Does anyone believe that this virus was intentionally released in attempt to calm the political tension taking place in Hong Kong?
joerobert_pete06 said:
Does anyone believe that this virus was intentionally released in attempt to calm the political tension taking place in Hong Kong?
I figured it would strike SA early on, in the US, what with how their city council fought so hard against CFA at the airport.law-apt-3g said:
Need to torch San Antonio, wahoo chicken virus is in Texas.
Where are you getting the trillion number?nortex97 said:
Now that we are getting more data on the spread and infection rates for areas outside of China (Japan, namely), I am getting very concerned, and will just buy some extra ammo and water/canned goods for now.
China will have soon spent over a trillion dollars in extreme measures/economic impact of their shut down to mitigate this; there is no way they are doing so unless it is quite deadly/R0 numbers are pretty bad.
So, who can give us a contrarian point of view to this? Just looking for two sides so I can decide what to buy at the store later today...JJMt said:
The numbers outside of China still refuse to reflect what seems to be going on inside China.
First, there are only 3 deaths total outside of China. Again, only 3!
Second, the rate of growth outside of China is stubbornly linear, not exponential, if that damn plague ship is taken out of the figures. For the last week, the rate of growth is about 15 people per day worldwide outside of China, and most of those new infections are from people who were in China.
Yeah, I'm concerned, as we all should be, but the numbers outside of China are significantly and strangely different from within China.
And I haven't taken a hard look at the numbers inside China, but a quick look seems to indicate that the numbers outside of Huwai province are dramatically different than within the province. It's not just the total numbers but also the rate of growth, death rate, etc.
They weren't hauling them off because they were sick. They weren't following quarantine orders.TexasAggie_02 said:so do the cops get hauled away too? they man handled these people with only a face mask on. No gloves, no special suits. Doesn't help to haul off sick people, if the people hauling them away are not protected. More likely this was something political or criminal in nature.Mr.Infectious said:
Singapore is in a much warmer climate, yet the rates of infection are similar to Hubei. It has a lot of severe cases already. The prime minister is unsure if it can be controlled.Quote:
And I haven't taken a hard look at the numbers inside China, but a quick look seems to indicate that the numbers outside of Hubei province are dramatically different than within the province. It's not just the total numbers but also the rate of growth, death rate, etc.
Quote:
Singapore
67 cases
0 deaths
6 critical, 17 recovered
kingj3 said:So, who can give us a contrarian point of view to this? Just looking for two sides so I can decide what to buy at the store later today...JJMt said:
The numbers outside of China still refuse to reflect what seems to be going on inside China.
First, there are only 3 deaths total outside of China. Again, only 3!
Second, the rate of growth outside of China is stubbornly linear, not exponential, if that damn plague ship is taken out of the figures. For the last week, the rate of growth is about 15 people per day worldwide outside of China, and most of those new infections are from people who were in China.
Yeah, I'm concerned, as we all should be, but the numbers outside of China are significantly and strangely different from within China.
And I haven't taken a hard look at the numbers inside China, but a quick look seems to indicate that the numbers outside of Huwai province are dramatically different than within the province. It's not just the total numbers but also the rate of growth, death rate, etc.
Thanks all, this thread is a great source of info so far.
claym711 said:
God it would suck to have been born into communism.
Quote:
While the metrics of public health might put the flu alongside or even ahead of the new coronavirus for sheer deadliness, the mind has its own ways of measuring danger.
Experts used to believe that people gauged risk like actuaries, parsing out cost-benefit analyses every time a merging car came too close or local crime rates spiked. But a wave of psychological experiments in the 1980s upended this thinking.
Researchers instead found that people use a set of mental shortcuts for measuring danger. And they tend to do it unconsciously, meaning that instinct can play a large role.
The coronavirus, which has created a wave of fear, may be a case in point.
"This hits all the hot buttons that lead to heightened risk perception," said Paul Slovic, a University of Oregon psychologist who helped pioneer modern risk psychology.
Whooping cough is around R16, polio around 6, and Smallpox is also around 6, but its R0 value comes from the time when the vaccination process was well underway. Estimates put its R0 value as high as 20 before there was a vaccine for it.Snap E Tom said:Unvaccinated mumps is like 10. Unvaccinated measles is like 16.scottimus said:On paper (TexAgs), you statement (post) makes sense, however one needs to ask if any other epidemic has ever seen such a value?Rapier108 said:
Actually, if one thinks about it, a transmission rate that high early on should not be a shock.
-No one trying to avoid anyone who is sick because it is assumed to be just a cold or the flu
-People who are sick continue with normal activities because again, it doesn't appear to be serious
-No one taking extra precautions such as following all the usual advice on how to reduce the transmission of respiratory viruses
-Extreme population density which results in large crowds such as at markets or other places that were often visited daily or even multiple times a day
-Poor hygiene and the previously discussed Chinese habit of spitting everywhere
-Common for large numbers of family to be living together, in close quarters
For any virus that is easily transmissible, be it a rhinovirus, norovirus, influenza virus, or any strain of the coronavirus, this is nothing but a pool of gasoline waiting for the match.
Before R0 Values=4,5,6 would have been considered ludicrous. Has there ever been an R0=8 recorded?
If not, then I would suggest this be shocking.
We've been hearing "next week" or "check back in a week" for almost a month now on the doomsday predictions.PJYoung said:kingj3 said:So, who can give us a contrarian point of view to this? Just looking for two sides so I can decide what to buy at the store later today...JJMt said:
The numbers outside of China still refuse to reflect what seems to be going on inside China.
First, there are only 3 deaths total outside of China. Again, only 3!
Second, the rate of growth outside of China is stubbornly linear, not exponential, if that damn plague ship is taken out of the figures. For the last week, the rate of growth is about 15 people per day worldwide outside of China, and most of those new infections are from people who were in China.
Yeah, I'm concerned, as we all should be, but the numbers outside of China are significantly and strangely different from within China.
And I haven't taken a hard look at the numbers inside China, but a quick look seems to indicate that the numbers outside of Huwai province are dramatically different than within the province. It's not just the total numbers but also the rate of growth, death rate, etc.
Thanks all, this thread is a great source of info so far.
Check back in a week - I think you will see at least 3 countries in the 100s, up from the 50s.
Quote:
so do the cops get hauled away too? they man handled these people with only a face mask on. No gloves, no special suits. Doesn't help to haul off sick people, if the people hauling them away are not protected. More likely this was something political or criminal in nature.
bmks270 said:Mr.Infectious said:
Some Americans think scenes like this couldn't happen on American soil. They're right only for as long as the citizens own fire arms.