He posted a series of tweets which fingered a classmate of Kavanaugh's as the dude who assaulted Ford. The guy looks a lot like Kav, lived around where Ford said the party was and lived in a house that fit the description of the scene she gave.
Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations
501,094 Views |
5316 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by 93MarineHorn
Seams reasonable
BenFiasco14 said:etcetera said:
It is amazing that there are people defending this tweet by Trump.
Present the facts.
The tweer doesn't say or imply "present the facts". It implies that the only way a story such as hers is credible is if a police report was filed when it happens. Talk to a forensic nurse who deals with assault, they'll tell you this tweet is b.s.
PatentMike, J.D.
BS Biochem
MS Molecular Virology
BS Biochem
MS Molecular Virology
Michael Barnhart said:BenFiasco14 said:etcetera said:
It is amazing that there are people defending this tweet by Trump.
Present the facts.
The tweer doesn't say or imply "present the facts". It implies that the only way a story such as hers is credible is if a police report was filed when it happens. Talk to a forensic nurse who deals with assault, they'll tell you this tweet is b.s.
"I ask that she bring those filings forward so that we can learn date, time, and place!"
Oh, you're right, my bad. I forgot that the only way a story of assault can be lauded as inextricably credible is if it's surfaced 36 years later in the public sphere by a Democrat during the 11th hour of a conservative SCOTUS nominee's confirmation hearingsMichael Barnhart said:BenFiasco14 said:etcetera said:
It is amazing that there are people defending this tweet by Trump.
Present the facts.
The tweer doesn't say or imply "present the facts". It implies that the only way a story such as hers is credible is if a police report was filed when it happens. Talk to a forensic nurse who deals with assault, they'll tell you this tweet is b.s.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
They didn't cave. They countered with an approach that is exactly how this process should proceed. Still on track to approve before 10/1. This was smart.BenFiasco14 said:FireAg said:
Caving to the leftists demands.
Kav isn't gonna be confirmed in time for the next SCOTUS session and the Dems will have gotten their goal
Michael Barnhart said:aTm2004 said:etcetera said:
It is amazing that there are people defending this tweet by Trump.
It's amazing people believe this isn't a political hit job.
It's very possible to both attack that tweet and to believe Ford is being used for a political hit job.
You don't know that poster.
What did they cave to? Other than the date.BenFiasco14 said:FireAg said:
Caving to the leftists demands.
Kav isn't gonna be confirmed in time for the next SCOTUS session and the Dems will have gotten their goal
As long as he is confirmed, do a few days matter that much? He'll probably be there 30 plus years.
One day at a time.
Ive just seen this story before. Give the libs an inch and they'll keep taking miles upon miles. A line needs to be drawn eventually, I just don't have faith in the Rs to NOT keep cavingaginlakeway said:What did they cave to? Other than the date.BenFiasco14 said:FireAg said:
Caving to the leftists demands.
Kav isn't gonna be confirmed in time for the next SCOTUS session and the Dems will have gotten their goal
As long as he is confirmed, do a few days matter that much? He'll probably be there 30 plus years.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
WelchAg said:They didn't cave. They countered with an approach that is exactly how this process should proceed. Still on track to approve before 10/1. This was smart.BenFiasco14 said:FireAg said:
Caving to the leftists demands.
Kav isn't gonna be confirmed in time for the next SCOTUS session and the Dems will have gotten their goal
This. And if she says no the vote proceeds.
Grassley is playing this as smart as you could hope for.
They partially compromised on the date of the testimony and told her to **** off on her other demands. How exactly is this caving? The Repubs save face by showing they still wish to hear her testimony while not bending over and taking it from the libs. Grassley is doing well.
OK. But you said they were caving to leftist demands. I don't think they did. Agree to disagree.BenFiasco14 said:Ive just seen this story before. Give the libs an inch and they'll keep taking miles upon miles. A line needs to be drawn eventually, I just don't have faith in the Rs to NOT keep cavingaginlakeway said:What did they cave to? Other than the date.BenFiasco14 said:FireAg said:
Caving to the leftists demands.
Kav isn't gonna be confirmed in time for the next SCOTUS session and the Dems will have gotten their goal
As long as he is confirmed, do a few days matter that much? He'll probably be there 30 plus years.
One day at a time.
Yep. It's not caving.PanzerAggie06 said:
They partially compromised on the date of the testimony and told her to **** off on her other demands. How exactly is this caving? The Repubs save face by showing they still wish to hear her testimony while not bending over and taking it from the libs. Grassley is doing well.
One day at a time.
That depends on how many oral arguments he may miss. If he's not seated when the arguments take place, he's recused and it's a 4/4 court. That having been said, Chief Justice Roberts set the schedule of the Court but those orders on briefing schedule etc. have been sent for the early cases, AFAIK.aginlakeway said:What did they cave to? Other than the date.BenFiasco14 said:FireAg said:
Caving to the leftists demands.
Kav isn't gonna be confirmed in time for the next SCOTUS session and the Dems will have gotten their goal
As long as he is confirmed, do a few days matter that much? He'll probably be there 30 plus years.
