Ronald Reagan said:

---

AggieVictor10 said:

---

rwpag71 said:

---

Let's get rid of the EC so these urban centers that can't seem to run an election can then run the Country.

---

Agreed, let's switch to the popular vote.

---

Sure. Let's also require an IQ test and making it required to be a net taxpayer. That way you won't be able to prey on the ignorance of minorities like you always do. The

---

Considering that the largest welfare states tend to be pretty red and trump's hardcore-base is mainly made up of people without a college education, I don't think a net-taxpayer-and-minimum-IQ-requirement would play out the way you think it will. Also, if anyone played on and benefited from "the ignorance of minorities" it was trump who insisted that his name appear on the stimulus checks that south texas hispanics have said influenced them to vote for trump.

Hey, how about we make the minimum IQ to vote 130? That way only the smartest people get to vote for our leaders. Would be okay with that, "Ronald Reagan"?

agjacent said:

---

Ronald Reagan said:

---

AggieVictor10 said:

---

rwpag71 said:

---

Let's get rid of the EC so these urban centers that can't seem to run an election can then run the Country.

---

Agreed, let's switch to the popular vote.

---

Sure. Let's also require an IQ test and making it required to be a net taxpayer. That way you won't be able to prey on the ignorance of minorities like you always do. The

---

Considering that the largest welfare states tend to be pretty red and trump's hardcore-base is mainly made up of people without a college education, I don't think a net-taxpayer-and-minimum-IQ-requirement would play out the way you think it will. Also, if anyone played on and benefited from "the ignorance of minorities" it was trump who insisted that his name appear on the stimulus checks that south texas hispanics have said influenced them to vote for trump.

Hey, how about we make the minimum IQ to vote 130? That way only the smartest people get to vote for our leaders. Would be okay with that, "Ronald Reagan"?

---

Let's compare those aspects of each side's base. Why do you prey on uneducated minorities and convince them
You're for them when you actually believe they incapable morons?
Why do Democrats keep citing who has college degrees and who doesn't? The majority of college degrees are worthless and don't teach their recipients even base level logical reasoning skills. You're calling people without college degrees de facto less intelligent when they aren't.

agjacent said:

---

Ronald Reagan said:

---

AggieVictor10 said:

---

rwpag71 said:

---

Let's get rid of the EC so these urban centers that can't seem to run an election can then run the Country.

---

Agreed, let's switch to the popular vote.

---

Sure. Let's also require an IQ test and making it required to be a net taxpayer. That way you won't be able to prey on the ignorance of minorities like you always do. The

---

Considering that the largest welfare states tend to be pretty red and trump's hardcore-base is mainly made up of people without a college education, I don't think a net-taxpayer-and-minimum-IQ-requirement would play out the way you think it will. Also, if anyone played on and benefited from "the ignorance of minorities" it was trump who insisted that his name appear on the stimulus checks that south texas hispanics have said influenced them to vote for trump.

Hey, how about we make the minimum IQ to vote 130? That way only the smartest people get to vote for our leaders. Would be okay with that, "Ronald Reagan"?

---

1. Those red states have no shortage of lazy Democrat trash that consume the majority of those welfare dollars
2. The Democrat college educated base is mainly made up of people with liberal arts degrees that are worthless in he real world. Conservatives have real jobs and run businesses.
3. I don't think the net taxpayer and IQ requirement would workout nearly as well as you think. Just because liberals get libarts degrees doesn't mean they're smarter. In fact they have to be morons to vote Democrat.
4. It's extremely racist of you to assume that hispanics are only smart enough to vote for Trump because they saw his name on a check. Seriously WTF is wrong with you?
5. If the only the smartest people voted, the Democrat leadership would be gone, because I guarantee you none of them even come close to 130. They'd likely vote for people that actually respect the constitution. Unlike you!
6. It's an extremely baseless and arrogant assumption to make that the people who believe in socialism, gun control, abortion on demand, open borders, and that giving money to Democrats will change the global temperature are smarter than conservatives. GTFO with that nonsense!

aggieforester05 said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Ronald Reagan said:

---

AggieVictor10 said:

---

rwpag71 said:

---

Let's get rid of the EC so these urban centers that can't seem to run an election can then run the Country.

---

Agreed, let's switch to the popular vote.

