Ugh. I had to stop watching.... I've got a 2 yr old daughter and that creepy old basterd just triggered the hell out of me.
Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations
501,614 Views |
5316 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by 93MarineHorn
Quote:
So she won't appear at the committee under oath because she's terrified for her life but she'll show up on the tonight show where she's conveniently free to say whatever she wants and it's not a crime
Makes perfect sense. Nobody has killed on Late Night shows for several years now.
I have 3 kids--all under 4 years old. Joe Biden is creepy as hell.tsuag10 said:
Ugh. I had to stop watching.... I've got a 2 yr old daughter and that creepy old basterd just triggered the hell out of me.
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
I've seen tons of the still photos of Biden in the creepy memes, but the video is sort of chilling. Maybe it's just me.Pinche Abogado said:I have 3 kids--all under 4 years old. Joe Biden is creepy as hell.tsuag10 said:
Ugh. I had to stop watching.... I've got a 2 yr old daughter and that creepy old basterd just triggered the hell out of me.
Liberals are ****ing insane
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Prognightmare said:
Libs are BSC! They don't realize that **** like this energizes Republicans to turn out the vote.
I'd love to slip an agent provocateur into this group that would chant with them but finish with "We believe Karen Monahan" just to see how fast these brave defenders of women shut them down.
If they believe Christine, then let's get her in front of the committee and hear what she has to say. It isn't mean old Trump or Chuck "brass balls" Grassley that is silencing her.
This is also red meat for their base.Prognightmare said:
Libs are BSC! They don't realize that **** like this energizes Republicans to turn out the vote.
They already believe "war on women" and that republicans are misogynistic, sexist, "barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen making me a sandwich" scumbags, and this will be used to perpetuate that myth.
Don't think this hasn't been vetted.
Squadron7 said:Quote:
So she won't appear at the committee under oath because she's terrified for her life but she'll show up on the tonight show where she's conveniently free to say whatever she wants and it's not a crime
Makes perfect sense. Nobody has killed on Late Night shows for several years now.
Yes, their base. The moderates in the middle are the ones that are getting pushed out or are voting for the R. These loons are killing their own party because of this. It's glorious.pagerman @ work said:This is also red meat for their base.Prognightmare said:
Libs are BSC! They don't realize that **** like this energizes Republicans to turn out the vote.
They already believe "war on women" and that republicans are misogynistic, sexist, "barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen making me a sandwich" scumbags, and this will be used to perpetuate that myth.
Don't think this hasn't been vetted.
aTm2004 said:Squadron7 said:Quote:
So she won't appear at the committee under oath because she's terrified for her life but she'll show up on the tonight show where she's conveniently free to say whatever she wants and it's not a crime
Makes perfect sense. Nobody has killed on Late Night shows for several years now.
Thanks for noticin'.
We believed Paula Jones, Gennifer Flowers, Monica Lewinsky, Juanite Broderick, Kathleen Willey, and many others.
Looks like she's thinking about testifying now. It's their only hope of delaying the vote. Grasley shot down their FBI plan earlier. Will be interesting to see ihey require in to be under oath.
They are going to come up with a protracted delay on her testifying, who knows if she ever will.
She said if "her conditions are met". It's a delay tactic.FriscoKid said:
Looks like she's thinking about testifying now. It's their only hope of delaying the vote. Grasley shot down their FBI plan earlier. Will be interesting to see ihey require in to be under oath.
Just heard that she "may" testify, but only if her safety is guaranteed (lol), and her pre-conditions are met. Also, won't be Monday, because her attorney says that day is "arbitrary."FriscoKid said:
Looks like she's thinking about testifying now. It's their only hope of delaying the vote. Grasley shot down their FBI plan earlier. Will be interesting to see ihey require in to be under oath.
In other words, no way in hell will she testify under oath. This is a smear campaign merely intended to delay. As we all knew.
But not on Monday....FriscoKid said:
Looks like she's thinking about testifying now. It's their only hope of delaying the vote. Grasley shot down their FBI plan earlier. Will be interesting to see ihey require in to be under oath.
Quote:
An email her lawyers sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee said Ford "would be prepared to testify next week" if the senators offer her "terms that are fair and which ensure her safety."
At this point, tell her to eff off (but politely).
