BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

mts6175 said:

---

That_Guy_Moose said:

---

I'm sure all of those 64,000 jobs in Ohio are VERY appreciative of our president meddling in private business.

---

Maybe they should have thought about that before including him (MAGA) in their policy.....

---

Or maybe Don should stop being a hypersensitive poon and realize that not everyone is going to think the way he does. And that private businesses can set policies as they see fit and shouldn't expect retribution from the government.

But that leads me back to the hypersensitive poon part...

---

Goodyear got Repubcanceled.

Expect more to come. We can play by your rules, too.

Back the police. If you don't, we will absolutely call your ass on it. Sounds like fun?

Are you really going to accuse us of hypersensitivity? Glass houses and all?

---

I'll accuse the president of it because he cannot let it go and is so insecure he cannot STAND the fact that someone might not like him. Pretty pathetic if you ask me, but if that's the light you'd like to be painted in, good luck, snowflake.

---

Who said anything about Trump?

I'm glad he agrees with me on this, it's nice to have someone in charge that understands your views, but my opinion on Goodyear has nothing to do with Trump.

---

I accused the president of hypersensitivity. You equated it to "us".

93MarineHorn said:

---

What Good Year and other corporations are really doing is acknowledging that the weak minded libs that work for them cannot tolerate political expressions they don't agree with. It so upsets their fragile emotions that they must complain to HR, which is why we get these silly corporate memos in the first place. Corporations understand how petty and childish libs are and feel they must accommodate them. They are gambling that conservatives will just sigh and say "whatever" and go along. It's a strategy that has been working well for them.

---

I agree.

F that.

If there is a hill to die on, Back the Blue is it.

If you want to make it corporate policy that law and order is not something to fight for, go F yourself.

lamivudine said:

---

someone is triggered.

---

Nah, I just find it hilarious that the party of small government is OK with any reaction and intervention by the president in regard to a company's internal policy, as long as it "gets them libtards" and sells more bull**** hats.

GooooooooooooooooooooTEAM!

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

mts6175 said:

---

That_Guy_Moose said:

---

I'm sure all of those 64,000 jobs in Ohio are VERY appreciative of our president meddling in private business.

---

Maybe they should have thought about that before including him (MAGA) in their policy.....

---

Or maybe Don should stop being a hypersensitive poon and realize that not everyone is going to think the way he does. And that private businesses can set policies as they see fit and shouldn't expect retribution from the government.

But that leads me back to the hypersensitive poon part...

---

Goodyear got Repubcanceled.

Expect more to come. We can play by your rules, too.

Back the police. If you don't, we will absolutely call your ass on it. Sounds like fun?

Are you really going to accuse us of hypersensitivity? Glass houses and all?

---

I'll accuse the president of it because he cannot let it go and is so insecure he cannot STAND the fact that someone might not like him. Pretty pathetic if you ask me, but if that's the light you'd like to be painted in, good luck, snowflake.

---

Who said anything about Trump?

I'm glad he agrees with me on this, it's nice to have someone in charge that understands your views, but my opinion on Goodyear has nothing to do with Trump.

---

I accused the president of hypersensitivity. You equated it to "us".

---

Do you believe we should defund the police? Is law and order an idea that is central to the American dream? Maybe this is a topic that I, personally, am also "hypersensitive" of. Your take?

Anonymous Source said:

---

lamivudine said:

---

someone is triggered.

---

Nah, I just find it hilarious that the party of small government if OK with any reaction and intervention by the president in regard to a company's internal policy, as long as it "gets them libtards" and sells more bull**** hats.

GooooooooooooooooooooTEAM!

---

Except it isn't government intervention because he's not using any government resources. It's no different than any business leader or celebrity casing for a boycott.

Anonymous Source said:

---

lamivudine said:

---

someone is triggered.

---

Nah, I just find it hilarious that the party of small government is OK with any reaction and intervention by the president in regard to a company's internal policy, as long as it "gets them libtards" and sells more bull**** hats.

GooooooooooooooooooooTEAM!

---

yep triggered.

Anonymous Source said:

---

lamivudine said:

---

someone is triggered.

---

Nah, I just find it hilarious that the party of small government is OK with any reaction and intervention by the president in regard to a company's internal policy, as long as it "gets them libtards" and sells more bull**** hats.

GooooooooooooooooooooTEAM!

---

Intervention?

