No but I know Keith, pretty nice guy.Bingo Bango Bongo said:MsDoubleD81 said:
What was your previous screen name?
KeithDB'sShineBoy
No but I know Keith, pretty nice guy.Bingo Bango Bongo said:MsDoubleD81 said:
What was your previous screen name?
KeithDB'sShineBoy
Wearamaskaggie said:
That's all cool and dandy, he's still getting charged for shooting and killing.
lamivudine said:
Keef is a ******.
"Give me an army of Aggies and I'll win a war. Give the other side an army of wearamaskaggies and I'll do it myself."Wearamaskaggie said:Plenty. One may not simply shot another because they feel "threatened". Just as I may not stab someone who merely punched me in the mouth.Beaux12 said:
Young one, do you have any concept of self defense?
Both men in the vehicle are already at home. Self-defense. And they will walk, even in Austin.Wearamaskaggie said:
That's all cool and dandy, he's still getting charged for shooting and killing.
There's a good amount of nuances when considering self-defense. I would be glad to talk about them via DM. Here would just be akin to pissing in the wind. But to answer your question, in that situation you may or may not be able to defend yourself give other circumstances in play.Beaux12 said:
So someone points a loaded rifle at you and you cannot defend yourself?
We shall see.aggierogue said:Both men in the vehicle are already at home. Self-defense. And they will walk, even in Austin.Wearamaskaggie said:
That's all cool and dandy, he's still getting charged for shooting and killing.
Absent something crazy, the driver will not be convicted. Period. This is still Texas.Wearamaskaggie said:There's a good amount of nuances when considering self-defense. I would be glad to talk about them via DM. Here would just be akin to pissing in the wind. But to answer your question, in that situation you may or may not be able to defend yourself give other circumstances in play.Beaux12 said:
So someone points a loaded rifle at you and you cannot defend yourself?
I'm a great shot man! We would have won 'Nam if we had an army of studs like me.AgStuckinLBK said:"Give me an army of Aggies and I'll win a war. Give the other side an army of wearamaskaggies and I'll do it myself."Wearamaskaggie said:Plenty. One may not simply shot another because they feel "threatened". Just as I may not stab someone who merely punched me in the mouth.Beaux12 said:
Young one, do you have any concept of self defense?
- General George Patton.
Wearamaskaggie said:There's a good amount of nuances when considering self-defense. I would be glad to talk about them via DM. Here would just be akin to pissing in the wind. But to answer your question, in that situation you may or may not be able to defend yourself give other circumstances in play.Beaux12 said:
So someone points a loaded rifle at you and you cannot defend yourself?
We shall see.The_Fox said:Absent something crazy, the driver will not be convicted. Period. This is still Texas.Wearamaskaggie said:There's a good amount of nuances when considering self-defense. I would be glad to talk about them via DM. Here would just be akin to pissing in the wind. But to answer your question, in that situation you may or may not be able to defend yourself give other circumstances in play.Beaux12 said:
So someone points a loaded rifle at you and you cannot defend yourself?
Wearamaskaggie said:There's a good amount of nuances when considering self-defense. I would be glad to talk about them via DM. Here would just be akin to pissing in the wind. But to answer your question, in that situation you may or may not be able to defend yourself give other circumstances in play.Beaux12 said:
So someone points a loaded rifle at you and you cannot defend yourself?
We shall see.Bingo Bango Bongo said:Wearamaskaggie said:There's a good amount of nuances when considering self-defense. I would be glad to talk about them via DM. Here would just be akin to pissing in the wind. But to answer your question, in that situation you may or may not be able to defend yourself give other circumstances in play.Beaux12 said:
So someone points a loaded rifle at you and you cannot defend yourself?
In THIS case, the motorist wont be spending any more nights in jail for this. Ever.
Just giving my opinion. This is kind of my area of expertise.Wearamaskaggie said:We shall see.The_Fox said:Absent something crazy, the driver will not be convicted. Period. This is still Texas.Wearamaskaggie said:There's a good amount of nuances when considering self-defense. I would be glad to talk about them via DM. Here would just be akin to pissing in the wind. But to answer your question, in that situation you may or may not be able to defend yourself give other circumstances in play.Beaux12 said:
So someone points a loaded rifle at you and you cannot defend yourself?
I got an A- in crim law, give me some credit big dawg.Rockdoc said:Wearamaskaggie said:There's a good amount of nuances when considering self-defense. I would be glad to talk about them via DM. Here would just be akin to pissing in the wind. But to answer your question, in that situation you may or may not be able to defend yourself give other circumstances in play.Beaux12 said:
So someone points a loaded rifle at you and you cannot defend yourself?
Well there's proof you have no idea what you're talking.
Wearamaskaggie said:I got an A- in crim law, give me some credit big dawg.Rockdoc said:Wearamaskaggie said:There's a good amount of nuances when considering self-defense. I would be glad to talk about them via DM. Here would just be akin to pissing in the wind. But to answer your question, in that situation you may or may not be able to defend yourself give other circumstances in play.Beaux12 said:
So someone points a loaded rifle at you and you cannot defend yourself?
