Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations
501,897 Views |
5316 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by 93MarineHorn
They can't bring themselves to show up for their hi tech lynching.
Robert Bork's nomination process and the Anita Hill fiasco- all I need to know about Democrat's in the
SCOTUS confirmation.
With Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton as their poster boys-what can you really expect.
SCOTUS confirmation.
With Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton as their poster boys-what can you really expect.
She had 70 sex partners before she was 18 and he wasn't even one of them? I think he is the real victim here and not her.
FriscoKid said:
She had 70 sex partners before she was 18 and he wasn't even one of them? I think he is the real victim here and not her.
No kidding. Looking at it this way Kavanaugh is my people!
Okay, I'm not sure what the Dems next move is....but if I were Kavanaugh I would not be attending any Judicial League softball practices for a while.
Wow. I hope they televise this ... and there are NO Democrats there ...Wildmen03 said:Not surprising, they'd have questions asked of them that would need to be answered as well.aginlakeway said:Wow. Is this true?Big Al 1992 said:
This is all you need to know. Go ahead with vote.
Can't get caught in a lie if you don't show up.
What is the Democrats reason for not showing up?
One day at a time.
Oh you know the truth already...aginlakeway said:Wow. I hope they televise this ... and there are NO Democrats there ...Wildmen03 said:Not surprising, they'd have questions asked of them that would need to be answered as well.aginlakeway said:Wow. Is this true?Big Al 1992 said:
This is all you need to know. Go ahead with vote.
Can't get caught in a lie if you don't show up.
What is the Democrats reason for not showing up?
They don't care about the truth. They want him confirmed so they can have their little campaign talking point.
This play has been tried before. If you want the American people to take it serious and believe it isn't political, I would expect the Honorable Senator Feinstein to be put under oath in front of this committee to answer questions about her role in this and why she pushed it out last Thursday after the hearings were done. Questions would include why she didn't turn the note over to the FBI to be included in his background check over the Summer, why she didn't ask him about it privately, why she didn't ask him about it under oath in front of the committee. I would also ask her and her staff to answer questions under oath and turn over documents (if any) where a strategy was discussed to introduce the allegations.
This is serious business and doing the above would provide some assurances that this isn't a little political game. Feinstein's team should be more than willing to do this. It may be enlightening or all of the strategy may be being handled by the legal team of the accuser and coordinated with other groups with Feinstein as the useful idiot to them. I would expect the accuser's lawyer to go under oath in front of the committee to answer questions too. We must ensure this isn't politically motivated.
This is serious business and doing the above would provide some assurances that this isn't a little political game. Feinstein's team should be more than willing to do this. It may be enlightening or all of the strategy may be being handled by the legal team of the accuser and coordinated with other groups with Feinstein as the useful idiot to them. I would expect the accuser's lawyer to go under oath in front of the committee to answer questions too. We must ensure this isn't politically motivated.
Agree 1000%. In a town that is already a cesspool, this type of dirty move is taking it to another level. It's way past time to start reeling this garbage in, and Feinstein and her staff have served themselves up on a platter. They need to be grilled, and at an absolute minimum, she needs to lose her spot on the committee.
Isn't it ironic that the one who "accidentally" leaked Fusion GPS testimony earlier this year was very careful not to leak a thing until the 11th hour.Gap said:
This play has been tried before. If you want the American people to take it serious and believe it isn't political, I would expect the Honorable Senator Feinstein to be put under oath in front of this committee to answer questions about her role in this and why she pushed it out last Thursday after the hearings were done. Questions would include why she didn't turn the note over to the FBI to be included in his background check over the Summer, why she didn't ask him about it privately, why she didn't ask him about it under oath in front of the committee. I would also ask her and her staff to answer questions under oath and turn over documents (if any) where a strategy was discussed to introduce the allegations.
This is serious business and doing the above would provide some assurances that this isn't a little political game. Feinstein's team should be more than willing to do this. It may be enlightening or all of the strategy may be being handled by the legal team of the accuser and coordinated with other groups with Feinstein as the useful idiot to them. I would expect the accuser's lawyer to go under oath in front of the committee to answer questions too. We must ensure this isn't politically motivated.
You liberals are nothing if not shameless.
laavispa said:
Robert Bork's nomination process and the Anita Hill fiasco- all I need to know about Democrat's in the
SCOTUS confirmation.
With Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton as their poster boys-what can you really expect.
Yes Kennedy's car did more to harm women than Brett Kavanaugh ever will.
Emotional Support Cobra
Joined:
Feb 5, 2003
Posts:
38,134
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Burdizzo said:laavispa said:
Robert Bork's nomination process and the Anita Hill fiasco- all I need to know about Democrat's in the
SCOTUS confirmation.
With Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton as their poster boys-what can you really expect.
Yes Kennedy's car did more to harm women than Brett Kavanaugh ever will.
Burdizzo said:laavispa said:
Robert Bork's nomination process and the Anita Hill fiasco- all I need to know about Democrat's in the
SCOTUS confirmation.
With Ted Kennedy and Bill Clinton as their poster boys-what can you really expect.
Yes Kennedy's car did more to harm women than Brett Kavanaugh ever will.