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

lamivudine said:

---

someone is triggered.

---

Nah, I just find it hilarious that the party of small government if OK with any reaction and intervention by the president in regard to a company's internal policy, as long as it "gets them libtards" and sells more bull**** hats.

GooooooooooooooooooooTEAM!

---

Except it isn't government intervention because he's not using any government resources. It's no different than any business leader or celebrity casing for a boycott.

---

He's President. 24/7.

This isn't something that's even debatable. This isn't what a PotUS should be doing. Just because he's "on our side" doesn't change that fact.

If Obama, while PotUS, had tweeted from his personal account "We should boycott Goya foods...", we'd all be ****ting a brick. Rightly so.

Again, I agree with his sentiment, but a PotUS shouldn't be doing what he did. Even if I like the idea, itself.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

lamivudine said:

---

someone is triggered.

---

Nah, I just find it hilarious that the party of small government is OK with any reaction and intervention by the president in regard to a company's internal policy, as long as it "gets them libtards" and sells more bull**** hats.

GooooooooooooooooooooTEAM!

---

Intervention?

---

What would you call something non-policy related and not related in any sense to how they may or may not do business from the government that affects a company's stock prices?

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

mts6175 said:

---

That_Guy_Moose said:

---

I'm sure all of those 64,000 jobs in Ohio are VERY appreciative of our president meddling in private business.

---

Maybe they should have thought about that before including him (MAGA) in their policy.....

---

Or maybe Don should stop being a hypersensitive poon and realize that not everyone is going to think the way he does. And that private businesses can set policies as they see fit and shouldn't expect retribution from the government.

But that leads me back to the hypersensitive poon part...

---

Goodyear got Repubcanceled.

Expect more to come. We can play by your rules, too.

Back the police. If you don't, we will absolutely call your ass on it. Sounds like fun?

Are you really going to accuse us of hypersensitivity? Glass houses and all?

---

I'll accuse the president of it because he cannot let it go and is so insecure he cannot STAND the fact that someone might not like him. Pretty pathetic if you ask me, but if that's the light you'd like to be painted in, good luck, snowflake.

---

Who said anything about Trump?

I'm glad he agrees with me on this, it's nice to have someone in charge that understands your views, but my opinion on Goodyear has nothing to do with Trump.

---

I accused the president of hypersensitivity. You equated it to "us".

---

Do you believe we should defund the police? Is law and order an idea that is central to the American dream? Maybe this is a topic that I, personally, am also "hypersensitive" of. Your take?

---

I don't think we should defund the police. I also think that the president should stay out of the policies set by private businesses. And let's be honest...no one would know anything about this is it wasn't on Twitter. Seems like Trump should have more to do with his time than to cruise Twitter all day.

goodyear should have just said : we make tires, and we dont care about anything else but tires.

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

lamivudine said:

---

someone is triggered.

---

Nah, I just find it hilarious that the party of small government if OK with any reaction and intervention by the president in regard to a company's internal policy, as long as it "gets them libtards" and sells more bull**** hats.

GooooooooooooooooooooTEAM!

---

Except it isn't government intervention because he's not using any government resources. It's no different than any business leader or celebrity casing for a boycott.

---

He's the president, ergo, he's the government.

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

mts6175 said:

---

That_Guy_Moose said:

---

I'm sure all of those 64,000 jobs in Ohio are VERY appreciative of our president meddling in private business.

---

Maybe they should have thought about that before including him (MAGA) in their policy.....

---

Or maybe Don should stop being a hypersensitive poon and realize that not everyone is going to think the way he does. And that private businesses can set policies as they see fit and shouldn't expect retribution from the government.

But that leads me back to the hypersensitive poon part...

---

Goodyear got Repubcanceled.

Expect more to come. We can play by your rules, too.

Back the police. If you don't, we will absolutely call your ass on it. Sounds like fun?

Are you really going to accuse us of hypersensitivity? Glass houses and all?

---

I'll accuse the president of it because he cannot let it go and is so insecure he cannot STAND the fact that someone might not like him. Pretty pathetic if you ask me, but if that's the light you'd like to be painted in, good luck, snowflake.

---

Who said anything about Trump?

I'm glad he agrees with me on this, it's nice to have someone in charge that understands your views, but my opinion on Goodyear has nothing to do with Trump.

---

I accused the president of hypersensitivity. You equated it to "us".

