KorbinDallas said:Civil.Savage said:
great report from unlikely source this morning, NPR, sharing audio from Wuhan.... Young woman complaining, her grandmother died of "pneumonia" very suddenly during original outbreak, Aunt, Mother and Father all now sick, only father diagnosed however.
Just more confirmation that the numbers are most likely off by a factor of 2-3.
No, but it is another piece of data.FriendlyAg said:KorbinDallas said:Civil.Savage said:
great report from unlikely source this morning, NPR, sharing audio from Wuhan.... Young woman complaining, her grandmother died of "pneumonia" very suddenly during original outbreak, Aunt, Mother and Father all now sick, only father diagnosed however.
Just more confirmation that the numbers are most likely off by a factor of 2-3.
How is that confirmation of any kind? Some may call this an insult, but you just read a personal story and then multiplied it by 2-3 over the number of known cases and called it fact to confirm your bias. Some woman saying that has zero data. Antidotal evidence shouldn't be treated as mathematical fact.
It is still hard to tell (due to China being so inscrutable) whether we have pandemic deniers or chicken littles. This thread is a petri dish of how people react to new threats.law-apt-3g said:
What we have here looks like some pandemic deniers
FriendlyAg said:KorbinDallas said:Civil.Savage said:
great report from unlikely source this morning, NPR, sharing audio from Wuhan.... Young woman complaining, her grandmother died of "pneumonia" very suddenly during original outbreak, Aunt, Mother and Father all now sick, only father diagnosed however.
Just more confirmation that the numbers are most likely off by a factor of 2-3.
How is that confirmation of any kind? Some may call this an insult, but you just read a personal story and then multiplied it by 2-3 over the number of known cases and called it fact to confirm your bias. Some woman saying that has zero data. Antidotal evidence shouldn't be treated as mathematical fact.
I like zerohedge but seriously the only thing that could make zerohedge more excited about a pandemic and global economic downturn directly due to a Chinese bio-weapon that was "accidentally" released would be if Tesla's autopilot was the primary cause of transmissiondaggertx said:
Zerohedge is suspect as well.
JJMt said:If that's accurate, we will be amazed at how quickly American industry rises to the challenge. At the start of WW 2, Henry Ford built the largest aircraft manufacturing facility in the world in less than a year, and the entire Pentagon was also. When we want to get stuff done, we get stuff done.Nuclear Scramjet said:
Apparently we get most of our raw feedstock for medicines from China. Even if this only devastates China, the affects here will be massive.
This is an opportunity for us to shine, not to dwell in morbid doom and gloom.
And, we also have alternative sources of pharmaceutical feedstocks, such as India. My guess is that, like the tariffs, other sources will rise quickly to fill the void left by China.
Don't be so damn doom and gloom.
Edit to add: those are only headlines. Do you actually check any of this negative stuff before you post it? And one of those headlines is about anti-depressants. We may actually be better off if that supply is cut off.
I plan on buying the drop. It has to be temporary in that the demand for the end products made in China shouldn't be changed that much by this.Big Al 1992 said:
For the O&G folks oil price is dropping. When your second largest customer doesn't need product for 30-days how will that affect everyone over here?
I would guess it's more related to the latter, although I would bet it also has something to do with the fact that there is much more travel between China and Europe/NA/Asia than there is with the other continents.Bobcat06 said:
Interesting perspective:
So far Asia, Europe and North America are on the board for Coronavirus medals.
However, Latin America, South America and Africa have yet to medal.
The 3rd world countries that would seem most susceptible to an epidemic dont have no reported cases.
Is that because they dont have any cases or they dont have the means to properly screen everyone?
Quote:
China has been reporting 6% GDP for years now and they can't sustain it.
The real story is that their economy has been on the downturn for a while now.
Brian asks, "Are they going to follow through on the deal? Is it enough make farmers in Iowa vote for Trump?"
He responded, "They have already made purchases and seem to fulfilling their side of the deal. If they don't fulfill their side of the deal, it is back to tariffs (trade war) to recoup the lost money..."
That's a hard sell, scaling percentages from a pool of 9 individuals to a pool of 11,000,000..VaultingChemist said:
One of 9 Belgians infected as compared to 3 of 200 Japanese evacuated earlier. If the population in Wuhan had similar infection rates, there should be about 165,000 to 1,200,000 infections in Wuhan (based on 11,000,000 population).
China has manufacturing in Mexico and investments in AfricaBowSowy said:I would guess it's more related to the latter, although I would bet it also has something to do with the fact that there is much more travel between China and Europe/NA/Asia than there is with the other continents.Bobcat06 said:
Interesting perspective:
So far Asia, Europe and North America are on the board for Coronavirus medals.
However, Latin America, South America and Africa have yet to medal.
The 3rd world countries that would seem most susceptible to an epidemic dont have no reported cases.
Is that because they dont have any cases or they dont have the means to properly screen everyone?
Bobcat06 said:
Interesting perspective:
So far Asia, Europe and North America are on the board for Coronavirus medals.
However, Latin America, South America and Africa have yet to medal.
The 3rd world countries that would seem most susceptible to an epidemic dont have no reported cases.
Is that because they dont have any cases or they dont have the means to properly screen everyone?
Do you have any other figures for infections outside of China's figures? Yes, it has a huge degree of uncertainty, especially since we don't have figures for those countries that evacuated their citizens with no infections. So 4 of 209+ would be about 210,000 infections.BowSowy said:That's a hard sell, scaling percentages from a pool of 9 individuals to a pool of 11,000,000..VaultingChemist said:
One of 9 Belgians infected as compared to 3 of 200 Japanese evacuated earlier. If the population in Wuhan had similar infection rates, there should be about 165,000 to 1,200,000 infections in Wuhan (based on 11,000,000 population).
Bobcat06 said:
Interesting perspective:
So far Asia, Europe and North America are on the board for Coronavirus medals.
However, Latin America, South America and Africa have yet to medal.
The 3rd world countries that would seem most susceptible to an epidemic dont have no reported cases.
Is that because they dont have any cases or they dont have the means to properly screen everyone?
Do you have a source for that first part? Not disputing it, just curious why that would be the case and how it would be evidenced.Nuclear Scramjet said:Africans apparently have an even greater resistance to this type of virus than whites do and African international travel is pretty sparse, it's not that surprising.Bobcat06 said:
Interesting perspective:
So far Asia, Europe and North America are on the board for Coronavirus medals.
However, Latin America, South America and Africa have yet to medal.
The 3rd world countries that would seem most susceptible to an epidemic dont have no reported cases.
Is that because they dont have any cases or they dont have the means to properly screen everyone?
Get it into a city like Lagos though, better watch out.
fifyYelnick McWawa said:Bobcat06 said:
Interesting perspective:
So far Asia, Europe and North America are on the board for Coronavirus medals.
However, Latin America, South America and Africa have yet to medal.
The 3rd world countries that would seem most susceptible to an epidemic dont have no reported cases.
Is that because they dont have any cases or they dont have the means to properly screen everyone?
I can't speak for Africa, but as far as Latin and South Americas are concerned, pos tienen Vicks guey. No the preocupes.