---

Sure. Let's also require an IQ test and making it required to be a net taxpayer. That way you won't be able to prey on the ignorance of minorities like you always do. The

---

Considering that the largest welfare states tend to be pretty red and trump's hardcore-base is mainly made up of people without a college education, I don't think a net-taxpayer-and-minimum-IQ-requirement would play out the way you think it will. Also, if anyone played on and benefited from "the ignorance of minorities" it was trump who insisted that his name appear on the stimulus checks that south texas hispanics have said influenced them to vote for trump.

Hey, how about we make the minimum IQ to vote 130? That way only the smartest people get to vote for our leaders. Would be okay with that, "Ronald Reagan"?

---

1. Those red states have no shortage of lazy Democrat trash that consume the majority of those welfare dollars
2. The Democrat college educated base is mainly made up of people with liberal arts degrees that are worthless in he real world. Conservatives have real jobs and run businesses.
3. I don't think the net taxpayer and IQ requirement would workout nearly as well as you think. Just because liberals get libarts degrees doesn't mean they're smarter. In fact they have to be morons to vote Democrat.
4. It's extremely racist of you to assume that hispanics are only smart enough to vote for Trump because they saw his name on a check. Seriously WTF is wrong with you?
5. If the only the smartest people voted, the Democrat leadership would be gone, because I guarantee you none of them even come close to 130. They'd likely vote for people that actually respect the constitution. Unlike you!
6. It's an extremely baseless and arrogant assumption to make that the people who believe in socialism, gun control, abortion on demand, open borders, and that giving money to Democrats will change the global temperature are smarter than conservatives. GTFO with that nonsense!

---

Well IQ and common sense are two different things. There are plenty of smart tech people that vote Dem. There are plenty of Dems with real jobs.

Wow. Just wow.

AustinScubaAg said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Ronald Reagan said:

---

AggieVictor10 said:

---

rwpag71 said:

---

Let's get rid of the EC so these urban centers that can't seem to run an election can then run the Country.

---

Agreed, let's switch to the popular vote.

---

Sure. Let's also require an IQ test and making it required to be a net taxpayer. That way you won't be able to prey on the ignorance of minorities like you always do. The

---

Considering that the largest welfare states tend to be pretty red and trump's hardcore-base is mainly made up of people without a college education, I don't think a net-taxpayer-and-minimum-IQ-requirement would play out the way you think it will. Also, if anyone played on and benefited from "the ignorance of minorities" it was trump who insisted that his name appear on the stimulus checks that south texas hispanics have said influenced them to vote for trump.

Hey, how about we make the minimum IQ to vote 130? That way only the smartest people get to vote for our leaders. Would be okay with that, "Ronald Reagan"?

---

1. Those red states have no shortage of lazy Democrat trash that consume the majority of those welfare dollars
2. The Democrat college educated base is mainly made up of people with liberal arts degrees that are worthless in he real world. Conservatives have real jobs and run businesses.
3. I don't think the net taxpayer and IQ requirement would workout nearly as well as you think. Just because liberals get libarts degrees doesn't mean they're smarter. In fact they have to be morons to vote Democrat.
4. It's extremely racist of you to assume that hispanics are only smart enough to vote for Trump because they saw his name on a check. Seriously WTF is wrong with you?
5. If the only the smartest people voted, the Democrat leadership would be gone, because I guarantee you none of them even come close to 130. They'd likely vote for people that actually respect the constitution. Unlike you!
6. It's an extremely baseless and arrogant assumption to make that the people who believe in socialism, gun control, abortion on demand, open borders, and that giving money to Democrats will change the global temperature are smarter than conservatives. GTFO with that nonsense!

---

Well IQ and common sense are two different things. There are plenty of smart tech people that vote Dem. There are plenty of Dems with real jobs.

---

There are plenty of smart and well educated people that vote Republican. This assumption that liberals are smarter because they churn out more worthless college degrees is asinine. Equally asinine is assigning the massive amount of Democrat welfare voters in red states to Republicans.

Ralphael Warnock was declared the winner, and it's not looking good for David Perdue. With 98% votes coutned, David Perdue is trailing Jon Ossof by 26,000 votes. This means the Democrats would win control of the Senate with incoming Vice President Kamala Harris as the tiebreaker.

Burdizzo said:

---

---

This is a really stunning image. Abrams funneled all her energy after a hard political loss to registering and turning out enough voters to change her state, the nation, and by extension, the world. What a fitting and moving tribute to an incredible woman by a clearly talented artist.

agjacent said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

---

This is a really stunning image. Abrams funneled all her energy after a hard political loss to registering and turning out enough voters to change her state, the nation, and by extension, the world. What a fitting and moving tribute to an incredible woman by a clearly talented artist.

