This is the case Fusion cites to support its Motion to Intervene--totally cuts against their argument for intervention. Court should denied Fusion intervention and they know it, but it served its purpose of getting it all in the record. https://t.co/WVcbuvVoqb
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) April 19, 2022
sicandtiredTXN said:This is the case Fusion cites to support its Motion to Intervene--totally cuts against their argument for intervention. Court should denied Fusion intervention and they know it, but it served its purpose of getting it all in the record. https://t.co/WVcbuvVoqb
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) April 19, 2022
TBD as to whether or not the court grants or denies the FGPS motion to intervene. Prof Cleveland is just pointing out the case they cite lends them no favor.SwigAg11 said:sicandtiredTXN said:This is the case Fusion cites to support its Motion to Intervene--totally cuts against their argument for intervention. Court should denied Fusion intervention and they know it, but it served its purpose of getting it all in the record. https://t.co/WVcbuvVoqb
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) April 19, 2022
What does mean?
Hillary about to file motion. Expect one from the DNC as well.
— UndeadFOIA (@UndeadFoia) April 19, 2022
Oh good grief!will25u said:
Hurry about to have 3638937264792 intervenors like we had so many amicus briefs in the Flynn trial?Hillary about to file motion. Expect one from the DNC as well.
— UndeadFOIA (@UndeadFoia) April 19, 2022
This is really rich from @marceelias. He is citing his role defending against Bush's swiftboat attack against Kerry as justification of his involvement in Clinton's swiftboat attack against Trump. What a piece of work this guy is.https://t.co/EMmzaWzVPU pic.twitter.com/dDAGxuLZ3n
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) April 19, 2022
Perkins Coie just filed this in the Sussmann case. Elias took all the files. How convenient. pic.twitter.com/MmrvDOsLYG
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) April 19, 2022
Hillary For America now intervenes in the Michael Sussmann case-
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) April 19, 2022
Says the Perkins Coie/Fusion GPS communications and work product is "privileged"
In support, Robby Mook swears under penalty of perjury that Fusion GPS was retained to provide "legal services and legal advice"
👀 pic.twitter.com/R6mOMeSfbM
And the second attorney entering the case for Hillary is aptly named paola, apparently to defend her pay-ola. pic.twitter.com/efghDAkVgf
— Mccabe's Porsche on Blocks (@Larry_Beech) April 19, 2022
Interesting. Sussmann was indicted on September 16, 2021.will25u said:Perkins Coie just filed this in the Sussmann case. Elias took all the files. How convenient. pic.twitter.com/MmrvDOsLYG
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) April 19, 2022
It would have been an all day news story at CNN, MSNBC and elsewhere if Trump people had fought this desperately to avoid turning over documents in the Mueller probe
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) April 19, 2022
To give you an idea of the Sussmann madness, this is all the stuff that's been filed TODAY. And all of it has to do with concealing various emails from Durham. pic.twitter.com/KBqzM0POaM
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) April 19, 2022
Yes. It's called "a rolling barrage." Works well against civil litigants with limited pockets.will25u said:
Is everything that is happening today trying to muddy the water for the judge/Durham for the hearing tomorrow?
If these motions are all germane to the hearing tomorrow, any chance the judge blows them up for waiting for the day before to dump all these briefs on the court?aggiehawg said:Yes. It's called "a rolling barrage." Works well against civil litigants with limited pockets.will25u said:
Is everything that is happening today trying to muddy the water for the judge/Durham for the hearing tomorrow?
Does not work as well against a Special Counsel with the government's deep pockets.
What do I always say about pigs squealing?? Yeah, that.
I have forsaken predicting how any DC judge will view anything at this point. Even the "good" judges suck.Quote:
If these motions are all germane to the hearing tomorrow, any chance the judge blows them up for waiting for the day before to dump all these briefs on the court?
You can believe all you want that the work is legal services, but if it isn’t, it isn’t.
— Leslie McAdoo Gordon ⚖️ 👠🇺🇸 (@McAdooGordon) April 19, 2022
And opposition research . . . isn’t.
Further, hiring lawyers to manage or even do something doesn’t make it legal services if it isn’t. https://t.co/hk5raEa2dz
There is such a thing a legit work product when law firms hire private eyes for pending and anticipated litigation.will25u said:You can believe all you want that the work is legal services, but if it isn’t, it isn’t.
