***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

894,061 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 11 mo ago by Pizza
RyanAg08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

aggiehawg said:


So... Much... Soy...


If you combine "she" and "boy", you get "soy".
Zemira
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bo Darville said:

MetoliusAg said:

It's a poll. The MT does it periodically and has done so for many years. Nothing nefarious.


None of us read that **** unless we are standing in line at the shoppette.
Or not. If I'm standing in line long enough to read something it's probably Texags on my phone.
VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lindsey Graham surprisingly comes out in favor of having a fair trial with witnesses.

Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

Lindsey Graham surprisingly comes out in favor of having a fair trial with witnesses.


You do realize a witness means someone with FIRST HAND knowledge, right? Not hearsay.

So, that leaves the Dems with ZERO witnesses of Trump doing ANYTHING...
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you think this is going to help you, you're in for another crushing disappointment
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Little Rock Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Huh?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gary Johnson said:

Lindsey Graham surprisingly comes out in favor of having a fair trial with witnesses.


If the evidence backing the Articles of Impeachment were as air-tight as you and the other Democrat bootlickers claim, then why would you even need to call witnesses in the Senate?

Bring forward your case, laughable as it is, and let the Senate decide whether or not to remove the President from office.


Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prognightmare said:


First time we've seen a President impeached for the blatant corruption of his predecessors in the White House.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Joke.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:


So...

Lynch him?
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids said:

Rapier108 said:


So...

Lynch him?

Yep. The traditional Democrat Party way of taking care of business when people don't behave as they wish them to do.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?


hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hey that is exactly what I was arguing.

Libs are in a pickle of their own creation. I'll continue to argue Trump has not been impeached until congress actually finishes their constitutional duty.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hbtheduce said:

Hey that is exactly what I was arguing.

Libs are in a pickle of their own creation. I'll continue to argue Trump has not been impeached until congress actually finishes their constitutional duty.
Listen, after your marathon discussion with the hearsay dodos (Meta, GJ, and J Valentine) on theis Impeachment thread, you've got my vote!
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?


The dems have been so impartial.
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hbtheduce said:

I'll continue to argue Trump has not been impeached until congress actually finishes their constitutional duty.


Agvet12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

hbtheduce said:

I'll continue to argue Trump has not been impeached until congress actually finishes their constitutional duty.





5 more years of Trump
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I still don't see what the Ds are gaining...

The evidence was nil...
The charges aren't real crimes...
There was zero evidence...
They just want to sit on the articles and not take them to trial in Senate...

This has to be the dumbest political ploy in history...
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FireAg said:

I still don't see what the Ds are gaining...

The evidence was nil...
The charges aren't real crimes...
There was zero evidence...
They just want to sit on the articles and not take them to trial in Senate...

This has to be the dumbest political ploy in history...
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FireAg said:

I still don't see what the Ds are gaining...

The evidence was nil...
The charges aren't real crimes...
There was zero evidence...
They just want to sit on the articles and not take them to trial in Senate...

This has to be the dumbest political ploy in history...

I'm thinking about buying my kids gifts, wrapping them up, and then not delivering them on Christmas. I just want them to sit under the tree and be useful.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
FireAg said:

I still don't see what the Ds are gaining...

The evidence was nil...
The charges aren't real crimes...
There was zero evidence...
They just want to sit on the articles and not take them to trial in Senate...

This has to be the dumbest political ploy in history...
Some of their speech gives them away. They think this is the 1970's and have not realized that it is more like 1998-1999, and actually is the post-2012 Romney demonization political landscape.

They think the water-carriers of the MSM can "stain" Trump with just the fact that a kangaroo court leveled impeachment charges -- not even conviction, against him. But they don't realize the right and much of the center now knows they are the greater threat to the whole future and style of living, and it just doesn't matter. For example, have little doubt that had it been Bill Clinton running in 2000 and not Gore, he would have been re-elected.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prognightmare said:



The dems have been so impartial.
Means Warren, Sanders, Booker and Kamala are toast - political rivals and all. We've already established through the dems that going after your political rivals in any way is an abuse of power. Might as well put Schumer on the pile, too
rab79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
leakypipes said:

Gary Johnson said:

Does a "fast fair trial" include his house minions calling to "slow things down"?

Does a "fast trial" also include years of litigation to decide whether trials should have evidence and witnesses?

He's obviously guilty and scared to death of more damning evidence being presented.


Oh my. Can you hook me up with your dealer? I want what you are on!
You probably don't the dose he tolerates would be lethal to a person not already brain dead
Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

hbtheduce said:

I'll continue to argue Trump has not been impeached until congress actually finishes their constitutional duty.





An "impeachment" with no removal is the very definition of a moral victory.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

hbtheduce said:

I'll continue to argue Trump has not been impeached until congress actually finishes their constitutional duty.



Your team has been beaten to a gooey pulp by Trump over and over and over again since 2015. I can't believe you had the nads to post that
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Please explain to the class how undelivered articles of impeachment aren't a moral victory....
aggiejayrod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prognightmare said:



The dems have been so impartial.
welp..we've just ruled her out of hearing another case again
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
McInnis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prognightmare said:



The dems have been so impartial.
Are you guys talking about this Ruth Bader Ginsburg, or another one?

Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump gonna let his emotions make him do something stupid like allow evidence and witnesses at the trial.

1872walker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Or maybe he knows that Democrats will vehemently oppose anything he supports and he's suckering them into doing exactly what he wants.
First Page Last Page
Page 195 of 264
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.