---

troll

agjacent said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

---

This is a really stunning image. Abrams funneled all her energy after a hard political loss to registering and turning out enough voters to change her state, the nation, and by extension, the world. What a fitting and moving tribute to an incredible woman by a clearly talented artist.

---

Wow, complete delusion!

Blame game well underway.

Correction said:

---

Blame game well underway.

---

No surprise you'd be using Tapper as a source.

No one in Georgia is going to change their vote because of something a Senator in another state does.

TurkeyBaconLeg said:

---

---

Familiar, isn't it.

Cheating for all the world to see, but the libs support it so they pretend it didn't happen.

Pinche Abogado said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

---

This is a really stunning image. Abrams funneled all her energy after a hard political loss to registering and turning out enough voters to change her state, the nation, and by extension, the world. What a fitting and moving tribute to an incredible woman by a clearly talented artist.

---

troll

---

How is me stating facts and expressing an opinion about a piece of art, trolling?

If this is what you consider trolling then for your own sake I really hope you spend all of your online time in the safest of safe spaces, like this forum.

agjacent said:

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

---

This is a really stunning image. Abrams funneled all her energy after a hard political loss to registering and turning out enough voters to change her state, the nation, and by extension, the world. What a fitting and moving tribute to an incredible woman by a clearly talented artist.

---

troll

---

How is me stating facts and expressing an opinion about a piece of art, trolling?

If this is what you consider trolling then for your own sake I really hope you spend all of your online time in the safest of safe spaces, like this forum.

---

She's not an incredible woman, she's an evil dishonest corrupt socialist and she's changing all of the above for the worse.

Rapier108 said:

---

TurkeyBaconLeg said:

---

---

Familiar, isn't it.

Cheating for all the world to see, but the libs support it so they pretend it didn't happen.

---

How does that show fraud? Doesn't that just show the pattern of votes counted in respect to when mail-in, early and day of votes are reported?

aggieforester05 said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

---

This is a really stunning image. Abrams funneled all her energy after a hard political loss to registering and turning out enough voters to change her state, the nation, and by extension, the world. What a fitting and moving tribute to an incredible woman by a clearly talented artist.

---

troll

---

How is me stating facts and expressing an opinion about a piece of art, trolling?

If this is what you consider trolling then for your own sake I really hope you spend all of your online time in the safest of safe spaces, like this forum.

---

She's not an incredible woman, she's an evil dishonest corrupt socialist and she's changing all of the above for the worse.

---

A woman lost a gubernatorial election and then devoted herself to registering and turning out voters for the next election two years later, and the fruits of her labor resulted in not only flipping her state, but the US senate flipping, too. I think that's incredible, and you would too, if she weren't a Democrat.

Rhonda the Rash said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

TurkeyBaconLeg said:

---

---

Familiar, isn't it.

Cheating for all the world to see, but the libs support it so they pretend it didn't happen.

---

How does that show fraud? Doesn't that just show the pattern of votes counted in respect to when mail-in, early and day of votes are reported?

---

Trumpers think counting votes over the passage of time is clear evidence of election fraud. Why can't states just instantaneously count all the votes the second the polls close?? Or barring that, why can't they just stop counting when Republicans are ahead??? WAAAAAAAAAAH!

edited for a typo but went ahead and added some more As

Rhonda the Rash said:

---

---

Gabriel Sterling is a virulent anti-Trump, Lincoln Project type. He is also deeply connected to Dominion.

He is about as legitimate of a source on voter fraud as Abrams is. He is also a contract worker, not employed by the state itself.

Please stick to Premium. There are enough communists already here.

agjacent said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

---

This is a really stunning image. Abrams funneled all her energy after a hard political loss to registering and turning out enough voters to change her state, the nation, and by extension, the world. What a fitting and moving tribute to an incredible woman by a clearly talented artist.

---

troll

---

How is me stating facts and expressing an opinion about a piece of art, trolling?

If this is what you consider trolling then for your own sake I really hope you spend all of your online time in the safest of safe spaces, like this forum.

---

She's not an incredible woman, she's an evil dishonest corrupt socialist and she's changing all of the above for the worse.

---

A woman lost a gubernatorial election and then devoted herself to registering and turning out voters for the next election two years later, and the fruits of her labor resulted in not only flipping her state, but the US senate flipping, too. I think that's incredible, and you would too, if she weren't a Democrat.

