Quote:

---

DNC lawyers wrote in court filings Friday that Joseph Mifsud, who spoke to Papadopoulos during the 2016 presidential election, "is missing and may be deceased," Bloomberg News reported. The lawyers did not elaborate.

---

He's been murdered? I wondered about that when Team Mueller filed that ridiculous sentencing recommendation if they did so knowing the only person who could refute it was likely silenced permanently.

Might have been the Russians, if Mifsud was playing both teams against each other. Might have been us, might have been other country's intelligence agencies.

Weird coming from the DNC attorneys, however.

Now this is funny:

Quote:

---

"Today, Essential Consultants LLC and Michael Cohen have effectively put an end to the lawsuits filed against them by Stephanie Clifford aka Stormy Daniels," Blakely told CNN.

The rescission of the Confidential Settlement Agreement will result in Ms. Clifford returning to Essential Consultants the $130,000 she received in consideration, as required by California law," he added.

A source familiar with Cohen's thinking told the network that Cohen no longer benefits from Daniels's promise to keep quiet about the affair.

---

Quote:

---

Michael Avenatti, the attorney representing Daniels in her defamation case against Cohen and Trump over their denials of the alleged affair, told CNN that the move was likely made in an attempt to protect Trump from being deposed.
"I haven't had a chance to digest it, I just saw it on my email literally right before I came on," Avenatti told CNN.

"What they're trying to do is they don't want me to get a chance to depose Michael Cohen and Donald Trump," he added. "This is a hail mary to try and avoid that, that's my first guess."

Avenatti added in a tweet Friday night that Cohen "is back to playing games and trying to protect Donald Trump."

"He is now pulling a legal stunt to try and 'fix it' so that we can't depose Trump and present evidence to the American people about what happened. He is not a hero nor a patriot. He deserves what he gets," the attorney added.

---

LINK

Game, set, match, Avenatti. You just got rick-rolled.

Poor Avenatti

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1038446676485332993.html

Interesting thread...even references a lawyer named 'Dixie'.

Translate that for use common folk

Prognightmare said:

---

Translate that for use common folk

---

Well, she sued to have the confidentiality agreement voided by the court claiming it was fraudulently induced. Instead of trying to enforce the agreement, Cohen is now agreeing to rescind the contract, making it go away as she wished only she has to pay back the consideration of $130,000.

Avenatti is now in a box. His client very well could have to pay that back and the best way to prevent that is to settle and dismiss the case.

Clearer?

What does he hope to get out of deposing Trump? Isn't it his client that violates the contract? Shouldn't Trumps team be deposing her? What a circus.

This also seems weird because Cohen is still working for Trump then? Didn't he secretly record Trump and is being charged by the FBI?

bmks270 said:

---

What does he hope to get out of deposing Trump? Isn't it his client that violates the contract? Shouldn't Trumps team be deposing her? What a circus.

---

Perjury trap. That's what he wants. Deposing her isn't that worthwhile because you cannot shame a porn star who is dumber than a box of rocks.

bmks270 said:

---

This also seems weird because Cohen is still working for Trump then? Didn't he secretly record Trump and is being charged by the FBI?

---

No. Cohen has a company, Essential Consultants, that has the actual contract with her, not Trump.

Now Avenatti has tried to sue Trump on her behalf for defamation over one of his tweets but that won't likely go anywhere. Again, how do you defame a porn star?

Yes it is! Gracias!

Now, Gameday i nearly over with, football games begin, and it's time for a Deathburger, perhaps a drink at the Whiskey Bar---maybe around 3:00PM, and an eye on the skies.

BTHO Clemson.

Quote:

---

Even those that weren't pulling the levers can't be trusted. Because they have a false view that it's their patriotic duty to protect the instititutions when in reality they should be protecting the Constitution and the individual liberties it protects.

---

Well said.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

Even those that weren't pulling the levers can't be trusted. Because they have a false view that it's their patriotic duty to protect the institutions when in reality they should be protecting the Constitution and the individual liberties it protects.

