Quote:

---

She has been a partner at two very high profile law firms and, in between, she was Executive Vice President and General Counsel for Fannie Mae.

---

I'd love to know when Wilkinson was General Counsel for Fannie Mae. From 2006 to 2010,, there was tons of shenanigans at Fannie Mae under one of Obama's cohorts, Franklin Raines. That SOB made every money job in the country more difficult because of his extremely questionable accounting.

Basically, Raines is a crook.

I'm not saying Wilkinson is bad, and likely quite the opposite, but it wouldn't look good if she was there when Raines ran things. Her husband is David Gregory. While I immediately distrust any major media mouthpiece, Gregory found God sometime ago, and is much more trustworthy than most of the corrupt talking heads.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1264599241441378306.html

Some interesting GP tweets and retweets

Rex is taking a break.

Twitter is getting more and more toxic and with a 24/7/365 access, I would imagine quite exhausting to continuously monitor it and respond. One of the many, many reasons I'm not on twitter.

Quote:

---

Basically, Raines is a crook.

---

So is Jamie Gorelick. She had no education in finance, he hired her anyway. By the time she left, she was 26 million dollars richer.

Hate that b****!

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Basically, Raines is a crook.

---

So is Jamie Gorelick. She had no education in finance, he hired her anyway. By the time she left, she was 26 million dollars richer.

Hate that b****!

---

Yeah, remember her from the 9/11 hearings where Counter-Intel on the potential plot didn't get to the law enforcement due to a memo she signed preventing such exchanges when she worked for Slick Willy. The Gorelick Curtain.

EKUAg said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Basically, Raines is a crook.

---

So is Jamie Gorelick. She had no education in finance, he hired her anyway. By the time she left, she was 26 million dollars richer.

Hate that b****!

---

Yeah, remember her from the 9/11 hearings where Counter-Intel on the potential plot didn't get to the law enforcement due to a memo she signed preventing such exchanges when she worked for Slick Willy. The Gorelick Curtain.

---

She certainly played a role but her sin there was one of many that had happened over a number of years after the Church Committee (in the 70s) hearing results. We seem to keep going back and forth on the pendulum here.

CIA was definitely OOC in the 60s, 70s even the 80s. They get their wings clipped but in an overboard fashion.

9/11 happens and the overreaction goes too far in the opposite manner, so the IC is unleashed same as they did in the freewheeling times. Now we are back at the contraction phase...again.

I'm 61. I'm tired of seeing the same mistakes being made over and over again. <sigh>

Long thread here:

I hear ya. Only a year behind you.

VaultingChemist said:

---

Attorney Obtains Evidence US Government Has Communications Between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks

Quote:

---

Attorney Clevenger sent a letter to ADNI Rick Grenell ten days ago.
According to Ty, the NSA, knows exactly who sent the records to Wikileaks. So does the FBI.
Clevenger goes on to state the most shocking statement related to the Russia collusion sham to date:
I am reliably informed that the NSA or its partners intercepted at least some of the communications between Mr. Rich and Wikileaks. Before elaborating on that, however, I should first note the extent to which the "deep state" has already tried to cover up information about Mr. Rich. In an October 9, 2018 affidavit submitted in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, FBI section chief David M. Hardy testified that (1) the FBI did not investigate any matters pertaining to Mr. Rich, and (2) the FBI was unable to locate any records about Mr. Rich. Both claims were unequivocally false.

---

From the letter....

Quote:

---

...... in one email Agent Strzok boasts about having "squashed" something pertaining to Mr. Rich.
The redaction codes on the email indicate that there was some sort of investigation pertaining to Mr. Rich, contrary to Mr. Hardy's affidavit. Furthermore, the email string originated in the Washington Field Office, which is exactly where I had originally asked the FBI to search. The FBI refused to search there and, even though emails have since surfaced from the Washington Field Office, it still refuses to search there for records about Mr. Rich.

On March 20, 2020, I deposed former Asst. U.S. Attorney Deborah Sines, the prosecutor assigned to the Seth Rich murder case. She testified that (1) the FBI investigated a possible intrusion into Mr. Rich's electronic accounts; (2) the FBI examined Mr. Rich's computer; and (3) the FBI did have records pertaining to Mr. Rich. Ms. Sines further testified that she met with a prosecutor and an FBI agent from Mr. Mueller's team (ergo there should be an FD-302 form from that interview). Again, this flatly contradicts the FBI's official narrative that (1) Mr. Rich was never the subject of an FBI investigation; and (2) the FBI has no records pertaining to Mr. Rich.

