Also maybe a question for separate thread and there are a lot of assumptions built into this question butQuote:
I don't want to see the world burn but I wish we could get on with this and just get it over with.
tysker said:Also maybe a question for separate thread and there are a lot of assumptions built into this question butQuote:
I don't want to see the world burn but I wish we could get on with this and just get it over with.
How many of us would be a willing infected right now and get it over with? Kinda like a chicken pox party...
Just book a cruise, essentially the same thing.tysker said:Also maybe a question for separate thread and there are a lot of assumptions built into this question butQuote:
I don't want to see the world burn but I wish we could get on with this and just get it over with.
How many of us would be a willing infected right now and get it over with? Kinda like a chicken pox party...
What about the testicular swelling that comes with it as a side effect?IrishTxAggie said:tysker said:Also maybe a question for separate thread and there are a lot of assumptions built into this question butQuote:
I don't want to see the world burn but I wish we could get on with this and just get it over with.
How many of us would be a willing infected right now and get it over with? Kinda like a chicken pox party...
Yes. I'm a 32 y/o nonsmoker with zero underlying health conditions. I've had hangovers last longer than this would lay me up.
Yes.aginlakeway said:So are all of your posts doom and gloom? Just curious ...cone said:
today feels like a major major escalation
they must be seeing an iceberg somewhere
IrishTxAggie said:tysker said:Also maybe a question for separate thread and there are a lot of assumptions built into this question butQuote:
I don't want to see the world burn but I wish we could get on with this and just get it over with.
How many of us would be a willing infected right now and get it over with? Kinda like a chicken pox party...
Yes. I'm a 32 y/o nonsmoker with zero underlying health conditions. I've had hangovers last longer than this would lay me up.
FriscoKid said:What about the testicular swelling that comes with it as a side effect?IrishTxAggie said:tysker said:Also maybe a question for separate thread and there are a lot of assumptions built into this question butQuote:
I don't want to see the world burn but I wish we could get on with this and just get it over with.
How many of us would be a willing infected right now and get it over with? Kinda like a chicken pox party...
Yes. I'm a 32 y/o nonsmoker with zero underlying health conditions. I've had hangovers last longer than this would lay me up.
They are, same for about 75% of the regulars on this thread, and 100% of those who never posted before on F16, but now live on this thread.aginlakeway said:So are all of your posts doom and gloom? Just curious ...cone said:
today feels like a major major escalation
they must be seeing an iceberg somewhere
Or the two to six week hospital vacay with free tubes stuck into your lungs.FriscoKid said:What about the testicular swelling that comes with it as a side effect?IrishTxAggie said:tysker said:Also maybe a question for separate thread and there are a lot of assumptions built into this question butQuote:
I don't want to see the world burn but I wish we could get on with this and just get it over with.
How many of us would be a willing infected right now and get it over with? Kinda like a chicken pox party...
Yes. I'm a 32 y/o nonsmoker with zero underlying health conditions. I've had hangovers last longer than this would lay me up.
tysker said:That's not what I'm saying at all. For example if 100,000 people are going to die from this anyways, is a prolonged recession caused by lengthening the infection time-frame (flattening the curve so as to keep the health care facilities functional) to ultimately save 10,000 lives worth it? Its basically a different version of the trolley problem.Proposition Joe said:tysker said:You're selfishness is noted and, imo, commendable. I'm simply trying to ask questions and be open and honest about my desire to protect my family, friends and community. You do you and I'll do me.MetoliusAg said:I'm a retiree, and 95% of my best friends, siblings, cousins, in-laws, and favorite hunting & fishing buddies are in the age range of 60 to 90 (including many Trumper friends who I love dearly). So I too am glad you are not the one making these decisions.tysker said:Reducing the spread and the peak is fine but if we have a long-flat peak (upside down U) versus a short high-peak (upside down V), is that really worth it in the long run? Especially if estimates are that 60-70% of the population is going to get it anyways? Should we suffer now greatly now and get is over with or suffer less but more slowly over time? Again I'm glad I don't have to make these decisions.k2aggie07 said:No. The desired effect is to reduce the spread, to reduce the peak. This saves more lives in the long run by affording better care to those who are inevitably going to get it and who are at higher risk.Quote:
We get it. The desired effect is to keep a segment of society alive longer to eventually die of the same disease anyways. By delaying the inevitable we'll hopefully save lives of the other unhealthy people that also need medical care. The reason the government and media aren't relaying the message is that it sucks and sounds like a form of rationing.
