Joined July 2022
I was told yesterday that it was announced who killed Ashley Babbit?
23,452 Views |
283 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by Robert L. Peters
LarryElder said:Grapesoda2525 said:
Don't get why conservatives bother with this woman. She had no business being there just like all of the other rioters on January 6th. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
So shooting unarmed women is cool in your book ? He's scum karma got something for him
Did he know she was unarmed?
She was breaking into a place she wasn't allowed.
LOL "overthrow a government" with what means?TheTruthsLastHope said:jt2hunt said:Domestic terrorist? Get the **** outta here with that nonsense.TheTruthsLastHope said:mFCBlitz said:CS78 said:
Good thing he didn't hit any of the officers that were right behind her.
Right? Thank gawd she didn't have a poodle with her. I wonder what those two officers and the other out of control rioter thought who saw the kill.
Once again, the folks were in the building. There was no final area where the officer had to retreat to. He could have holstered his gun and walked on out and no one had to die. It was not Custer's Last Stand.
She could have complied after several warning and retreated or turned around. She could have not been illegally trying to break through area she was clearly not allowed. She is 10000% responsible for her death and the shoot was a clean and good as they come. The officer saved us by stopping a domestic terrorist from committing any further acts of terror.
Participating an in insurrection to overthrow the government because you were emotional and couldn't control your emotions like a toddler would definitely classify as a domestic terrorist to any objective person.
LarryElder said:Grapesoda2525 said:
Don't get why conservatives bother with this woman. She had no business being there just like all of the other rioters on January 6th. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
So shooting unarmed women is cool in your book ? He's scum karma got something for him
Absolutely. She was climbing through a broken window in a barricade a door in the freaking US capital. It doesn't matter if she was armed or not. If someone is breaking into my house, man or woman, armed or unarmed, they are getting shot. End of story.
In no way, are her actions that day defendable.
How many did they kill that day? There were a lot of people there as I recall.YellowPot_97 said:LarryElder said:Grapesoda2525 said:
Don't get why conservatives bother with this woman. She had no business being there just like all of the other rioters on January 6th. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
So shooting unarmed women is cool in your book ? He's scum karma got something for him
Absolutely. She was climbing through a broken window in a barricade a door in the freaking US capital. It doesn't matter if she was armed or not. If someone is breaking into my house, man or woman, armed or unarmed, they are getting shot. End of story.
In no way, are her actions that day defendable.
No one who minded their business and went to work on 1/6 got shot by capital police. Ask me how I know.
I'm not sure if people genuinely believe someone is going to say, "Wow, if some people say I'm a moron for not believing this, it clearly must be true."
It's not much a persuasive argument. It really just sounds like a bunch of miniature dachshunds barking because the first one one barked when it thought it heard something.
It's not much a persuasive argument. It really just sounds like a bunch of miniature dachshunds barking because the first one one barked when it thought it heard something.
TheTruthsLastHope said:Slicer97 said:
In a just world, he'd be doing life in prison.
In no shape or form is being legally allowed to defend with force during an appropriate time to use force a just world if said person then goes to prison.
Do you mean like Derek Chauvin?
Jesus the number of lemmings on this forum defending a dumbass cop for murdering an unarmed woman are unbelievable. She shouldn't have been there. That's established. But none of the swat/riot police BEHIND her were pointing any weapons at her. They sure didn't think she was a threat.
And these two groups of officers not knowing what the other group were doing HIGHLIGHTS their failures that day. They were not prepared. Just ****ing admit it. They were unprepared intentionally, at the fault of their superiors. And this woman is dead because of it.
And these two groups of officers not knowing what the other group were doing HIGHLIGHTS their failures that day. They were not prepared. Just ****ing admit it. They were unprepared intentionally, at the fault of their superiors. And this woman is dead because of it.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
You might want to watch the video again, and again, and again, if the whole exchange is still available. If her actions were so threatening, why didn't the, couple of dozen, cops on her side of the door try and stop her? Why did the guy that broke the window retreat down the stairwell, past all the cops, and start to change his clothes? This was a setup and she happened to be the unlucky person who took the bait first.YellowPot_97 said:FCBlitz said:YellowPot_97 said:
It blows my mind that any of you don't think this was a justified use of force. She was in a riot, inside the capitol, climbing through a broken window of a barricaded door with members of congress right down the hall. This was a good shoot. End of story. The fact some of you are calling for him to be in prison or killed is insane.
Sounds like propaganda to me. No need to kill her like it was a wackemole game.
It's not propaganda. It's what happened. The entire incident is on video. She played a stupid game and won a stupid prize.
You sound like liberal defund the police type. "He was a good boy who didn't do nuffin'. Why the police have to shoot him." As "good" boy is on film trying to rob and stab people.
