Quote:
In September 2015, the Obama-Biden administration approved the sale of a strategically sensitive Michigan manufacturer, Henniges Automotive, to a firm connected to Joe Biden's son, Hunter, and a Chinese military contractor that was on an American watch list because of its close ties to the People's Liberation Army. Hunter Biden's equity fund, backed by the Communist Chinese government, and the Chinese contractor, Aviation Industry Corporation (AVIC), needed special approval for the deal from the Committee of Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CIFIUS) because Henniges produced technology with potential military use.
AVIC entities have been sanctioned by the United States on five separate occasions since 1993 and the addition to the watch lista major red flagoccurred less than a year-and-a-half before they co-purchased Henniges with the Biden-led Chinese joint venture known as Bohai Harvest RST (BHR). The fact that CFIUS approved the deal is alarming given that Henniges owns numerous facilities in the United States that are now controlled by a Chinese military front company.
Internal BHR documents show exactly how the Chinese military contractor was able to disguise its ownership via shell corporations and formed a joint-venture with the son of the vice president to facilitate the Chinese takeover of an American dual-use technology supplier. Additional documents suggest that Hunter Biden's Chinese-backed venture funneled money to an entity controlled by Vanessa Kerry, the daughter of then-Secretary of State John Kerry, just one month before CFIUS approved the takeover. At the time, Secretary Kerry played a lead role on the Obama-Biden CFIUS committee.
captkirk said:
Wow. If true this is an incredibly damning report.TRM said:
In September 2015, the Obama-Biden administration approved the sale of a strategically sensitive Michigan manufacturer, Henniges Automotive, to a firm connected to Joe Biden's son, Hunter, and a Chinese military contractor that was on an American watch list because of its close ties to the People's Liberation Army. Hunter Biden's equity fund, backed by the Communist Chinese government, and the Chinese contractor, Aviation Industry Corporation (AVIC), needed special approval for the deal from the Committee of Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CIFIUS) because Henniges produced technology with potential military use.
AVIC entities have been sanctioned by the United States on five separate occasions since 1993 and the addition to the watch lista major red flagoccurred less than a year-and-a-half before they co-purchased Henniges with the Biden-led Chinese joint venture known as Bohai Harvest RST (BHR). The fact that CFIUS approved the deal is alarming given that Henniges owns numerous facilities in the United States that are now controlled by a Chinese military front company.
Internal BHR documents show exactly how the Chinese military contractor was able to disguise its ownership via shell corporations and formed a joint-venture with the son of the vice president to facilitate the Chinese takeover of an American dual-use technology supplier. Additional documents suggest that Hunter Biden's Chinese-backed venture funneled money to an entity controlled by Vanessa Kerry, the daughter of then-Secretary of State John Kerry, just one month before CFIUS approved the takeover. At the time, Secretary Kerry played a lead role on the Obama-Biden CFIUS committee.
That strategy backfired, bigly.Quote:
Hunter took his rental car to Arizona, where Hertz workers called the cops after finding a crack pipe and a baggie containing a "white powdery substance," along with a Secret Service business card, Hunter's driver's license and a badge from Beau's time as Delaware attorney general inside.
Local prosecutors declined to pursue the case, citing a lack of evidence that he actually used the pipe, according to the New Yorker.
Hunter, meanwhile, finally spent a week at Grace Grove Lifestyle Center a local "detox, rejuvenation and healing retreat" before checking into a resort spa, where Hallie flew to meet him and they decided to become a couple.
They tried to keep it a secret, but Joe Biden found out when Page Six called him for comment on a story revealing the relationship.
They split up later that year.
"All we got was st from everybody, all the time," Hunter told the New Yorker. "It was really hard. And I realized that I'm not helping anybody by sticking around."
Hunter spoke to the New Yorker amid his former vice president dad's campaign for the Democratic nomination for president, to prevent "a trickle of disclosures" winding up in the press, the article says.
But he recently found himself in the headlines anyway when he married a South African woman named Melissa Cohen a week after they met and was sued by another woman who claims he's the father of her new son. He denies having sex with that woman.
Quote:
Fox News previously reported an email thread, initially released by the New York Post, which purportedly showed an equity split proposition that would benefit "the big guy," whom sources and Bobulinski claimed was Joe Biden.
According to the Post's reporting and Bobulinski, the proposed equity split referenced "20" for "H" and "10 held by H for the big guy?" with no further details.
"In that email, there is no question that 'H' stands for Hunter, 'big guy' for his father, Joe Biden, and Jim for Jim Biden," Bobulinski claimed Thursday in a statement he gave ahead of the second presidential debate, where he was President Trump's guest.
"In fact, Hunter often referred to his father as the big guy or 'my chairman.' On numerous occasions, it was made clear to me that Joe Biden's involvement was not to be mentioned in writing but only face-to-face. In fact, I was advised by [James] Gillier and [Rob] Walker that Hunter and Jim Biden were paranoid about keeping Joe Biden's involvement secret."
According to separate emails obtained and analyzed by Fox News, the "chairman" appears to refer to China.
texaglurkerguy said:
Fox reporting that "Chairman" or "Big Guy" was likely referring to China, not Joe:Quote:
Fox News previously reported an email thread, initially released by the New York Post, which purportedly showed an equity split proposition that would benefit "the big guy," whom sources and Bobulinski claimed was Joe Biden.
According to the Post's reporting and Bobulinski, the proposed equity split referenced "20" for "H" and "10 held by H for the big guy?" with no further details.
"In that email, there is no question that 'H' stands for Hunter, 'big guy' for his father, Joe Biden, and Jim for Jim Biden," Bobulinski claimed Thursday in a statement he gave ahead of the second presidential debate, where he was President Trump's guest.