---

Well said.

---

Here here I'm stealing this

Papadopoulos interview with CNN. Of course it's heavily politicized with CNN interjecting lots of 'defamatory' type material. I've only watched part (sorry, it's football Saturday), but at ...start at 19.00: Papa says he has no memory, no recollection of ever mentioning to the Australian Ambassador to the UK, Alexander Downer, that the Russians had damaging material on Hillary.

Much, thanks

Quote:

---

Papadopoulos interview with CNN. Of course it's heavily politicized with CNN interjecting lots of 'defamatory' type material. I've only watched part (sorry, it's football Saturday), but at ...start at 19.00: Papa says he has no memory, no recollection of ever mentioning to the Australian Ambassador to the UK, Alexander Downer, that the Russians had damaging material on Hillary.

---

Maybe Downer slipped him a mickey in his drink? Classic blackout.

drcrinum said:

---

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1038446676485332993.html

Interesting thread...even references a lawyer named 'Dixie'.

---

Is that you? Are you Roscoe B. Davis?

My name isn't Roscoe, but somebody else on this thread is named Roscoe.

drcrinum said:

---

My name isn't Roscoe, but somebody else on this thread is named Roscoe.

---

Sorry. I was imprecise. I meant to ask Roscoe, not you, since he's the only one who calls me "Dixie" and I am always blathering about fruit of the poisonous tree. LOL.

aggiehawg said:

---

drcrinum said:

---

My name isn't Roscoe, but somebody else on this thread is named Roscoe.

---

Sorry. I was imprecise. I meant to ask Roscoe, not you, since he's the only one who calls me "Dixie" and I am always blathering about fruit of the poisonous tree. LOL.

---

For anyone curious about this document dump page it looks like every two days they are going to roll stuff out

Here's a screenshot of about 1/3 of the icons

This is a copy and paste of the first page


UNITED STATES SECURITY BREACHES AND ACTS CONSTITUTING TREASON

BY U.S. GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL



THERE WERE NO GROUNDS TO HIRE SPECIAL

COUNSEL IN THE FIRST PLACE

THERE WAS NEVER ANY REAL THREAT ASSESSMENT JUSTIFICATION FOR THE INVESTIGATION.


The cross referenced threat assessments from the following United States Agencies during the period of verified by showed no such assessment of the Trump For President Campaign that would warrant an investigation.The time stamped access and egress by department personnel at the following UNITED STATES Departments and Agencies pertaining to



THE INVESTIGATION WAS A COUNTER ATTACK IN RESPONSE TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY NOT WINNING THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND KEY OFFICIALS HAVING TO VACATE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FACILITIES, WHICH WILL EXPOSE CRIMINAL OFFENSES OF THE FORMER OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND OUTSIDE PARTIES THAT INCLUDE FOREIGN FACTIONS AVERSE TO THE VALUES OF THE UNITED STATES AND THAT SEEK TO USURP OPPORTUNITIES AND STEAL OUR
RESOURCES; THE BEST DEFENSE, AN OFFENSE.



Retroactive measures such as James Clapper, on December 15, 2016 and Loretta Lynch on January 3, 2017 each being instructed to modify Section 2.3 of Executive Order 12333, to expand access to surveillance of United States Citizens, granting the 16 additional main publicly recognized Intelligence Agencies to receive unfiltered Intelligence without any privacy policies, however, the FBI had already accessed comprehensive NSA surveillance files prior to this date. The claim was made by the Obama Administration that they had been working towards expanding the NSA surveillance machine, however, no reports had been found to date, and the
Obama Administration was already sharing the raw signal Intelligence between U.S. Agencies illegally including the FBI, for self enrichment and political purposes according to The expansion was reckless, irresponsible and criminal because the motive was to achieve a political advantage, enrich themselves and their foreign alliances, and cover up crimes but the HIGH PROBABILITY OUTCOME STUDY rightly foretasted multiple security vulnerabilities.





