Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations

488,136 Views | 5316 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by 93MarineHorn
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She and her supporters are on the way!

ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?


aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Porn Lawyer locks his Twitter page.

NonReg85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dallasiteinsa02 said:

Kimmel is dead wrong on this one. Assuming that everything that been alleged by Ford is true that would not be the correct remedy for the situation. We aren't talking about some serial rapist that has been finally brought to justice. His comments are really offensive. My bet is that that he is made to apologize by the network, but turns it into another joke that isn't really an apology.
Wow. If what was alleged should result in mutilation I guess participation in, "The Man Show," should result in having his nuts dipped into a fire ant hill.
Evanhue
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTm2004 said:

Porn Lawyer locks his Twitter page.


CPL is a total clown show, and yet CNN and MSNBC trot him out repeatedly on their channels. Hmmm...???
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prognightmare said:




FORD ISN'T GOING TO SHOW UP...
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a little biatch
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nope and here is the source. I forgot to add it

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6204287/Is-Dr-Blasey-backing-Thursdays-Senate-showdown-letter-sent-Judiciary-Committee.html
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I received this note from Squadron 7. I was asked to pass it along ...

"I've not abandoned my threads/arguments/discussions. For whatever reason, I've been banned until 4:13AM on 09/28/2018. See you on the other side."


pagerman @ work
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This to me is the most telling sentence in that letter:
Quote:

The central point is that there is no precedent for this Committee to bring in outside counsel for the sole purpose of shielding the members of the Committee from performing their responsibility to question witnesses.
This shows what this entire episode is now about. They want the republican senators (old white men) to question their client for election/political purposes.

Be mean to the girl and get killed in dem messaging (i.e. the media, late night, campaign ads, etc.) or go easy on her and let them smear Kavanaugh.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"nobody is on trial here"

Well yeah that's kind of what you did here.
rwpag71
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For some reason Avenatti is treated as a god on the DU. Never quite figured out why. Guy has a solid track record of over promising and under delivering.
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
pagerman @ work said:

This to me is the most telling sentence in that letter:
Quote:

The central point is that there is no precedent for this Committee to bring in outside counsel for the sole purpose of shielding the members of the Committee from performing their responsibility to question witnesses.
This shows what this entire episode is now about. They want the republican senators (old white men) to question their client for election/political purposes.

Be mean to the girl and get killed in dem messaging (i.e. the media, late night, campaign ads, etc.) or go easy on her and let them smear Kavanaugh.


Yep. They are so transparent it is laughable. News flash *****: you don't get to make the rules. You want to testify, come do it. Otherwise GTFO.
AggieUSMC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

The central point is that there is no precedent for this Committee to bring in outside counsel for the sole purpose of shielding the members of the Committee from performing their responsibility to question witnesses.
There is also no precedent for witnesses in a committee hearing getting to dictate who asks them questions.
Emotional Support Cobra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FriscoKid said:

"nobody is on trial here"


NonReg85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rwpag71 said:

For some reason Avenatti is treated as a god on the DU. Never quite figured out why. Guy has a solid track record of over promising and under delivering.
He's an obnoxious dewshbag. You know, your typical liberal super hero.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
pagerman @ work said:

This to me is the most telling sentence in that letter:
Quote:

The central point is that there is no precedent for this Committee to bring in outside counsel for the sole purpose of shielding the members of the Committee from performing their responsibility to question witnesses.
This shows what this entire episode is now about. They want the republican senators (old white men) to question their client for election/political purposes.

Be mean to the girl and get killed in dem messaging (i.e. the media, late night, campaign ads, etc.) or go easy on her and let them smear Kavanaugh.
Okey doke. Add a new witness. The lawyer who has crafted the questions that the old white men will ask Ford. She will be called to give her resume and that she wrote the direct examination questions. After Ford has been questioned, call the lawyer back and ask if anyone deviated from the script.

Then call Kavanaugh.
aTm2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rwpag71 said:

For some reason Avenatti is treated as a god on the DU. Never quite figured out why. Guy has a solid track record of over promising and under delivering.
I think you answered your own question.
Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If Ford fails to show for the hearing, she will probably go on CNN or MSNBC and do an interview to "tell her story" since the mean GOP was mean.