---

---

Yeah, related to this is the testimony of CrowdStrike Shawn Henry saying basically that there was no determination that Russians exfiltrated the DNC server. There was only evidence that the server was exfiltrated.

If it turns out that it was Seth Rich, then besides $46,000.00 in Facebook adds and the Hillary funded Steel Dossier that solicited Russian garbage disinformation, where is the evidence that Russians interfered in the 2016 election?

Looks like Rexxurection has been silenced by the Twitterazis again.

Heck of a week, we can add that TDS has completely broken Coulter to the extent she is siding with Sessions.

GreyhoundDad said:

---

How pathetic of a dad you must be to not fight for justice for your son.

---

how many other kids do you have that you can afford to lose if it has already been demonstrated how easily you can lose one? Not saying this is what happened but given the parties possibly involved who knows?

Media whataboutism on unmaskings in 2017 and 2018 fails to mention the SCO's role in those figures.

Que Te Gusta Mas said:

---

---

Byron York is something of a swamp creature.

He is pretty consistent at stating DC groupthink.

Has a little never trumperism. Lost a lot of respect for him especially during the Mueller SC investigation, when he seemed to parrot the swamp position on Russia, Russia, Russia!

GreyhoundDad said:

---

How pathetic of a dad you must be to not fight for justice for your son.

---

Seth Rich's parents are dems..........or course they ran with story about a mugging gone bad.

It is pathetic.

Quote:

---

Almost as pathetic as the notion the Bill Barr's justice department would be complicit in the cover up of a murder scheme perpetrated by the DNC.

---

Sometimes you remind me of Henry Gibson...

SMH

What if FBI investigation found nothing to connect him to Wikileaks?


Going back to Clevenger, why is Barr DoJ not renewing this info? (Asking all, not just Ulysses)

unmade bed said:

---

CyclingAg82 said:

---

GreyhoundDad said:

---

How pathetic of a dad you must be to not fight for justice for your son.

---

Seth Rich's parents are dems..........or course they ran with story about a mugging gone bad.

It is pathetic.

---

Only thing pathetic is you guys trashing a dead guys parents because they won't play along with your bull**** partisan political fantasy.

Almost as pathetic as the notion the Bill Barr's justice department would be complicit in the cover up of a murder scheme perpetrated by the DNC.

---

I think Bill is Barr is trying uncover what really happened......FBI misdeeds all occurred prior to his appointment as AG. We'll see about the partisan political fantasy.

What is the basis for thinking Barr, or anyone at DOJ, is looking into Seth Rich currently?

BMX Bandit said:

---

What if FBI investigation found nothing to connect him to Wikileaks?


Going back to Clevenger, why is Barr DoJ not renewing this info? (Asking all, not just Ulysses)

---

To me it's clear the Barr DoJ, while not seeking to be involved in new politicized scandals (oh, heaven forbid any leftists are ever prosecuted/incarcerated), does not want to really be transparent about what happened in the prior regimes (FBI and DoJ), as it is all too damaging to the institutions, respectfully.

The pattern of redactions, slow walking answers/documents to Johnson/Grassley etc., and ongoing lack of transparency about things as wide ranging as the Flynn transcript/FD302's etc., to the documents from the Rich investigation that really did occur, all add up to a high level of consistency.

A ton of little things also could have been done to drive real answers, such as for instance seeking a court order to get a review of the lover birds personal phone messages, rather than allowing Pete/Lisa to just check them themselves for any work related content and declare 'nope, nothing to see here.' The abdication on the Wolfe prosecution. The lack of follow up on the overt lies to congress during impeachment testimonies (Yovanovich was the worst). The fact that McCabe, Comey, and Clinesmith have not been indicted/prosecuted. The lack of production of at least the three scope memos Rosenstein authored for Mueller. I could go on, but even a handful of action on production of the above documents would have been an indicator of good faith.

Back to your Q1: if they didn't find anything, they should be able to come out and say so, and at least admit it was investigated and the answer is no. But that's not what they have said.