Well there's proof you have no idea what you're talking.
Of course, not saying you're wrong. That very well could be the case. But it is still relatively early to be saying anything definitively.The_Fox said:Just giving my opinion. This is kind of my area of expertise.Wearamaskaggie said:We shall see.The_Fox said:Absent something crazy, the driver will not be convicted. Period. This is still Texas.Wearamaskaggie said:There's a good amount of nuances when considering self-defense. I would be glad to talk about them via DM. Here would just be akin to pissing in the wind. But to answer your question, in that situation you may or may not be able to defend yourself give other circumstances in play.Beaux12 said:
So someone points a loaded rifle at you and you cannot defend yourself?
Idiots like me I suppose.Rockdoc said:Wearamaskaggie said:I got an A- in crim law, give me some credit big dawg.Rockdoc said:Wearamaskaggie said:There's a good amount of nuances when considering self-defense. I would be glad to talk about them via DM. Here would just be akin to pissing in the wind. But to answer your question, in that situation you may or may not be able to defend yourself give other circumstances in play.Beaux12 said:
So someone points a loaded rifle at you and you cannot defend yourself?
Well there's proof you have no idea what you're talking.
Who doesn't get an A in that?
I don't understand your reference but sure. If I'm wrong I will stop posting on this forum, if you're wrong you'll stop posting in this forum.Bingo Bango Bongo said:
I'd offer to bet, but I sense your betting sense is similar to Fosters and I'd feel really bad about taking money from the less fortunate
Wearamaskaggie said:Of course, not saying you're wrong. That very well could be the case. But it is still relatively early to be saying anything definitively.The_Fox said:Just giving my opinion. This is kind of my area of expertise.Wearamaskaggie said:We shall see.The_Fox said:Absent something crazy, the driver will not be convicted. Period. This is still Texas.Wearamaskaggie said:There's a good amount of nuances when considering self-defense. I would be glad to talk about them via DM. Here would just be akin to pissing in the wind. But to answer your question, in that situation you may or may not be able to defend yourself give other circumstances in play.Beaux12 said:
So someone points a loaded rifle at you and you cannot defend yourself?
Wearamaskaggie said:
That's all cool and dandy, he's still getting charged for shooting and killing.
Whoa! You are betting that the driver gets convicted? Don't take that bet. That is a suckers bet with the facts we have right now.Wearamaskaggie said:I don't understand your reference but sure. If I'm wrong I will stop posting on this forum, if you're wrong you'll stop posting in this forum.Bingo Bango Bongo said:
I'd offer to bet, but I sense your betting sense is similar to Fosters and I'd feel really bad about taking money from the less fortunate
Not so cut and dry. There are still other options one must take before simply firing their gun to defend themselves.Bobby Petrino`s Neckbrace said:
Yes, actually, any person who is LTC can discharge his weapon in public once he feels his life or safety is threatened.
Very true.HoustonAg2106 said:Wearamaskaggie said:Of course, not saying you're wrong. That very well could be the case. But it is still relatively early to be saying anything definitively.The_Fox said:Just giving my opinion. This is kind of my area of expertise.Wearamaskaggie said:We shall see.The_Fox said:Absent something crazy, the driver will not be convicted. Period. This is still Texas.Wearamaskaggie said:There's a good amount of nuances when considering self-defense. I would be glad to talk about them via DM. Here would just be akin to pissing in the wind. But to answer your question, in that situation you may or may not be able to defend yourself give other circumstances in play.Beaux12 said:
So someone points a loaded rifle at you and you cannot defend yourself?
"That's all cool and dandy, he's still getting charged for shooting and killing."
Take your own advice big dog
Wearamaskaggie said:Not so cut and dry. There are still other options one must take before simply firing their gun to defend themselves.Bobby Petrino`s Neckbrace said:
Yes, actually, any person who is LTC can discharge his weapon in public once he feels his life or safety is threatened.
I'll let it ride. I think it'll be an interesting case to follow.The_Fox said:Whoa! You are betting that the driver gets convicted? Don't take that bet. That is a suckers bet with the facts we have right now.Wearamaskaggie said:I don't understand your reference but sure. If I'm wrong I will stop posting on this forum, if you're wrong you'll stop posting in this forum.Bingo Bango Bongo said:
I'd offer to bet, but I sense your betting sense is similar to Fosters and I'd feel really bad about taking money from the less fortunate
Wearamaskaggie said:I don't understand your reference but sure. If I'm wrong I will stop posting on this forum, if you're wrong you'll stop posting in this forum.Bingo Bango Bongo said:
I'd offer to bet, but I sense your betting sense is similar to Fosters and I'd feel really bad about taking money from the less fortunate
Wearamaskaggie said:Not so cut and dry. There are still other options one must take before simply firing their gun to defend themselves.Bobby Petrino`s Neckbrace said:
Yes, actually, any person who is LTC can discharge his weapon in public once he feels his life or safety is threatened.