P.U.T.U said:
Mariupol and Melitopol are key logistic centers, take those and you cut off anything to the west like Kherson. I have not looked at the maps but if Ukraine made it that far in they are likely past the second line of defenses in that area. They will have to start again at Tokmak since I remember seeing defenses around the city
The AFU General Staff have not been known for overstating things like that. If anything, usually what they put out is a couple of days behind in cases where they don't want to give the enemy free intel on their movements.Waffledynamics said:
It should be noted that other maps like DeepState have not yet updated with that information. I'm skeptical and would like to find corroboration of what LiveUAMap is currently showing. The information comes from the General Staff of the AFU.
Very interesting for sure.
The offensive is still focused on attacking Russian logistics, command hubs and artillery, so Ukraine doesn't need to take Mariupol and Melitopol in the near term, just get close enough to place them under fire.P.U.T.U said:
Mariupol and Melitopol are key logistic centers, take those and you cut off anything to the west like Kherson. I have not looked at the maps but if Ukraine made it that far in they are likely past the second line of defenses in that area. They will have to start again at Tokmak since I remember seeing defenses around the city
Agreed.74OA said:The offensive is still focused on attacking Russian logistics, command hubs and artillery, so Ukraine doesn't have to take Mariupol and Melitopol in the near term, just get close enough to place them under fire.P.U.T.U said:
Mariupol and Melitopol are key logistic centers, take those and you cut off anything to the west like Kherson. I have not looked at the maps but if Ukraine made it that far in they are likely past the second line of defenses in that area. They will have to start again at Tokmak since I remember seeing defenses around the city
Getting close enough to those two cities to hit them and the LOCs running from them is an important step towards starving the Russian force in the south of the volume of supplies needed to defend itself with high rates of fire--particularly intense artillery fire.
The complimentary broad-front Ukranian advance is intended, amongst other things, to keep as many Russians as possible in contact and steadily drawing down their stockpiles of increasingly hard to get munitions.
Meanwhile, it appears that Ukraine's primary mechanized force is being held in reserve until sufficient weakness develops to make a more concentrated assault on a narrower front feasible.
Will this approach succeed? I have no particular insight, but the strategy seems a good fit for Ukrainian strengths and Russian weaknesses.
and that could precipitate a panicked dis-organized withdrawal away from the heat. Wonder if this is a big of enough of a push to start committing fresh troops and armor?AgLA06 said:
If that's correct, they just drove 1/4 of the way to the Sea of Azov.
This. Don't try to take the big cities back right away. We saw how the orcs got bogged down trying to do that in Mariupol and Bakhmut. Just drive a wedge in between them, cut off the supply routes, then use the new position on the coast of the Sea of Azov to harass resupply effort via Crimea. Without water or supplies to Crimea, the orc troops there will collapse in short order.AgLA06 said:Agreed.74OA said:The offensive is still focused on attacking Russian logistics, command hubs and artillery, so Ukraine doesn't have to take Mariupol and Melitopol in the near term, just get close enough to place them under fire.P.U.T.U said:
Mariupol and Melitopol are key logistic centers, take those and you cut off anything to the west like Kherson. I have not looked at the maps but if Ukraine made it that far in they are likely past the second line of defenses in that area. They will have to start again at Tokmak since I remember seeing defenses around the city
Getting close enough to those two cities to hit them and the LOCs running from them is an important step towards starving the Russian force in the south of the volume of supplies needed to defend itself with high rates of fire--particularly intense artillery fire.
The complimentary broad-front Ukranian advance is intended, amongst other things, to keep as many Russians as possible in contact and steadily drawing down their stockpiles of increasingly hard to get munitions.
Meanwhile, it appears that Ukraine's primary mechanized force is being held in reserve until sufficient weakness develops to make a more concentrated assault on a narrower front feasible.
Will this approach succeed? I have no particular insight, but the strategy seems a good fit for Ukrainian strengths and Russian weaknesses.
I'd love to see them bypass it and other large cities / defenses and drive straight to the sea splitting Melitopol and Mariupol. Then push from Kherson to the Sea of Azov in a pincer and wait them out. All the south would be liberated and Crimea is isolated.
