to slow the spread you need testing, hygiene, and government mitigation
and older people need to shelter in place
and older people need to shelter in place
I honestly don't think we know at this moment, queso. I've found an obscure way via traffic monitoring to get a general idea of how things are going.queso1 said:
But we're not seeing a decrease over there? I've heard people were returning to work.
Quote:
Apple tells ALL its 12,000 staff at the Cupertino HQ to work from home with immediate effect - following Facebook and Microsoft edicts to its Bay Area staff
- Apple issued a memo to its employees based at the Santa Clara Valley headquarters Apple Park advising them to remain home Friday
- Offices will remain open but the 12,000 Cupertino staff were told to stay away
- Facebook has also told all San Fran workers to stay at home and cancel business trips on Friday
- Facebook already closed its Seattle office when a contractor there was infected
- The closure sees about 17,000 Facebook employees working from home
- Microsoft has also told San Francisco Bay and Seattle workers to stay at home
- The Seattle bases houses 54,000 employees, a third of its global staff
- The company is paying hourly workers even if they can't come into work
- An estimated 83,000 workers are affected between the three companies
This is what I'm afraid of. I think you have to hope you can slow the spread a bit so as to prevent hospitals from being overrun.Aggie Pharmer said:
FWIW, my wife has a friend that works for a large university hospital system in Germany. From what I've been privy to, they have pretty much given up hope on controlling spread. They think it's going to infect 80-90% of the population. They are hoping that the majority of cases will be mild and that the spread is slow enough so that the serious cases won't overwhelm the number of ICU beds.
Great question. I couldn't find a good apples-to-apples but here is some ok data:tysker said:But its the same with adults in their office and cubicle and their car. Its just they (supposedly) wash their hands and even that's is mostly due to social pressure. I would argue, at any given time a schools cafeteria isn't that much more germy than your office's break-room.KidDoc said:Because it will be spread by kids like wildfire because they are germy little beings. They do not cover coughs. They do not wash hands. They chew on their fingers and pick their noses all day long.tysker said:Considering that it seems to be less harmful to children, does it really make sense to close schools for extended periods? Maybe close for few days for a deep cleaning and make arrangements for workers over say 50 yrs old. Or is the logic that young people cant be trusted to not touch one another and generally be hygienic? Closing schools already puts pressure on other sectors and services and may even put those others areas at risk.Quote:
From the available data this seems to be harmless in kids. I'm sure plenty of Chinese kids with asthma caught it but it still seems like it is a bunch of nothing in the young.
Basically I'm wondering are schools, especially colleges where people are supposedly smart and informed, don't seem like they're that much prone to spreading this disease than church services, the gym or the grocery store.
The purpose of shutting schools is to stop the little germ machines from spreading it to everyone in a 10 foot radius all day long.
PJYoung said:AgsMyDude said:
These charts look interesting. Where are you getting them?
https://covid2019.app/
Tbs2003 said:This is what I'm afraid of. I think you have to hope you can slow the spread a bit so as to prevent hospitals from being overrun.Aggie Pharmer said:
FWIW, my wife has a friend that works for a large university hospital system in Germany. From what I've been privy to, they have pretty much given up hope on controlling spread. They think it's going to infect 80-90% of the population. They are hoping that the majority of cases will be mild and that the spread is slow enough so that the serious cases won't overwhelm the number of ICU beds.
ttu_85 said:Spoken like a true believer of the Third ReichFbgTxAg said:
Aside from the disastrous economic impact of the "pandemonium," someone convince me this virus is bad for humanity.
It's highly contagious, but only deadly to the oldest and weakest/sickest humans on the planet, who actually cost us the most in medical resources to keep alive anyway.
My inner-Darwinist thinks this thing is a net positive.
Prove me wrong!!
It is leveling off over there I believe. Mass quarantine efforts, everyone wearing masks, regular temperature checks, they are making everyone register where they go. You know... alot of authoritarian measures that will never happen here.queso1 said:
But we're not seeing a decrease over there? I've heard people were returning to work.
CrazyRichAggie said:inoffensive username said:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
I didn't see this posted before, but it's a great resource updated in real time.
Have you found a site you can export the data to an excel file?
A big difference between killing brain cells and killing the weakest sickest HUMAN beings and calling it a 'net positive'. Back peddle as fast as you can. Congrats on the worst post on this thread.FbgTxAg said:ttu_85 said:Spoken like a true believer of the Third ReichFbgTxAg said:
Aside from the disastrous economic impact of the "pandemonium," someone convince me this virus is bad for humanity.