---

Do you believe we should defund the police? Is law and order an idea that is central to the American dream? Maybe this is a topic that I, personally, am also "hypersensitive" of. Your take?

---

I don't think we should defund the police. I also think that the president should stay out of the policies set by private businesses. And let's be honest...no one would know anything about this is it wasn't on Twitter. Seems like Trump should have more to do with his time than to cruise Twitter all day.

---

I want to vote for a president that thinks law and order is important.

I am 100% OK with a president that calls out a private company that tries to make BLM a non-political issue. It is.

BLM is a political issue. Do you agree?

I don't think he should call for a boycott but I do think it's fair game for the president to point out clear political bias being exerted at a presumably apolitical organization. Citizens can be made aware of instances where they are being manipulated or suppressed in the private sector.

Anonymous Source said:

---

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

lamivudine said:

---

someone is triggered.

---

Nah, I just find it hilarious that the party of small government if OK with any reaction and intervention by the president in regard to a company's internal policy, as long as it "gets them libtards" and sells more bull**** hats.

GooooooooooooooooooooTEAM!

---

Except it isn't government intervention because he's not using any government resources. It's no different than any business leader or celebrity casing for a boycott.

---

He's the president, ergo, he's the government.

---

No, that's not how it works. Even the president gets to function as a private citizen. He can call for a boycott, and people can choose to not listen, just as if anyone else did it. Implementing one using government mandates would be entirely different because there's no choice.

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

mts6175 said:

---

That_Guy_Moose said:

---

I'm sure all of those 64,000 jobs in Ohio are VERY appreciative of our president meddling in private business.

---

Maybe they should have thought about that before including him (MAGA) in their policy.....

---

Or maybe Don should stop being a hypersensitive poon and realize that not everyone is going to think the way he does. And that private businesses can set policies as they see fit and shouldn't expect retribution from the government.

But that leads me back to the hypersensitive poon part...

---

Goodyear got Repubcanceled.

Expect more to come. We can play by your rules, too.

Back the police. If you don't, we will absolutely call your ass on it. Sounds like fun?

Are you really going to accuse us of hypersensitivity? Glass houses and all?

---

I'll accuse the president of it because he cannot let it go and is so insecure he cannot STAND the fact that someone might not like him. Pretty pathetic if you ask me, but if that's the light you'd like to be painted in, good luck, snowflake.

---

Who said anything about Trump?

I'm glad he agrees with me on this, it's nice to have someone in charge that understands your views, but my opinion on Goodyear has nothing to do with Trump.

---

I accused the president of hypersensitivity. You equated it to "us".

---

Do you believe we should defund the police? Is law and order an idea that is central to the American dream? Maybe this is a topic that I, personally, am also "hypersensitive" of. Your take?

---

I don't think we should defund the police. I also think that the president should stay out of the policies set by private businesses. And let's be honest...no one would know anything about this is it wasn't on Twitter. Seems like Trump should have more to do with his time than to cruise Twitter all day.

---

I want to vote for a president that thinks law and order is important.

I am 100% OK with a president that calls out a private company that tries to make BLM a non-political issue. It is.

BLM is a political issue. Do you agree?

---

I do agree.
Unlike you, I am not OK with government telling people to boycott an American corporation because someone's 9th grade feelers got hurt. He didn't say a damn word about BLM or anything even remotely close to that. It was all about his ****ing hats.

Waaaaaaahhhhhh...they banned MAGA hats.

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

lamivudine said:

---

someone is triggered.

---

Nah, I just find it hilarious that the party of small government if OK with any reaction and intervention by the president in regard to a company's internal policy, as long as it "gets them libtards" and sells more bull**** hats.

GooooooooooooooooooooTEAM!

---

Except it isn't government intervention because he's not using any government resources. It's no different than any business leader or celebrity casing for a boycott.

---

He's the president, ergo, he's the government.

---

No, that's not how it works. Even the president gets to function as a private citizen. He can call for a boycott, and people can choose to not listen, just as if anyone else did it. Implementing one using government mandates would be entirely different because there's no choice.

---

All of his tweets come from the same account. How should the American public discern between President Don and just hanging out Don?

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

mts6175 said:

---

That_Guy_Moose said:

---

I'm sure all of those 64,000 jobs in Ohio are VERY appreciative of our president meddling in private business.

---

Maybe they should have thought about that before including him (MAGA) in their policy.....