BenFiasco14 said:Ive just seen this story before. Give the libs an inch and they'll keep taking miles upon miles. A line needs to be drawn eventually, I just don't have faith in the Rs to NOT keep cavingaginlakeway said:What did they cave to? Other than the date.BenFiasco14 said:FireAg said:
Caving to the leftists demands.
Kav isn't gonna be confirmed in time for the next SCOTUS session and the Dems will have gotten their goal
As long as he is confirmed, do a few days matter that much? He'll probably be there 30 plus years.
Yep. And it just gives them more time to manufacture something else.
I'll be shocked if she actually allows herself to be placed under oath.
My guess is the Dems will back out at the last second and Kavanaugh will be confirmed...and the DNC/MSM complex will salvage what they can from this...mainly the ability to beg the question and tag "controversial and probable sex predator SC Justice" to any mention of Kavanaugh from now until forever.
They can't stop him. The next step in their playbook is to try and de-legitimize him.
My guess is the Dems will back out at the last second and Kavanaugh will be confirmed...and the DNC/MSM complex will salvage what they can from this...mainly the ability to beg the question and tag "controversial and probable sex predator SC Justice" to any mention of Kavanaugh from now until forever.
They can't stop him. The next step in their playbook is to try and de-legitimize him.
Hey Ben, if you're still going out with that hot lib I hope you have acquired express written consent for any frivolities. 
I really do want to see someone else do the questioning here. Dems have already developed the narrative of her being unfairly grilled by a bunch of old white men. They know they can depend upon the media to promote this narrative and completely ignore the fact she demanded it.PanzerAggie06 said:
They partially compromised on the date of the testimony and told her to **** off on her other demands. How exactly is this caving? The Repubs save face by showing they still wish to hear her testimony while not bending over and taking it from the libs. Grassley is doing well.
Still don't know if this is Grassley's line in the sand or just what it is being referred to...a counter offer.
She smacked my ass at the river the other day without asking. Other than this post (and my therapist) Im not gonna bring it up again until 36 years from nowPrognightmare said:
Hey Ben, if you're still going out with that hot lib I hope you have acquired express written consent for any frivolities.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Why shouldn't he be confirmed?
They are only against them when it is "other" people. Not them. We are deplorable after all. They are elites.aginlakeway said:Burning Tree is STILL all-male. FYI.VaultingChemist said:Holton-Arms girls school is located next to the all-male Burning Tree Golf Club, where Ralph Blasey (Christine's father) was president. Did Christine use her father's position to gain access to PGA golfers?Quote:https://heavy.com/news/2018/09/christine-blasey-ford-pga-golfers-tour/Quote:
"I can only tell you this. There is more news coming out every day about Dr. Ford," diGenova claimed on the show. "The Washington Post is doing a biography on her right now. And in the course of doing so, they contacted, at her request, members of the PGA tour. One of whom told the Post, 'I don't think you really want to talk to me.'" The comment was not further explained.
At the end of the show, diGenova said, "I'm for calling in outside witnesses. I want all the PGA golfers who have anything to say about her brought in to testify." Ingraham then said, "OK, to go to her character?" He replied, "bring in the PGA golfers to testify about her. She has put her character at issue. Bring in those golfers! Bring in those golfers!" Ingraham laughed and said, "we're going to learn more about that, everyone's wondering, googling LPGA, is it LPGA or PGA?" DiGenova replied, "It's PGA. It's the men. Bring in the golfers!"
Then, after Democrat Scott Bolden said there should be an investigation that includes the investigators from the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office's sex crimes unit, diGenova interrupted, saying, "you've got to send for the golfers first!
I thought the Liberals were against this sort of club?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
I'm doubting she shows up Wednesday as well. There will be some new excuse manufactured over the weekend. Some threat or some such.Squadron7 said:
I'll be shocked if she actually allows herself to be placed under oath.
My guess is the Dems will back out at the last second and Kavanaugh will be confirmed...and the DNC/MSM complex will salvage what they can from this...mainly the ability to beg the question and tag "controversial and probable sex predator SC Justice" to any mention of Kavanaugh from now until forever.
They can't stop him. The next step in their playbook is to try and legitimize him.
I was watching Sununu the other day talk about the Anita Hill hearing, He said those people who knew only Anita Hill believed her. Those knowing only Thomas, believed him. BUT those who knew both of them believed Thomas. That was the difference.
I don't think we even know of people who knew both of them well.
Oh, they caved the moment they let this ****show delay the vote to begin with...aginlakeway said:What did they cave to? Other than the date.BenFiasco14 said:FireAg said:
Caving to the leftists demands.
Kav isn't gonna be confirmed in time for the next SCOTUS session and the Dems will have gotten their goal
As long as he is confirmed, do a few days matter that much? He'll probably be there 30 plus years.
Maybe it's right to do it one more time, but folks need to go back and read about all of the "caving" allies did in Munich...
Appeasement simply makes the aggressor more aggressive...