She and her supporters are on the way!
Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations
488,138 Views |
5316 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by 93MarineHorn
Wow. If what was alleged should result in mutilation I guess participation in, "The Man Show," should result in having his nuts dipped into a fire ant hill.dallasiteinsa02 said:
Kimmel is dead wrong on this one. Assuming that everything that been alleged by Ford is true that would not be the correct remedy for the situation. We aren't talking about some serial rapist that has been finally brought to justice. His comments are really offensive. My bet is that that he is made to apologize by the network, but turns it into another joke that isn't really an apology.
FORD ISN'T GOING TO SHOW UP...Prognightmare said:
What a little biatch
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Nope and here is the source. I forgot to add it
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6204287/Is-Dr-Blasey-backing-Thursdays-Senate-showdown-letter-sent-Judiciary-Committee.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6204287/Is-Dr-Blasey-backing-Thursdays-Senate-showdown-letter-sent-Judiciary-Committee.html
I received this note from Squadron 7. I was asked to pass it along ...
"I've not abandoned my threads/arguments/discussions. For whatever reason, I've been banned until 4:13AM on 09/28/2018. See you on the other side."
"I've not abandoned my threads/arguments/discussions. For whatever reason, I've been banned until 4:13AM on 09/28/2018. See you on the other side."
This to me is the most telling sentence in that letter:
Be mean to the girl and get killed in dem messaging (i.e. the media, late night, campaign ads, etc.) or go easy on her and let them smear Kavanaugh.
This shows what this entire episode is now about. They want the republican senators (old white men) to question their client for election/political purposes.Quote:
The central point is that there is no precedent for this Committee to bring in outside counsel for the sole purpose of shielding the members of the Committee from performing their responsibility to question witnesses.
Be mean to the girl and get killed in dem messaging (i.e. the media, late night, campaign ads, etc.) or go easy on her and let them smear Kavanaugh.
"nobody is on trial here"
Well yeah that's kind of what you did here.
Well yeah that's kind of what you did here.
For some reason Avenatti is treated as a god on the DU. Never quite figured out why. Guy has a solid track record of over promising and under delivering.
pagerman @ work said:
This to me is the most telling sentence in that letter:This shows what this entire episode is now about. They want the republican senators (old white men) to question their client for election/political purposes.Quote:
The central point is that there is no precedent for this Committee to bring in outside counsel for the sole purpose of shielding the members of the Committee from performing their responsibility to question witnesses.
Be mean to the girl and get killed in dem messaging (i.e. the media, late night, campaign ads, etc.) or go easy on her and let them smear Kavanaugh.
Yep. They are so transparent it is laughable. News flash *****: you don't get to make the rules. You want to testify, come do it. Otherwise GTFO.
There is also no precedent for witnesses in a committee hearing getting to dictate who asks them questions.Quote:
The central point is that there is no precedent for this Committee to bring in outside counsel for the sole purpose of shielding the members of the Committee from performing their responsibility to question witnesses.
Emotional Support Cobra
Joined:
Feb 5, 2003
Posts:
38,003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FriscoKid said:
"nobody is on trial here"
He's an obnoxious dewshbag. You know, your typical liberal super hero.rwpag71 said:
For some reason Avenatti is treated as a god on the DU. Never quite figured out why. Guy has a solid track record of over promising and under delivering.
Okey doke. Add a new witness. The lawyer who has crafted the questions that the old white men will ask Ford. She will be called to give her resume and that she wrote the direct examination questions. After Ford has been questioned, call the lawyer back and ask if anyone deviated from the script.pagerman @ work said:
This to me is the most telling sentence in that letter:This shows what this entire episode is now about. They want the republican senators (old white men) to question their client for election/political purposes.Quote:
The central point is that there is no precedent for this Committee to bring in outside counsel for the sole purpose of shielding the members of the Committee from performing their responsibility to question witnesses.
Be mean to the girl and get killed in dem messaging (i.e. the media, late night, campaign ads, etc.) or go easy on her and let them smear Kavanaugh.
Then call Kavanaugh.
I think you answered your own question.rwpag71 said:
For some reason Avenatti is treated as a god on the DU. Never quite figured out why. Guy has a solid track record of over promising and under delivering.
If Ford fails to show for the hearing, she will probably go on CNN or MSNBC and do an interview to "tell her story" since the mean GOP was mean.
pagerman @ work said:
This to me is the most telling sentence in that letter:This shows what this entire episode is now about. They want the republican senators (old white men) to question their client for election/political purposes.Quote:
The central point is that there is no precedent for this Committee to bring in outside counsel for the sole purpose of shielding the members of the Committee from performing their responsibility to question witnesses.