---

Or maybe Don should stop being a hypersensitive poon and realize that not everyone is going to think the way he does. And that private businesses can set policies as they see fit and shouldn't expect retribution from the government.

But that leads me back to the hypersensitive poon part...

---

Goodyear got Repubcanceled.

Expect more to come. We can play by your rules, too.

Back the police. If you don't, we will absolutely call your ass on it. Sounds like fun?

Are you really going to accuse us of hypersensitivity? Glass houses and all?

---

I'll accuse the president of it because he cannot let it go and is so insecure he cannot STAND the fact that someone might not like him. Pretty pathetic if you ask me, but if that's the light you'd like to be painted in, good luck, snowflake.

---

Who said anything about Trump?

I'm glad he agrees with me on this, it's nice to have someone in charge that understands your views, but my opinion on Goodyear has nothing to do with Trump.

---

I accused the president of hypersensitivity. You equated it to "us".

---

Do you believe we should defund the police? Is law and order an idea that is central to the American dream? Maybe this is a topic that I, personally, am also "hypersensitive" of. Your take?

---

I don't think we should defund the police. I also think that the president should stay out of the policies set by private businesses. And let's be honest...no one would know anything about this is it wasn't on Twitter. Seems like Trump should have more to do with his time than to cruise Twitter all day.

---

I want to vote for a president that thinks law and order is important.

I am 100% OK with a president that calls out a private company that tries to make BLM a non-political issue. It is.

BLM is a political issue. Do you agree?

---

I do agree.
Unlike you, I am not OK with government telling people to boycott an American corporation because someone's 9th grade feelers got hurt.

---

Your take is wrong. He was elected because of his brash style of calling foul on the far left machine that has infected academia and corporate america. Goodyear condones BLM (group that calls for an end to the family unit) and will not condone the blue lives matter or all lives matter beliefs.

He is on point and you are a puppet of the far left...water is wet.

Anonymous Source said:

---

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

ABATTBQ11 said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

lamivudine said:

---

someone is triggered.

---

Nah, I just find it hilarious that the party of small government if OK with any reaction and intervention by the president in regard to a company's internal policy, as long as it "gets them libtards" and sells more bull**** hats.

GooooooooooooooooooooTEAM!

---

Except it isn't government intervention because he's not using any government resources. It's no different than any business leader or celebrity casing for a boycott.

---

He's the president, ergo, he's the government.

---

No, that's not how it works. Even the president gets to function as a private citizen. He can call for a boycott, and people can choose to not listen, just as if anyone else did it. Implementing one using government mandates would be entirely different because there's no choice.

---

All of his tweets come from the same account. How should the American public discern between President Don and just hanging out Don?

---

Not only that, this defeats the argument of presidential immunity. If he's a private citizen he can appear in court as one.

John_Cocktolstoy said:

---

That_Guy_Moose said:

---

who?mikejones said:

---

I dont disagree but trump is (or should be) secondary to the main conversation.

This is what trump does. Im not sure why anyone takes anything he tweets too seriously. Havent we learned by now his tweets dont mean much?

---

Well that's the thing. This time it's costing people a lot of money, and money talks.

Their stock may bounce back tomorrow but for the time being it's a really bad look.

---

Literally the only people who agree with the horrendous logic you're utilizing are the same morons who already vote like you do.

---

Ah the classic "I can't really argue against your position so I'm just going to sling out insults" tactic.

Anonymous Source said:

---

I do agree.
Unlike you, I am not OK with government telling people to boycott an American corporation because someone's 9th grade feelers got hurt.

Waaaaaaahhhhhh...they banned MAGA hats.

---

I am perfectly OK with the POTUS calling out a company that says that BLM is so mainstream that it is not even a political issue anymore, but that "Back the Blue" is so political that it shouldn't be expressed at work.

The POTUS is a politician, BTW.

shhopkins said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

mts6175 said:

---

That_Guy_Moose said:

---

I'm sure all of those 64,000 jobs in Ohio are VERY appreciative of our president meddling in private business.

---

Maybe they should have thought about that before including him (MAGA) in their policy.....

---

Or maybe Don should stop being a hypersensitive poon and realize that not everyone is going to think the way he does. And that private businesses can set policies as they see fit and shouldn't expect retribution from the government.

But that leads me back to the hypersensitive poon part...

---

Goodyear got Repubcanceled.

Expect more to come. We can play by your rules, too.

