Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations

487,430 Views | 5316 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by 93MarineHorn
NonReg85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ArbAg said:

Wildmen03 said:

bigcat22 said:

Now that it appears the FBI investigation is winding down, CPL happens to have another victim/witness come forward...just laughable


Meh, whatever credibility he had is long gone now. His last "witness" is a loony skank and I have no doubt this one is the exact same.
You can bet a constant source of loony skanks will show up accusing Kav until the Soros funded espionage campaign runs short of funding.
Redacting the name makes it all so believable.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

will25u said:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/10/02/resist-democrat-senator-to-file-injunction-to-block-final-kavanaugh-vote-n2521237
Separation of powers. Judiciary does not get to tell the legislative branch how to do their job and what their internal Senate rules should be. Judiciary only gets to tell them when they screwed up in a particular piece of legislation after the fact.


They've gotten so used to running to the Hawaiian judge for all their unconstitutional demands that they figured "why not one more time right?"
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Icecream_Ag said:

aggiehawg said:

will25u said:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/10/02/resist-democrat-senator-to-file-injunction-to-block-final-kavanaugh-vote-n2521237
Separation of powers. Judiciary does not get to tell the legislative branch how to do their job and what their internal Senate rules should be. Judiciary only gets to tell them when they screwed up in a particular piece of legislation after the fact.
hasn't stopped the judges on the left coast
That's Executive powers not legislative. (Oh and those courts were b****slapped by SCOTUS on the travel ban cases. Not to mention that Sotomayor showed she's too incompetent to be on SCOTUS with that Korematsu tripe in her dissent.)
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Icecream_Ag said:

aggiehawg said:

will25u said:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/10/02/resist-democrat-senator-to-file-injunction-to-block-final-kavanaugh-vote-n2521237
Separation of powers. Judiciary does not get to tell the legislative branch how to do their job and what their internal Senate rules should be. Judiciary only gets to tell them when they screwed up in a particular piece of legislation after the fact.
hasn't stopped the judges on the left coast
The problem here is that even a crazy leftist Obamabot judge could issue the most aggressively restrictive injunction out there and the senate could simply ignore it.

Actually, that might kill me if they get the judge to issue the injunction, Cocaine Mitch says, "neat," holds the confirmation vote over the extended sound of "reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" and Kavenaugh walks into his new office at 1 First Street.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well to be clear, this "lawsuit" is actually in Amy Berman Jackson's court in DC.

I say "lawsuit" because the lawyers that signed it probably violated FRCP 11 because the "cause of action" they raise is not justiciable on its face and any lawyer with a bar licence (or a working brain) should know that.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blindey said:

Well to be clear, this "lawsuit" is actually in Amy Berman Jackson's court in DC.

I say "lawsuit" because the lawyers that signed it probably violated FRCP 11 because the "cause of action" they raise is not justiciable on its face and any lawyer with a bar licence (or a working brain) should know that.
Berman Jackson might just be nuts enough to do it, however. Which would be nice. She'll never be on a short list for elevation to an appellate court if she did.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agree that she's nuts but respectfully disagree that she'll sign her name on anything that stupid.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blindey said:

Agree that she's nuts but respectfully disagree that she'll sign her name on anything that stupid.
Meh, depends on how much #metoo crap is on her FB feed.
policywonk98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, seems like no matter a judges' politics, allowing it would be career suicide.
Ducks4brkfast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Meanwhile on the 40 acres

https://instagr.am/p/Bocj1U8h5Jd
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't think she'd ever get impeached but the general work order for the District Court for the District of Columbia would see a serious reduction in her caseload and serious limitations in the subject matter of cases assigned to her. And I say that even with a Democrat appointee serving as Chief Judge.
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mathguy86 said:

Avenatti is doubling down on stupid. You would think he would have learned his lesson the first time. Or not.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex-boyfriend-says-kavanaugh-accuser-julie-swetnick-threatened-to-kill-his-unborn-child-was-exaggerating-everything

Quote:

Ex-boyfriend says Kavanaugh accuser Julie Swetnick threatened to kill his unborn child, 'was exaggerating everything'
oysterbayAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
" The Court has made their decision, now let them inforce it " Andrew Jackson
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blindey said:

I don't think she'd ever get impeached but the general work order for the District Court for the District of Columbia would see a serious reduction in her caseload and serious limitations in the subject matter of cases assigned to her. And I say that even with a Democrat appointee serving as Chief Judge.
Wouldn't be funny if Kavanuagh wound up being the SCOTUS liasion on the DC circuit? But he's taking Kennedy's spot who was over the Ninth Circuit.
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

blindey said:

I don't think she'd ever get impeached but the general work order for the District Court for the District of Columbia would see a serious reduction in her caseload and serious limitations in the subject matter of cases assigned to her. And I say that even with a Democrat appointee serving as Chief Judge.
Wouldn't be funny if Kavanuagh wound up being the SCOTUS liasion on the DC circuit? But he's taking Kennedy's spot who was over the Ninth Circuit.
That will make some good tears...
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:


Now that's funny. Just caught up on this thread and this made me laugh and is worth reposting. This is why I TexAgs.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Not sure if there is anything there, but Fords "lifelong friend" Keyser was a pro golfer and the Georgetown U women's golf coach before her health issues (I think I read it has something to do with a neck injury). Keyser was also previously married to Fox's Bob Beckel (maybe not significant).

So she's a lefty with terrible tastes in men? Color me surprised.


I thought Bob mentioned on an Imus segment that he shared with Tiger Woods the horror of a woman chasing him with a pitching wedge.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


I'm shocked to learn this, truly shocked I say. Hehe.
tallgrant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They cc'd Rosenstein!
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We have the testimony of Ford and Kavanaugh under oath. Those claims are being investigated as requested. Now, the democrat operatives representing Ford want to direct that investigation. I'd laugh if they weren't so pathetic.
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blindey said:

Icecream_Ag said:

aggiehawg said:

will25u said:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/10/02/resist-democrat-senator-to-file-injunction-to-block-final-kavanaugh-vote-n2521237
Separation of powers. Judiciary does not get to tell the legislative branch how to do their job and what their internal Senate rules should be. Judiciary only gets to tell them when they screwed up in a particular piece of legislation after the fact.
hasn't stopped the judges on the left coast
The problem here is that even a crazy leftist Obamabot judge could issue the most aggressively restrictive injunction out there and the senate could simply ignore it.

Actually, that might kill me if they get the judge to issue the injunction, Cocaine Mitch says, "neat," holds the confirmation vote over the extended sound of "reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" and Kavenaugh walks into his new office at 1 First Street.
I'd pay money to see it go down just like this.

War damn turtle stepping on their throats
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Old Tom Morris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd like to see Mitch on the the Senate floor giving this speech, except directed at the judge
NSFW - language warning

drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


The intolerant Left...
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:



I'm shocked to learn this, truly shocked I say. Hehe.


If the FBI was going about a proper investigation they should have spend 36 hours with her over 2 days thoroughly dismantling her bag of lies.
74Ag1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's time to take action on these *******s
Just an Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:



The intolerant Left...

It should be easy to prosecute for these crimes, right?
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETA...Seems to be fake.
wbt5845
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That story has already been bunked.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

MOCO9
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just an Ag said:

drcrinum said:



The intolerant Left...

It should be easy to prosecute for these crimes, right?
Khaki shorts behind kinda looks like my emoji
Alta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll go out on a limb here and say probably because the story is false - which is apparent within about two seconds of reading and looking at the pictures.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag87H2O said:

aggiehawg said:


Now that's funny. Just caught up on this thread and this made me laugh and is worth reposting. This is why I TexAgs.
The reason it is so funny is because it is soooo damn believable.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:



Heh heh heh. Maybe there is a reason why the FBI hasn't talked to Ford yet.........
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CPL claims he now has a "witness" to back up all of his client's claims.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2018/10/02/breaking-avenatti-submits-declaration-from-a-witness-that-confirms-number-of-j-n2524888
Gigem_94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Knows both Swetnick and Ford for "decades" even though the only connection between Ford and Swetnick is their attorney since Swetnick and Ford don't know each other directly. Ya right. I guess we need her definition of "know." This is the only person that seems to know both of them and we are just now hearing about it. And she just happened to meet kavenaugh at beach week in 1980 which he won't be able to refute because we all now know "Beach Week" is probably marked in his 1980 calendar......how convenient.
First Page Last Page
Page 125 of 152
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.