"In fact, Hunter often referred to his father as the big guy or 'my chairman.' On numerous occasions, it was made clear to me that Joe Biden's involvement was not to be mentioned in writing but only face-to-face. In fact, I was advised by [James] Gillier and [Rob] Walker that Hunter and Jim Biden were paranoid about keeping Joe Biden's involvement secret."
According to separate emails obtained and analyzed by Fox News, the "chairman" appears to refer to China.
aginlakeway said:texaglurkerguy said:
Fox reporting that "Chairman" or "Big Guy" was likely referring to China, not Joe:Quote:
Fox News previously reported an email thread, initially released by the New York Post, which purportedly showed an equity split proposition that would benefit "the big guy," whom sources and Bobulinski claimed was Joe Biden.
According to the Post's reporting and Bobulinski, the proposed equity split referenced "20" for "H" and "10 held by H for the big guy?" with no further details.
"In that email, there is no question that 'H' stands for Hunter, 'big guy' for his father, Joe Biden, and Jim for Jim Biden," Bobulinski claimed Thursday in a statement he gave ahead of the second presidential debate, where he was President Trump's guest.
"In fact, Hunter often referred to his father as the big guy or 'my chairman.' On numerous occasions, it was made clear to me that Joe Biden's involvement was not to be mentioned in writing but only face-to-face. In fact, I was advised by [James] Gillier and [Rob] Walker that Hunter and Jim Biden were paranoid about keeping Joe Biden's involvement secret."
According to separate emails obtained and analyzed by Fox News, the "chairman" appears to refer to China.
So he was lying when he said at the press conference before the debate that it was Biden?
That's what Fox's reporting would seem to suggest.aginlakeway said:texaglurkerguy said:
Fox reporting that "Chairman" or "Big Guy" was likely referring to China, not Joe:Quote:
Fox News previously reported an email thread, initially released by the New York Post, which purportedly showed an equity split proposition that would benefit "the big guy," whom sources and Bobulinski claimed was Joe Biden.
According to the Post's reporting and Bobulinski, the proposed equity split referenced "20" for "H" and "10 held by H for the big guy?" with no further details.
"In that email, there is no question that 'H' stands for Hunter, 'big guy' for his father, Joe Biden, and Jim for Jim Biden," Bobulinski claimed Thursday in a statement he gave ahead of the second presidential debate, where he was President Trump's guest.
"In fact, Hunter often referred to his father as the big guy or 'my chairman.' On numerous occasions, it was made clear to me that Joe Biden's involvement was not to be mentioned in writing but only face-to-face. In fact, I was advised by [James] Gillier and [Rob] Walker that Hunter and Jim Biden were paranoid about keeping Joe Biden's involvement secret."
According to separate emails obtained and analyzed by Fox News, the "chairman" appears to refer to China.
So he was lying when he said at the press conference before the debate that it was Biden?
From the same article:aggiehawg said:
"The big guy" is still Biden.
But within that precise context with Sinohawk, "the chairman" is supposedly China, according to Fox, is how I read that.
But both could be true that at times Hunter referred to his Dad as "chairman."
Even Fox refuses to touch this one.Quote:
However, according to separate emails obtained by Fox News, Bobulinski states there are no other members besides Hunter Biden, Jim Biden, Rob Walker, James Gillar and Anthony Bobulinski, regarding the shareholding structure, and records for all stages of company negotiations show no role for Joe Biden.
No longer convinced Fox New's agenda today is what it used to be. Different leadership and relatively different tone or vent with a few exceptions. The network doesn't advertise its new model...but, it can't hide it either.texaglurkerguy said:
Beats me, I'm just passing along reporting from a news outlet people around here generally seem to trust that casts doubt on Joe's involvement. If you think Fox News is lying here to protect Joe Biden then I don't know what to tell you, other than lol.
texaglurkerguy said:From the same article:aggiehawg said:
"The big guy" is still Biden.
But within that precise context with Sinohawk, "the chairman" is supposedly China, according to Fox, is how I read that.
But both could be true that at times Hunter referred to his Dad as "chairman."Even Fox refuses to touch this one.Quote:
However, according to separate emails obtained by Fox News, Bobulinski states there are no other members besides Hunter Biden, Jim Biden, Rob Walker, James Gillar and Anthony Bobulinski, regarding the shareholding structure, and records for all stages of company negotiations show no role for Joe Biden.
Whuptedoo! Of course Joe's name is not on any of the official paperwork. They aren't that stupid.texaglurkerguy said:From the same article:aggiehawg said:
"The big guy" is still Biden.
But within that precise context with Sinohawk, "the chairman" is supposedly China, according to Fox, is how I read that.
But both could be true that at times Hunter referred to his Dad as "chairman."Even Fox refuses to touch this one.Quote:
However, according to separate emails obtained by Fox News, Bobulinski states there are no other members besides Hunter Biden, Jim Biden, Rob Walker, James Gillar and Anthony Bobulinski, regarding the shareholding structure, and records for all stages of company negotiations show no role for Joe Biden.
No, they just went with "russian disinformation" from start.texaglurkerguy said:
It's not just Fox News that refuses to imply Joe's involvement. No major media outlet left of Fox will. The closest they got was the WSJ, and even they ended up relegating their coverage of it to an opinion piece.
But if I had referenced any of numerous other MSM reportings doubting Joe's involvement, I'm sure I would have gotten the canned "MSM is fake news/covering for Biden" responses. Fox is an unquestionably right-leaning media outlet. If this story doesn't even clear their bar for reporting, that says a lot.