Your buddy Stacey Abrams says hi. She was allowed by Raffensperger to basically set the rules for both the Presidential election, and this one. Everything she demanded, he agreed with and implemented.AgBMF42 said:Rapier108 said:No, it's your excuse for the cheating your party is doing.AgBMF42 said:Rapier108 said:
Quit trying to deflect.
It's not a deflection, it is an explanation. Two of the candidates suck more than the other.
Democrats don't control the election, this is Georgia.
Georgia Senate Election
96,015 Views |
970 Replies |
Last: 5 yr ago by YouBet
Can someone tell me why anyone in good faith could vote for him?
I disagree with Ossoff on policy but that's it. Warnock on the other hand is objectively a bad person.
I disagree with Ossoff on policy but that's it. Warnock on the other hand is objectively a bad person.
Two reasons.DenverAg91 said:
Can someone tell me why anyone in good faith could vote for him?
I disagree with Ossoff on policy but that's it. Warnock on the other hand is objectively a bad person.
D by his name.
Color of his skin.
That is the depth of why the Democrats voted for him.
MrsFlyingSquirrel95 said:Ronald Reagan said:MrsFlyingSquirrel95 said:Aggie118 said:MrsFlyingSquirrel95 said:fka ftc said:Great example of lib thinking.MrsFlyingSquirrel95 said:Fenrir said:
What is the answer on healthcare you think americans want?
I don't have that answer, or else I would be in healthcare policy.
I don't know what I want, just an answer to this question. Muh healthcare! Muh immigration! Muh free education! Muh minimum wage! Muh capitalism is evil!
I have questions! I want answers! But I has no ideas!
Or maybe I don't want to debate health care policy with my thumbs on a thread about Senate elections at 11pm. Read between the lines/Get over yourself.
No it's the first one, you're just a quintessential liberal wanting to complain about everything and not even knowing what it is you want. You are getting absolutely owned tonight. It may be time for you to just scoot on out of here.
Again with the delusion. I will wrap the most pertinent points on this thread.
The Republicans legitimately lost
Because fewer people voted for them
Because either their platform or campaigns were not appealing enough
It doesn't even sound like fking rocket science guys.
Once again....do you believe that losing means one's policies are inferior? Or could one win with worse policies than their opposition simply because people are stupid?
I genuinely think most people are stupid.
Most people are, and have historically been, stupid. Yes, the "wrong" policies or people can be elected. There are some ways around this for the Not Stupids, like bureaucracies that persist, institutions, checks and balances, and a lot of people having no clue what their representatives are actually doing anyway. But since everyone is pulling from the same population, everyone is equally hamstrung. And people are stupid on both sides in different ways. So in the end I do think it comes back to being able to engage with *enough* people in a way that they see either their values represented in you, or a benefit to them, or both. You can't say "well there are more stupid people so they voted for the stupid party". That's really a very immature way to look at politics.
You'd think so, until you look at what the two parties stand for. Hard work, opportunity, getting the government out of the way vs. handouts, catering to lies about victim hood and promising to take from
The more successful to give to the lazy and pathetic.
Rapier108 said:Two reasons.DenverAg91 said:
Can someone tell me why anyone in good faith could vote for him?
I disagree with Ossoff on policy but that's it. Warnock on the other hand is objectively a bad person.
D by his name.
Color of his skin.
That is the depth of why the Democrats voted for him.
It's fine to vote for someone because they're black. Not ok to vote for someone because they're a white male.
GA SoS goes on CNN to tip off dems how much they need to cheat by. He stresses how important the 17k military ballots coming in overseas on Friday. Dems must work fast to offset that!!!
Raffensperger is a traitor and is compromised by the Democrats and the CCP.thirdcoast said:
GA SoS goes on CNN to tip off dems how much they need to cheat by. He stresses how important the 17k military ballots coming in overseas on Friday. Dems must work fast to offset that!!!
You totally misinterpreted that.thirdcoast said:
GA SoS goes on CNN to tip off dems how much they need to cheat by. He stresses how important the 17k military ballots coming in overseas on Friday. Dems must work fast to offset that!!!
There aren't 17K pro-GOP military ballots. There are up to 17K ballots from Georgians living overseas, including military. A lot of those people will be ex-pats and foreign service govt. employees, which tend to vote D.
If I recall correctly, Biden gained votes among "overseas and military."
Tbh I've been disappointed in Georgia ever since the 2018 Sugar Bowl.
ex pats tend to vote dem?Correction said:You totally misinterpreted that.thirdcoast said:
GA SoS goes on CNN to tip off dems how much they need to cheat by. He stresses how important the 17k military ballots coming in overseas on Friday. Dems must work fast to offset that!!!
There aren't 17K pro-GOP military ballots. There are up to 17K ballots from Georgians living overseas, including military. A lot of those people will be ex-pats and foreign service govt. employees, which tend to vote D.
AgBMF42 said:Rapier108 said:
Quit trying to deflect.
It's not a deflection, it is an explanation. Two of the candidates suck more than the other.
