***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

7,677,911 Views | 47966 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by lb3
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AtticusMatlock said:

The Ukrainians are claiming to have sunk another Russian warship this morning in the Black Sea, the Caesar Kunikov.
UPDATES
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

AtticusMatlock said:

The Ukrainians are claiming to have sunk another Russian warship this morning in the Black Sea, the Caesar Kunikov.
UPDATES
A new Black Sea Submarine!!!
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fullback44 said:

74OA said:

Russia finally really did hit HIMARS, a grand total of two to be exact.

Today's SITREP.
Yeah it looks like they hit them with a few heavy rocks or something …. Those two bad boys will be back in action in a few weeks… but Ukraine needs to keep hiding them well
I can't believe they've made it what, 18 months without losing them (or at least keeping it under wraps).

That's a miracle in itself. They have to be top 5 on the Russian hit list.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NATO allies surge defense spending. Much needed and long overdue. Thanks again, Vlad.

RECORD
AlaskanAg99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgLA06 said:

74OA said:

AtticusMatlock said:

The Ukrainians are claiming to have sunk another Russian warship this morning in the Black Sea, the Caesar Kunikov.
UPDATES
A new Black Sea Submarine!!!


74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
More details on the latest Russian warship loss in the Black Sea.

IIRC, these sunken landing ships are part of the flotilla Russia hurriedly sent from its northern European bases just in time to get them through the Bosporus Strait and into the Black Sea before the invasion kicked off and Turkey closed the passage to warships.

Who knew they were rushing to their doom.

SUNK
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

NATO allies surge defense spending. Much needed and long overdue. Thanks again, Vlad.

RECORD


It's funny to see that in Putin's effort to push back on NATO he only brought them together, made them stronger, increased their footprint, and at the same time made his own country and military far weaker.

Dude is one of the worst leaders in the world today.
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

More details on the latest Russian warship loss in the Black Sea.

SUNK
Looks like the first USV loiters in wait for others to get on station.

I can imagine this operation looks something like this:

USVs are launched to target area. The O3 or O4 goes off to bed or the gold course while several E3/4s are like playing X box and monitoring the big screens. As soon as one makes a find the intel guy gets a wake up at the same time the CO does. The target is IDd and the order to strike is given. BDA is assessed, starbucks is called in, and high 5s go all around.

Or better do the E3-5s have authority to attack on their own?

Didn't look like a single life raft made it off the boat. Current reported sea temp there is 47 degrees w 20+ knot winds.

I hope millions of dollars of ammunition went to the sea floor.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No way an E3 in any military can sink a ship on their own authority in international waters.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgLA06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lb3 said:

No way an E3 in any military can sink a ship on their own authority in international waters.


Well, you guys are acting like it's the US navy copycatting the airforce's drone pilot program in Nevada instead of Ukrainians operating to perfection in an active war zone.
2000AgPhD
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It looks like most of the superstructure was destroyed by the time it sank. How many drones are they claiming hit it?
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's now what hit it. It is what it was loaded with when it was hit.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
5 explosions
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GLSDB makes its combat debut in Ukraine. Nice bump in range and hitting power over HIMARS.

BOMB
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How many of these large landing ships have they lost now? I've honestly lost track...
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

GLSDB makes its combat debut in Ukraine. Nice bump in range.

BOMB
Wonder if those HIMARS were actually still usable but needed repair, and once they had GLSDB in theater ready to go, they could afford to pull them back for repair?
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I may be missing your point, but I don't think one had anything to do with the other.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agent-maroon said:

How many of these large landing ships have they lost now? I've honestly lost track...
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

I may be missing your point, but I don't think one had anything to do with the other.
I was just remarking that it was an interesting coincidence that the GLSDB showed up in use about the same time the news came out showing two relatively lightly damaged HIMARS being pulled back for repair. You are probably right that they were not related, but given the remarks from others who would know that the HIMARS did not seem to be that badly damaged, it was an interesting coincidence.
docb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think they are launched from the HIMARS
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
docb said:

I think they are launched from the HIMARS
Can also be launched from the M270 MLRS, which the Ukrainians also have.
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks! Not too bad for not even having a conventional navy!
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
2wealfth Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agent-maroon said:

Thanks! Not too bad for not even having a conventional navy!
ships are in constant peril with the large array of stand-off weapons that are available these days. The days of fleet versus fleet are over.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Poor Avdiivka. I'm worried about the guy Matt Tardio from Speak the Truth knows there, and all of those brave people.



