This is the profile of a well designed Bio-weapon. It is important to take out the octogenarians and nonagenarians before starting a battle.japantiger said:
Deaths by age:
This is the profile of a well designed Bio-weapon. It is important to take out the octogenarians and nonagenarians before starting a battle.japantiger said:
Deaths by age:
VaultingChemist said:The virus kills 10 times as many healthy young people (0.2% vs 0.02%) as the regular flu. In addition, it requires hospitalization of about 10% of those infected.nortex97 said:
Outside of Petri dish settings (like urban china, cruise ship) it seems modern medicine and healthcare standards makes this just a tad worse than a regular flu outbreak.
goodAg80 said:This is the profile of a well designed Bio-weapon. It is important to take out the octogenarians and nonagenarians before starting a battle.japantiger said:
Deaths by age:
That is based on over 70,000 cases in China. However, there is not much difference so far in the cases outside of China.nortex97 said:VaultingChemist said:The virus kills 10 times as many healthy young people (0.2% vs 0.02%) as the regular flu. In addition, it requires hospitalization of about 10% of those infected.nortex97 said:
Outside of Petri dish settings (like urban china, cruise ship) it seems modern medicine and healthcare standards makes this just a tad worse than a regular flu outbreak.
I think a lot of that is based on the initial numbers and Chinese stats.
That looks roughly linear. 500 people in 32 days ~= 16 people per day. 437,500,000 days to infect everyone.PJYoung said:
Here is the chart outside of China but excluding the cruise ship in Japan:
JJMt said:Drilling into the data a bit deeper may relieve some of the concern. There were only 30 new cases outside China and the cruise ship yesterday, but that 30 includes the 14 in the U.S. that were flown in Sunday or Monday from the cruise ship (are those being double-counted - it's not clear.). Thus, if you exclude those 14, there were only 16 new cases outside China yesterday. S. Korea only had 1 new case, although Japan did have 8 new cases. Singapore also had 4 new cases.PJYoung said:
This includes the cruise ship passengers however with the new cases in S. Korea and Japan the trend is still very much up:
JJMt said:It is linear, although the average for the last 4 days has increased to ~25/day. That's too short a time frame to make any generalizations, though, and it also includes the 14 confirmed cases from the cruise ship that were transferred to the U.S. (thereby shifting them on the spread sheets from the Cruise Ship category to the U.S. category). Take them out and the last 4 day average drops back to 20.25/day, which is still an increase.goodAg80 said:That looks roughly linear. 500 people in 32 days ~= 16 people per day. 437,500,000 days to infect everyone.PJYoung said:
Here is the chart outside of China but excluding the cruise ship in Japan:
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countriesJJMt said:
Are those numbers from today, 2/19? Also, what's the source? Those numbers are definitely not good.
I used the wink emoji.JJMt said:It is linear, although the average for the last 4 days has increased to ~25/day. That's too short a time frame to make any generalizations, though, and it also includes the 14 confirmed cases from the cruise ship that were transferred to the U.S. (thereby shifting them on the spread sheets from the Cruise Ship category to the U.S. category). Take them out and the last 4 day average drops back to 20.25/day, which is still an increase.goodAg80 said:That looks roughly linear. 500 people in 32 days ~= 16 people per day. 437,500,000 days to infect everyone.PJYoung said:
Here is the chart outside of China but excluding the cruise ship in Japan:
onpaste.com since snaggy has been down. You crop it and then hit the i to auto upload to imgurl. Pretty slick.JJMt said:Thanks. How do you copy and paste charts like that here? They're not jpgs or other pics. I've tried but it doesn't work for me.PJYoung said:https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countriesJJMt said:
Are those numbers from today, 2/19? Also, what's the source? Those numbers are definitely not good.
JJMt said:
I'm confused (which is all too easy to do) - the Johns Hopkins site shows 472 confirmed cases outside of China on 2/18, excluding the cruise ship but including the 14. If you deduct the 14, that leaves only 458 confirmed cases, but your chart makes it look like there's exactly 500.
Odd that the number of cases in U.S. is still at 15.Quote:
More than "5,400 people had been asked to self-quarantine in California alone as of Feb. 14, according to the California Department of Public Health. Hundreds more are self-quarantining in Georgia, Washington state, Illinois, New York and other states."
VaultingChemist said:
This makes me feel safe.
Coronavirus Has U.S. Cities Stretching to Monitor Self-Quarantined AmericansOdd that the number of cases in U.S. is still at 15.Quote:
More than "5,400 people had been asked to self-quarantine in California alone as of Feb. 14, according to the California Department of Public Health. Hundreds more are self-quarantining in Georgia, Washington state, Illinois, New York and other states."
VaultingChemist said:
This makes me feel safe.
Coronavirus Has U.S. Cities Stretching to Monitor Self-Quarantined AmericansOdd that the number of cases in U.S. is still at 15.Quote:
More than "5,400 people had been asked to self-quarantine in California alone as of Feb. 14, according to the California Department of Public Health. Hundreds more are self-quarantining in Georgia, Washington state, Illinois, New York and other states."
Self-quarantine is because there is the possibility that they may have been exposed to the virus, but there is nothing to say they were, nor that they have it. Most likely traveled from China recently even if they were not in areas where the virus is active, it is better safe than sorry.VaultingChemist said:
This makes me feel safe.
Coronavirus Has U.S. Cities Stretching to Monitor Self-Quarantined AmericansOdd that the number of cases in U.S. is still at 15.Quote:
More than "5,400 people had been asked to self-quarantine in California alone as of Feb. 14, according to the California Department of Public Health. Hundreds more are self-quarantining in Georgia, Washington state, Illinois, New York and other states."
Civil.Savage said:
youtube blocked, can you bullet point any highlights?
Maybe it sticks around in some form after the initial symptoms wears off. What if something close to 100% of those infected over the age of 60 die over the next four decades or so? We could all be very screwed.Sasappis said:I am no expert, but if I was designing a bioweapon I would want it to be more severeVaultingChemist said:
Large study just released on 72,314 COVID-19 cases in China
Epidemiology Characteristics of COVID-19 Disease
Largest study to date, with a sample size of 72,314 cases.
81% of infections mild. 13.8% severe. 4.7% critical
Highest fatality rate is for people over 80, at 14.8%Quote:
There were no deaths among children aged up to 9, despite at least two cases of newborn babies infected through their mothers.
The team also found that up to age 39, the death rate remains low at 0.2%.
The fatality rate increases gradually with age. For people in their 40s, it is 0.4%, in their 50s it is 1.3%, in their 60s it is 3.6% and their 70s it is 8.0%.
And men are more likely to die (2.8 percent) than women (1.7 percent).
Should be renamed Logan's Run VirusQuote:
Kids are spared