FriscoKid said:That sounds like a yes to me then, but he is still a little b.WelchAg said:
Flake just said we will not get answers tomorrow and is supportive of a vote.
WelchAg said:
Flake just said we will not get answers tomorrow and is supportive of a vote.
If he's supportive of a vote then he is a yes. He's just banging away at the Republicans.Wildcat said:FriscoKid said:That sounds like a yes to me then, but he is still a little b.WelchAg said:
Flake just said we will not get answers tomorrow and is supportive of a vote.
I disagree. He's pushing back on the old white men and female victim narrative DiFi has worked so hard to build.
BallerStaf2003 said:
It was like 15, 20, and 55 years ago man. It's past time for that.
And it's not even the situation alleged by the first accuser of a younger girl and two older boys. This would be younger boys and a girl who'd been in college for two years who is walking around these parties freely, who notices activity that she calls gang-rape, and does absolutely nothing about it. She surely wouldn't have been alone at these parties, but would have been there with older friends of hers, and none of them took any action, either? Or said anything to anyone at the time?93MarineHorn said:Oh, for f/cks sake! This liar can remember Kavanaugh but can't name a single other person that can corroborate any of this. It's amazing! A woman a few years older than Kav, supposedly goes to gang rape parties and clearly remembers Kav (who she says didn't actually do any of the raping) but not a single other person. She is a liar. Open your eyes.Quote:
I think if you really think about the time They were in, it should give you a smidge if doubt of kavanaughs innocence.
That is so bizarre. It won't be controversial to 99% of Americans who see past this BS. About 49% of that 99% will pretend like it is, but they'd be lying.Quote:
Ok, i have nothing else to say than today. Wait and see but I'd expect him to be confirmed. It will always be controversial, unfortunately.
This is a joke, right?Quote:
But if one of you starts a gay thread with some story that some psycho queer raped a 12 year old boy and then made him transition I swear to God you will [meet] my fury. I am in no mood today!
WTF???BallerStaf2003 said:BTHOB said:Mark Judge issued a statement this morning through his attorney denying all claims made by this third accuser.BallerStaf2003 said:BTHOB said:Well, fortunately for you his friend has already adamantly denied that anything remotely resembling the claims occurred.BallerStaf2003 said:Bo Darville said:BallerStaf2003 said:
I think the hardliners on this thread that say this all has to be made up are dismissing how difficult it was in the 80's and 90's for a woman to speak out about rape.
Both of my sisters were raped in college at JMU, and my mother was raped in Montreal. They never reported it. They moved on bc that was just what you did back then.
I think if you really think about the time They were in, it should give you a smidge if doubt of kavanaughs innocence.
I've also been a sexual harassment and assault advocate in the Army and have represented too many girls that lied to ruin the careers of others.
Exactly. Why this situation is just terrible for our country. It's like the lowest common denominator of gross.
If his best friend came forward and said that they got girls drunk to go poundtown on passed out girls, that would be about the level of testimony i would need to disqualify him. I think.
Mark Judge denied all claims?
Ok, i have nothing else to say than today. Wait and see but I'd expect him to be confirmed. It will always be controversial, unfortunately.
But if one of you starts a gay thread with some story that some psycho queer raped a 12 year old boy and then made him transition I swear to God you will meet my fury. I am in no mood today!
TurkeyBaconLeg said:
She is going to high school parties as a college student?
I bet she went to college to be a teacher. Banging HS kids never gets old for them.TurkeyBaconLeg said:
People, it was a joke. I was basically bowing out of the thread because my point was made and ohter people made points that enlightened my perspective.Resistol said:That is so bizarre. It won't be controversial to 99% of Americans who see past this BS. About 49% of that 99% will pretend like it is, but they'd be lying.Quote:
Ok, i have nothing else to say than today. Wait and see but I'd expect him to be confirmed. It will always be controversial, unfortunately.This is a joke, right?Quote:
But if one of you starts a gay thread with some story that some psycho queer raped a 12 year old boy and then made him transition I swear to God you will [meet] my fury. I am in no mood today!
Yep, she does look a lot like Elizabeth Berkley during SBTB years.smango05 said:TurkeyBaconLeg said:
She is going to high school parties as a college student?
Anyone else think she bears a striking resemblance to Jessie Spano?
Drunken grinding pretty much describes every party I ever went to in high school, and it was all consensual, except occasionally when a less-attractive female would be half of the grinder sandwich with her more attractive female friend. But you would live with it just to enjoy the good half of the sandwich so it's not like it was traumatic to the guy being grinded on.Marcus Aurelius said:
How much of these claims, if indeed there were "sexual" interactions, were actually consensual?
The Republicans are walking on egg shells because the media is just looking for something to call them on.Rockdoc said:
I'm sure I'm over simplifying this, but it's pretty obvious what's going on here. Dems are just doing what dems do. They're scum. All the republicans know exactly what's going on here and absolutely none of them believe it. ALL of them. The problem is you've got a handful of R's that just don't want to vote for Kav because they hate trump or they're just acting like they always act. They're just looking for excuses and the dems are happy to oblige.
EditedBallerStaf2003 said:
You're sooooo wrong, but that's typical of you.
BallerStaf2003 said:
I think the hardliners on this thread that say this all has to be made up are dismissing how difficult it was in the 80's and 90's for a woman to speak out about rape.
Both of my sisters were raped in college at JMU, and my mother was raped in Montreal. They never reported it. They moved on bc that was just what you did back then.
I think if you really think about the time They were in, it should give you a smidge if doubt of kavanaughs innocence.
TurkeyBaconLeg said:
She is going to high school parties as a college student?
Quote:
The problem is you've got a handful of R's that just don't want to vote for Kav because they hate trump...
NO! Then my reply will look weird.BallerStaf2003 said:
For once I brought it up first, to try and make a joke that we all could connect on. I should've known better. Carry on.
Staff, please delete my failed attempt at humor.
Completely agree. I pray the Republicans get this woman under oath and rip her to shreds. An older woman with knowledge of parties where younger girls get gang raped but never coming forward to anyone. She would have been the oldest person at these parties by a few years. The best she could hope for is looking like an accomplice to all these alleged rapes.Quote:
And it's not even the situation alleged by the first accuser of a younger girl and two older boys. This would be younger boys and a girl who'd been in college for two years who is walking around these parties freely, who notices activity that she calls gang-rape, and does absolutely nothing about it. She surely wouldn't have been alone at these parties, but would have been there with older friends of hers, and none of them took any action, either? Or said anything to anyone at the time?
It's fantastical.