Be mean to the girl and get killed in dem messaging (i.e. the media, late night, campaign ads, etc.) or go easy on her and let them smear Kavanaugh.
A bunch of white men questioning her is the Dems priority number 1 in using this woman. Without this, they'll abandon it. Grassley is on to them. Lord knows the WH is.
I mean, she's already in town. Might as well....TurkeyBaconLeg said:
If Ford fails to show for the hearing, she will probably go on CNN or MSNBC and do an interview to "tell her story" since the mean GOP was mean.
Good call.TurkeyBaconLeg said:
If Ford fails to show for the hearing, she will probably go on CNN or MSNBC and do an interview to "tell her story" since the mean GOP was mean.
They are desperate for a reason for her to back out but still claim it's the GOPs fault because they aren't even going to give the Dems the "misogynistic Patriarchy blames the survivor" pictures they want
I have zero doubt of this. And NOT under oath. And with no tough questions.TurkeyBaconLeg said:
If Ford fails to show for the hearing, she will probably go on CNN or MSNBC and do an interview to "tell her story" since the mean GOP was mean.
I stand by my opinion. If she does not testify, Kavanaugh is confirmed.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
Joined:
Oct 10, 2006
Posts:
49,082
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
its that easy.TurkeyBaconLeg said:
If Ford fails to show for the hearing, she will probably go on CNN or MSNBC and do an interview to "tell her story" since the mean GOP was mean.
The dems thought the allegation would be enough to get the nomination pulled.
That was a bluff. The republicans called. Now the democrats are looking for any reason possible to keep from showing their hand (while trying to make it look like they never bluffed in the first place).
He'll be confirmed, even if she does testify. There is nothing she can say that can be corroborated at this point. So unless that changes, this is done. The only thing this is about is the mid-terms.
The once touted blue wave has dwindled to a ripple and Dems are desperate for something to tilt the scale in their favor.
It's sort of sad to watch, really.
The once touted blue wave has dwindled to a ripple and Dems are desperate for something to tilt the scale in their favor.
It's sort of sad to watch, really.
This is why it is best to just ignore the liberals here, because most are just trying to get people banned, but they themselves rarely do.
Yeah, he asked me what he did wrong. I have no idea, told him to email staff and ask.aginlakeway said:
I received this note from Squadron 7. I was asked to pass it along ...
"I've not abandoned my threads/arguments/discussions. For whatever reason, I've been banned until 4:13AM on 09/28/2018. See you on the other side."
MY guess is that some pearl clutching libs objected to his posts.
Ford is the one in the bind now. She agreed to the terms of the hearing. Nothing has changed, if she backs out now the MSM is going to have to spin like their pasty little fingers have never spinned before
You know that feeling you have if you have been chasing a draw in poker and calling off bets that you had no business calling and then the river hits and you still didn't make your hand and you have a pile of your money in the post and you really want it back?
By using MeToo for political gains, the libs have pissed off the moderates...and they know it. So they are going to start the spin cycle and focus on the travesty of "silencing women's voices". I'm sure the libs told CPL to stfu, as he went off script and made the whole sham even more obvious. Rape trains? Drugging girls? Lol. Too funny.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
Joined:
Oct 10, 2006
Posts:
49,082
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And Chuck Grassly is confidently munching on an Oreo cookie....FriscoKid said:
You know that feeling you have if you have been chasing a draw in poker and calling off bets that you had no business calling and then the river hits and you still didn't make your hand and you have a pile of your money in the post and you really want it back?
That letter states that one of Fords request is that senators conduct the questioning.
Just let the Dems question her... make sure all of the Republican senators are present, but have no questions.
Just let the Dems question her... make sure all of the Republican senators are present, but have no questions.
And you want to know why I am quite sure that Schumer is driving this whole thing and not Ford or her lawyers????bmks270 said:
That letter states that one of Fords request is that senators conduct the questioning.
Just let the Dems question her... make sure all of the Republican senators are present, but have no questions.
Featured Stories
See All
19:00
40m ago
954
Post Game Review: No. 15 Texas A&M 38, New Mexico State 3
by Kay Naegeli
19:50
1d ago
5.8k
Donors can now earn priority points by giving to Texas Aggies United
by Texas Aggies United
8:23
8h ago
1.1k
TexAgs' The Night Before: No. 15 Texas A&M vs. New Mexico State
by Luke Evangelist
27:22
22h ago
4.7k