Stop making excuses for stupid criminals.
But you ignore all that.
The cop murdered her.
I have no doubt you also have no issue with the government slaughtering the Branch Davidians. And sending Elian Gonzalez back to Cuba.
If this was an unarmed, pink haired BLM liberal, there would be some different tunes being sung.
Why? Murder is wrong, even when the government does it.Tanya 93 said:
If this was an unarmed, pink haired BLM liberal, there would be some different tunes being sung.
I agree, you and all the leftist would be calling for the cop to be jailed at the very least. Glad you can admit that.Tanya 93 said:
If this was an unarmed, pink haired BLM liberal, there would be some different tunes being sung.
YellowPot_97 said:LarryElder said:Grapesoda2525 said:
Don't get why conservatives bother with this woman. She had no business being there just like all of the other rioters on January 6th. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
So shooting unarmed women is cool in your book ? He's scum karma got something for him
Absolutely. She was climbing through a broken window in a barricade a door in the freaking US capital. It doesn't matter if she was armed or not. If someone is breaking into my house, man or woman, armed or unarmed, they are getting shot. End of story.
In no way, are her actions that day defendable.
Good point. You'd think the supporters of "stand your ground" would support what the cop did.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Apples and oranges. Weird take.Quote:
Good point. You'd think the supporters of "stand your ground" would support what the cop did.
LarryElder said:Grapesoda2525 said:
Don't get why conservatives bother with this woman. She had no business being there just like all of the other rioters on January 6th. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
So shooting unarmed women is cool in your book ? He's scum karma got something for him
You make it seem as if she was sitting on a bench reading a book when she got the head shot. The video, which was watched seemingly a bazillion times of her dropping like a rock doesn't show her doing something benign like that.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
aggiehawg said:Apples and oranges. Weird take.Quote:
Good point. You'd think the supporters of "stand your ground" would support what the cop did.
But legally, how far off? If he feared for his life, how would that not qualify? We've seen people kill others for far less and it was justified in court. How would this be different? Again, in the justice system.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
She made a very poor decision, she got what she dererved. If it was the other way around and had been a blm protester I would feel the same. Of course the media out cry would be completely different.
Law enforcement versus Joe Blow Citizen on self defense. The criteria are different for cops when analyzing whether use of lethal force is justified or excessive.Quote:
But legally, how far off? If he feared for his life, how would that not qualify? We've seen people kill others for far less and it was justified in court. How would this be different? Again, in the justice system.
The factors for them are set out in SCOTUS decision, Graham v. Connor.
jt2hunt said:LOL "overthrow a government" with what means?TheTruthsLastHope said:jt2hunt said:Domestic terrorist? Get the **** outta here with that nonsense.TheTruthsLastHope said:mFCBlitz said:CS78 said:
Good thing he didn't hit any of the officers that were right behind her.
Right? Thank gawd she didn't have a poodle with her. I wonder what those two officers and the other out of control rioter thought who saw the kill.
Once again, the folks were in the building. There was no final area where the officer had to retreat to. He could have holstered his gun and walked on out and no one had to die. It was not Custer's Last Stand.
She could have complied after several warning and retreated or turned around. She could have not been illegally trying to break through area she was clearly not allowed. She is 10000% responsible for her death and the shoot was a clean and good as they come. The officer saved us by stopping a domestic terrorist from committing any further acts of terror.
Participating an in insurrection to overthrow the government because you were emotional and couldn't control your emotions like a toddler would definitely classify as a domestic terrorist to any objective person.
The means of illegally entering premises you weren't allowed to, not following direct orders from law enforcement to retreat and attempting to commit violence until an officer was able to be the here we needed and have her stopped in her tracks immediately.
Ellis Wyatt said:
I have no doubt you also have no issue with the government slaughtering the Branch Davidians. And sending Elian Gonzalez back to Cuba.
The feds slaughtered those kids in Waco. David Karesh should have been arrested in town.
Gonzales should have been left in the US instead of being sent to be Castro's propaganda puppet.
**** Bill Clinton.
Every BLM rioter breaking into stores and burning businesses should have been put down.
Kyle Rittenhouse shot in self defense and was 100% justified.
Ashli Babbitt climbed through a broken window in a barricaded door in the capitol building down the hall from members of congress during a riot. She was justifiably shot.
Anymore ad hominem bull*****
Tanya 93 said:LarryElder said:Grapesoda2525 said:
Don't get why conservatives bother with this woman. She had no business being there just like all of the other rioters on January 6th. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
So shooting unarmed women is cool in your book ? He's scum karma got something for him
Did he know she was unarmed?
She was breaking into a place she wasn't allowed.
Laws don't allow simple, indiscriminate killing of a person who is breaking into your house. Yet you are ok with blowing away people who break in to a government office.
