only four air-to-air missiles and the jet's onboard cannon for the final two kills, a feat Ukraine's Air Force described at the time as the first instance anywhere in the world of a fighter destroying that many cruise missiles in one engagement."

VIPER

Too close for missiles, switching to guns...
You can turn off signatures, btw
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PJYoung said:





JFC those SAMs SUCK. Do they not have any terminal phase guidance?
You can turn off signatures, btw
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PJYoung said:



You can turn off signatures, btw
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus said:

They're probing to see how far they can go, and slowly creating acclimation/habituation/acceptance by euros. Because they know that up to a mass casualty event, nobody will engage out of fear of "escalation". They also know that the US won't get involved regardless of what they do. So, for them, the risk is exceedingly low and very much worth it.

This. But there's another available response option.

"Given that these episodes keep occurring, diplomatic demarches are clearly not cutting it. But how does NATO respond unambiguously without climbing the escalation ladder? The right answer is to take the leash off Ukraine.

Visiting Washington last week, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky asked President Donald Trump to persuade Elon Musk to lift restrictions on using Starlink, SpaceX's satellite communications system, to help guide strikes inside Russia. With the global supply of interceptors running dangerously low, Ukraine needs to be able to hit Russian launchers before they fire their ballistic missiles.

Russia has always probed its adversaries. Every "stray" drone or missile that goes unanswered encourages greater risk-taking. Doing nothing, paradoxically, is the more dangerous option."

WaPo: PUSH BACK
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus said:




And there's a drone for all of them.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus said:



troops?

They misspelled bullet-catchers.
You can turn off signatures, btw
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
More X posts beginning to surface, seeming to validate Russia importing North Korean women as laborers to replace their plummeting workforce as well. So that post from a while back may not have been fake news after all.

PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2wealfth Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Russian citizens evidently hate having the NORKS around from what I have heard of the first go around. This is essentially the modern version of slavery
EastSideAg2002
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PJYoung said:



So nothing.
Gilligan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2wealfth Man said:

The Russian citizens evidently hate having the NORKS around from what I have heard of the first go around. This is essentially the modern version of slavery


I'd wager the NORKS love the opportunity. I wonder how tight the leash is on them from running away?
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?


More detailed COVERAGE.
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids said:

Rossticus said:



troops?

They misspelled bullet-catchers.

Drone-fodder.
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gilligan said:

2wealfth Man said:

The Russian citizens evidently hate having the NORKS around from what I have heard of the first go around. This is essentially the modern version of slavery


I'd wager the NORKS love the opportunity. I wonder how tight the leash is on them from running away?


Very. They're kept under tight surveillance, their passports are confiscated and held, and a significant portion of their presumed wages are withheld as insurance (doubt they ever actually see that portion).
Blackbeard94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Don't forget family, if you try to split, your mom, dad and siblings all go off to the gulag
eric76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blackbeard94 said:

Don't forget family, if you try to split, your mom, dad and siblings all go off to the gulag

Are we speaking of North Korea? I think it goes for three generations there.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus said:

They're probing to see how far they can go, and slowly creating acclimation/habituation/acceptance by euros. Because they know that up to a mass casualty event, nobody will engage out of fear of "escalation". They also know that the US won't get involved regardless of what they do. So, for them, the risk is exceedingly low and very much worth it.


I don't see them provoking Poland or CR, but part of me hopes they do.
“You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Gilligan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eric76 said:

Blackbeard94 said:

Don't forget family, if you try to split, your mom, dad and siblings all go off to the gulag

Are we speaking of North Korea? I think it goes for three generations there.


What if you don't like them anyway? Asking for a friend...
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GAC06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If they can really produce a ballistic missile interceptor, it would be pretty impressive
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Necessity is the mother of invention".

I hope.
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Further indication that there will be no "deal" nor substantive negotiation to end this.

Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I know, "Unnamed sources", but not remotely outside the realm of possibility.

EastSideAg2002
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus said:

I know, "Unnamed sources", but not remotely outside the realm of possibility.



This sounds pretty plausible. They are fighting for survival, MIC is fighting for profits.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EastSideAg2002 said:

Rossticus said:

I know, "Unnamed sources", but not remotely outside the realm of possibility.



This sounds pretty plausible. They are fighting for survival, MIC is fighting for profits.

If SLS had been given veto authority over letting SpaceX build rockets, they would have done the same. Nightmare scenario for the MIC to have somebody show how much faster and cheaper their products can be made.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If the Ukes have the money they would be better off dealing directly (if they can) with Anduril for weapons supply.
“You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rossticus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

EastSideAg2002 said:

Rossticus said:

I know, "Unnamed sources", but not remotely outside the realm of possibility.



This sounds pretty plausible. They are fighting for survival, MIC is fighting for profits.

If SLS had been given veto authority over letting SpaceX build rockets, they would have done the same. Nightmare scenario for the MIC to have somebody show how much faster and cheaper their products can be made.


There is a workforce difference to consider. American unions will not work for the rates their skilled Ukrainian counterparts will. Even nonunion workers cannot compete.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

txags92 said:

EastSideAg2002 said:

Rossticus said:

I know, "Unnamed sources", but not remotely outside the realm of possibility.



This sounds pretty plausible. They are fighting for survival, MIC is fighting for profits.

If SLS had been given veto authority over letting SpaceX build rockets, they would have done the same. Nightmare scenario for the MIC to have somebody show how much faster and cheaper their products can be made.


There is a workforce difference to consider. American unions will not work for the rates their skilled Ukrainian counterparts will. Even nonunion workers cannot compete.

The pay for the workforce is really a small part of why US weapons manufacturing is so slow and expensive. The main problem is the government procurement system that rewards bloat and bureaucracy over speed and cost efficient production.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

EastSideAg2002 said:

Rossticus said:

I know, "Unnamed sources", but not remotely outside the realm of possibility.



This sounds pretty plausible. They are fighting for survival, MIC is fighting for profits.

If SLS had been given veto authority over letting SpaceX build rockets, they would have done the same. Nightmare scenario for the MIC to have somebody show how much faster and cheaper their products can be made.

Well, Ukraine won't have union workers making everything. So, of COURSE it's cheaper to make it there.

Now, improve? Not sure about that. I worked on the precursor to the PAC-3 and it's not a simple thing to do what it does...
You can turn off signatures, btw
First Page Last Page
Page 1560 of 1573
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.