Good luck reinforcing by sea with the new weapon announcements.
txags92 said:This. Don't try to take the big cities back right away. We saw how the orcs got bogged down trying to do that in Mariupol and Bakhmut. Just drive a wedge in between them, cut off the supply routes, then use the new position on the coast of the Sea of Azov to harass resupply effort via Crimea. Without water or supplies to Crimea, the orc troops there will collapse in short order.AgLA06 said:Agreed.74OA said:The offensive is still focused on attacking Russian logistics, command hubs and artillery, so Ukraine doesn't have to take Mariupol and Melitopol in the near term, just get close enough to place them under fire.P.U.T.U said:
Mariupol and Melitopol are key logistic centers, take those and you cut off anything to the west like Kherson. I have not looked at the maps but if Ukraine made it that far in they are likely past the second line of defenses in that area. They will have to start again at Tokmak since I remember seeing defenses around the city
Getting close enough to those two cities to hit them and the LOCs running from them is an important step towards starving the Russian force in the south of the volume of supplies needed to defend itself with high rates of fire--particularly intense artillery fire.
The complimentary broad-front Ukranian advance is intended, amongst other things, to keep as many Russians as possible in contact and steadily drawing down their stockpiles of increasingly hard to get munitions.
Meanwhile, it appears that Ukraine's primary mechanized force is being held in reserve until sufficient weakness develops to make a more concentrated assault on a narrower front feasible.
Will this approach succeed? I have no particular insight, but the strategy seems a good fit for Ukrainian strengths and Russian weaknesses.
I'd love to see them bypass it and other large cities / defenses and drive straight to the sea splitting Melitopol and Mariupol. Then push from Kherson to the Sea of Azov in a pincer and wait them out. All the south would be liberated and Crimea is isolated.
Good luck reinforcing by sea with the new weapon announcements.
the Crimean canal is done for after the dam breech; water supplies have got to be a pressing issuetxags92 said:This. Don't try to take the big cities back right away. We saw how the orcs got bogged down trying to do that in Mariupol and Bakhmut. Just drive a wedge in between them, cut off the supply routes, then use the new position on the coast of the Sea of Azov to harass resupply effort via Crimea. Without water or supplies to Crimea, the orc troops there will collapse in short order.AgLA06 said:Agreed.74OA said:The offensive is still focused on attacking Russian logistics, command hubs and artillery, so Ukraine doesn't have to take Mariupol and Melitopol in the near term, just get close enough to place them under fire.P.U.T.U said:
Mariupol and Melitopol are key logistic centers, take those and you cut off anything to the west like Kherson. I have not looked at the maps but if Ukraine made it that far in they are likely past the second line of defenses in that area. They will have to start again at Tokmak since I remember seeing defenses around the city
Getting close enough to those two cities to hit them and the LOCs running from them is an important step towards starving the Russian force in the south of the volume of supplies needed to defend itself with high rates of fire--particularly intense artillery fire.
The complimentary broad-front Ukranian advance is intended, amongst other things, to keep as many Russians as possible in contact and steadily drawing down their stockpiles of increasingly hard to get munitions.
Meanwhile, it appears that Ukraine's primary mechanized force is being held in reserve until sufficient weakness develops to make a more concentrated assault on a narrower front feasible.
Will this approach succeed? I have no particular insight, but the strategy seems a good fit for Ukrainian strengths and Russian weaknesses.
I'd love to see them bypass it and other large cities / defenses and drive straight to the sea splitting Melitopol and Mariupol. Then push from Kherson to the Sea of Azov in a pincer and wait them out. All the south would be liberated and Crimea is isolated.
Good luck reinforcing by sea with the new weapon announcements.
Taking another look at this, I believe this might be the actual plan. The breach they've created points directly to the Obitochna Split peninsula that appears would allow them to have fire control over the Sea of Azov and Kerch bridge. That would be huge.AgLA06 said:Agreed.74OA said:The offensive is still focused on attacking Russian logistics, command hubs and artillery, so Ukraine doesn't have to take Mariupol and Melitopol in the near term, just get close enough to place them under fire.P.U.T.U said:
Mariupol and Melitopol are key logistic centers, take those and you cut off anything to the west like Kherson. I have not looked at the maps but if Ukraine made it that far in they are likely past the second line of defenses in that area. They will have to start again at Tokmak since I remember seeing defenses around the city
Getting close enough to those two cities to hit them and the LOCs running from them is an important step towards starving the Russian force in the south of the volume of supplies needed to defend itself with high rates of fire--particularly intense artillery fire.
The complimentary broad-front Ukranian advance is intended, amongst other things, to keep as many Russians as possible in contact and steadily drawing down their stockpiles of increasingly hard to get munitions.
Meanwhile, it appears that Ukraine's primary mechanized force is being held in reserve until sufficient weakness develops to make a more concentrated assault on a narrower front feasible.
Will this approach succeed? I have no particular insight, but the strategy seems a good fit for Ukrainian strengths and Russian weaknesses.