Just a reminder that Warnock
1) hit his estranged wife with his car after a recent argument
2) not just pro-choice but wants abortion on demand (that's ok to you though)
3) was arrested for obstructing a child abuse issue at his Church's child summer camp. Staff threw urine on kids and he shut the investigation down
But sure, he's a great upstanding guy that doesn't own stocks.
Well I was more curious about policy thoughts but it is becoming clear that there was no coherent argument present. Generally when someone presents a major example you'd think they would manage more than a single vague sentence, but in the end you pivoted to a more generic argument that can't really be discussed.
Aggie95 said:AgBMF42 said:Rapier108 said:
Quit trying to deflect.
It's not a deflection, it is an explanation. Two of the candidates suck more than the other.
Just a reminder that Warnock
1) hit his estranged wife with his car after a recent argument
2) not just pro-choice but wants abortion on demand (that's ok to you though)
3) was arrested for obstructing a child abuse issue at his Church's child summer camp. Staff threw urine on kids and he shut the investigation down
But sure, he's a great upstanding guy that doesn't own stocks.
I wish Democrats had a Roy Moore moment and put character ahead of party if the behavior was egregious enough.
When Republicans in deep red Alabama decided not to turn out and vote for him because his sexual scandals were too much for voters.
(I don't want to re hash Moore and get into that but it was good to see that people wouldn't vote for their preferred party at any costs)
Urine? Not urine!!!Aggie95 said:AgBMF42 said:Rapier108 said:
Quit trying to deflect.
It's not a deflection, it is an explanation. Two of the candidates suck more than the other.
Just a reminder that Warnock
1) hit his estranged wife with his car after a recent argument
2) not just pro-choice but wants abortion on demand (that's ok to you though)
3) was arrested for obstructing a child abuse issue at his Church's child summer camp. Staff threw urine on kids and he shut the investigation down
But sure, he's a great upstanding guy that doesn't own stocks.
AgBMF42 said:Rapier108 said:
A point of interest. The total vote in the Senate races is almost identical, the difference being less than 100 votes.
The total vote in the other race for the Public Service Commission District 4 has about 46,000 fewer total votes.
Although the total vote was 46,000 fewer, Lauren Bubba McDonald has 2,208,570; more than any one the Senate candidates.
In the race for commissioner, the Republican has a lead of about 87,000 votes. In a race with 46,000 fewer votes, Lauren Bubba McDonald was 2,208,570 votes, more than any of the Senate candidates. The Democrat running for commissioner has about 60 to 80 thousand votes less than the Dem Senate candidates.
And I'd bet the difference is all out of the Atlanta area.
Does Lauren Bubba McDonald use insider classified information to trade stocks?
Do you smoke bath salts?
Based on numbers im seeing with Fulton and DeKalb still not 100%, Ossof will net 45,000 and Purdue 12,000. Unless there are some heavy red counties still not reporting 100%, dems are going to win control.
agracer said:
Based on numbers im seeing with Fulton and DeKalb still not 100%, Ossof will net 45,000 and Purdue 12,000. Unless there are some heavy red counties still not reporting tbe dems are going to win control.
Yeah. But Bevo scaring the crap out of that inbred dog was pretty funny.DenverAg91 said:
Tbh I've been disappointed in Georgia ever since the 2018 Sugar Bowl.
What answers do dems have for COVID....enlighten me, PLEASE!
So basically copy 90% of what is already being done and make up stuff that will never happen?
MrsFlyingSquirrel95 said:Aggie95 said:
What answers do dems have for COVID....enlighten me, PLEASE!
It's right in the campaign website? https://joebiden.com/covid19/
I'm not here to debate the content, just the importance to the platform. People who think Trump isn't taking it seriously enough will be more likely to vote D.
All you're arguing is that people are easily manipulated.
Not really. It's just more vague generalities. Do you want the federal government to dictate covid response to states, counties and cities? What about covid management would be considered a positive change outside of trump's dumb communication habits.
If the improvement for healthcare involves a public option I am curious how anyone anticipates such a system could coexist with anything even remotely similar to what we currently use or if you anticipate complete upheaval of our current system as part of the process.
If the improvement for healthcare involves a public option I am curious how anyone anticipates such a system could coexist with anything even remotely similar to what we currently use or if you anticipate complete upheaval of our current system as part of the process.
You know what the worst part of all this **** is? The slowness as it gets down to the wire. It's like they want to drag it out and torture people.
**** the Democrats, and **** the "vote counters" that do this stuff. There needs to be reform, by force, in this country. Never allow these sham "elections" to happen this way again.
**** the Democrats, and **** the "vote counters" that do this stuff. There needs to be reform, by force, in this country. Never allow these sham "elections" to happen this way again.
Featured Stories
See All
Jones aspires to join A&M's lineage of great defensive ends
by Olin Buchanan
14:22
2d ago
8.0k
Doubleheader sweep clinches second straight SEC series victory
by Richard Zane
Spring Football Snippets: Practice No. 8
by Olin Buchanan
13:35
2d ago
3.5k
Ford & Co. wins top-15 SEC series with UGA
by Kayla Gaither
47:54
1d ago
2.7k
Rosenthalmeatz12thman
Five-star OL Ismael Camara returns to A&M to see a spring practice
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
3