I think that's the point. The poster is using a Dem tactic.
***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****
987,404 Views |
9220 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by Pizza
The fact that the left is trying to pretend there is something wrong with this is mystifyingaggiehawg said:Congratulations! You have just made the most incredibly dumb statement in the history of the internet. I'll alert the Guinness World Record people on your behalf.Quote:
Sydney Powell is a defense attorney. Rudy Giuliani is the personal attorney of the man who oversees the DOJ.
And you claim you are a CPA? LOL.
ETA: Let me school you about being a person's attorney. You play both offense and defense. There is a reason that most successful Prosecutors become defense attorneys when in private practice. They fully understand the other side's mindset and tactics. Trump is being attacked, just not criminally but politically with lies and manufactured evidence. Rudy is representing his client's interests by refuting the media narrative.
aggiehawg said:Congratulations! You have just made the most incredibly dumb statement in the history of the internet. I'll alert the Guinness World Record people on your behalf.Quote:
Sydney Powell is a defense attorney. Rudy Giuliani is the personal attorney of the man who oversees the DOJ.
And you claim you are a CPA? LOL.
Under what authority are you so qualified to bestow such an award so I can put it on my certificate?
As a cogent being.Jimmy Valentine said:aggiehawg said:Congratulations! You have just made the most incredibly dumb statement in the history of the internet. I'll alert the Guinness World Record people on your behalf.Quote:
Sydney Powell is a defense attorney. Rudy Giuliani is the personal attorney of the man who oversees the DOJ.
And you claim you are a CPA? LOL.
Under what authority are you so qualified to bestow such an award so I can put it on my certificate?
Got itbackintexas2013 said:
I think that's the point. The poster is using a Dem tactic.
NM
Jimmy, call your shot. What happens to Trump before November 2020?
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
It is over....you just don't know it yetJimmy Valentine said:
Oh wow this changes everything! You're right, it's over!
Jimmy Valentine said:
Oh wow this changes everything! You're right, it's over!
It is over. Trump will win in 2020. I'd gladly wager you on that.
The House will impeach. Politically, they have to at this point.
In the Senate, I think it depends on if Trump is required to testify or not.
If he has to testify under oath, he will almost assuredly perjure himself. If he doesn't testify, he'll be acquitted, no doubt.
In the Senate, I think it depends on if Trump is required to testify or not.
If he has to testify under oath, he will almost assuredly perjure himself. If he doesn't testify, he'll be acquitted, no doubt.
Jimmy Valentine said:
The House will impeach. Politically, they have to at this point.
In the Senate, I think it depends on if Trump is required to testify or not.
If he has to testify under oath, he will almost assuredly perjure himself. If he doesn't testify, he'll be acquitted, no doubt.
And then he'll be reelected. Good job Democrats!!
Keep the dream aliveJimmy Valentine said:
The House will impeach. Politically, they have to at this point.
In the Senate, I think it depends on if Trump is required to testify or not.
If he has to testify under oath, he will almost assuredly perjure himself. If he doesn't testify, he'll be acquitted, no doubt.
Jimmy Valentine said:
The House will impeach. Politically, they have to at this point.
In the Senate, I think it depends on if Trump is required to testify or not.
If he has to testify under oath, he will almost assuredly perjure himself. If he doesn't testify, he'll be acquitted, no doubt.
Perjure himself how? On some process bull***** Or an actual substantive fact answer?
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
Jimmy going down with the ship. That works!
captkirk said:Keep the dream aliveJimmy Valentine said:
The House will impeach. Politically, they have to at this point.
In the Senate, I think it depends on if Trump is required to testify or not.
If he has to testify under oath, he will almost assuredly perjure himself. If he doesn't testify, he'll be acquitted, no doubt.
Quoted wrong one
“A republic, if you can keep it”
AggieKatie2 said:
ETX is honestly starting to scare me a bit as someone who may be trigger happy.
AggieKatie2 said:
ETX is honestly starting to scare me a bit as someone who may be trigger happy.
Jimmy Valentine said:
The House will impeach. Politically, they have to at this point.
In the Senate, I think it depends on if Trump is required to testify or not.