There are additional facts that have been overlooked. COMMUNICATIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF EVERY MEMBER OF THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN COULD EASILY BE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE IF THERE WERE ANY RUSSIA COLLUSION EVENTS, because as Edward Snowden told the world and our Intelligence Community admitted, all communications are collected and stored. See
confirmation videos.




The intelligence Community including U.S., Five Eyes and various foreign alliances are highly efficient. See video of Tucker Carlson interview with Brett Larson and their report on google tracking and profiling capabilities. The Intelligence Community capabilities are much more robust and detailed than the news broadcast example.




Because our surveillance system collects all data from each communication of every person daily and then stores the data for retroactive mining when a target is identified, and any expansion of access requires multiple security layers and redundant security protocols, rushing the transition puts the whole Nation and the world at risk for weapon technology transfer such as chemical and nuclear threats, and enabling enemies to collect war strategies, plus the more people who touch the surveillance network also greatly increase the probability of more intercepts due to higher volume per day, including information coming in and out of the
Pentagon, defense contractors and research institutions, all of which have the potential to be compromised regardless of bifurcation.


THE GLARING FLAW IN THE RUSSIA COLLUSION INVESTIGATION IS THAT THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND U.S. DEPARTMENT HOLDOVERS AND SELF SERVING RADICAL WASHINGTON ELITISTS ALREADY KNEW THERE WAS NO COLLUSION BECAUSE OF OUR ROBUST SURVEILLANCE CAPABILITIES, AND THUS THE MOTIVE BY THE DESPERATE FORMER OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO MANUFACTURE EVIDENCE BY MANIPULATING THE CARTER PAGE MATTER AND INVENTING THE FAKE DOSSIER IN COLLABORATION WITH BAD ACTOR GCHQ AND MI6 OPERATIVES ALIGNED WITH U.S. BAD ACTORS.
EITHER THE OBAMA INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES WERE COMPLETELY INEPT OR THEY DELIBERATELY COMMITTED TREASON AGAINST A SITTING PRESIDENT.



As mentioned at the start of this Report there were no records of any threat assessment that would ever justify the investigation of a Republican or Democrat Nominee for President and then continued investigation



Rod Rosenstein


Further as Mark Levin, Joseph DiGenova, Gregg Jarrett, Judge Jeanine Pirro, Sean Hannity, Sara Carter, Jay Sekulow and a number of qualified attorneys and former Federal Judges have detailed and as can be found in the 2000 VOLUME 24 OPINIONS OF THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CONCERNING THE OFFICIAL DUTIES
OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL attached hereto, the President cannot be indicted or criminally prosecuted anyway, because such action as found on Page 222, "would impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions", and further reaffirmed, "We believe that the conclusion reached by the Department in 1973 still represents the best interpretation of the Constitution."


Therefore, special counsel never should have been appointed but particularly because there was not even a scintilla of real evidence and the parties who were the main instigators and continued antagonists, had the following motivations and conflicts, making them ineligible to participate anywhere in this process of calling for special counsel for an allegation of an action that would not be a crime in the first place (collusion is not a crime although that could lead to conspiracy, which is a crime)


Standard protocols for investigating foreign infiltration were not followed from the beginning by the Obama Administration, as their responsibility through the proper U.S. Departments was to collect data from the environment of the supposed crime, perform the threat assessment, identify the players showing there was bias by multiple parties.



THE ACTUAL PARTIES WHO WERE RESPONSIBLE FOR STAGING AND INITIATING THE FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF RUSSIA COLLUSION, WERE ACTUALLY, ACCORDING TO FEDERAL RULES OF LAW,GUILTY OF OBSTRUCTION, PERJURY, CONSPIRACY AND TREASON AMONG MULTIPLE ADDITIONAL OFFENSES, BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING:





REDACTED

whereby James Comey admitted he purposefully leaked information because he knew that would prompt the appointment of special counsel



Rod Rosenstein had insisted President Trump fire FBI Director James Comey and cited the reasons with the recommendations of seven reputable bipartisan DOJ Attorney Generals and Deputy Attorney Generals. Please see the May 9, 2017 MEMORANDUM BY ROD J. ROSENSTEIN REGARDING RESTORING PUBLIC CONFIDENCE.