— Leslie McAdoo Gordon ⚖️ 👠🇺🇸 (@McAdooGordon) April 19, 2022
And opposition research . . . isn’t.
Further, hiring lawyers to manage or even do something doesn’t make it legal services if it isn’t. https://t.co/hk5raEa2dz
I don't know how many attorneys Durham has, but assume it's 20, or more. How does someone like Durham divide each lawyer, or teams of lawyers?aggiehawg said:Yes. It's called "a rolling barrage." Works well against civil litigants with limited pockets.will25u said:
Is everything that is happening today trying to muddy the water for the judge/Durham for the hearing tomorrow?
Does not work as well against a Special Counsel with the government's deep pockets.
What do I always say about pigs squealing?? Yeah, that.
Everything I've seen from Durham indicates to me he runs a very tight ship. Clearly delineated spheres of responsibility with some redundancy built in.fasthorse05 said:I don't know how many attorneys Durham has, but assume it's 20, or more. How does someone like Durham divide each lawyer, or teams of lawyers?aggiehawg said:Yes. It's called "a rolling barrage." Works well against civil litigants with limited pockets.will25u said:
Is everything that is happening today trying to muddy the water for the judge/Durham for the hearing tomorrow?
Does not work as well against a Special Counsel with the government's deep pockets.
What do I always say about pigs squealing?? Yeah, that.
I assume he has certain folks writing the motions, others on research, and others on potential actions to be taken outside of the Sussman case.
someome dug this up....
— Budgy (@Buuuuuudgeruck1) April 19, 2022
Elias has a problem.... pic.twitter.com/c9XeOHZcde
Oopsie!!!!will25u said:
Hopefully Durham knows everything Twitter folks have brought forward. If not, I hope they already know. Crowdfunded research on the internet is no joke, ESPECIALLY Since they don't have everything available to them that the government does.someome dug this up....
— Budgy (@Buuuuuudgeruck1) April 19, 2022
Elias has a problem.... pic.twitter.com/c9XeOHZcde
Found this response to the tweet you posted. Hoping he gets this and more.will25u said:
Hopefully Durham knows everything Twitter folks have brought forward. If not, I hope they already know. Crowdfunded research on the internet is no joke, ESPECIALLY Since they don't have everything available to them that the government does.
. . . . . . . .
Yep.
— » J H « (@FuarFearg) April 19, 2022
Espiecially now that we prosecute people for Obstructing Congress. For Elias, thats worth 15-21 months in prison.
The reason Durham has been able to keep a lid on this investigation for two plus years is because he has a very small group of hand picked seasoned prosecutors. I think he has 6 or 7 prosecutors that he's used for years in all the corruption cases he's prosecuted for decades. Now those prosecutors have staffers as well but they are going to be few and all 100% trustworthy, because Durham's MO is zero leaks.fasthorse05 said:I don't know how many attorneys Durham has, but assume it's 20, or more. How does someone like Durham divide each lawyer, or teams of lawyers?aggiehawg said:Yes. It's called "a rolling barrage." Works well against civil litigants with limited pockets.will25u said:
Is everything that is happening today trying to muddy the water for the judge/Durham for the hearing tomorrow?
Does not work as well against a Special Counsel with the government's deep pockets.
What do I always say about pigs squealing?? Yeah, that.
I assume he has certain folks writing the motions, others on research, and others on potential actions to be taken outside of the Sussman case.
I hope you are 100% right.sicandtiredTXN said:The reason Durham has been able to keep a lid on this investigation for two plus years is because he has a very small group of hand picked seasoned prosecutors. I think he has 6 or 7 prosecutors that he's used for years in all the corruption cases he's prosecuted for decades. Now those prosecutors have staffers as well but they are going to be few and all 100% trustworthy, because Durham's MO is zero leaks.fasthorse05 said:. . . . . . .aggiehawg said:. . . . . .will25u said:
. . . . . . .
This blizzard of paperwork isn't a big deal for this team, this is exactly what they expected. This isn't always a good strategy, and it backfires a lot of the time. And some of these arguments are so legally ludicrous the stench or it attaches itself to any real legal arguments they have. This is desperation because they've run outta things to do. Some of these claims now they are making directly contradicts sworn testimony they made three and four years ago. They never expected this to go this far.
