I just learned that Jussie was in the original movie The Mighty Ducks.
It's not the severity of the punishment that deters crime; it's the certainty of it.
If you believe being molested as a kid increases your chances of being gay (I do) then this is interesting. Kids in movies are common victims.BadMoonRisin said:
I just learned that Jussie was in the original movie The Mighty Ducks.
FIFY to try and make a little more senseMadman said:If you believe being molested as a kid increases your chances ofBadMoonRisin said:
I just learned that Jussie was in the original movie The Mighty Ducks.beingturning gay (I do) then this is interesting. Kids in movies are common victims.
Maybe he should have 'quacked' the teacher instead of fabricating a fake crime...BadMoonRisin said:
I just learned that Jussie was in the original movie The Mighty Ducks.
..welldrcrinum said:
https://chicago.cbslocal.com/2019/06/21/judge-to-appoint-special-prosecutor-to-jussie-smollett-case-prosecutor-could-reinstate-charges/
Well, well...
That's another thing that was hokey, the non-plea-deal-plea-deal. The indictment was nolle prossed, dismissed and there was no plea nor even nolo contendere. Very strange.combat wombat said:
I thought the charges were simply dismissed. I didn't realize he had actually agreed to a plea deal.
JCA1 said:
I'm torn on this one. While he clearly was given a sweetheart deal he should have never been given, the idea that an agreed-to deal can be set aside and prosecution reinstated long after the case was dismissed troubles me (even though this is admittedly a very unique circumstance). So, despite the joy I would get out of his deal being revoked, I'm not sure this is a good precedent to set. IMO, it is the prosecutor's office which should have to answer for this mess.
Removed from office, disbarred possibly.Johnny2Fan said:
So what happens to the prosecutor and DA?
Depends.Johnny2Fan said:
So what happens to the prosecutor and DA?
This explains it well...JCA1 said:
I'm torn on this one. While he clearly was given a sweetheart deal he should have never been given, the idea that an agreed-to deal can be set aside and prosecution reinstated long after the case was dismissed troubles me (even though this is admittedly a very unique circumstance). So, despite the joy I would get out of his deal being revoked, I'm not sure this is a good precedent to set. IMO, it is the prosecutor's office which should have to answer for this mess.
Quote:
1. From where an elected official derives his power from is important, and it's what makes us a constitutional republic. When a state's attorney is appointed by a governor, the governor is elected by the people, and invested with the power to appoint states attorneys, so the states attorneys' power to prosecute derives from the people, albeit indirectly. In Illinois, states attorneys are elected directly, so their power derives directly from the people.
2. There is a specified procedure for recusal of states attorney and for appointing a special prosecutor for the cases the attorney has recused herself from. Kim Foxx attempted a fake, sham recusal, a non-recusal recusal, and did not follow this procedure. She tried to pretend she was recusing herself while just giving the case to her direct subordinate -- someone who cannot be said to be "independent" of her, as she's his boss. He knows her mind,and he knows what she wants him to do. And he's incentivized to please her.
3. So, when Kim Foxx executed this illegal, unconstitutional maneuver of appointing a fake special prosecutor who was really just her flunky carrying out her wishes, that fake special prosecutor did not have any actual authority deriving from the law or the people in an election.
4. Therefore, her deputy's decision to let Smollett off the hook without even an admission of guilt was done without any actual force of law. It was basically lawless, and can be, and should be, ignored.
They know everything. So it isn't all that surprising to me. Live by the Chicago PD, lose your career by the Chicago PD.Zemira said:
I'm just shocked that a judge in Cook County ruled this way. With exception to the uproar from the CPD, the rest of legal system seemed to be bribed (with or without cash consideration). This case seemed to run the typical corrupt democrat machine way in Chicago that has been the standard the last 100+ years in that city.
My best friend in law school was from Chicago and practiced law there for many years (retired to Florida a few years back). The tales she told were chilling and she was in commercial real estate, not criminal law. She did lunches and closings, not arraignments and jury trials but the same corrupt practices were there for her to hurdle as well.Zemira said:
Yeah I try to stay out of Chicago politics. From an outsider it just seems like they are all corrupt.
agent-maroon said:
If he does try the suicide gesture, then his track record with this sort of thing suggests that he'll screw it up and die unintentionally. Not that there's anything wrong with that...
BadMoonRisin said:
Calling it now, this guy is going to attempt suicide or a drug OD to try and make people feel sorry for him in hopes of being sent to rehab instead of prison.
Ranger #007 said:
I don't even care if he gets prosecuted at this point if they roast the corrupt people that tried to shove this farce through.