There is just such an enormous amount of evidence of a continuing pattern of conduct here, different deals, different countries but upshot is always the same. Hunter isn't qualified for jack s*** but is getting paid millions. No one can ever articulate a reason why other than his last name and influence peddling.whatthehey78 said:Just a feeling, but I don't think he will bring himself to "honestly" respond to your query. He may be thinking about it...I hear fuses frying.aggiehawg said:Be honest here. If those emails were between China and one of Trump's children, would you still say no big deal?Brock Strongballs said:
Yes this other FCPA crime you imagine might have occurred would be criminal. But Bobulinski neither made or documented any such claim.
The timing and weakness of the rollout alone is a tell that magaworld is getting played by Bannon and Giuliani, again.
At the same time, Joe and Jill are living well above their means for decades. What is the alternative explanation for that? Joe was honest as all get out about "prostituting" himself since he first ran for office. That Kitty Kelley article and taped interview are proof of that. And he is also on record saying Senators aren't paid enough. Guy has always been greedy and not shy about admitting it.
So when his son has a long history of setting up these same types of deals over and over again, where's the plausible deniability? There isn't any. A jury looking at it all may not totally ready to go with beyond a reasonable doubt but in the absence of a defense with a plausible alternative explanation would they really have a choice?