Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations

489,074 Views | 5316 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by 93MarineHorn
FbgTxAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:16p, 9/27/18
AG
Travesty isn't a strong enough word for what is happening. Mayella Ewell has zero proof and can't remember anything, the all white jury are completely prejudiced, and Tom Robinson has an exemplary reputation and record. This is a dispiriting, despicable charade.

#metoo has become the new racism, and it's being fully embraced and championed by the left. God help us all.
Reply Quote
2
Joe Exotic
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Lot Y Tailgate • 12:17p, 9/27/18
AG
I really don't want to be unfair to you so I'll ask the question with an example just so we are clear.

If I get drunk at the company Christmas party and feel up the bosses wife and call him an ass hole I didn't "drink to excess" as long as I didn't black out?
Reply Quote
tysker
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Lot Y Tailgate • 12:19p, 9/27/18
AG
Lot Y Tailgate said:
When you are discussing what the definition of "is" you have a problem.
Yes, we learned about the controversy surrounding the definition of 'is' during the Clinton years.
Reply Quote
2
Lot Y Tailgate
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Joe Exotic • 12:24p, 9/27/18
AG
If someone was accusing you to that would your defense be people were 18 so it was legal (he wasnt) and then go off how you go to church on Sunday?
Reply Quote
spaceman
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rapier108 • 12:26p, 9/27/18
AG
Rapier108 said:
"It's not the nature of the evidence, it is the seriousness of the charge."
Did someone (important) actually say this??
Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people.
Reply Quote
Joe Exotic
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Lot Y Tailgate • 12:27p, 9/27/18
AG
Lot Y Tailgate said:
If someone was accusing you to that would your defense be people were 18 so it was legal (he wasnt) and then go off how you go to church on Sunday?


Please just answer my question. It's a very simple one.
Reply Quote
2
Lot Y Tailgate
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Joe Exotic • 12:31p, 9/27/18
AG
I did.
Reply Quote
Joe Exotic
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Lot Y Tailgate • 12:32p, 9/27/18
AG
Lot Y Tailgate said:
I did.


No you didn't. I'll ask again.

Do you consider "drinking in excess" and drinking to the point of blacking out to be equivalent? It's a simple question.
Reply Quote
2
NonReg85
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Lot Y Tailgate • 12:32p, 9/27/18
AG
Lot Y Tailgate said:
I backed it up, you are choosing to ignore the evidence.
This explains so much. Even mor misguided than your discourse on economics; that's saying something.
Reply Quote
4
Joe Exotic
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:35p, 9/27/18
AG
In summary...

I asked Lot Y for a quote of Kav saying he never drank in excess. I got two links, no quotes.

I asked if he thought "drinking in excess" was the same thing as drinking to the point you black out. He has refused to answer twice.
Reply Quote
8
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Lot Y Tailgate • 12:37p, 9/27/18
AG
Lot Y Tailgate said:
I backed it up, you are choosing to ignore the evidence.


No you didn't. He asked a very straight forward question.

Do you know there is a difference between excess and blacked out?
Reply Quote
1
coconutED
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to spaceman • 12:39p, 9/27/18
AG
spaceman said:
Rapier108 said:
"It's not the nature of the evidence, it is the seriousness of the charge."
Did someone (important) actually say this??

It's a reference to this:
Quote:
Congressional Democratic leaders today ordered a formal investigation into whether Ronald Reagan's Presidential campaign made a deal with Iran in 1980 to delay the release of American hostages until after the election.

Thomas S. Foley, the House Speaker, and George J. Mitchell, the Senate Democratic leader, said they had designated the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to supervise separate but coordinated inquiries.

"These allegations are both persistent and disturbing," the two leaders said in a joint statement. "We have no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, but the seriousness of the allegations, and the weight of circumstantial information, compel an effort to establish the facts."

https://www.nytimes.com/1991/08/06/us/inquiry-is-ordered-on-1980-campaign.html
Reply Quote
1 edit
Lot Y Tailgate
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to backintexas2013 • 12:51p, 9/27/18
AG
backintexas2013 said:
Lot Y Tailgate said:
I backed it up, you are choosing to ignore the evidence.


No you didn't. He asked a very straight forward question.

Do you know there is a difference between excess and blacked out?


So you are ignoring everything else he said about drinking? This is exactly like Bill Clinton's defense.
Reply Quote
End Of Message
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:53p, 9/27/18
AG
This "my truth"/"your truth" nonsense is dangerous. Facts are not subjective. Truth is not subjective.
Reply Quote
20
1 edit
Joe Exotic
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Lot Y Tailgate • 12:58p, 9/27/18
AG
Lot Y Tailgate said:
backintexas2013 said:
Lot Y Tailgate said:
I backed it up, you are choosing to ignore the evidence.


