Probably because Kav and Ford both had hours in front of the SJC.
Given Ford's testimony and previous statements, plus the report from Mitchell, they may not have anything to ask. Same for Kavanaugh, especially given his 6 previous, very high level background checks.tehmackdaddy said:
I don't understand why the FBI doesn't just at least question every possible person (that has been named or could potentially provide info) so as to at least give the appearance of taking this seriously. There are a lot of polarized people who won't have their minds changed no matter what, but there are also people who are reasonable and want to see this handled properly.
I think you've identified an interesting long-play strategy here: if the Senate goes with what it's getting today, you get the media publicly trashing the FBI, just like Trump wanted them to do.tehmackdaddy said:
I get it, I just think it would be wiser to remove as much ammunition from the Democrats as possible. The MSM can easily run headlines and click-bait for the uninformed regarding what you two wrote and say how the investigation is a sham because the FBI didn't even interview the victim or the accused.
Play it clean and smart.
johnnyblaze36 said:
Cavuto just said there will only be one copy of the FBI report and each Senator will take turns reading it twenty minutes at a time for thirty plus hours.
It won't take that long... only about 6-10 senators are really interested in what it has to say.johnnyblaze36 said:
Cavuto just said there will only be one copy of the FBI report and each Senator will take turns reading it twenty minutes at a time for thirty plus hours.
Because previously the optics were on how crappy the democrats were treating Judge Kav & Dr. Ford. Now the focus is on how crappy Trump was to Dr. Ford. See the difference?Pinche Abogado said:
Trump mocked a liar. So what?
You underestimate these slimeballs. Just wait until they start making their own excuses that they have some function to attend to or whatever and try to delay even further.SpreadsheetAg said:It won't take that long... only about 6-10 senators are really interested in what it has to say.johnnyblaze36 said:
Cavuto just said there will only be one copy of the FBI report and each Senator will take turns reading it twenty minutes at a time for thirty plus hours.
But only the senators will see it.oysterbayAG said:
I think the FBI will list solid reasons why they did not interview certain people. The Sleazy Democrats were not careful what they wished for !
johnnyblaze36 said:
Cavuto just said there will only be one copy of the FBI report and each Senator will take turns reading it twenty minutes at a time for thirty plus hours.
This. So much this.aggiehawg said:
Didn't even need to click once I saw Durbin's name.
It does not necessarily need to be notarized to be a sworn statement. See 28 USC s1746.aginlakeway said:HeardAboutPerio said:
Avenatti emerges with new sworn allegations against Kavanaugh, amid questions over 1st client
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/avenatti-emerges-with-new-sworn-allegations-against-kavanaugh-amid-questions-over-1st-client
I didn't see this on the several other threads. SIAP.
These people need to face prosecution for false statements if it is debunked or she refuses to cooperate.
Where is the notary and seal for the sworn statement?
will25u said:
And so it starts again....
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/here-we-go-dianne-feinstein-suggests-fbi-probe-of-brett-kavanaugh-not-credible/
Report - Blasey Ford's yearbook pagebackintexas2013 said:WestAustinAg said:
Has Blasey Ford's yearbook page been posted yet? Twitter seems to be fast removing those posts...
On here? I haven't seen it
johnnyblaze36 said:
Cavuto just said there will only be one copy of the FBI report and each Senator will take turns reading it twenty minutes at a time for thirty plus hours.