Maybe a senator can ask her is her nickname was "Chrissy Blowsie"?
Basically along the lines of "we'll do it, but not on Monday." Also they're supposed to discuss the conditions and how they're going to guarantee her safety this afternoon.
I'd say, nope, you came forward months ago you lawyered up in August. You've been preparing for this inevitability since then.
I'd say, nope, you came forward months ago you lawyered up in August. You've been preparing for this inevitability since then.
She had a week to work this out. I would keep it Monday. Vote on Tuesday. If she wants to be there she will be.
FriscoKid said:
Maybe a senator can ask her is her nickname was "Chrissy Blowsie"?
All I know is that Mark May calls her "Sensei."
Um, why not do it in the Capital? That's probably a pretty safe place.
Here's how to guarantee her safety: Just make sure the left knows she's not a republican.Ellis Wyatt said:Just heard that she "may" testify, but only if her safety is guaranteed (lol), and her pre-conditions are met. Also, won't be Monday, because her attorney says that day is "arbitrary."FriscoKid said:
Looks like she's thinking about testifying now. It's their only hope of delaying the vote. Grasley shot down their FBI plan earlier. Will be interesting to see ihey require in to be under oath.
In other words, no way in hell will she testify under oath. This is a smear campaign merely intended to delay. As we all knew.
I hope Grassley doesn't change the timeline by one minute. She, Schumer, nor her lawyers get to dictate "conditions ". That's not how this works.
Grassley should not budge at all. He has set the agenda, and they can either comply or go butt a stump, but her side should not be demanding anything. So disgusting for what I believe to be a contrived lie, for delay tactics. She has been 'schooled' for some time on this by those who are pulling her strings.
Squadron7 said:FriscoKid said:
Maybe a senator can ask her is her nickname was "Chrissy Blowsie"?
All I know is that Mark May calls her "Sensei."
terms that are fair?!?! wtf does that mean? they offered to do it privately and fly out to meet her.
This is a delay tactic. Do not fall for it Grassley. Dont try to play nice and take the "high road". These people are scum!
This is a delay tactic. Do not fall for it Grassley. Dont try to play nice and take the "high road". These people are scum!
ThunderCougarFalconBird
Joined:
Oct 10, 2006
Posts:
49,158
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Go back a few pages and read the letter he fired off. He's good.garc said:
Do not fall for it Grassley. Dont try to play nice and take the "high road". These people are scum!
At this point, the tactics are akin to a 4 year old begging to stay up just 5 more minutes.
"My 5 year old has more delay tactics than a Democrat on the Judiciary Committee" has a nice ring to it
There is no way she will ever testify under oath. I would love to put up money to that effect. This is just a delaying tactic.
Grassley needs to schedule a vote for next Friday afternoon and tell her "We're happy to accommodate you, pick any day next week that suits you. We are voting Friday afternoon one way or another."
Grassley needs to schedule a vote for next Friday afternoon and tell her "We're happy to accommodate you, pick any day next week that suits you. We are voting Friday afternoon one way or another."
NM. Didn't work.
WillieBrownsBratwurstBun
Joined:
Jul 12, 2005
Posts:
3,432
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nice to see some GOP backbone for a changeaggiehawg said:The Senatorial version of a dick slap.FriscoKid said:
That is a great letter
Very interesting.
How does he know the floor plan?
How does he know the floor plan?
One day at a time.
Featured Stories
See All
49:45
13h ago
7.2k
25:48
16h ago
2.9k
Scouting Report: No. 22 Texas A&M vs. No. 1 Auburn
by Tom Schuberth
Wade Taylor IV will be chasing history during his final game at Reed
by Luke Evangelist
Dirty Mikes Boyz
An offseason sit-down with Texas A&M head football coach Mike Elko
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
4
74OA
An offseason sit-down with Texas A&M head football coach Mike Elko
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
4
BayouAg19
An offseason sit-down with Texas A&M head football coach Mike Elko
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
3
MooreTrucker
An offseason sit-down with Texas A&M head football coach Mike Elko
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
2
RetvrnAg
An offseason sit-down with Texas A&M head football coach Mike Elko
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
2
HunterAggie
An offseason sit-down with Texas A&M head football coach Mike Elko
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
2