Translation:

Quote:

The defense of Avdiivka continues.

The enemy advanced again in the north and south of the city. In the south, their main task is to surround Zenit, and in the north to push the Defense Forces as far as possible. The situation continues to deteriorate due to the incessant shelling of anti-aircraft guns and rockets. The Katsaps want to cut off AKHZ as much as possible and get to the 9th quarter. The enemy's assault groups concentrate on those areas where they are successful. At the same time, the accumulation of manpower in occupied houses in the city continues.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Translation:

Quote:

At night, the Defense Forces burned down an enemy column near Avdiyivka.

Katsapas were preparing to transfer equipment to Avdiyivka, but were destroyed between Verkhnotoretsky and Kamianka. Great joint work of all "Avdiiv" brigades and battalions
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good lord. Looks like WWI. NSFW.

PlaneCrashGuy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics said:

Good lord. Looks like WWI. NSFW.




I counted 7 corpses in a 5 minute video. Did I miss something?
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

The Russian Federation has deployed more troops to the Orihiv direction than to the Avdiivka direction, they are planning an offensive - "Tavria" Operational Command


https://liveuamap.com/en/2024/15-february-the-russian-federation-has-deployed-more-troops
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lb3 said:

No way an E3 in any military can sink a ship on their own authority in international waters.


I dunno. This is a warzone, and that's very obviously a Russian warship. I think any E3 would probably be commended for taking the initiative. I would imagine these are one way trips since it's 250+ miles from Ukrainian controlled coast to where a lot of these attacks take place, and once they find a target of opportunity they'd probably want to hit it as soon as possible. Probably don't want to waste fuel or risk losing the opportunity if you don't intend to bring it back if you're not successful. Once they find a target, they probably get all of their boats together for an attack and swarm them.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PlaneCrashGuy said:

Waffledynamics said:

Good lord. Looks like WWI. NSFW.




I counted 7 corpses in a 5 minute video. Did I miss something?


Probably others in the tanks and BTR's. You're also not seeing everything there, just this one guy's perspective. He mentions a group of spetznaz somewhere off camera that got ****ed up and that some bodies have already been collected, so there's more than what's being shown. This position was worked over pretty well.

He also mentions that 70% of a 4000 person bridge is gone. I would call that pretty substantial.
docb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ABATTBQ11 said:

lb3 said:

No way an E3 in any military can sink a ship on their own authority in international waters.


I dunno. This is a warzone, and that's very obviously a Russian warship. I think any E3 would probably be commended for taking the initiative. I would imagine these are one way trips since it's 250+ miles from Ukrainian controlled coast to where a lot of these attacks take place, and once they find a target of opportunity they'd probably want to hit it as soon as possible. Probably don't want to waste fuel or risk losing the opportunity if you don't intend to bring it back if you're not successful. Once they find a target, they probably get all of their boats together for an attack and swarm them.
Yea it's not like your going to confuse it with a Ukranian warship
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
lb3 said:

No way an E3 in any military can sink a ship on their own authority in international waters.


Not with that attitude.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bottom line: Time is not on Russia's side and the two-year US aid package in Congress is crucial to ensure that remains true.

"The Russian theory of victory is plausible if Ukraine's international partners fail to properly resource the AFU. However, if Ukraine's partners continue to provide sufficient ammunition and training support to the AFU to enable the blunting of Russian attacks in 2024, then Russia is unlikely to achieve significant gains in 2025. If Russia lacks the prospect of gains in 2025, given its inability to improve force quality for offensive operations, then it follows that it will struggle to force Kyiv to capitulate by 2026. Beyond 2026, attrition of systems will begin to materially degrade Russian combat power, while Russian industry could be disrupted sufficiently by that point, making Russia's prospects decline over time."

Worth reading: RUSI
First Page Last Page
Page 1264 of 1371
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.