No you didn't. He asked a very straight forward question.

Do you know there is a difference between excess and blacked out?


So you are ignoring everything else he said about drinking? This is exactly like Bill Clinton's defense.



That's the only comment he made about drinking in the Fox News interview
Reply Quote
1
End Of Message
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:02p, 9/27/18
AG
Kalamata Olive Harris is such a piece of ****
Reply Quote
9
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Joe Exotic • 1:22p, 9/27/18
AG
He doesn't care. He has his own reality and he doesn't think he is lying.
Reply Quote
1
tsuag10
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to End Of Message • 1:50p, 9/27/18
AG
Pinche Abogado said:
This "my truth"/"your truth" nonsense is dangerous. Facts are not subjective. Truth is not subjective.
Facts are misogynistic. Your privilege influences your truth.
Reply Quote
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:57p, 9/27/18


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1045318531401895936.html?refreshed=yes

If you couldn't watch the Ford Circus Part 1, here is a running 'commentary' on the proceedings.
Reply Quote
aggiedata
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:55p, 9/27/18
AG
Reply Quote
14
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:23a, 9/28/18


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1045390314733797377.html

Followup from the my previous post. This is a running account of Part 2 of the Ford Circus (Kavanaugh's hearing) if you could not watch it, sort of a game cast written in real rime by a conservative viewer.
Reply Quote
MooreTrucker
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:32a, 9/28/18
AG

Should I post this to the OB and let them have at it?



Reply Quote
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:33a, 9/28/18


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1045516473983279106.html

Interesting thread on how Dem schemes are crafted.
Reply Quote
5
End Of Message
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MooreTrucker • 8:34a, 9/28/18
AG
MooreTrucker said:

Should I post this to the OB and let them have at it?




Yes
Reply Quote
3
MarineAggie95
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MooreTrucker • 8:48a, 9/28/18
AG
As a Marine I had to look up her tweet and she is getting killed on it. Some people just never learn.
Reply Quote
2
dallasiteinsa02
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to drcrinum • 8:59a, 9/28/18
drcrinum said:


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1045516473983279106.html

Interesting thread on how Dem schemes are crafted.
I also think the original letter was crafted. She went to the Washington Post who sent her on to the Democrat insiders. They worked up the letter and decided who it should go to.
Reply Quote
2
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:18a, 9/28/18

Reply Quote
3
ProgN
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MarineAggie95 • 9:18a, 9/28/18
jlwalker95 said:
As a Marine I had to look up her tweet and she is getting killed on it. Some people just never learn.





This is just a sample for the board. Several I can't bring in because I'd catch a definite ban.
Reply Quote
2
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:10a, 9/28/18

Reply Quote
14
1 edit
SpreadsheetAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to drcrinum • 11:23a, 9/28/18
AG
drcrinum said:

I choose to believe that Time Traveler Trump warned Kavanaugh's father 40 years ago about this and started the process.
Reply Quote
5
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:31a, 9/28/18


https://jonathanturley.org/2018/09/28/the-kavanaugh-hearing-leaves-lingering-questions-over-representations-made-to-the-committee-by-counsel/

Interesting legal opinion read.
Reply Quote
TOMMYGUNNER
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:16p, 9/28/18
AG
dems readying claim that FBI is controlled by Trump!!!
Going to request a Special Counsel!
Reply Quote
1
SpreadsheetAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:21p, 9/28/18
AG
Good find




Kavanaugh p, if charges were filed in 1982, would be facing a misdemeanor. And since law at the time for such wphad a statute of limitations of 1 year, they have 0 case. The Dems are presenting no evidence for a misdemeanor that occurred 36 years ago as their red line against confirmation.
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_pill_and_blue_pill]I prefer the red pills[/url]
Reply Quote
2
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to SpreadsheetAg • 9:28p, 9/28/18
SpreadsheetAg said:
Good find




Kavanaugh p, if charges were filed in 1982, would be facing a misdemeanor. And since law at the time for such wphad a statute of limitations of 1 year, they have 0 case. The Dems are presenting no evidence for a misdemeanor that occurred 36 years ago as their red line against confirmation.
I'm certain the Dems have known this all along.
Reply Quote
6
Sterling96
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:30p, 9/28/18
Not sure the Democrats have ever wanted (or currently want) a criminal prosecution, so the statute of limitations is kind of a moot point IMO. This was a political move, no doubt.
Reply Quote
1
First Page Last Page
Page 112 of 152 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.