***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

894,726 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 11 mo ago by Pizza
JB!98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

From a current Military Times poll:




Woah, slam on the breaks. What are you trying to insinuate with this? It may be a poll that has no consequence and is not statistically correct, but why post it?

I think I know, but where are you headed? Is this just more of your typical poop throwing or are you going somewhere more nefarious?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
90% of the crap he posts on here is completely irrelevant to the thread topic, but for some reason, he and GJ are allowed to off-topic spam non-stop.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's a poll. The MT does it periodically and has done so for many years. Nothing nefarious.
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

90% of the crap he posts on here is completely irrelevant to the thread topic, but for some reason, he and GJ are allowed to off-topic spam non-stop.


And when called out they whine to mods and for some inexplicable reason mods then ban people
Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

It's a poll. The MT does it periodically and has done so for many years. Nothing nefarious.


None of us read that **** unless we are standing in line at the shoppette.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am still trying to figure out why that one woman talking about her holidays has to do with impeachment. Hoping someone can shed some light on it.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Quote:

Yet you're 100% approving of Trump's rapes and sexual assaults?
Which ones are those. Was he in the train with Kavanaugh?
Agvet12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bo Darville said:

MetoliusAg said:

It's a poll. The MT does it periodically and has done so for many years. Nothing nefarious.


None of us read that **** unless we are standing in line at the shoppette.


Even then no one reads it, definitely not at the PX
Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agvet12 said:

Bo Darville said:

MetoliusAg said:

It's a poll. The MT does it periodically and has done so for many years. Nothing nefarious.


None of us read that **** unless we are standing in line at the shoppette.


Even then no one reads it, definitely not at the PX


You mean you don't like fake attention hooor headlines like

"ARMY TO BAN NCO'S. HOW DOES IT AFFECT YOU?"
MicheIangeIo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

Sorry yo boy's dumb lizard brain conspiracy gullibility got him impeached.
JB!98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

It's a poll. The MT does it periodically and has done so for many years. Nothing nefarious.
Then why post it? You understand that there is an actual undercurrent of complete discontent in some within the general populous. We look to those that have taken an oath to the Constitution to defend us and our Liberties. I am not going to make this post into some fantasy about some civil war, but damn. Ya'll seem to keep wanting to throw gas on the fire.

What I don't think you understand it that you and your ilk have awakened people who have never paid attention to politics in their lives. They can see through the charade.
Agvet12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bo Darville said:

Agvet12 said:

Bo Darville said:

MetoliusAg said:

It's a poll. The MT does it periodically and has done so for many years. Nothing nefarious.


None of us read that **** unless we are standing in line at the shoppette.


Even then no one reads it, definitely not at the PX


You mean you don't like fake attention hooor headlines like

"ARMY TO BAN NCO'S. HOW DOES IT AFFECT YOU?"

No one wants to read CNN equivalent headline while waiting with a paychecks worth of alcohol on a weds night
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MicheIangeIo said:

Gary Johnson said:

Sorry yo boy's dumb lizard brain conspiracy gullibility got him impeached.



What do you think of Nancy chickening out?
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

Sorry yo boy's dumb lizard brain conspiracy gullibility got him impeached.


Sorry your original handle was permabanned
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JB!98 said:

MetoliusAg said:

It's a poll. The MT does it periodically and has done so for many years. Nothing nefarious.
Then why post it? You understand that there is an actual undercurrent of complete discontent in some within the general populous. We look to those that have taken an oath to the Constitution to defend us and our Liberties. I am not going to make this post into some fantasy about some civil war, but damn. Ya'll seem to keep wanting to throw gas on the fire.

What I don't think you understand it that you and your ilk have awakened people who have never paid attention to politics in their lives. They can see through the charade.
I am one of those, but it wasn't the lefties that brought me to politics, it was something else.

Until 2 years ago, I really could care less about what was going on in Washington. Now, I actively post here, and since 2016 have voted in every election I was able. Before that, the last time I voted was probably 2000. I have voted in county/city elections, and most importantly the Presidential election in 2016.

I recently donated my first ever $ to a politician. President Donald J. Trump. And could not be more enthusiastic about what he is doing for this country. Lefties and all.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

Sorry yo boy's dumb lizard brain conspiracy gullibility got him impeached.

