Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,604,288 Views | 49329 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by JFABNRGR
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He dated/socialized some lady that had some background with Russia Russia Russia. Maybe that Butina lady, if memory serves?
pagerman @ work
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

He dated/socialized some lady that had some background with Russia Russia Russia. Maybe that Butina lady, if memory serves?
Yep.
Quote:

Byrne said the investigation into Clinton was one of the main reasons he came forward. This reporter first published Byrne's story about his relationship with now convicted Russian gun right's activist Maria Butina. She pleaded guilty in 2018 for failing to register as a foreign agent in the U.S. and is now serving out her sentence, which ends in October.
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. It's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of miseries." - Winston Churchill
Whens lunch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:

Prognightmare said:


Why would the CEO of overstock.com have first hand information about this? What is the connection?
This article was posted here a few weeks ago. It will answer some questions.

Sara Carter article 7/26/19
Not when I'm done with it.
Long Live Sully
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:

Prognightmare said:


Why would the CEO of overstock.com have first hand information about this? What is the connection?
Bro.. He sold the golden showers bed.


DUH!
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Here's the interview Sara Carter is quoting in her article. (It's a short video.) But there's more than what she quoted. Byrne stated that Comey & Brennan conducted political espionage against Hillary, Cruz, Rubio & Trump. Now let that sink in....he said everything we know about the Russian collusion investigation (& the Clinton investigation) is a lie.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Here's the interview Sara Carter is quoting in her article. (It's a short video.) But there's more than what she quoted. Byrne stated that Comey & Brennan conducted political espionage against Hillary, Cruz, Rubio & Trump. Now let that sink in....he said everything we know about the Russian collusion investigation (& the Clinton investigation) is a lie.
I guarantee that if they were keeping tabs on Hillary it was done to eliminate threats to her and give her defensive briefings.
Larry S Ross
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Or a file of all kinds of info to protect themselves if and when they needed it. They had to know the Clintons w turn on you in a second.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Larry S Ross said:

Or a file of all kinds of info to protect themselves if and when they needed it. They had to know the Clintons w turn on you in a second.
Good point. I have often referred to Comey as the second coming of J. Edgar.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:



Here's the interview Sara Carter is quoting in her article. (It's a short video.) But there's more than what she quoted. Byrne stated that Comey & Brennan conducted political espionage against Hillary, Cruz, Rubio & Trump. Now let that sink in....he said everything we know about the Russian collusion investigation (& the Clinton investigation) is a lie.

This is really getting weird. You couldn't make this stuff up
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've never really thought about that, but it seems to me that J Edgar was never going to be granted membership in the musketeers, being one for one, and all for one. I do believe he supported America.

I think Comey has some of that, but he seems more interested in Party, and not country. I'm not saying Comey isn't interested in self-preservation, his actions suggest America wasn't as important as the Dems were.

BTW, isn't Comey's daughter an attorney involved in the Epstein case?
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Witness protection or Arkancide watch?
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://www.scribd.com/document/421640047/De-95-CNN-v-FBI-Memo-Opinion

Looks like we will be able to see some Comey memo-related stuff.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MooreTrucker said:

Witness protection or Arkancide watch?
I think you're replying to me, but I was under the assumption she was placed on the Epstein case in general.

I'm not even sure that's the case, so i wouldn't know which one. I know she's been placed on one of the high profile cases.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
Nosmo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Here's the interview Sara Carter is quoting in her article. (It's a short video.) But there's more than what she quoted. Byrne stated that Comey & Brennan conducted political espionage against Hillary, Cruz, Rubio & Trump. Now let that sink in....he said everything we know about the Russian collusion investigation (& the Clinton investigation) is a lie.
He said he decided to go public after the advice of and consulting with his mentor, Warren Buffett, who is a huge Hillary Clinton supporter. That would suggest that this will be a positive for Clinton. I'm guessing he doesn't care if it helps the Republicans, but is more concerned in trying to clear Hillary, while sticking it to the FBI and CIA leadership.
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can I go to sleep Looch?
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fasthorses05 said:

MooreTrucker said:

Witness protection or Arkancide watch?
I think you're replying to me, but I was under the assumption she was placed on the Epstein case in general.

I'm not even sure that's the case, so i wouldn't know which one. I know she's been placed on one of the high profile cases.
Nope, general comment about this Byrne guy.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nosmo said:

Quote:

Here's the interview Sara Carter is quoting in her article. (It's a short video.) But there's more than what she quoted. Byrne stated that Comey & Brennan conducted political espionage against Hillary, Cruz, Rubio & Trump. Now let that sink in....he said everything we know about the Russian collusion investigation (& the Clinton investigation) is a lie.
He said he decided to go public after the advice of and consulting with his mentor, Warren Buffett, who is a huge Hillary Clinton supporter. That would suggest that this will be a positive for Clinton. I'm guessing he doesn't care if it helps the Republicans, but is more concerned in trying to clear Hillary, while sticking it to the FBI and CIA leadership.
Thats not how he came off in the posted video
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can I go to sleep Looch?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wouldn't he have to demonstrate he was a government agent to be eligible for such a dismissal, not merely pose the possibility?
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Declassification of certain documents might just blow this dismissal request out of the water. On the other hand, suppose the judge dismisses her suit, & then documents are declassified which prove she was correct -- that Halper had smeared her in the press -- what happens then?
Nosmo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:

Nosmo said:

Quote:

Here's the interview Sara Carter is quoting in her article. (It's a short video.) But there's more than what she quoted. Byrne stated that Comey & Brennan conducted political espionage against Hillary, Cruz, Rubio & Trump. Now let that sink in....he said everything we know about the Russian collusion investigation (& the Clinton investigation) is a lie.
He said he decided to go public after the advice of and consulting with his mentor, Warren Buffett, who is a huge Hillary Clinton supporter. That would suggest that this will be a positive for Clinton. I'm guessing he doesn't care if it helps the Republicans, but is more concerned in trying to clear Hillary, while sticking it to the FBI and CIA leadership.
Thats not how he came off in the posted video
I actually got my opinion more from the Sara Carter article referenced previously.

https://saraacarter.com/russia-probe-twist-a-billion-dollar-ceo-a-convicted-russian-agent-and-the-fbi/

It's just hard for me to believe that Buffet would advise him to do something to harm Hillary, or her cause. Also, Byrne's cryptic conversation / statements are ambiguous, especially considering his relationship with Butina.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drcrinum said:

Declassification of certain documents might just blow this dismissal request out of the water. On the other hand, suppose the judge dismisses her suit, & then documents are declassified which prove she was correct -- that Halper had smeared her in the press -- what happens then?
Just suppostion here, but it probably falls into the "tough luck" category. It's certainly something that would happen with a Dem administration, since about five agencies are Dem acolytes.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fasthorses05 said:

drcrinum said:

Declassification of certain documents might just blow this dismissal request out of the water. On the other hand, suppose the judge dismisses her suit, & then documents are declassified which prove she was correct -- that Halper had smeared her in the press -- what happens then?
Just suppostion here, but it probably falls into the "tough luck" category. It's certainly something that would happen with a Dem administration, since about five agencies are Dem acolytes.
Agree. Her original complaint, though an entertaining read, was long on narrative and short on the law.

Although it seems counter-intuitive for Halper to simultaneously assert he may or may not be a contractor with agencies of the federal government, for purposes of a Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, that is allowable in that setting.

Apparently Halper took great offense at being called, "a rat-f***er" but calling her a Russian honeypot who had an affair with Michael Flynn was A-okay. As to the latter, unfortunately, Halper is correct.
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Now this is an interesting tweet with comments.

Can I go to sleep Looch?
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Can I go to sleep Looch?
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Athanasius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SIAP...

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/08/12/victoria_nuland_tells_all_on_trump-russia__not_119932.html

Quote:

Former Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland has repeatedly downplayed her role in the spread of Christopher Steele's anti-Trump dossier. Long-awaited evidence emerged last week showing Nuland was more involved in the dossier than she has let on and in particular, more than she admitted under oath before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

...

And yet Steele stayed connected to the FBI. His friend Bruce Ohr, one of the top officials at the Justice Department, became a go-between. Ohr would talk with Steele and then stop by the J. Edgar Hoover Building to recount their conversations to the bureau. Summaries of that information were written down by FBI agents in what are called "302" memos. Judicial Watch has succeeded in clawing heavily redacted copies of those memos into the open through Freedom of Information Act requests. The memos show that though Steele compiled the dossier, the most active promoter of Steele's product was his paymaster, Fusion GPS head Glenn Simpson. Which is why Chairman Burr may have been missing a key part of the puzzle when he focused on asking Nuland about her contacts with Steele.

That becomes clear in a 302 memo of an FBI interview with Ohr from Nov. 22, 2016 just weeks after Donald Trump won the presidential election. Ohr recounted to the FBI a crucial piece of information he had learned from Steele. As the agents wrote it down, "OHR knew Glen [sic] Simpson and others were talking to Victoria Nuland at the U.S. State Department."
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think they are wrong in their interpretation of the Halper motion to dismiss. It is citing two different and alternative grounds. One under 12(b)(6)--failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and 12(b)(1) lack of ubject matter jurisdiction.

Under 12(b)(6), the court is constrained to accept as true all of the allegations of the complaint. She alleged he's a government agent or contractor. So his attorneys are arguing that even if that were true, there would be immunity issues.

They are also arguing that the news articles in question are not defamatory, per se nor is there any evidence or allegation presented that Halper was the sole source, nor one of the sources for the articles.

They also have challenged her claimed damages as not compensable under the laws regarding torts.

Finally, there are Statute of Limitations issues as to several of the articles cited. And the only one that does fall within the SOL says Halper was contacted but declined to comment within the article itself.

So to recap: immunity, not defamatory per se, not a source, no compensable damages and Statute of Limitations are being asserted in the motion.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whens lunch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lou Dobbs speaking the truth authoritatively!
Not when I'm done with it.
Cy_Tolliver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Larry S Ross said:

Or a file of all kinds of info to protect themselves if and when they needed it. They had to know the Clintons w turn on you in a second.
Good point. I have often referred to Comey as the second coming of J. Edgar.
Even if I was a Clinton supporter, I'd make damn sure there was something devastating that they knew would be released if I was ever killed or prosecuted.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Take with a grain of salt. Solomon says Horowitz report on Comey around end of week.

pagerman @ work
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Take with a grain of salt. Solomon says Horowitz report on Comey around end of week.

Has anyone kept a running tab on how many times this promise has been made?

Don't get me wrong, I hope it drops, but fool me once...
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. It's inherent virtue is the equal sharing of miseries." - Winston Churchill
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
pagerman @ work said:

Quote:

Take with a grain of salt. Solomon says Horowitz report on Comey around end of week.

Has anyone kept a running tab on how many times this promise has been made?

Don't get me wrong, I hope it drops, but fool me once...
Not enough finger and toes to count.

And if it happens, Comey will get off with a slap on the wrist at best.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
First Page Last Page
Page 890 of 1410
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.