How about this: walk up to her with gun drawn and arrest her. If she pulls a weapon or threatens you, shoot her.
Inside every liberal is a totalitarian screaming to get out - Horowitz
Logos Stick said:Tanya 93 said:LarryElder said:Grapesoda2525 said:
Don't get why conservatives bother with this woman. She had no business being there just like all of the other rioters on January 6th. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
So shooting unarmed women is cool in your book ? He's scum karma got something for him
Did he know she was unarmed?
She was breaking into a place she wasn't allowed.
Laws don't allow simple, indiscriminate killing of a person who is breaking into your house.
They should.
I'm not sure if people genuinely believe someone is going to say, "Wow, if some people say I'm a moron for not believing this, it clearly must be true."
It's not much a persuasive argument. It really just sounds like a bunch of miniature dachshunds barking because the first one one barked when it thought it heard something.
It's not much a persuasive argument. It really just sounds like a bunch of miniature dachshunds barking because the first one one barked when it thought it heard something.
YellowPot_97 said:LarryElder said:Grapesoda2525 said:
Don't get why conservatives bother with this woman. She had no business being there just like all of the other rioters on January 6th. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
So shooting unarmed women is cool in your book ? He's scum karma got something for him
Absolutely. She was climbing through a broken window in a barricade a door in the freaking US capital. It doesn't matter if she was armed or not. If someone is breaking into my house, man or woman, armed or unarmed, they are getting shot. End of story.
In no way, are her actions that day defendable.
Local library is a gvt building should i be shot if i break in unarmed ?
Anyone breaking a barricade into floors of congress can be justifiably shot and killed. Whether it's a climate crusader, handsmaid tale freak, 14 year old taliban, BLM, or MAGA protester.
The outrage should be the double standard reaction. If it was a white cop shooting black BLM female, the cop would be crucified, the girls fam would get 10s of milions and statues would be built.
Under all circumstances the action should be treated the same. But it's not, bc we live in clown world.
The outrage should be the double standard reaction. If it was a white cop shooting black BLM female, the cop would be crucified, the girls fam would get 10s of milions and statues would be built.
Under all circumstances the action should be treated the same. But it's not, bc we live in clown world.
Correct.Logos Stick said:
The cop murdered her.
I guess it's just a tragedy he didn't leave his loaded service weapon in the bathroom again, that day. Who knows what form of government we'd have today were it not for his murder of Ashli.Quote:
"She was shot and killed under color of authority by an officer who violated not only the law but his oath and committed an arrestable offense," Kephart said.
Kephart said that to him, nothing in the video showed Byrd should have felt in danger from Babbitt, a supporter of former President Donald Trump, who was 5-foot-2 and weighed 110-pounds.
"In order for lethal force to be authorized, the officer has to be able to articulate that he or she was in fear of losing his life, was about to be killed, or grievously injured," Kephart said in the documentary, according to The Epoch Times.
"There is nothing I saw in that film that would indicate that was possible or probable from what unfolded," he said.
I agree she was an idiot. Deserve to die? No.
But this ridiculous troll drivel and posters being allowed to 100% troll, tlh's only manner of posting, is why paying for this site sucks and I went to free sub after 15plus years of paid subscriber.
But this ridiculous troll drivel and posters being allowed to 100% troll, tlh's only manner of posting, is why paying for this site sucks and I went to free sub after 15plus years of paid subscriber.
Quote:
The officer saved us by stopping a domestic terrorist from committing any further acts of terror.
Staff - take out the trash.
Four synchronised videos showing different angles of the shooting of Ashli Babbit in the Capitol building (Graphic). pic.twitter.com/DRe1aajxoB
— Bellingcat (@bellingcat) January 7, 2021
I'm not sure if people genuinely believe someone is going to say, "Wow, if some people say I'm a moron for not believing this, it clearly must be true."
It's not much a persuasive argument. It really just sounds like a bunch of miniature dachshunds barking because the first one one barked when it thought it heard something.
It's not much a persuasive argument. It really just sounds like a bunch of miniature dachshunds barking because the first one one barked when it thought it heard something.
LarryElder said:YellowPot_97 said:LarryElder said:Grapesoda2525 said:
Don't get why conservatives bother with this woman. She had no business being there just like all of the other rioters on January 6th. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
So shooting unarmed women is cool in your book ? He's scum karma got something for him
Absolutely. She was climbing through a broken window in a barricade a door in the freaking US capital. It doesn't matter if she was armed or not. If someone is breaking into my house, man or woman, armed or unarmed, they are getting shot. End of story.
In no way, are her actions that day defendable.
Local library is a gvt building should i be shot if i break in unarmed ?