He hasn't been impeached, the house has yet to send these "articles" to the senate.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Two-thirds of voters say Democrats want to impeach Trump more than help Americans

Quote:

In the final impeachment poll released before today's House vote to condemn President Trump, two-thirds of voters believed Democrats in Congress are "more concerned" with punishing the president than helping Americans.

In the latest Zogby Analytics survey, 67% of voters said that they "believe the Democrats are more interested in impeaching the president as opposed to passing legislation that will help Americans."
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenFiasco14 said:

Gary Johnson said:

Sorry yo boy's dumb lizard brain conspiracy gullibility got him impeached.


Sorry your original handle was permabanned
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
hbtheduce said:

Gary Johnson said:

Sorry yo boy's dumb lizard brain conspiracy gullibility got him impeached.

He hasn't been impeached, the house has yet to send these "articles" to the senate.

Sorry you couldn't get a conviction, swampy.
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

It's a poll. The MT does it periodically and has done so for many years. Nothing nefarious.

Of course, a poll! Thanks for the clarification.
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
JB!98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

JB!98 said:

MetoliusAg said:

It's a poll. The MT does it periodically and has done so for many years. Nothing nefarious.
Then why post it? You understand that there is an actual undercurrent of complete discontent in some within the general populous. We look to those that have taken an oath to the Constitution to defend us and our Liberties. I am not going to make this post into some fantasy about some civil war, but damn. Ya'll seem to keep wanting to throw gas on the fire.

What I don't think you understand it that you and your ilk have awakened people who have never paid attention to politics in their lives. They can see through the charade.
I am one of those, but it wasn't the lefties that brought me to politics, it was something else.

Until 2 years ago, I really could care less about what was going on in Washington. Now, I actively post here, and since 2016 have voted in every election I was able. Before that, the last time I voted was probably 2000. I have voted in county/city elections, and most importantly the Presidential election in 2016.

I recently donated my first ever $ to a politician. President Donald J. Trump. And could not be more enthusiastic about what he is doing for this country. Lefties and all.
Yeah, I am opposite. I remember my socials studies teacher in 1980 having her class over to watch the election results. I was hooked since then. (She was one of the ugliest women you could have imagined so no) I got two degrees from A&M, Business and Poli Sci. What I find interesting is that people like my wife, 11yr old, brother, dad, cousins, who I have never talked in depth politics with are really PO'ed by this crap.

Where I am driving with this, I also have friends in Virginia that I have not talked to in 20+ years, that have recently called me. These folks are Patriots, but not very sophisticated. I am really concerned with the rhetoric that is being pushed. I think it is a powder keg. Hint: Its not all about guns for these Virginians. As unsophisticated as they are, they still have an understanding of what is going on.

People like Met do not understand that certain folks play for keeps and they keep pushing.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Speedy Trial act of 1974


Quote:

Trial must commence within 70 days from the date the information or indictment was filed, or from the date the defendant appears before an officer of the court in which the charge is pending, whichever is later.[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedy_Trial_Act#cite_note-3][3][/url]
[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedy_Trial_Act#cite_note-3][/url]


If congressional dems want to pretend they are a grand jury handing down an indictment. It would be massively hypocritical for them to delay the trial beyond 70 days. But we know how adverse dems are to things like Federal Laws.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



This is called adding insult to injury. Bad day for Nancy.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:



It was a bad, bad day for xer in the end.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is that?
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He certainly looks like a winner!

Good chance this is Metolious IRL!
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

What is that?

The result of an 11 year old boy and a My Little Pony getting mixed up in a transporter malfunction.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Squadron7 said:

Rockdoc said:

What is that?

The result of an 11 year old boy and a My Little Pony getting mixed up in a transporter malfunction.
LOL. The My Little Pony reference is priceless.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Squadron7 said:

Rockdoc said:

What is that?

The result of an 11 year old boy and a My Little Pony getting mixed up in a transporter malfunction.
There's a good chance that he is actually a "brony".



These are the people we should trust to choose our leaders.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:


So... Much... Soy...
e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't know why the staff lets certain posters lie and give false information. Pitiful!
Jimmy Valentine
How long do you want to ignore this user?
e=mc2 said:

I don't know why the staff lets certain posters lie and give false information. Pitiful!


Lol!
e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jimmy Valentine said:

e=mc2 said:

I don't know why the staff lets certain posters lie and give false information. Pitiful!


Lol!
No one believes anything you post either.
First Page Last Page
Page 194 of 264
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.