---

She's a scum bag POS, who used questionable methods to get what she achieved. I don't know if it's still going on, but it's my understanding that she's under criminal investigation. She has no ethical or moral boundaries.

Is she effective? Yes

Incredible? No

You're congratulating a woman for effectively making your future bleaker and stripping your freedoms.

Congrats, I guess

Here's a link for you:

https://www.cbs46.com/news/raffensperger-investigates-stacey-abrams-new-georgia-project-other-voter-groups/article_a24706b4-34e9-11eb-a4b7-b70c6d13e3af.html

BusterAg said:

---

Here's a link for you:

https://www.cbs46.com/news/raffensperger-investigates-stacey-abrams-new-georgia-project-other-voter-groups/article_a24706b4-34e9-11eb-a4b7-b70c6d13e3af.html

---

Since Raffensperger is compromised and totally in league with Abrams (actually let her dictate the voting rules for both elections) the entire point is to cover up the fraud.

aggieforester05 said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

---

This is a really stunning image. Abrams funneled all her energy after a hard political loss to registering and turning out enough voters to change her state, the nation, and by extension, the world. What a fitting and moving tribute to an incredible woman by a clearly talented artist.

---

troll

---

How is me stating facts and expressing an opinion about a piece of art, trolling?

If this is what you consider trolling then for your own sake I really hope you spend all of your online time in the safest of safe spaces, like this forum.

---

She's not an incredible woman, she's an evil dishonest corrupt socialist and she's changing all of the above for the worse.

---

She is an American treasure who has done more than anyone to counter voter suppression in the Deep South than anyone. Welcome to blue Georgia going forward. Texas is next

TurkeyBaconLeg said:

---

---

Did you make that yourself with MS Paint? Warnock and Ossoff had big leads at the beginning of the night and then the Republicans overtook them. Weird how your chart doesn't reflect that.

Rapier108 said:

---

Rhonda the Rash said:

---

---

Gabriel Sterling is a virulent anti-Trump, Lincoln Project type. He is also deeply connected to Dominion.

He is about as legitimate of a source on voter fraud as Abrams is. He is also a contract worker, not employed by the state itself.

Please stick to Premium. There are enough communists already here.

---

I am not a communist or socialist! Try again!

State Supreme courts and SCOTUS have shot down voter fraud "evidence." Even trump lawyers admitted there is no evidence of fraud when asked by judges in court. Show me the facts and I will change my opinion!

mesocosm said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

---

This is a really stunning image. Abrams funneled all her energy after a hard political loss to registering and turning out enough voters to change her state, the nation, and by extension, the world. What a fitting and moving tribute to an incredible woman by a clearly talented artist.

---

troll

---

How is me stating facts and expressing an opinion about a piece of art, trolling?

If this is what you consider trolling then for your own sake I really hope you spend all of your online time in the safest of safe spaces, like this forum.

---

She's not an incredible woman, she's an evil dishonest corrupt socialist and she's changing all of the above for the worse.

---

She is an American treasure who has done more than anyone to counter voter suppression in the Deep South than anyone. Welcome to blue Georgia going forward. Texas is next

---

Well, one thing we can always count on, is you being wrong.

Rhonda the Rash said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Rhonda the Rash said:

---

---

Gabriel Sterling is a virulent anti-Trump, Lincoln Project type. He is also deeply connected to Dominion.

He is about as legitimate of a source on voter fraud as Abrams is. He is also a contract worker, not employed by the state itself.

Please stick to Premium. There are enough communists already here.

---

I am not a communist or socialist! Try again!

State Supreme courts and SCOTUS have shot down voter fraud "evidence." Even trump lawyers admitted there is no evidence of fraud when asked by judges in court. Show me the facts and I will change my opinion!

---

Asking for "facts" on forum 16 is a fool's folly.

There is never voter fraud when 1. you have zero controls over the integrity of the vote, and 2. do not look for it.

The democrats have shown the world that in the U.S., fraudulent voting is endorsed, and there are no repercussions for doing it.

aggieforester05 said:

---

mesocosm said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

---

This is a really stunning image. Abrams funneled all her energy after a hard political loss to registering and turning out enough voters to change her state, the nation, and by extension, the world. What a fitting and moving tribute to an incredible woman by a clearly talented artist.

---

troll

---

How is me stating facts and expressing an opinion about a piece of art, trolling?

If this is what you consider trolling then for your own sake I really hope you spend all of your online time in the safest of safe spaces, like this forum.

