Caught on Camera: hidden ballots pulled out after poll watchers told to leave

24,432 Views | 302 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by FIDO95
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

Joseydog said:

Just getting caught up with this. There needs to be an immediate and comprehensive investigation.




Liars lie. Those that support cheating have no credibility here.
John Maplethorpe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So the investigators at the Georgia Secretary of state are in on the conspiracy? That's what you're going with instead of updating your priors?
M-K-TAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

Quote:


Bull***** "Legal" counting AFTER observers had been dismissed

Read the article - state investigators checked out that claim too.


Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

So the investigators at the Georgia Secretary of state are in on the conspiracy? That's what you're going with instead of updating your priors?
I know what was testified to in the hearing and I know what I saw with my own eyes. I trust that way more than all the crap being spouted by libs on this board.

Liars lie.
RedHand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O said:

John Maplethorpe said:

Joseydog said:

Just getting caught up with this. There needs to be an immediate and comprehensive investigation.




Liars lie. Those that support cheating have no credibility here.
I agree. This fact check story is total BS. I have been highly skeptical of most of the things posted here, but that fact check article has multiple holes in it.

Quote:

There wasn't a bin that had ballots in it under that table. It was an empty bin and the ballots from it were actually out on the table when the media were still there, and then it was placed back into the box when the media were still there and placed next to the table.
You can see in the video them pulling the ballot boxes out from under the table, opening it and then placing the ballots on the table.

Quote:

Nobody told them to stay. Nobody told them to leave. Nobody gave them any advice on what they should do. And It was still open for them or the public to come back in to view at whatever time they wanted to, as long as they were still working.
There are multiple sworn affidavits of people there saying they were told to leave. Add in that Trump and his team have been screaming about election fraud prior to the election, do you really think republican election officials just left because they got bored? Really.
John Maplethorpe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That claim was investigated too. Read the article. "Cutters " left because they were done, but nobody was made or told to leave.
RedHand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

That claim was investigated too. Read the article. "Cutters " left because they were done, but nobody was made or told to leave.
So you are saying that the Republican observers are liars in their sworn affidavits and just left on their own free will?
Gyles Marrett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
John Maplethorpe said:

That claim was investigated too. Read the article. "Cutters " left because they were done, but nobody was made or told to leave.
So you choose to believe a journalists article over your own eyes and sworn affidavits? Do you ever get allowed out of your corral to graze or are you stuck in there with all the other sheep?
Marcus Brutus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RedHand said:

John Maplethorpe said:

That claim was investigated too. Read the article. "Cutters " left because they were done, but nobody was made or told to leave.
So you are saying that the Republican observers are liars in their sworn affidavits and just left on their own free will?


Its pretty stupid, isn't it?
VitruvianAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

That claim was investigated too. Read the article. "Cutters " left because they were done, but nobody was made or told to leave.
Let's see the details of the investigation:

Who did it?

What questions were asked?

Whom did they interview?

Where are the documented interviews? Any affidavits?

I'm not taking the word of an official, I don't care if he's a Republican, Democrat or Independent.
Satellite of Love
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There is also this reporting from Nov 3:
https://www.mdjonline.com/neighbor_newspapers/north_fulton/fulton-county-stopped-counting-absentee-ballots-for-the-night/article_91ee4c04-1e56-11eb-b8dd-ab745d920a95.html
Quote:

Fulton County has stopped counting absentee ballots for the remainder of Nov. 3.

Fulton County officials say employees have tabulated all in-person votes and ceased counting absentee ballots for the night. Employees have been sent home and will finish counting in the morning, Nov. 4.
JP_Losman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ballots hidden under tables...only pulled out after everyone leaves... nothing to see here
M-K-TAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

That claim was investigated too. Read the article. "Cutters " left because they were done, but nobody was made or told to leave.
So basically what you are saying is its the word of the Georgia SOS person saying that nothing was ever said versus other people in affidavits saying that there was an announcement that counting was stopping hence misleading the poll watchers into believing they could leave....

aggie appraiser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's pointless to argue with Stephenville ag, he's a well documented liar.
ttu_85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasAggie_02 said:

aggie appraiser said:

The penalties for rigging an election need to be increased and this has to be monitored. It is outrageous what is going on.
rigging an election should be treason.
Because it is. It makes people doubt the constitution and the foundation of the Republic.
Marcus Brutus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why would a poll watcher willingly leave knowing ballots are still being counted? That in itself makes no damn sense. It did not happen. Period.

I don't trust Dems, aka liars, at all. If I'm watching ballot counting, I'm not leaving while the counting is happening unless I'm having a stroke.
thirdcoast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gyles Marrett said:

John Maplethorpe said:

That claim was investigated too. Read the article. "Cutters " left because they were done, but nobody was made or told to leave.
So you choose to believe a journalists article over your own eyes and sworn affidavits? Do you ever get allowed of your corral to graze or are you stuck in there with all the other sheep?



This.

You can't have it both ways as the "fact check" spin article states.

Scanning is essential to ballot vote counting. You would have to believe the observer role was reduced to "cutting" and only to unpackage ballots for a closed group of dem workers to decide which ones to scan in private. That's BS!

