Still don't see any romantic relationship between these two
Friends in a foxhole they like to refer too. There's a couple of pages I didn't post where she is evidently melting down and they have a moment, but never any real flirty sort of stuff that you know damn good and well two cheating on their spouses would be doing. Of course who knows what texts we aren't seeing.Cepe said:
Still don't see any romantic relationship between these two
RoscoePColtrane said:
Mueller announcement does public
Speculation on who gets to join the team, feeding frenzy to follow.
No distraction really, I like that news as limited as it may be, be nice to read some real stuff, heavily redacted does't sound good. might be like the Hillary stuff and get pages of 8x10 black squares.drcrinum said:
Not to distract from Roscoe's effort, but looks like another, possibly interesting dump of documents is set to happen this morning, although redactions as usual.
RoscoePColtrane said:
Little side bar maybe
I think I found this Lawfare blog they talked about don't know anything about it, maybe Hawg can vouch for it, it's an interesting read. But in it they talk about Tashina Gauhar, an official in the deputy attorney general's office, this is possibly "Tash"
https://www.lawfareblog.com/anatomy-presidential-untruth-what-data-did-justice-department-really-provide-white-house
He signed off on a FICA application for a FISA warrant on an American Citizen, and in the footnotes it mentions it briefly exactly what he told Baier. Remember what Nunes said and Gowdy said about the rambling way they described who paid for it in the footnote, instead of just saying HRC and DNC paid. Comey is a skilled liar. Think about that, he cherry picked that very talking point, when he knew damn good and well who paid.coyote68 said:
I strongly suspect that some folks inside the FBI are going have a different recollection of what Mr. Comey knew regarding Mr. Steele.
Mr. Comey's body language last night did not support the message he was delivering.
Okay, read it. Basically tries to say Trump deliberately lied in his SOTU. But problem is that the information he was provided was disjointed, misleading and essentially crap since they never kept that information. The FBI had to scramble and manually pull some information in which even they had a low degree of confidence was accurate. Akin to saying, "Here's the report you asked for. It's incomplete and contains lots of errors, BTW."Quote:
I think I found this Lawfare blog they talked about don't know anything about it, maybe Hawg can vouch for it, it's an interesting read. But in it they talk about Tashina Gauhar, an official in the deputy attorney general's office, this is possibly "Tash"
Never took much of it seriously, but was just searching things that they talked about in the texts and stumbled across that girls name and it fit the Tash handle in the text message.aggiehawg said:Okay, read it. Basically tries to say Trump deliberately lied in his SOTU. But problem is that the information he was provided was disjointed, misleading and essentially crap since they never kept that information. The FBI had to scramble and manually pull some information in which even they had a low degree of confidence was accurate. Akin to saying, "Here's the report you asked for. It's incomplete and contains lots of errors, BTW."Quote:
I think I found this Lawfare blog they talked about don't know anything about it, maybe Hawg can vouch for it, it's an interesting read. But in it they talk about Tashina Gauhar, an official in the deputy attorney general's office, this is possibly "Tash"
Blaming Trump reminds me of the old phrase, "Garbage in, garbage out."
Roscoe, could you please post pp. 6-7 together please. There is apparently an interesting finding:RoscoePColtrane said:
Here we go
https://www.scribd.com/document/377540616/PS-LP-Text-Messages-Dec-2016-May-2017#from_embed
drcrinum said:Roscoe, could you please post pp. 6-7 together please. There is apparently an interesting finding:RoscoePColtrane said:
Here we go
https://www.scribd.com/document/377540616/PS-LP-Text-Messages-Dec-2016-May-2017#from_embed
F 302 = reference to the Flynn 302. Obtaining Andy's approval on 02/14/2017 sounds very weird to me, considering the interview was conducted on 01/24/2017, 3 weeks earlier.
The FBI intentionally does not record or video interviews because it gives them full range of subjectivity or lack there of. In this day and age it's unbelievable that this is still policy.backintexas2013 said:
So he had the original notes of the 302 but wanted deeper info three weeks later? Was the interview recorded or are they going off memory?
FBI doesn't record interviews for some bizarre reason.backintexas2013 said:
So he had the original notes of the 302 but wanted deeper info three weeks later? Was the interview recorded or are they going off memory?