drcrinum said:

---

But his deposition/testimony is not under oath.
Edit: There is debate over the latter; some say that is not true.

---

drcrinum said:

---

But his deposition/testimony is not under oath.
Edit: There is debate over the latter; some say that is not true.

---

Doesn't matter lying to congress is illegal sworn or not sworn. The oath is a talking point.


H.R.3166 - False Statements Accountability Act of 1996

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

---

Not politically biased? That's the most absurd statement I've heard in a while. "My political biases didn't affect my judgement" would at least be arguable.

Q dropped some transcripts

I don't think this had been officially released at 12:31 pm CT

Q !CbboFOtcZs 06/27/18 (Wed) 12:31:43 1a8b54 (2) No.1926130>>1926140 >>1926141 >>1926144 >>1926145 >>1926147 >>1926148 >>1926149 >>1926150 >>1926151 >>1926155 >>1926156 >>1926157 >>1926158 >>1926159 >>1926160 >>1926163 >>1926164 >>1926167 >>1926168 >>1926169 >>1926170 >>1926172 >>1926173 >>1926174 >>1926178 >>1926179 >>1926180 >>1926182 >>1926183 >>1926185 >>1926188 >>1926190 >>1926192 >>1926198 >>1926199 >>1926201 >>1926203 >>1926206 >>1926208 >>1926209 >>1926210 >>1926211 >>1926212 >>1926215 >>1926216 >>1926217 >>1926221 >>1926222 >>1926223 >>1926225 >>1926232 >>1926236 >>1926237 >>1926238 >>1926241 >>1926245 >>1926246 >>1926248 >>1926249 >>1926250 >>1926254 >>1926257 >>1926258 >>1926262 >>1926264 >>1926268 >>1926270 >>1926271 >>1926274 >>1926278 >>1926279 >>1926280 >>1926296 >>1926318 >>1926322 >>1926330 >>1926341 >>1926344 >>1926345 >>1926347 >>1926349 >>1926356 >>1926369 >>1926371 >>1926395 >>1926399 >>1926409 >>1926417 >>1926424 >>1926430 >>1926435 >>1926450 >>1926455 >>1926458 >>1926459 >>1926467 >>1926486 >>1926493 >>1926510 >>1926545 >>1926555 >>1926559 >>1926575 >>1926607 >>1926610 >>1926611 >>1926614 >>1926626 >>1926643
PS "Texts taken out of context"
PS "While emotional over the election, I conduct myself w/ upmost integrity w/o bias while undertaking any such investigation, especially a high-profile case against the POTUS."
PS "In hindsight, it was a bad idea to openly discuss my feelings, but, in no way did those feelings impact my ability to conduct a fair and proper investigation - we followed where the "facts" took us."
PS "I decline to answer that question on advice from counsel."
: When you state "where 'facts' led us" - what 'facts' are you referring to? To date, there has been zero evidence of any such collusion or connections between the Trump campaign and Russia." In fact, the only facts discovered thus far have been between the Clinton camp and Russia and other foreign groups."
PS "On advice of counsel, I decline to answer that question"
PS "Because of the ongoing investigation, such answers may violate the security of such investigations."
: "Mr S, I believe nobody here is buying what you are selling. I believe there was/is a serious effort on the part of people more senior than you to remove Mr Trump from office out of fear of what this Administration may uncover. I believe you are being dishonest in your answers and frankly shocked you agreed to come here today. I believe everyone on this panel (minus those from the other side of the aisle) knew exactly what your answers would be and if you think we are going to sit here and accept these answers you would be a foolish. We are also following the facts and once we uncover more (which we will) we will act accordingly. I'm glad you retained counsel - you'll need one and hopefully they are very good."
.
Q

What does that "continue to serve in senior status" mean?

MooreTrucker said:

---

What does that "continue to serve in senior status" mean?

---

means he will still get paid and can work on lower court cases or special matters

Souter still regularly sits on appellate court.

VaultingChemist said:

---

Rockdoc said:

---

ttha_aggie_09 said:

---

So, we can't impeach and they know it... only option is to can him but that would explode in the Rs face.

Does trump have another option or executive power he can utilize to stop this nonsense?

---

Sessions needs to stand up and state that he is back. Screw the recusal and tell rod to sit down and shut up and that he's done. Not fired, just neutered.

---

You forgot the third option......let Huber indict Rosenstein for FISA abuse, and other crimes.

Rosenstein could then be removed and replaced, and his replacement shuts down Mueller.

---

I'll take door number 3, Monty.

So two former officials with the FBI have single handedly eliminated crime in America forever with two quotes:
"No intent" and "just intimate talk between two intimate friends."

Didn't want to start a new thread "out there" because I value the posters on here, but do you guys think the new Supreme Court business will have an effect on Muellers decisions? I think it may cause him to speed up or invent something to appease the screams from the left. They're going to be looking for any reason they can find to invalidate a choice by trump.

Rockdoc said:

---

Didn't want to start a new thread "out there" because I value the posters on here, but do you guys think the new Supreme Court business will have an effect on Muellers decisions? I think it may cause him to speed up or invent something to appease the screams from the left. They're going to be looking for any reason they can find to invalidate a choice by trump.

---

The left will continue to trot out distractions. Yes , Mueller will try to do something, but he has painted himself in a corner. He has to be very, very careful because he is surrounded by corruption.

If all the leaks are correct, this was a dog and pony show fir Strzok to appear behind closed doors, and invoke the it's classified and I can't speak about an ongoing investigation. Then he parroted the same garbage about his bias had no effect on his worth and all those texts were pillow talk. What a joke.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

If all the leaks are correct, this was a dog and pony show fir Strzok to appear behind closed doors, and invoke the it's classified and I can't speak about an ongoing investigation. Then he parroted the same garbage about his bias had no effect on his worth and all those texts were pillow talk. What a joke.

---

Yep sir. I knew this w be a nothing burger. Waste of time. Did anyone seriously think he was going in there like to confession or something?

And now we know why they have been slow rolling his firing by the DOJ so they can maintain control over his testimony

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

And now we know why they have been slow rolling his firing by the DOJ so they can maintain control over his testimony

---

Surely Sessions w order his immediate firing.

Bluffs need to be called on occasion

Prosperdick said:

---

"Intimate conversation between friends." So that's what we're calling treason today.

---

So much this... Hell, Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nicols Oklahoma City bombing started out as an "intimate conversation between friends."

TurkeyBaconLeg said:

---

PS "I decline to answer that question on advice from counsel."

---

Didn't he say he wouldn't take the 5th?

VegasAg86 said:

---

TurkeyBaconLeg said:

---

PS "I decline to answer that question on advice from counsel."

---

Didn't he say he wouldn't take the 5th?

---

Trump should just blow this whole charade up and declassify everything and watch them squirm.