Exactly, The "who did I tell" bull**** corroboration story has changed.Rapier108 said:Yep. She originally claimed to have only told her shrink and husband, and didn't even mention a name to her shrink.Wildcat said:
Wait a minute. Did she name Kavanaugh in 2012? That isn't what was initially reported. I thought she only named Kavanaugh after he was nominated.
Quote:
Brett Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford has presented sworn statements from four individuals to back her claims of an assault decades ago including one from her husband Russel Ford.
Ford signed an affidavit stating that his wife informed him of the assault claim during a 2012 couple's therapy session. His statement comes a day before Ford is to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee and a day after Kavanaugh appeared side by side with his wife, Ashley, to deny charges against him.
'I remember her saying that her attacker's name was Brett Kavanaugh, that he was a successful lawyer who had grown up in Christine's home town, and that he was well-known in the Washington D.C. community," Russell Ford said in his statement.
Ford said his wife was 'afraid' Trump would nominate Kavanaugh, who sits on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, to the high court, and was 'very conflicted' about bringing her story forward.
Quote:
The declarations, first reported by USA Today, also include signed documents from three friends that her lawyers sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
"However, in the end she believed her civic duty required her to speak out," Russell Ford said. "In our 16 years of marriage I have always known Christine to be truthful person of great integrity. I am proud of her for her bravery and courage,' he husband said.
Quote:
Republican President Donald Trump, who has also been accused of sexual misconduct, escalated his rhetoric against both of Kavanaugh's accusers on Tuesday and called the allegations 'a con game being played by the Democrats.'
Trump also spoke out directly against the two accusers, suggesting their claims were invented.
The White House earlier this week said it would welcome testimony from the second accuser, Ramirez. Asked about her possible testimony, Trump on Tuesday said she 'had nothing.'
Ramirez's lawyer, John Clune, said in television interviews on NBC and CBS on Wednesday that she has not been invited to speak to senators.
The Republican-controlled committee, led by 11 men, on Tuesday said it had hired a female lawyer to question Ford. The decision prompted an outcry from Democrats, whose 10 panel members include four women, given that senators typically do the questioning themselves.
Senate Republicans chose Rachel Mitchell, a sex crimes prosecutor from Arizona, to conduct the questioning.
Old Tom Morris said:
Yeah, I don't like putting the calendar out there to be picked apart. Those that don't want to believe it aren't going to believe it anyway, and you just give them material to go pick apart and shape to their lie.
or back them into a cornerOld Tom Morris said:
Yeah, I don't like putting the calendar out there to be picked apart. Those that don't want to believe it aren't going to believe it anyway, and you just give them details to go pick apart and shape to their lie.
maybe they'll go through her attic and find a trapper keeper with the date in it?Maroon Dawn said:Old Tom Morris said:
Yeah, I don't like putting the calendar out there to be picked apart. Those that don't want to believe it aren't going to believe it anyway, and you just give them material to go pick apart and shape to their lie.
Normally yes
But recall that, she says she can't remember the exact date
If all of a sudden she does recall it and it coincidentally corresponds to one of the very few totally blank days on that calendar then they have her.
I would expect them to be slightly more creative than just doing it this way. But we'll see.Maroon Dawn said:Old Tom Morris said:
Yeah, I don't like putting the calendar out there to be picked apart. Those that don't want to believe it aren't going to believe it anyway, and you just give them material to go pick apart and shape to their lie.
Normally yes
But recall that, she says she can't remember the exact date
If all of a sudden she does recall it and it coincidentally corresponds to one of the very few totally blank days on that calendar then they have her.
Or this is a selective release and his parents had another "family" calendar. If that's the case, she can pick a blank date and then have the rug yanked out from under her by another calendar with a schedule conflict.Maroon Dawn said:
But recall that, she says she can't remember the exact date
If all of a sudden she does recall it and it coincidentally corresponds to one of the very few totally blank days on that calendar then they have her.
Maroon Dawn said:Old Tom Morris said:
Yeah, I don't like putting the calendar out there to be picked apart. Those that don't want to believe it aren't going to believe it anyway, and you just give them material to go pick apart and shape to their lie.
Normally yes
But recall that, she says she can't remember the exact date
If all of a sudden she does recall it and it coincidentally corresponds to one of the very few totally blank days on that calendar then they have her.
Date Night at the Ford House. He opens a nice Napa Chardonnay and catches up on the Atlantic and Huff Post. She picks up a bottle of Cuervo and some cranberry juice and meets Bob and Larry from Auto Zone at the La Quinta.BenFiasco14 said:He married a lib activist professor. His balls have been non-existent for a long, long time. Bending over and making a whiny affidavit was probably only a blip on his radaraTm2004 said:
Poor Russell. The whole world now knows he married a complete hoar.
Old Tom Morris said:Normally, I would expect them to be slightly more creative than just doing it this way. But we'll see.Maroon Dawn said:Old Tom Morris said:
Yeah, I don't like putting the calendar out there to be picked apart. Those that don't want to believe it aren't going to believe it anyway, and you just give them material to go pick apart and shape to their lie.
Normally yes
But recall that, she says she can't remember the exact date
If all of a sudden she does recall it and it coincidentally corresponds to one of the very few totally blank days on that calendar then they have her.
CanyonAg77 said:
I'd say those affidavits were totally believable. right down to the one where Adela Gilda-Mazzon (beware of women with hyphenated last names) vividly recalls exactly where she had lunch five and a half years ago, and still has the receipt.
I don't have a problem with that, given that Kavanaugh has calendars from 36 years ago.CanyonAg77 said:
I'd say those affidavits were totally believable. right down to the one where Adela Gilda-Mazzon (beware of women with hyphenated last names) vividly recalls exactly where she had lunch five and a half years ago, and still has the receipt.
pagerman @ work said:I don't have a problem with that, given that Kavanaugh has calendars from 36 years ago.CanyonAg77 said:
I'd say those affidavits were totally believable. right down to the one where Adela Gilda-Mazzon (beware of women with hyphenated last names) vividly recalls exactly where she had lunch five and a half years ago, and still has the receipt.
What this illustrates to me is that a person that was merely told about an incident can remember exactly where and when she heard the story, but the person that actually experienced the sexual assault in question can't remember where it happened, when it happened or how many boys were there when it happened.
TexasAggie_02 said:
HE WAS GROUNDED TWO FRIDAYS IN A ROW!! What kind of sick sh** did that SOB do to deserve that!?!?! /libs
And the thing is, I am not even that picky. I am not bothered that she can't name the exact day and specific house it happened in. I was almost killed by an illegal 25 years ago. I can tell you the year, the town, I'm 90% certain of the month, who was with me, but I couldn't tell you the date or exact location.pagerman @ work said:I don't have a problem with that, given that Kavanaugh has calendars from 36 years ago.CanyonAg77 said:
I'd say those affidavits were totally believable. right down to the one where Adela Gilda-Mazzon (beware of women with hyphenated last names) vividly recalls exactly where she had lunch five and a half years ago, and still has the receipt.
What this illustrates to me is that a person that was merely told about an incident can remember exactly where and when she heard the story, but the person that actually experienced the sexual assault in question can't remember where it happened, when it happened or how many boys were there when it happened.