It also prevents the rationing that will a matter of fact if the number of cases exceeds capacity.
And by rationing I would also consider it to include time, money and general happiness. From the outside, the young and healthy appear to be taking the brunt of the effort, lifestyle change and monetary loss.
So deaths of people in their 60-90s would be considered OK if it meant the younger generation didn't take a lifestyle hit?
I mean, don't get me wrong... Things would suck if we go into a big depression... But you'd still be alive.
Businesses, conferences, schools etc arent being stopped because of true fear of outbreak but instead for possible liability reasons. But what's the end-game and when is will it be "safe" to go back?
It may be cold to admit, but at this point there's no end to the spread and deaths will continue mount. Now its just managing the hospital beds until a vaccine is available or we develop a natural immunity. Saving the marginal person's life seems to be ultimate point of cancellations, isolation tactics and quarantines, not actually saving people from CoronaVirus.
Quote:
A Florida couple onboard a cruise ship stricken with the coronavirus has filed a $1m lawsuit against the boat's operator, Princess Cruises, for failing to protect passengers amid the global Covid-19 outbreak. The lawsuit filed this week by Ronald and Eva Weissberger in a federal court in Los Angeles reads:Quote:
As a result of [Princess Cruises'] lackadaisical approach to the safety of the plaintiffs, its passengers and crew about the Grand Princess, plaintiffs are at actual risk of immediate physical injury.
Thanks. The numbers really help put things in perspective.lead said:
---New deaths over the last 8 days in chronological order----
China: 38, 31, 30, 28, 27, 23, 17, 22. Total China deaths at 3162. China topped out at around 150 daily deaths.
Not China: 48, 53, 69, 78, 71, 202, 186, 258. Total 1130.
US: 4, 3, 1, 1, 0, 0, 8, 6. Total 25 (WHO numbers).
New Italy deaths: 28, 27, 41, 49, 37, 132, 97, 168. Total 631.
Cruise lines are always being sued for one thing or another. Somebody trips and falls, or has a bad experience, or an accident happens, they get sued. Happens all the time.Shanked Punt said:
And here comes the lawsuits....the cruise industry is in a wee bit of trouble.
From The Guardian...Quote:
A Florida couple onboard a cruise ship stricken with the coronavirus has filed a $1m lawsuit against the boat's operator, Princess Cruises, for failing to protect passengers amid the global Covid-19 outbreak. The lawsuit filed this week by Ronald and Eva Weissberger in a federal court in Los Angeles reads:Quote:
As a result of [Princess Cruises'] lackadaisical approach to the safety of the plaintiffs, its passengers and crew about the Grand Princess, plaintiffs are at actual risk of immediate physical injury.
$1 million seems small. Also could this 'pandemic' be considered an Act of God?Shanked Punt said:
And here comes the lawsuits....the cruise industry is in a wee bit of trouble.
From The Guardian...Quote:
A Florida couple onboard a cruise ship stricken with the coronavirus has filed a $1m lawsuit against the boat's operator, Princess Cruises, for failing to protect passengers amid the global Covid-19 outbreak. The lawsuit filed this week by Ronald and Eva Weissberger in a federal court in Los Angeles reads:Quote:
As a result of [Princess Cruises'] lackadaisical approach to the safety of the plaintiffs, its passengers and crew about the Grand Princess, plaintiffs are at actual risk of immediate physical injury.