Back the police. If you don't, we will absolutely call your ass on it. Sounds like fun?

Are you really going to accuse us of hypersensitivity? Glass houses and all?

---

I'll accuse the president of it because he cannot let it go and is so insecure he cannot STAND the fact that someone might not like him. Pretty pathetic if you ask me, but if that's the light you'd like to be painted in, good luck, snowflake.

---

Who said anything about Trump?

I'm glad he agrees with me on this, it's nice to have someone in charge that understands your views, but my opinion on Goodyear has nothing to do with Trump.

---

I accused the president of hypersensitivity. You equated it to "us".

---

Do you believe we should defund the police? Is law and order an idea that is central to the American dream? Maybe this is a topic that I, personally, am also "hypersensitive" of. Your take?

---

I don't think we should defund the police. I also think that the president should stay out of the policies set by private businesses. And let's be honest...no one would know anything about this is it wasn't on Twitter. Seems like Trump should have more to do with his time than to cruise Twitter all day.

---

I want to vote for a president that thinks law and order is important.

I am 100% OK with a president that calls out a private company that tries to make BLM a non-political issue. It is.

BLM is a political issue. Do you agree?

---

I do agree.
Unlike you, I am not OK with government telling people to boycott an American corporation because someone's 9th grade feelers got hurt.

---

Your take is wrong. He was elected because of his brash style of calling foul on the far left machine that has infected academia and corporate america. Goodyear condones BLM (group that calls for an end to the family unit) and will not condone the blue lives matter or all lives matter beliefs.

He is on point and you are a puppet of the far left...water is wet.

---

Sorry man. I've never voted D a day in my life.
And if he was upset about their alleged support of BLM, he should have said it. Instead, he's whining about hats.

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

I do agree.
Unlike you, I am not OK with government telling people to boycott an American corporation because someone's 9th grade feelers got hurt.

Waaaaaaahhhhhh...they banned MAGA hats.

---

I am perfectly OK with the POTUS calling out a company that says that BLM is so mainstream that it is not even a political issue anymore, but that "Back the Blue" is so political that it shouldn't be expressed at work.

The POTUS is a politician, BTW.

---

Show me in the tweet where he calls them out for that.
"They've thrown their support behind BLM."
They've come right out and said 'Don't Back The Blue'"

Nope. Hats.

Foamcows said:

---

goodyear should have just said : we make tires, and we dont care about anything else but tires.

---

I wish they would have said that before putting their name on those unbelievably bad wiper blades that I bought several years ago. Mine were so bad that I actually did an internet search for "counterfeit Goodyear wipers".

Just heard the audio on the radio from that training session. Goodyear screwed up.

Good year got caught.

If you read this board since July 4 there were many poster lamenting about how their companies have pushed for BLM-diversity training. They never outed the companies or the communications.

Anonymous Source said:

---

I do agree.
Unlike you, I am not OK with government telling people to boycott an American corporation because someone's 9th grade feelers got hurt. He didn't say a damn word about BLM or anything even remotely close to that. It was all about his ****ing hats.

Waaaaaaahhhhhh...they banned MAGA hats.

---

The message is consistent.

Do you agree with Goodyear's corporate policy that BLM shirts should be allowed, but MAGA shirts and Back the Blue shirts should not be allowed? Is that corporate policy worth criticism?

All I needed was a picture of Goodyear's policy to stop buying from them. I didn't need Trump to weigh in, nor do I care about his opinion on the matter, but I'm glad more people are aware due to it.

I have 4 vehicles at the moment including a drag race car and a 4x4 pickup, some with Goodyear tires. Goodyear is out of the running from here on out.

I don't do business with commies or people that support commies.


Edit: To be clear here, my point is that Trump isn't what caused this. If Goodyear loses money, it's their own damn fault taking on policies that don't sit right with at least half the nation. Blaming Trump for anything that happens is absurd. It's like blaming the pest guy who shone a flashlight on the termites eating your house, for the damage caused by termites eating away at your house. The pest guy didn't cause it, and blaming him isn't going to make the problem go away.

People can make their own decisions about what companies they support. Obviously the decisions that Goodyear HR made were already problematic, given the public reaction before he weighed in. To argue that Trump is the reason that their bottom line will be affected is ludicrous, but go ahead and keep blaming him for someone else's terrible double standard of a policy, it's the leftist way. Yeah, I'm sure all would be better for their stock and their employees if only Trump hadn't sent out a tweet. Spare me the tears.