It's highly contagious, but only deadly to the oldest and weakest/sickest humans on the planet, who actually cost us the most in medical resources to keep alive anyway.
My inner-Darwinist thinks this thing is a net positive.
Prove me wrong!!
Hahaha. Darwin was a Nazi?
This is the same belief system Cliff Klavin had about alcohol killing the weakest brain cells. Unlike Cliff, the concept of survival of the fittest has been around about as long as life itself.
CrazyRichAggie said:inoffensive username said:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
I didn't see this posted before, but it's a great resource updated in real time.
Have you found a site you can export the data to an excel file?
I understand. But, they also live completely different than us. There is very little social demand for personal space. You have thousands of people possibly living in one building. They are cramped together. Most people over there smoke and I would imagine the hygiene is not like ours.sawthemoffxx said:It is leveling off over there I believe. Mass quarantine efforts, everyone wearing masks, regular temperature checks, they are making everyone register where they go. You know... alot of authoritarian measures that will never happen here.queso1 said:
But we're not seeing a decrease over there? I've heard people were returning to work.
ttu_85 said:A big difference between killing brain cells and killing the weakest sickest HUMAN beings and calling it a 'net positive'. Back peddle as fast as you can. Congrats on the worst post on this thread.FbgTxAg said:ttu_85 said:Spoken like a true believer of the Third ReichFbgTxAg said:
Aside from the disastrous economic impact of the "pandemonium," someone convince me this virus is bad for humanity.
It's highly contagious, but only deadly to the oldest and weakest/sickest humans on the planet, who actually cost us the most in medical resources to keep alive anyway.
My inner-Darwinist thinks this thing is a net positive.
Prove me wrong!!
Hahaha. Darwin was a Nazi?
This is the same belief system Cliff Klavin had about alcohol killing the weakest brain cells. Unlike Cliff, the concept of survival of the fittest has been around about as long as life itself.
Well yea if you are referring Texas to China. New York, Chicago, Boston aren't all that different regarding population density and those are places where it's blowing up.queso1 said:I understand. But, they also live completely different than us. There is very little social demand for personal space. You have thousands of people possibly living in one building. They are cramped together. Most people over there smoke and I would imagine the hygiene is not like ours.sawthemoffxx said:It is leveling off over there I believe. Mass quarantine efforts, everyone wearing masks, regular temperature checks, they are making everyone register where they go. You know... alot of authoritarian measures that will never happen here.queso1 said:
But we're not seeing a decrease over there? I've heard people were returning to work.
sawthemoffxx said:Well yea if you are referring Texas to China. New York, Chicago, Boston aren't all that different regarding population density and those are places where it's blowing up.queso1 said:I understand. But, they also live completely different than us. There is very little social demand for personal space. You have thousands of people possibly living in one building. They are cramped together. Most people over there smoke and I would imagine the hygiene is not like ours.sawthemoffxx said:It is leveling off over there I believe. Mass quarantine efforts, everyone wearing masks, regular temperature checks, they are making everyone register where they go. You know... alot of authoritarian measures that will never happen here.queso1 said:
But we're not seeing a decrease over there? I've heard people were returning to work.
We may finally be thankfully our public transportation system here is crap.
Wow, you are right. It's worse. Gotta have that gov check even if others have to die. What the F* is wrong with people?IrishTxAggie said:ttu_85 said:A big difference between killing brain cells and killing the weakest sickest HUMAN beings and calling it a 'net positive'. Back peddle as fast as you can. Congrats on the worst post on this thread.FbgTxAg said:ttu_85 said:Spoken like a true believer of the Third ReichFbgTxAg said:
Aside from the disastrous economic impact of the "pandemonium," someone convince me this virus is bad for humanity.
It's highly contagious, but only deadly to the oldest and weakest/sickest humans on the planet, who actually cost us the most in medical resources to keep alive anyway.
My inner-Darwinist thinks this thing is a net positive.
Prove me wrong!!
Hahaha. Darwin was a Nazi?
This is the same belief system Cliff Klavin had about alcohol killing the weakest brain cells. Unlike Cliff, the concept of survival of the fittest has been around about as long as life itself.
Nah. There was someone that was openly jovial about the idea of this thinning the heard and giving them a chance at their SS check eventually.