If you're breaking in under the exact same circumstances as the head shot girl, don't be surprised if someone telling/yelling at you with a gun pointed at you, to stop or backaway, like is obvious in the video clip, head shots you too.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Garrelli 5000 said:
I agree she was an idiot. Deserve to die? No.
But this ridiculous troll drivel and posters being allowed to 100% troll, tlh's only manner of posting, is why paying for this site sucks and I went to free sub after 15plus years of paid subscriber.
Quote:
The officer saved us by stopping a domestic terrorist from committing any further acts of terror.
That poster believes that asinine garbage. He's not trolling.
No Spin Ag said:LarryElder said:YellowPot_97 said:LarryElder said:Grapesoda2525 said:
Don't get why conservatives bother with this woman. She had no business being there just like all of the other rioters on January 6th. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
So shooting unarmed women is cool in your book ? He's scum karma got something for him
Absolutely. She was climbing through a broken window in a barricade a door in the freaking US capital. It doesn't matter if she was armed or not. If someone is breaking into my house, man or woman, armed or unarmed, they are getting shot. End of story.
In no way, are her actions that day defendable.
Local library is a gvt building should i be shot if i break in unarmed ?
If you're breaking in under the exact same circumstances as the head shot girl, don't be surprised if someone telling/yelling at you with a gun pointed at you, to stop or backaway, like is obvious in the video clip, head shots you too.
Sad.
This is why a peaceful divorce will never occur in this country. People like this poster would gleefully watch and cheer as the government put a bullet in your head.
BigHead 04 said:
Jesus the number of lemmings on this forum defending a dumbass cop for murdering an unarmed woman are unbelievable. She shouldn't have been there. That's established. But none of the swat/riot police BEHIND her were pointing any weapons at her. They sure didn't think she was a threat.
And these two groups of officers not knowing what the other group were doing HIGHLIGHTS their failures that day. They were not prepared. Just ****ing admit it. They were unprepared intentionally, at the fault of their superiors. And this woman is dead because of it.
The same law enforcement that were opening doors. The same law enforcement breaking windows. The same law enforcement pulling people inside the building. Yeah, wtf ever! You are obtuse in your thinking and must not have watched the hours of video tape confirming what I just mentioned about law enforcement.TheTruthsLastHope said:jt2hunt said:LOL "overthrow a government" with what means?TheTruthsLastHope said:jt2hunt said:Domestic terrorist? Get the **** outta here with that nonsense.TheTruthsLastHope said:mFCBlitz said:CS78 said:
Good thing he didn't hit any of the officers that were right behind her.
Right? Thank gawd she didn't have a poodle with her. I wonder what those two officers and the other out of control rioter thought who saw the kill.
Once again, the folks were in the building. There was no final area where the officer had to retreat to. He could have holstered his gun and walked on out and no one had to die. It was not Custer's Last Stand.
She could have complied after several warning and retreated or turned around. She could have not been illegally trying to break through area she was clearly not allowed. She is 10000% responsible for her death and the shoot was a clean and good as they come. The officer saved us by stopping a domestic terrorist from committing any further acts of terror.
Participating an in insurrection to overthrow the government because you were emotional and couldn't control your emotions like a toddler would definitely classify as a domestic terrorist to any objective person.
The means of illegally entering premises you weren't allowed to, not following direct orders from law enforcement to retreat and attempting to commit violence until an officer was able to be the here we needed and have her stopped in her tracks immediately.
Again, how were they going to "overthrow a government"? You cannot provide a reasonable explanation of how unarmed protesters were going to overthrow the USA.
Garrelli 5000 said:
I agree she was an idiot. Deserve to die? No.
But this ridiculous troll drivel and posters being allowed to 100% troll, tlh's only manner of posting, is why paying for this site sucks and I went to free sub after 15plus years of paid subscriber.
Quote:
The officer saved us by stopping a domestic terrorist from committing any further acts of terror.
Your $15 a month isn't even a rounding error in the Tex Ags enterprise.
I'm not sure if people genuinely believe someone is going to say, "Wow, if some people say I'm a moron for not believing this, it clearly must be true."
It's not much a persuasive argument. It really just sounds like a bunch of miniature dachshunds barking because the first one one barked when it thought it heard something.
It's not much a persuasive argument. It really just sounds like a bunch of miniature dachshunds barking because the first one one barked when it thought it heard something.
Featured Stories
See All
38:51
22h ago
6.6k
77:19
17h ago
1.3k
Video Replay: Student Bonfire 2025
by TexAgs
5 Thoughts: Texas 70, No. 13 Texas A&M 69
by Luke Evangelist
1:29
4h ago
500
LIVE: Texas A&M at No. 5 LSU
by Kay Naegeli
Gigem314
Did Tom Hart really say we haven't won in Austin in X years?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
34