---

She's not an incredible woman, she's an evil dishonest corrupt socialist and she's changing all of the above for the worse.

---

She is an American treasure who has done more than anyone to counter voter suppression in the Deep South than anyone. Welcome to blue Georgia going forward. Texas is next

---

Well, one thing we can always count on, is you being wrong.

---

You're going to look foolish when she's on the new $20 bill.

aggieforester05 said:

---

agjacent said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

---

This is a really stunning image. Abrams funneled all her energy after a hard political loss to registering and turning out enough voters to change her state, the nation, and by extension, the world. What a fitting and moving tribute to an incredible woman by a clearly talented artist.

---

troll

---

How is me stating facts and expressing an opinion about a piece of art, trolling?

If this is what you consider trolling then for your own sake I really hope you spend all of your online time in the safest of safe spaces, like this forum.

---

She's not an incredible woman, she's an evil dishonest corrupt socialist and she's changing all of the above for the worse.

---

A woman lost a gubernatorial election and then devoted herself to registering and turning out voters for the next election two years later, and the fruits of her labor resulted in not only flipping her state, but the US senate flipping, too. I think that's incredible, and you would too, if she weren't a Democrat.

---

She's a scum bag POS, who used questionable methods to get what she achieved. I don't know if it's still going on, but it's my understanding that she's under criminal investigation. She has no ethical or moral boundaries.

Is she effective? Yes

Incredible? No

You're congratulating a woman for effectively making your future bleaker and stripping your freedoms.

Congrats, I guess

---

What were the questionable methods? What were the criminal investigations and evidence supporting them? Did the investigation go anywhere? Where specific and accurate examples show her moral boundaries lack?

aggieforester05 said:

---

mesocosm said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

---

This is a really stunning image. Abrams funneled all her energy after a hard political loss to registering and turning out enough voters to change her state, the nation, and by extension, the world. What a fitting and moving tribute to an incredible woman by a clearly talented artist.

---

troll

---

How is me stating facts and expressing an opinion about a piece of art, trolling?

If this is what you consider trolling then for your own sake I really hope you spend all of your online time in the safest of safe spaces, like this forum.

---

She's not an incredible woman, she's an evil dishonest corrupt socialist and she's changing all of the above for the worse.

---

She is an American treasure who has done more than anyone to counter voter suppression in the Deep South than anyone. Welcome to blue Georgia going forward. Texas is next

---

Well, one thing we can always count on, is you being wrong.

---

She is black, she is a female, and she was able to get out the Democratic vote. That is why you don't like her. Sour grapes. I hope you enjoy them

agjacent said:

---

aggieforester05 said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

agjacent said:

---

Burdizzo said:

---

---

This is a really stunning image. Abrams funneled all her energy after a hard political loss to registering and turning out enough voters to change her state, the nation, and by extension, the world. What a fitting and moving tribute to an incredible woman by a clearly talented artist.

---

troll

---

How is me stating facts and expressing an opinion about a piece of art, trolling?

If this is what you consider trolling then for your own sake I really hope you spend all of your online time in the safest of safe spaces, like this forum.

---

She's not an incredible woman, she's an evil dishonest corrupt socialist and she's changing all of the above for the worse.

---

A woman lost a gubernatorial election and then devoted herself to registering and turning out voters for the next election two years later, and the fruits of her labor resulted in not only flipping her state, but the US senate flipping, too. I think that's incredible, and you would too, if she weren't a Democrat.

---

Boss Tweed got **** done, too...

Rhonda the Rash said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Rhonda the Rash said:

---

---

Gabriel Sterling is a virulent anti-Trump, Lincoln Project type. He is also deeply connected to Dominion.

He is about as legitimate of a source on voter fraud as Abrams is. He is also a contract worker, not employed by the state itself.

Please stick to Premium. There are enough communists already here.

---

I am not a communist or socialist! Try again!

State Supreme courts and SCOTUS have shot down voter fraud "evidence." Even trump lawyers admitted there is no evidence of fraud when asked by judges in court. Show me the facts and I will change my opinion!

---

The cases haven't even been heard by the courts and a large number have been dismissed on "standing". Sounds like a cope out to avoid hearing cases and evidence that may make them have to make a difficult choice.

Also when it comes to evidence, will thousands of affidavits work for you? And if the lawsuits are "shot down" I'm assuming those folks who signed affidavits will be tried for lying in an affidavit, right? Links to those trials would help.