REDACTED

The verified surveillance apparatus has been effectively explained by Mr. William Binney, Mr. Kirke Wiebe, Mr. Tom Drake, Ms. Diane Roark and Mr. Ed Loomis, and in a lawsuit against President Barack Obama by Mr. Elliott Schuchardt attached hereto.

No collusion or crime was ever committed as has been actually proven by Robert Mueller from more than a year of conducting an investigation and confirmed by Rod Rosenstein, Andrew McCabe, James Clapper and Diane Feinstein, among multiple parties.


See VIDEOS of Rosenstein, McCabe, Clapper, Feinstein.


Therefore the following United States Departments, as represented by the following personnel
declared there was no collusion, without rebuttal from anyone within those Departments:


THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Represented by Rod Rosenstein;




THE FBI represented by Andrew McCabe;



THE ENTIRE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY represented by DNI James Clapper;




THE SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE represented by Diane Feinstein.





The findings of this Report are that the hard evidence is incontrovertible, that for the sake of Justice and restoring our Intelligence Community including the FBI, and restoring the DOJ, and public confidence thereof, the false allegations concerning Russia Collusion should be immediately dismissed, to remove the distractions from President Donald J. Trump, and relieving the U.S. Taxpayers of this burden, and subsequently, the abundance of evidence, should cause the immediate referrals for criminal prosecution against the following parties, and the removal from U.S. Government office, of those who remained employed.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1038534791568576512.html

There's a football game on

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

For anyone curious about this document dump page it looks like every two days they are going to roll stuff out

Here's a screenshot of about 1/3 of the icons

---

Who exactly is "they" and what are these and who are they from?????? TIA!

Go back and read the thread

whatthehey78 said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

For anyone curious about this document dump page it looks like every two days they are going to roll stuff out

Here's a screenshot of about 1/3 of the icons

---

Who exactly is "they" and what are these and who are they from?????? TIA!

---

I was/am a bit confused by this post as well. But I believe Roscoe is following up with these two sites and analyzing what he is finding. And posting one of the documents.

Votertruth.com and Reportforthepresident.org

Quote:

---

Further as Mark Levin, Joseph DiGenova, Gregg Jarrett, Judge Jeanine Pirro, Sean Hannity, Sara Carter, Jay Sekulow and a number of qualified attorneys and former Federal Judges have detailed and as can be found in the 2000 VOLUME 24 OPINIONS OF THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CONCERNING THE OFFICIAL DUTIES OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL attached hereto, the President cannot be indicted or criminally prosecuted anyway

---

I was doubting the credibility of this post until I saw the author quoted Levin and Hannity. Would be even more credible if Guiliani supported this opinion as well. That would really add weight to the argument.

Yeah, That last bit was a re-hash of information we already had. Sort of a summary but I don't see anything really new in it.

Found this interesting

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1037868770541416449.html

txwxman said:

---

Quote:

---

Further as Mark Levin, Joseph DiGenova, Gregg Jarrett, Judge Jeanine Pirro, Sean Hannity, Sara Carter, Jay Sekulow and a number of qualified attorneys and former Federal Judges have detailed and as can be found in the 2000 VOLUME 24 OPINIONS OF THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CONCERNING THE OFFICIAL DUTIES OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL attached hereto, the President cannot be indicted or criminally prosecuted anyway

---

I was doubting the credibility of this post until I saw the author quoted Levin and Hannity. Would be even more credible if Guiliani supported this opinion as well. That would really add weight to the argument.

---

It's not their argument. It's the official position of the Department of Justice. These people have merely pointed that out.