And that is why there are no more Oldsmobiles.
It is known.
Think about exactly what Kavanaugh is being accused of doing when he was 17.
Now......have a look here.....
Click here to go to search results.
Now......have a look here.....
Click here to go to search results.
Picture of accuser.....
Yes, facts do matter.
Did Tech send her an acceptance letter with no application?FriscoKid said:
She had 70 sex partners before she was 18 and he wasn't even one of them? I think he is the real victim here and not her.
I'm pro choice but I hope Kavanaugh casts a vote to overturn Roe just to punish these losers
Cy_Tolliver said:Did Tech send her an acceptance letter with no application?FriscoKid said:
She had 70 sex partners before she was 18 and he wasn't even one of them? I think he is the real victim here and not her.
A "full ride" scholarship.
*Ba-Dump Bump*
Bo Darville said:
I'm pro choice but I hope Kavanaugh casts a vote to overturn Roe just to punish these losers
If he were that malleable he should be disqualified. Thankfully, he is not.
I need citation on this.FriscoKid said:
She had 70 sex partners before she was 18 and he wasn't even one of them? I think he is the real victim here and not her.
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others
Mtn_Guide said:I need citation on this.FriscoKid said:
She had 70 sex partners before she was 18 and he wasn't even one of them? I think he is the real victim here and not her.
Sneakiest Rule 1 call ever.
Dems aren't participating. They'll delay the committee vote by a day or two max.
That's why McConnell could act.NonReg85 said:
Dems aren't participating. They'll delay the committee vote by a day or two max.
It's smart for them to at least hear her out. Vote won't be delayed by more than a few days.
NonReg85 said:
Dems aren't participating. They'll delay the committee vote by a day or two max.
The Democrats won't be there to question Kavanaugh and the accuser? Really?
One day at a time.
50-50, in my view. There is a lot going on behind the scenes that we don't know about. How FOS are the Dems and the accuser? If they are as bad as it appears, McConnell goes nuclear on them, in my viewbiobioprof said:True. Odds?aggiehawg said:Little known fact, McConnell can still call a full vote even if the committee stalls.biobioprof said:
Committee vote will be delayed.
This is how the Dems want the testimony to go on Monday
Mr. Grassley: What day did this alleged altercation happen?
Liar : I don't know. I don't remember
Mr. Grassley : Where did this alleged altercation happen?
Liar: I don't know. At some House.
Mr Grassley: Mr Kavanagh says he never did any of what you claim to anyone. Ever. Can you prove what you are saying is true?
Liar : No
Mr Grassley: So, you don't know the day it happened and you don't know where it happened. You have no witnesses that corroborate your story. The people that you say where there don't corroborate your story. There is no physical evidence of an attack and there was no police report filed. You never told anyone about this alleged altercation for 35 years. Yet we are supposed to believe your story?
Liar: Yes
Mr Grassley: Based on your testimony, Do you think we should not confirm Mr Kavanagh as a Supreme Court Justice?
Liar: Yes, I do not think Mr Kavanagh should be confirmed.
Mr Grassley: Why not?
Liar : Because he tried really hard to touch my boob. And I didn't let him.
Mr Grassley: Ok. Sure thing. Sorry Mr Kavanagh you are out of here. Based on a single unfounded accusation of a sexual assault without any evidence we are kicking you off the deal and you will not be confirmed!! Especially, for the fact that apparently you couldn't even make it to first base with this beautiful women!
Good bye!
Mr. Grassley: What day did this alleged altercation happen?
Liar : I don't know. I don't remember
Mr. Grassley : Where did this alleged altercation happen?
Liar: I don't know. At some House.
Mr Grassley: Mr Kavanagh says he never did any of what you claim to anyone. Ever. Can you prove what you are saying is true?
Liar : No
Mr Grassley: So, you don't know the day it happened and you don't know where it happened. You have no witnesses that corroborate your story. The people that you say where there don't corroborate your story. There is no physical evidence of an attack and there was no police report filed. You never told anyone about this alleged altercation for 35 years. Yet we are supposed to believe your story?
Liar: Yes
Mr Grassley: Based on your testimony, Do you think we should not confirm Mr Kavanagh as a Supreme Court Justice?
Liar: Yes, I do not think Mr Kavanagh should be confirmed.
Mr Grassley: Why not?
Liar : Because he tried really hard to touch my boob. And I didn't let him.
Mr Grassley: Ok. Sure thing. Sorry Mr Kavanagh you are out of here. Based on a single unfounded accusation of a sexual assault without any evidence we are kicking you off the deal and you will not be confirmed!! Especially, for the fact that apparently you couldn't even make it to first base with this beautiful women!
Good bye!
A lot of people can play this game. I lived in Fairfield, Connecticut from 1972-1974. When I was 15, I was in NYC, in Grand Central Station (completely true on many occasions) and was sexually assaulted in the bathroom (not true) but maybe I repressed that memory but now I know it was Chuck Schumer.
Prove me wrong.
And the sad thing is? If I substituted "Trump" for "Schumer" idiots would believe it.
Prove me wrong.
And the sad thing is? If I substituted "Trump" for "Schumer" idiots would believe it.
Odds another "victim" shows up before Friday?