Duplicate.IrishTxAggie said:ttu_85 said:A big difference between killing brain cells and killing the weakest sickest HUMAN beings and calling it a 'net positive'. Back peddle as fast as you can. Congrats on the worst post on this thread.FbgTxAg said:ttu_85 said:Spoken like a true believer of the Third ReichFbgTxAg said:
Aside from the disastrous economic impact of the "pandemonium," someone convince me this virus is bad for humanity.
It's highly contagious, but only deadly to the oldest and weakest/sickest humans on the planet, who actually cost us the most in medical resources to keep alive anyway.
My inner-Darwinist thinks this thing is a net positive.
Prove me wrong!!
Hahaha. Darwin was a Nazi?
This is the same belief system Cliff Klavin had about alcohol killing the weakest brain cells. Unlike Cliff, the concept of survival of the fittest has been around about as long as life itself.
Nah. There was someone that was openly jovial about the idea of this thinning the heard and giving them a chance at their SS check eventually.
Where did you see that?who?mikejones said:
Are they about to cancel sxsw in austin?
Press conference in 30 minutes
who?mikejones said:
Are they about to cancel sxsw in austin?
Press conference in 30 minutes
Bet!who?mikejones said:
Are they about to cancel sxsw in austin?
Press conference in 30 minutes
Since almost everyone has dropped out, there is almost no point in doing it.who?mikejones said:
Are they about to cancel sxsw in austin?
Press conference in 30 minutes
With the amount of international travel these companies would have....they have confirmed cases and know it.lunchbox said:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8082517/Microsoft-Facebook-embrace-home-working-amid-coronavirus-crisis.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailusQuote:
Apple tells ALL its 12,000 staff at the Cupertino HQ to work from home with immediate effect - following Facebook and Microsoft edicts to its Bay Area staff
- Apple issued a memo to its employees based at the Santa Clara Valley headquarters Apple Park advising them to remain home Friday
- Offices will remain open but the 12,000 Cupertino staff were told to stay away
- Facebook has also told all San Fran workers to stay at home and cancel business trips on Friday
- Facebook already closed its Seattle office when a contractor there was infected
- The closure sees about 17,000 Facebook employees working from home
- Microsoft has also told San Francisco Bay and Seattle workers to stay at home
- The Seattle bases houses 54,000 employees, a third of its global staff
- The company is paying hourly workers even if they can't come into work
- An estimated 83,000 workers are affected between the three companies
Yep, funny story. About 3 years ago I started running a low grade fever and just felt like poop. No other symptoms. Went to the Dr and they let it ride for a couple of weeks. Still running a low grade fever and feeling crappy about a month in I went to another Dr. They ran a panel of blood tests for all sorts of cancers, all negative. Another month of feeling like this I went to another Dr, and talked to his PA before he came in. She said, it sounds like you have mono. Run the test and sure enough I had mono at 45. By the way, mono sucks when you are old and I still don't feel like I did before it.Tbs2003 said:You don't have kids, do you? As noted above, kids are germ bombs. If one kid comes down with this, and goes to school before symptoms hit, I'd bet that a high percentage of kids in the school are going to end up with it.tysker said:Yes but do classrooms have a different transmission rate than your workplace, church, the grocery store, gyms, etc that are not closing? Closing schools and have many of those kids sent to an office with their parents or to be babysat by grandparents doesnt seem like a significantly 'better' solution especially if you're worried about the elderlyTbs2003 said:It really doesn't matter that the symptoms are mild among younger people. The problem we're trying to avoid is widespread infection, which will happen when it spreads throughout classrooms to parents and beyond. At that point, the elderly will be at risk whenever they go out to get groceries / meds / etc. If we can't stop the spread of the disease (which will likely require dramatic efforts given the apparent transmissibility of the virus), we're going to end up losing a good chunk of our senior population.tysker said:Considering that it seems to be less harmful to children, does it really make sense to close schools for extended periods? Maybe close for few days for a deep cleaning and make arrangements for workers over say 50 yrs old. Or is the logic that young people cant be trusted to not touch one another and generally be hygienic? Closing schools already puts pressure on other sectors and services and may even put those others areas at risk.Quote:
From the available data this seems to be harmless in kids. I'm sure plenty of Chinese kids with asthma caught it but it still seems like it is a bunch of nothing in the young.
Basically I'm wondering are schools, especially colleges where people are supposedly smart and informed, don't seem like they're that much prone to spreading this disease than church services, the gym or the grocery store.
I think there's probably a spectrum of risky places. Anywhere that you're standing / sitting right next to people for long periods of time (church, concerts, sporting events) is probably not the safest place to be. The more spread out people are, the less the risk. It's just common sense based on how they think this bug is spread.