I honestly think that when they got Trump out of office that Garland would have shut all this down and they'd be off to do more evil elsewhere and here they are with the Hail Mary.
Okay, this is going into multiple directions at once. Circular firing squads.fasthorse05 said:
Okay, I love the idea you put "oopsie" on your reply, but can't figure out why?
If the first doc is entirely blacked out, how does that support the last doc? Or, does the special counsel get to see the unredacted doc, but not the general public?
And it would be a darn shame to see the monies Elias put into his own firm go up in smoke!
sicandtiredTXN said:The reason Durham has been able to keep a lid on this investigation for two plus years is because he has a very small group of hand picked seasoned prosecutors. I think he has 6 or 7 prosecutors that he's used for years in all the corruption cases he's prosecuted for decades. Now those prosecutors have staffers as well but they are going to be few and all 100% trustworthy, because Durham's MO is zero leaks.fasthorse05 said:I don't know how many attorneys Durham has, but assume it's 20, or more. How does someone like Durham divide each lawyer, or teams of lawyers?aggiehawg said:Yes. It's called "a rolling barrage." Works well against civil litigants with limited pockets.will25u said:
Is everything that is happening today trying to muddy the water for the judge/Durham for the hearing tomorrow?
Does not work as well against a Special Counsel with the government's deep pockets.
What do I always say about pigs squealing?? Yeah, that.
I assume he has certain folks writing the motions, others on research, and others on potential actions to be taken outside of the Sussman case.
This blizzard of paperwork isn't a big deal for this team, this is exactly what they expected. This isn't always a good strategy, and it backfires a lot of the time. And some of these arguments are so legally ludicrous the stench or it attaches itself to any real legal arguments they have. This is desperation because they've run outta things to do. Some of these claims now they are making directly contradicts sworn testimony they made three and four years ago. They never expected this to go this far.
I honestly think that when they got Trump out of office that Garland would have shut all this down and they'd be off to do more evil elsewhere and here they are with the Hail Mary.
Actually, Biden could shut it down and fire Durham. Nixon fired Cox and none of the articles of impeachment drawn up against him did not even include that firing.Quote:
In theory, could Biden just shut this all down? I thought I remember reading that Trump could have shut down Mueller if he wanted.
Technically Biden yes I guess. Biden can order Garland to do it and then it's up to Garland to either obey or not. It's still up to Garland.SwigAg11 said:sicandtiredTXN said:The reason Durham has been able to keep a lid on this investigation for two plus years is because he has a very small group of hand picked seasoned prosecutors. I think he has 6 or 7 prosecutors that he's used for years in all the corruption cases he's prosecuted for decades. Now those prosecutors have staffers as well but they are going to be few and all 100% trustworthy, because Durham's MO is zero leaks.fasthorse05 said:I don't know how many attorneys Durham has, but assume it's 20, or more. How does someone like Durham divide each lawyer, or teams of lawyers?aggiehawg said:Yes. It's called "a rolling barrage." Works well against civil litigants with limited pockets.will25u said:
Is everything that is happening today trying to muddy the water for the judge/Durham for the hearing tomorrow?
Does not work as well against a Special Counsel with the government's deep pockets.
What do I always say about pigs squealing?? Yeah, that.
I assume he has certain folks writing the motions, others on research, and others on potential actions to be taken outside of the Sussman case.
This blizzard of paperwork isn't a big deal for this team, this is exactly what they expected. This isn't always a good strategy, and it backfires a lot of the time. And some of these arguments are so legally ludicrous the stench or it attaches itself to any real legal arguments they have. This is desperation because they've run outta things to do. Some of these claims now they are making directly contradicts sworn testimony they made three and four years ago. They never expected this to go this far.
I honestly think that when they got Trump out of office that Garland would have shut all this down and they'd be off to do more evil elsewhere and here they are with the Hail Mary.
In theory, could Biden just shut this all down? I thought I remember reading that Trump could have shut down Mueller if he wanted.
You can bet the house he doestxags92 said:
Do you have ay thoughts that Durham already may have more of their communications than he is letting on, potentially from the Radcliffe/Patel data dump? If so, has he possibly set some perjury traps for these various firms to walk into in filing their motions in support of Sussman?
