*** Official Merrick Garland Testimony Thread ***

10,408 Views | 108 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by will25u
CoppellAg93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Right off the bat - I forgot how much I can't stand "Penguin" Nadler talking. He's up there spewing a bunch of crap about Trump. Looking forward to the statement from the ranking member to shut him up.

Edit : Heck yeah - it's Jim Jordan - get your popcorn ready.
Ciboag96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nadler is literally a worthless sack of donkey ****
pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Had to turn him off after about a minute.
POS.
#FJB
CoppellAg93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jordan is owning him right now.
Proc92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh no, not a video!
Proc92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Love the puppet master with his hand up nadler's ass making his mouth move.
CoppellAg93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proc92 said:

Love the puppet master with his hand up nadler's ass making his mouth move.
Ha ha - at one point it sounded like Obi Wan talking to the Stormtroopers in Mos Eisley.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proc92 said:

Love the puppet master with his hand up nadler's ass making his mouth move.
Saw that. Why not just put a bud in Nadler's ear to feed him the lines instead of those being said on an open mic.
Proc92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Where's the giant meteor when you need it?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's now talking about pre-clearance review of voting practices under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. SCOTUS held that section is too restrictive against the states and is no longer in effect. It was struck down.

Garland just said he doesn't care that SCOTUS ruled it unconstitutional. That pretty much sums up his attitude about his unfettered powers as AG. We are now in John Mitchell/Nixon territory. It is not illegal if he does it.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He comes Gohmert!
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tells Garland to amend his letter indicating that parents at school board meetings are domestic terrorists.

Now asking about Jan 6th and whether FBI agents were involved in Jan 6th and Garland says he can't discuss an open investigation.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gohmert going after him on the pre-trial confinement and says the defendants have been abused.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nadler nattering on about masks and suggests he won't recognize members of the committee if they are not wearing their masks.
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One of the stupidest and most racist lawyers in America is up now
CoppellAg93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh damn. Had to jump on a work call and I have to mute the TV - won't get to hear SJL spout her normal BS.
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She wants more criminals on the streets - working great in Houston and her district- idiot
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SJL complaining about redistricting.
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ask him about the woman raped on the train since SJL is concerned about violence against women.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chicken Man Cohen up now. Going after Trump.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nadler citing the Southern Poverty Law Review as some sort of legitimate source
“ How you fellas doin? We about to have us a little screw party in this red Prius over here if you wanna join us.”
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

SJL complaining about redistricting.


Yet the state Republicans gave in to her complaints already and kept her district the way she wanted and not putting her and Green in the same district.

Republicans getting owned again.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mike Johnson (R-LA) asking about the conflict of interest with the CRT and his son-in-law.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Garland won't answer whether he asked for ethics counsel before issuing his memo about parents and school boards.

"I am exquisitely aware of the rules on conflicts of interest."

Johnson fires back, "Then why aren't you following them?"
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Guam tipping over" Hank Johnson up next.

Back to Voting Rights Act and pre-clearance.
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Mike Johnson (R-LA) asking about the conflict of interest with the CRT and his son-in-law.


Obviously he's violated ethics but of course separate rules for the ruling class.

Now Island Tipping idiot trying to make SJL sound intelligent. Tough task but he's giving it a good effort.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AGHouston11 said:

aggiehawg said:

Mike Johnson (R-LA) asking about the conflict of interest with the CRT and his son-in-law.


Obviously he's violated ethics but of course separate rules for the ruling class.

Now Island Tipping idiot trying to make SJL sound intelligent. Tough task but he's giving it a good effort.
Nor would Garland even commit to having an ethics review done now. He knows he will be found to have a monstrous conflict of interest.
CoppellAg93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AGHouston11 said:

aggiehawg said:

Mike Johnson (R-LA) asking about the conflict of interest with the CRT and his son-in-law.


Obviously he's violated ethics but of course separate rules for the ruling class.

Now Island Tipping idiot trying to make SJL sound intelligent. Tough task but he's giving it a good effort.
When he talks I can't help but here this guy ....

pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glad Jordan called JabaJerry out for shutting Johnson down. But, had to tune out Hank. That dude is definitely NOT 'smarter than a 5th grader'.
I'll read 'hawgs synopsis/translation of his idiocy in a bit.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WHOA! The National Security Division of DOJ is part of the task force? That's FISA crap. That's a threat for wiretapping!
LoudestWHOOP!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ciboag96 said:

Nadler is literally a worthless sack of donkey ****
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jordan just nailed him! That was great.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DOJ's source for the "violence" against school board members is the letter from the SB Association. They have no independent verification. And Jordan tried to get him to admit that the letter was written to get the feds involved (they were all working together). But, he said that didn't happen. But it did.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pdc093 said:

Glad Jordan called JabaJerry out for shutting Johnson down. But, had to tune out Hank. That dude is definitely NOT 'smarter than a 5th grader'.
I'll read 'hawgs synopsis/translation of his idiocy in a bit.
Johnson was going on about Garland's support for the John Lewis Voting Rights Act to be passed by the Senate since it has already been passed by the House. What that act is designed to do is to get around the SCOTUS ruling declaring Section 5 unconstitutional (the pre-clearance clause).

This is all to use federal law to negate the voting integrity laws passed by some states recently.

Another little factoid that I picked up from McConnell this morning is that there is cherry picking going on. States with Dem governors that have even stricter restrictions are not being challenged.

HTH.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Geez Nadler is barely mobile. It's time for him to go. Mentally all he can do is read the written word or repeat whatever his staff says in his ear. Poster child for term limits
“ How you fellas doin? We about to have us a little screw party in this red Prius over here if you wanna join us.”
Last Page
Page 1 of 4
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.