beerad12man said:So how is he a threat to them? Is he going to kill vaccinated people? It's a bad argument to say how am I going to give you the virus. The argument should be, why are you worried about me giving you essentially a cold if you are vaccinated?Carolin_Gallego said:The efficacy of vaccines varies from person to person. 'Breakthrough' infections do occur.WestTexAg12 said:
So, if you're vaccinated, how am I going to spread it to you?The efficacy of the vaccines are still high.Quote:
And if I do get vaccinated, how is that going to keep me from getting it?
Our medical community and responsible people are concerned about viral spread and mutation in addition to direct risk of injury or death.
Your argument is illogical because it is based on a false premise.
We believe progress is made through MORE discussion, not LESS, and we believe that to be true even if the topics are uncomfortable and we occasionally disagree with one another. - TexAgs
The name-calling technique making false associations is a child's game. The propagandist who uses this technique hopes that the audience will reject a person and their argument on this false basis.
The name-calling technique making false associations is a child's game. The propagandist who uses this technique hopes that the audience will reject a person and their argument on this false basis.