HelloUncleNateFitch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pagerman @ work said:

This to me is the most telling sentence in that letter:
Quote:

The central point is that there is no precedent for this Committee to bring in outside counsel for the sole purpose of shielding the members of the Committee from performing their responsibility to question witnesses.
This shows what this entire episode is now about. They want the republican senators (old white men) to question their client for election/political purposes.

Be mean to the girl and get killed in dem messaging (i.e. the media, late night, campaign ads, etc.) or go easy on her and let them smear Kavanaugh.


A bunch of white men questioning her is the Dems priority number 1 in using this woman. Without this, they'll abandon it. Grassley is on to them. Lord knows the WH is.
tsuag10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TurkeyBaconLeg said:

If Ford fails to show for the hearing, she will probably go on CNN or MSNBC and do an interview to "tell her story" since the mean GOP was mean.
I mean, she's already in town. Might as well....
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TurkeyBaconLeg said:

If Ford fails to show for the hearing, she will probably go on CNN or MSNBC and do an interview to "tell her story" since the mean GOP was mean.


Good call.
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They are desperate for a reason for her to back out but still claim it's the GOPs fault because they aren't even going to give the Dems the "misogynistic Patriarchy blames the survivor" pictures they want
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TurkeyBaconLeg said:

If Ford fails to show for the hearing, she will probably go on CNN or MSNBC and do an interview to "tell her story" since the mean GOP was mean.


I have zero doubt of this. And NOT under oath. And with no tough questions.

I stand by my opinion. If she does not testify, Kavanaugh is confirmed.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TurkeyBaconLeg said:

If Ford fails to show for the hearing, she will probably go on CNN or MSNBC and do an interview to "tell her story" since the mean GOP was mean.
its that easy.

The dems thought the allegation would be enough to get the nomination pulled.

That was a bluff. The republicans called. Now the democrats are looking for any reason possible to keep from showing their hand (while trying to make it look like they never bluffed in the first place).
Wildcat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He'll be confirmed, even if she does testify. There is nothing she can say that can be corroborated at this point. So unless that changes, this is done. The only thing this is about is the mid-terms.

The once touted blue wave has dwindled to a ripple and Dems are desperate for something to tilt the scale in their favor.

It's sort of sad to watch, really.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is why it is best to just ignore the liberals here, because most are just trying to get people banned, but they themselves rarely do.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

I received this note from Squadron 7. I was asked to pass it along ...

"I've not abandoned my threads/arguments/discussions. For whatever reason, I've been banned until 4:13AM on 09/28/2018. See you on the other side."



Yeah, he asked me what he did wrong. I have no idea, told him to email staff and ask.

MY guess is that some pearl clutching libs objected to his posts.
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ford is the one in the bind now. She agreed to the terms of the hearing. Nothing has changed, if she backs out now the MSM is going to have to spin like their pasty little fingers have never spinned before
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You know that feeling you have if you have been chasing a draw in poker and calling off bets that you had no business calling and then the river hits and you still didn't make your hand and you have a pile of your money in the post and you really want it back?
wyoag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
By using MeToo for political gains, the libs have pissed off the moderates...and they know it. So they are going to start the spin cycle and focus on the travesty of "silencing women's voices". I'm sure the libs told CPL to stfu, as he went off script and made the whole sham even more obvious. Rape trains? Drugging girls? Lol. Too funny.
FroWins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTm2004 said:

Porn Lawyer locks his Twitter page.




I'm hoping someone was trolling him like that radio show trolled Adam Schiff.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FriscoKid said:

You know that feeling you have if you have been chasing a draw in poker and calling off bets that you had no business calling and then the river hits and you still didn't make your hand and you have a pile of your money in the post and you really want it back?
And Chuck Grassly is confidently munching on an Oreo cookie....
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That letter states that one of Fords request is that senators conduct the questioning.

Just let the Dems question her... make sure all of the Republican senators are present, but have no questions.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bmks270 said:

That letter states that one of Fords request is that senators conduct the questioning.

Just let the Dems question her... make sure all of the Republican senators are present, but have no questions.
And you want to know why I am quite sure that Schumer is driving this whole thing and not Ford or her lawyers????
First Page Last Page
Page 74 of 152
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.