oh no said:
I don't know, but they can't do some of the stuff cyber ninjas are doing with testing the ink blots, creases/folds in the paper, etc.
Exactly.
But there are other inconsistencies. I watched when Bennett, Cybe Ninjas' Logan and Cyfir's Cotton were before Fann's committee to tell them what had not been turned over under the subpoena. Bennett said the chain of custody information from November 3 up until April when the ballots were delivered to them was missing. What this Benny guy is saying is he has some type of chain of custody information if he can reverse engineer from a box number, no?
The second thing discussed in that hearing was the shortage between what the tally sheets said were in the boxes and the actual # of paper ballots. MCBOS tried to explain that away as spoiled ballots that were removed and sent for duplication before they could be counted. Logan said that there were supposed to be identifying numbers on the duplicate ballots that match the original damaged ballot. Logan said those numbers were missing on the duplicates so they could not match them up. Also on those tally sheets, there is a space where such damaged ballots should be noted as having been sent to duplication but were not on all of the tally sheets having an undercount of ballots. Again, how can Benny have that information as well?
Ben Cotton of CyFir testified that data files from the EMS were missing but he was able to use a recovery program and get them back. So again, if those files were deleted, where did the info come from that was sent to Benny under a FOIA? Did the Maricopa County election officials have admin passwords to access it? Or not?
And of course the never ending saga of the missing routers was discussed in that hearing with Ben Cotton basically but tactfully pooh-poohing the MCBOS and Sheriff's contentions that the routers are data storage devices with sensitive information on them.