I'd love to see them bypass it and other large cities / defenses and drive straight to the sea splitting Melitopol and Mariupol. Then push from Kherson to the Sea of Azov in a pincer and wait them out. All the south would be liberated and Crimea is isolated.
Good luck reinforcing by sea with the new weapon announcements.
Deep in Russian territory towards the Ukraine coast. I know some Uke soldiers complain about how little artillery they fire compared to Russia but they actually hit what they are aiming forABATTBQ11 said:
Multiple explosions at Berdiansk airport
Quote:
Ukrainian HIMARS taking out battery of russian MSTA-S self-propelled howitzers
by u/tomina69 in CombatFootage
A Russian Command Headquarters and Supply Depot in the Occupied-City of Berdyansk was reportedly Hit by Ukrainian “Storm Shadow” Air-Launched Cruise Missiles earlier today, with at least 6 Missiles said to have been launched; Russian Sources are reporting that a number of “Storm… pic.twitter.com/0OkIYdD9ne
— OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) June 30, 2023
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) June 29, 2023
Probably won't have to worry about living much longer.P.U.T.U said:
Tinnitus, TBI, and you name it. They will be messed up for the rest of their life even if they never get any kind of PTSD
Per the reported location, this tank is right on the front pic.twitter.com/OrGbH57bvg
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) June 29, 2023
Is this this same one from a month ago or did they take out a second battery?2wealfth Man said:
HIMARS taking out 4 Orc self propelled guns. Just nasty when used this way to shape the battlefield.Quote:
Ukrainian HIMARS taking out battery of russian MSTA-S self-propelled howitzers
by u/tomina69 in CombatFootage
Would U like to know a short summary about Western supplied vehicles? It was made for people. That’s it.
— Kriegsforscher (@OSINTua) June 30, 2023
My friends from different units told my a lot of stories how those vehicles saved a lot of lives.
I know the fact about one…
1/2 pic.twitter.com/9gwxwi2pWu
Leopard tank survived 4 ATGMs and one direct hit from the enemy tank and managed to retreat. M2s saved hundreds of lives.
— Kriegsforscher (@OSINTua) June 30, 2023
MOREAgLA06 said:
Great post by an Ukranian soldier about first hand experience regarding the difference between using western made heavy equipment and soviet / Russian made.
Western equipment take exponentially more punishment and gets troops home alive. Not so much for Russian equipment.Would U like to know a short summary about Western supplied vehicles? It was made for people. That’s it.
— Kriegsforscher (@OSINTua) June 30, 2023
My friends from different units told my a lot of stories how those vehicles saved a lot of lives.
I know the fact about one…
1/2 pic.twitter.com/9gwxwi2pWu
We know supplies are strained.ReturnOfTheAg said:
Could be the difference in the war
You can replace equipment. Can't replace well-trained, battle-hardened soldiers
That has always been the philosophical difference between us and the orcs. To us, the vehicles are a means to get a trained soldier to the point of combat with as many advantages as we can, but overall to protect them to the extent possible. We place the value on the trained soldier and protect accordingly. To the orcs, the vehicle is a means to get a weapon close to the enemy and the troops operating it can be replaced, if needed. So they make as many gun carrying vehicles as they can as cheaply as they can, and if they need more troops because they are inadequately protected, they will just conscript them.ReturnOfTheAg said:
Could be the difference in the war
You can replace equipment. Can't replace well-trained, battle-hardened soldiers
txags92 said:That has always been the philosophical difference between us and the orcs. To us, the vehicles are a means to get a trained soldier to the point of combat with as many advantages as we can, but overall to protect them to the extent possible. We place the value on the trained soldier and protect accordingly. To the orcs, the vehicle is a means to get a weapon close to the enemy and the troops operating it can be replaced, if needed. So they make as many gun carrying vehicles as they can as cheaply as they can, and if they need more troops because they are inadequately protected, they will just conscript them.ReturnOfTheAg said:
Could be the difference in the war
You can replace equipment. Can't replace well-trained, battle-hardened soldiers
These must be the M39 & M39A1 ATACAMS. I think we have close to 1500 of them and most around 30 years old. They are supposed to be converted to M57E1s but I bet the conversion cost is higher than making new M57s and the PSMs are supposed to replace the ATACMS (all variants) anyway with greater range 100+ miles and come two per pod instead of one.74OA said:
DPICM under serious consideration. We must stop self-deterring and asking Ukraine to fight with one hand tied behind its back. What is the point of having a clean battlefield if Russia ends up owning it? Thanks to Russia, Ukraine already has a massive mine clean-up ahead, so let it decide if adding cluster munition duds to that hazard is worth the additional combat capability DPICM brings.
CLUSTER