Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,723,956 Views | 49400 Replies | Last: 9 hrs ago by Im Gipper
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like everything is back.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Jmiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump can't find the love birds for his lawsuit.
Quote:

Plaintiff has attempted service unsuccessfully six (6) times

Peter says he's not hiding.
Quote:

"I'm still not a party to the lawsuit not until the plaintiff effects service, which they have not done," Strzok told Insider Tuesday night, noting that he has hardly been hiding from process servers.
Quote:

"I don't know why they haven't served me. I don't know if they're not serious. I don't know if it's incompetence. I don't know if they're playing games. I just don't know but of course, with Trump, it could be all of those things."

No word from Lisa.
WatchOle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG
It appears to all be back. Overnight our system was updating/reconciling between the cache and database and for whatever reason it errored out mid way through the thread. We forced a redo.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jmiller said:

Trump can't find the love birds for his lawsuit.
Beat it.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Troll elsewhere, please.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jmiller said:

Trump can't find the love birds for his lawsuit.
Quote:

Plaintiff has attempted service unsuccessfully six (6) times

Peter says he's not hiding.
Quote:

"I'm still not a party to the lawsuit not until the plaintiff effects service, which they have not done," Strzok told Insider Tuesday night, noting that he has hardly been hiding from process servers.
Quote:

"I don't know why they haven't served me. I don't know if they're not serious. I don't know if it's incompetence. I don't know if they're playing games. I just don't know but of course, with Trump, it could be all of those things."

No word from Lisa.
Well, if Pete says he isn't dodging service, we have to believe him. He'd never lie about something involving Trump. The FISA warrants were completely legitimate.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Leftist trolling is not allowed on this thread. Be gone.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WatchOle said:

It appears to all be back. Overnight our system was updating/reconciling between the cache and database and for whatever reason it errored out mid way through the thread. We forced a redo.
Thanks for the quick diagnosis and restoration Brandon!
ABATTBQ87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VegasAg86 said:

Jmiller said:

Trump can't find the love birds for his lawsuit.
Quote:

Plaintiff has attempted service unsuccessfully six (6) times

Peter says he's not hiding.
Quote:

"I'm still not a party to the lawsuit not until the plaintiff effects service, which they have not done," Strzok told Insider Tuesday night, noting that he has hardly been hiding from process servers.
Quote:

"I don't know why they haven't served me. I don't know if they're not serious. I don't know if it's incompetence. I don't know if they're playing games. I just don't know but of course, with Trump, it could be all of those things."

No word from Lisa.
Well, if Pete says he isn't dodging service, we have to believe him. He'd never lie about something involving Trump. The FISA warrants were completely legitimate.


aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just file an entry of appearance, Strzok. It's not hard.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So...what is the likely implication of the Danchenko filing?
Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and myself founded empires; but upon what foundation did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force! But Jesus Christ founded His upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for Him. - Napoleon Bonaparte
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
whatthehey78 said:

So...what is the likely implication of the Danchenko filing?
Going to trial, I guess. Durham lining up his witnesses for the prosecution using court issued subpoenas.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

whatthehey78 said:

So...what is the likely implication of the Danchenko filing?
Going to trial, I guess. Durham lining up his witnesses for the prosecution using court issued subpoenas.
Okay...I'm stupid. Who's going to be tried and what is the charge?

TIA!! I kinda assumed this was nil and void after Sussman acquittal.
Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and myself founded empires; but upon what foundation did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force! But Jesus Christ founded His upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for Him. - Napoleon Bonaparte
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Five counts of false statements related to the Steele Dossier.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How many of those 30 subpoenas are for the purpose of getting people to testify under oath about various things to restart the clock on the conspiracy?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txags92 said:

How many of those 30 subpoenas are for the purpose of getting people to testify under oath about various things to restart the clock on the conspiracy?
No idea. Would have to see the subpoena list.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, northern virginia is at least marginally better than DC proper.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?


will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The federal bureaucracy seems to be going with the "incompetence" play to avoid the "malicious" charge. Ye olde "we were misled and fooled" act, when it was pretty obviously more than mere confirmation bias leading them astray. You don't end around and bypass numerous process safeguards intended to prevent mistakes and errors by accident.
Proc92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who gives a crap about any corruption case against the state held in a dc court? Home cooking on steroids. Waste of time and money. They are sitting back and giggling.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proc92 said:

Who gives a crap about any corruption case against the state held in a dc court? Home cooking on steroids. Waste of time and money. They are sitting back and giggling.


Not in DC, but close enough. Virginia.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


Is this a new subpoena? He was subpoenaed back in 2020
October 8, 2020 John Durham subpoena's Dan Jones and other participants in the Alfa Bank hoax
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



Of course
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Current or Ex-FBI / US Attorney person(s)...does the FBI / DOJ not perform 'internal' reviews? Or is everything just whitewashed and swept under the carpet?
Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and myself founded empires; but upon what foundation did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force! But Jesus Christ founded His upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for Him. - Napoleon Bonaparte
Sterling82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seems like a top law enforcement agency whose purpose is to uphold and enforce the law would fire this guy after the first treacherous act. Is it any wonder trust in these agencies is at rock bottom?
First Page Last Page
Page 1389 of 1412
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.