***** Official Houston Astros 2024-2025 Offseason Thread *****

405,072 Views | 4533 Replies | Last: 6 min ago by 07ag
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Paredes is still only 26, right? Probably hasn't had the opportunity to grow or develop those intangible skills that Bregman has. I'm not saying he will just that it's too soon to tell.
Jose Cruuuuuuuuuuuuz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Daddy-O5 said:

3B Paul 97 said:

txags92 said:

Bregman going to be playing in Japan next season?

Be on the lookout for Breggy Bomb wasabi!
Breggy Saki Bomb
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ttha_aggie_09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought Dusty was with San Fran?
SpaceCityAg05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't think baseball needs to have a salary cap compared to other spots, but ignoring challenges of collective bargaining for the moment, one thing that would immediately make baseball better would be if there max deals like the NBA - not necessarily in AAV, but in length.

Make it where at any given time, a player is eligible for a five year contract. Make it wear teams compete by throwing crazy salaries at guys if they so wish, but take away stupid 10 and 13 year contacts. And if a team and player want to renegotiate or extend said deal each year to push out further, they can. But at no time can you be under contract for more than 5 years out.

The length is what scares smart teams off more than the money. And the teams that do sign them always end up with albatrosses where the player is loathed by fans late in their careers.

Imagine how much different the offseason would look if Soto, Burnes, Bregman, Alonso, etc. were all eligible for five year max contracts and were simply competing to see who would offer the highest salary. The Mets could see if anyone would top a 5 year/$255 deal for Soto.

Honestly, I bet the players would end up happier in the long-run as well. They could still make a ton of money, but neither side is pinned down in a bad relationship for a decade.
All I do is Nguyen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This whole situation has to hurt Boras' reputation. Last offseason two of his clients had to wait a long time to sign albeit for fairly good offers but the market isn't showing that for Bergman.
No matter what!
Epstein didn't do, you know, the thing...
I'm the rare Astros/Cowboys/Spurs fan. We do exist
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggiEE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JDUB08AG said:

More players need to be humbled. I'm sorry it happened to him but it should happen more often.

Yep. Players need to realize that the market is a fickle beast. This is a major league with only a small number of teams in the running. It's very risky to just chase money while dicking around the team that gave you the original opportunity (and had a very good competitive deal on the table....for what? One more year?)

Don't feel bad for Bregman, he got paid generational money already. He was just trying to squeeze out every last dime and potentially hurt our moves this offseason. We had to move on.
Dekker_Lentz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Beat40 said:

I think they shouldn't have been surprised since you said not only did the Astros make one public offer, but came back with an improved offer.

They miscalculated with the Astros and have played everything else since then terribly. He's known Crane for years and for some reason thought he could bluff Crane or change his mind.

My opinion is he needs to sober up, face the reality of the situation, and accept the best offer from the best situation soon because I think it's going to get worse the longer he lets this draw out.

I honestly think he's getting something like 3/80-90, 4/110-120, or 5/125-150 contract at this point, which the 4 year deal being more likely.


They might have banked on more fan pressure to
resign Bregman. I think the leak of the 6/156 really dowsed any fan pressure as most everyone thinks that is a really fair deal.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wabs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If Altuve played in NY they wouldn't be debating whether he's a HOFer. The debate would be is he the best second baseman of all time.
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wabs said:

If Altuve played in NY they wouldn't be debating whether he's a HOFer. The debate would be is he the best second baseman of all time.


Would be the same story if he played for the f#^>ing Dodgers.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wabs said:

If Altuve played in NY they wouldn't be debating whether he's a HOFer. The debate would be is he the best second baseman of all time.
In the modern era it's a good argument. Since expansion it's a no brained. But over all? Hornsby and LaJoie were pretty decent in their era.

One of the things about Jose is he's made the absolute most of the glut of okay off games he's played in. There is also a good argument that he has been the greatest all around postseason performer of all time.
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I almost want him to have the record for most 4 hit games without a 5 hit game. That interaction between him and Pena was classic.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
yes, it's hard to believe now that Bregman turned down 6 years at $26 MM per

from any team
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://instagr.am/p/DEs1G3DyzDK
07ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
iamtheglove said:

Texaggie7nine said:

agproducer said:

I'd love if Crane did this:


I regularly tell Space City Sports on their social media channels that if they offered direct streaming, I and so many others would be happy to pay even upwards of $20 a month to get their channel directly. They could make so much more than what they get off their local sports fees to cable companies.


I worked in the RSN industry for most of my career. Streaming is still a net negative for most RSN unless it is priced significantly higher. Rangers are doing as a consequence of the Bally bankruptcy proceedings. Space City has one revenue advantage on the cable/satellite distribution side that virtually no other RSn has, though it will run its course several years down the line. Once that happens I would expect them to explore a streaming option, but for now the status quo is really more lucrative
can you explain on the idea that streaming is a net negative? i don't understand how adding a revenue stream decreases revenue for the astros
https://ts.la/eric59704
First Page Refresh
Page 130 of 130
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.