If he has to testify under oath, he will almost assuredly perjure himself. If he doesn't testify, he'll be acquitted, no doubt.
Why would he testify? Tell me legally what he would need to refute or what would compel him?
“A republic, if you can keep it”
AggieKatie2 said:
ETX is honestly starting to scare me a bit as someone who may be trigger happy.
AggieKatie2 said:
ETX is honestly starting to scare me a bit as someone who may be trigger happy.
Quote:
In Bob Woodward's book, Woodward describes how John Dowd made Trump sit for a mock interview to try to prove to the President that testifying for Mueller would be a terrible idea. Trump failed the test miserably, Woodward writes, and Dowd left convinced that the President could not survive Mueller's questioning without committing perjury. Dowd believed Trump was incapable of telling the truth.
In a shocking twist, Trump's lawyers later took a dramatic step and re-enacted the scene in front of Mueller. Dowd played the role of special counsel and posed questions to Jay Sekulow, who impersonated a combative Trump. Sekulow is still one of Trump's personal lawyers.
Dowd eventually advised Trump, "Don't testify. It's either that or an orange jump suit." Woodward reports that Dowd couldn't bring himself to tell Trump directly what he believed was true: "You're a ****ing liar."
Got 'eeeeem
If I was his lawyer, I'd strongly advise against it, but if he does choose to for whatever reason, I don't think it would go well for him.Deats said:Jimmy Valentine said:
The House will impeach. Politically, they have to at this point.
In the Senate, I think it depends on if Trump is required to testify or not.
If he has to testify under oath, he will almost assuredly perjure himself. If he doesn't testify, he'll be acquitted, no doubt.
Why would he testify? Tell me legally what he would need to refute or what would compel him?
Republicans have complained that they have not heard any first person knowledge from any on this situation. I can't think of anyone else but Trump who has the most first hand knowledge of what occurred.
Well if it's in Woodward's book....don't got him. Lol
Do you really think anyone actually believes the crap you post?
When this doesn't happen will you leave TexAgs and never post again?
Dowd refutes the story too. Woodward's reputation is pretty strong though. Who knows what's true. Either way, Dowd is a damn good lawyer who somehow convinced Mueller to only take written responses to Mueller's questions.Rockdoc said:
Well if it's in Woodward's book....don't got him. Lol
No, don't worry I'll keep postinghouag80 said:
When this doesn't happen will you leave TexAgs and never post again?
Jimmy Valentine said:Dowd refutes the story too. Woodward's reputation is pretty strong though. Who knows what's true. Either way, Dowd is a damn good lawyer who somehow convinced Mueller to only take written responses to Mueller's questions.Rockdoc said:
Well if it's in Woodward's book....don't got him. Lol
Yeah we like second hand and hearsay.
Democrats and the weak minded sure do.Rockdoc said:Jimmy Valentine said:Dowd refutes the story too. Woodward's reputation is pretty strong though. Who knows what's true. Either way, Dowd is a damn good lawyer who somehow convinced Mueller to only take written responses to Mueller's questions.Rockdoc said:
Well if it's in Woodward's book....don't got him. Lol
Yeah we like second hand and hearsay.
Thank you for the ban BTW. I enjoyed the time off.
What did you catch the ban for?
Being forceful in some of my comments to our favorite resident.
Glad to have you back!houag80 said:
Thank you for the ban BTW. I enjoyed the time off.
houag80 said:
Being forceful in some of my comments to our favorite resident.
Baller or jimmy?
I am cool with Baller.
houag80 said:
I am cool with Baller.
So jimmy got you banned? No ag tag? And no stars?
Funny isn't it?
Featured Stories
See All
13:00
9m ago
234
Key Matchups: No. 15 Texas A&M vs. New Mexico State
by Olin Buchanan
11:34
2h ago
1.1k
22:26
35m ago
876
SEC Mike comments on A&M's emergence under head man Mike Elko
by Billy Liucci
Ags host Buckeyes with an early-season Quad 1 opportunity at stake
by Olin Buchanan
ConfidentAg
Michigan to Offer 5 Star LSU QB Commit 8 Figure Deal
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
27