I am shocked at the amount of far left wing libs that rise to high power positions in business and the military, it seems so counter intuitive. Business is about making products/services and making profits for owners/shareholders, the military is about enforcing order and when the time comes breaking things and killing people, neither of these should be about "feels". I am in my 40's but when I was in HS those positions were almost exclusively held by conservative type people. When my wife became a VP at a Fortune 100ish company after being a director of marketing for another company of similar size, I was amazed by all the left wingers she worked with, nowadays I just accept it and move on.

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

I do agree.
Unlike you, I am not OK with government telling people to boycott an American corporation because someone's 9th grade feelers got hurt. He didn't say a damn word about BLM or anything even remotely close to that. It was all about his ****ing hats.

Waaaaaaahhhhhh...they banned MAGA hats.

---

The message is consistent.

Do you agree with Goodyear's corporate policy that BLM shirts should be allowed, but MAGA shirts and Back the Blue shirts should not be allowed? Is that corporate policy worth criticism?

---

Where in the tweet does the talking about corporate policy start and the whining about banning hats stop?
No, the message is not consistent. There's always someone who has to come around behind him and say, "Well, what he meant to say was...." just like you are doing right now. No. I'm sorry. He's not attacking their corporate culture. The tweet that caused all the damage to Goodyear was *****ing about hats like a premenstrual teenage girl.

AnScAggie said:

---

I am shocked at the amount of far left wing libs that rise to high power positions in business and the military, it seems so counter intuitive. Business is about making products/services and making profits for owners/shareholders, the military is about enforcing order and when the time comes breaking things and killing people, neither of these should be about "feels". I am in my 40's but when I was in HS those positions were almost exclusively held by conservative type people. When my wife became a VP at a Fortune 100ish company after being a director of marketing for another company of similar size, I was amazed by all the left wingers she worked with, nowadays I just accept it and move on.

---

it's almost like the trope that the right is all about logic, while the left is all about "feels" is not correct.

These guys are absolute idiots. The marketing group all the way to the CEO should be sent packing.

Anonymous Source said:

---

Where in the tweet does the talking about corporate policy start and the whining about banning hats stop?
No, the message is not consistent. There's always someone who has to come around behind him and say, "Well, what he meant to say was...." just like you are doing right now. No. I'm sorry. He's not attacking their corporate culture. The tweet that caused all the damage to Goodyear was *****ing about hats like a premenstrual teenage girl.

---

I don't GAF about what Trump said in his tweet.

Do you believe that a corporate policy that says BLM is not political, and can be worn by employees, but Back the Blue is political, and can't be worn by employees, is OK? Do you think that this is a corporate policy worth criticism?

That_Guy_Moose said:

---

John_Cocktolstoy said:

---

That_Guy_Moose said:

---

who?mikejones said:

---

I dont disagree but trump is (or should be) secondary to the main conversation.

This is what trump does. Im not sure why anyone takes anything he tweets too seriously. Havent we learned by now his tweets dont mean much?

---

Well that's the thing. This time it's costing people a lot of money, and money talks.

Their stock may bounce back tomorrow but for the time being it's a really bad look.

---

Literally the only people who agree with the horrendous logic you're utilizing are the same morons who already vote like you do.

---

Ah the classic "I can't really argue against your position so I'm just going to sling out insults" tactic.

---

That's when you know they lost the argument. The insults come. More consistent than old faithful.

BusterAg said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

Where in the tweet does the talking about corporate policy start and the whining about banning hats stop?
No, the message is not consistent. There's always someone who has to come around behind him and say, "Well, what he meant to say was...." just like you are doing right now. No. I'm sorry. He's not attacking their corporate culture. The tweet that caused all the damage to Goodyear was *****ing about hats like a premenstrual teenage girl.

---

I don't GAF about what Trump said in his tweet.

Do you believe that a corporate policy that says BLM is not political, and can be worn by employees, but Back the Blue is political, and can't be worn by employees, is OK? Do you think that this is a corporate policy worth criticism?

---

I think corporations should publicly stay out of politics. I also think the president should stay out of corporate policy.

And you should GAF about the tweet. That's what set the whole thing in motion. I am 99.999% certain you would if Obama used a bully pulpit to call for a boycott of an American business, based on nothing other than feelings.