Even the the BS article admits the observers were in fact DISMISSED, while vote scanning carried on WITHOUT them. So maybe its true about not leaving unscanned ballots out overnight. But its still NOT explained why observers were dismissed. Its a flat out lie that "their work had been completed". The law is clear about their observation role durring scanning/counting. The lady narrating the dam video makes that point clear!
bad_teammate
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rittenhouse said:

Why would a poll watcher willingly leave knowing ballots are still being counted?
Because they are there to observe the signature matching process and the opening/sorting of the ballots. The ballots are being counted by a machine, not by hand, so what is there to even see at that point?

If there's a mismatch between the # of ballot envelopes opened/verified and # of votes counted then that should be pretty easy to track.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Amazing how the Biden votes spiked at the same time the poll workers were out.

Libs trying to pi** on everyone's leg and convince them it's raining.
BigBrother
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

That claim was investigated too. Read the article. "Cutters " left because they were done, but nobody was made or told to leave.
Your contention is that the Republican observers, often zealots for their party, just decided they'd leave for the night? All of them? And you expect us to take you seriously?
thirdcoast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bad_teammate said:

Rittenhouse said:

Why would a poll watcher willingly leave knowing ballots are still being counted?
Because they are there to observe the signature matching process and the opening/sorting of the ballots. The ballots are being counted by a machine, not by hand, so what is there to even see at that point?

If there's a mismatch between the # of ballot envelopes opened/verified and # of votes counted then that should be pretty easy to track.

Are you saying they opened and matched sigs on the totes under table before being dismissed? How about observing which ballots are scanned and how many times they are scanned....that seems like a legit observation.

Oh BTW, The state law disagrees with your biased and ignorant opinion on the role of the observer. Keep grasping straws and moving goal post like the BS "fact check" article tells you to. Pathetic.

thirdcoast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

That claim was investigated too. Read the article. "Cutters " left because they were done, but nobody was made or told to leave.


Oh they just "left"....why don't your read your own BS article. If this is the best you got, its very sad.

Even the BS article tweet says clearly they were "DISMISSED"....and per state law, their work was NOT done. Im sure your girl in blonde braids will be submitting a sworn affidavit here shortly on how all these observers are lying and they just "left" without being TOLD to leave.

Marcus Brutus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bad_teammate said:

Rittenhouse said:

Why would a poll watcher willingly leave knowing ballots are still being counted?
Because they are there to observe the signature matching process and the opening/sorting of the ballots. The ballots are being counted by a machine, not by hand, so what is there to even see at that point?

If there's a mismatch between the # of ballot envelopes opened/verified and # of votes counted then that should be pretty easy to track.


That pure ignorance.
Marcus Brutus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah its pure stupidity. How about watching for ballots being tossed into the trash bin? He doesn't have a clue what he's talking about.

Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
thirdcoast said:

John Maplethorpe said:

That claim was investigated too. Read the article. "Cutters " left because they were done, but nobody was made or told to leave.


Oh they just "left"....why don't your read your own BS article. If this is the best you got, its very sad.

Even the BS article tweet says clearly they were "DISMISSED"....and per state law, their work was NOT done. Im sure your girl in blonde braids will be submitting a sworn affidavit here shortly on how all these observers are lying and they just "left" without being TOLD to leave.


Consider the source. This is coming from the guy that promoted and argued in favor of all the former trade deals with China because they were good for America.
ClassicAg18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Any reporter who writes an article, has posted in the NYT, lives in Seattle and deems themselves as a "fact checker" should be taken with extreme caution in my opinion. That's the girls credentials on the fact check article you all are talking about.

This all needs to go to court and be settled there
thirdcoast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agree. We need Trump to claim that journalists can easily survive a jump from a 50 story building. I bet we lose a few dozen TDS fact checking journos who have to prove him wrong.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
John Maplethorpe said:

Joseydog said:

Just getting caught up with this. There needs to be an immediate and comprehensive investigation.


If this is what really happened, then its an easy fix for GA


Quote:

Two high-level officials with the Georgia secretary of state's office and a state elections board monitor each told Lead Stories that their investigations revealed nothing suspicious in the video.
These anonymous people should go on record and explain all these things, along with the people in the video.


until that happens, people will be, and should be, highly suspicious of this explanation.
RedHand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Two high-level officials with the Georgia secretary of state's office and a state elections board monitor each told Lead Stories that their investigations revealed nothing suspicious in the video.
Notice how they are unnamed. That's on purpose. They didn't talk to anyone.
John Maplethorpe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Read article. They're both named. Including the lead investigator.
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

Read article. They're both named. Including the lead investigator.
Doesn't matter. If they were counting legal ballots, The ballots were being counted AFTER the observers were told to leave. They cleared out the place and said that everyone was going home, yet 4 stayed back and continued.

That means those ballots get tossed....
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
what is the law that says observer has to be there or the votes are tossed? (the article says they don't need to be) anyone know which is correct?
snowdog90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The fact that this obvious fraud can be "explained" away by liars who expect to be believed is why this country is in such trouble.

Just keep lying and cheating. That's always the plan. This is the Clinton legacy. Dems are evil and disgusting.
RedHand
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

Read article. They're both named. Including the lead investigator.
Actually only two are named. One refuses so who knows if that person is who they say they are and Gabriel Sterling is a known liar. You can read about it here. This is how fact checking works right?

Just more holes poked in this debunked "fact check".
chimpanzee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One liner dismissals of serious looking video are suspicious, but there's literally nothing that people won't deny with a straight face these days.

There are really straightforward questions to be answered here, and in response there is stonewalling followed by minimal talking points.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.