backintexas2013 said:

---

But this one didn't seem like she cared he was married. She was totally ok with it. Easy pickings for him

---

well yes.... obviously she was a co-worker anyway.

convenience.

AG 2000' said:

---

backintexas2013 said:

---

In that picture she looks like a solid 3 Other pictures she had never been above a 2.

---

That's her college law school photo. Big difference between that and now that she's been living the high life with a government expense account.

---

A few days ago:

Ag with kids said:

---

TexAgsAnon said:

---

Of all the things that I can't wrap my head around in the whole text messaging debacle, one stands out more than the rest.

Peter Stzrok is a decent looking guy. Not a Lothario, but not a goonie's Sloth.



So why in the blue hell is he risking everything for Lisa "A solid 2 with makeup on" Page?

---

Maybe Page does the freak stuff that wifey won't do?

---

#ButtStuff

aggiehawg said:

---

Can we get back on topic please instead of dissecting Strzok and Page's sex life? Visuals are getting pretty disgusting.

---

Preach.

This thread is extremely informative and important. Let's cut down on the worthless chatter.

https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/fbi-lovers-texted-every-four-minutes-during-those-missing-five-months/

Quote:

---

COULD YOU TEXT SOMEBODY EVERY FOUR MINUTES FOR FIVE MONTHS? That's what those FBI lovers, Counter-Intelligence agent Peter Strzok and bureau lawyer Lisa Page, did during those now-formerly missing five months. Think about that for a moment:

• There are 12,960,000 seconds in five 30-day months.
• 12,960,000 divided by 50,000 equals a new text message every 259.2 seconds.
• That means Strzok and Page texted each other on average every 4.32 minutes.
• Every day of every week of every month for five months!
• Give or take a few here and there, of course.

---

jjeffers1 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Can we get back on topic please instead of dissecting Strzok and Page's sex life? Visuals are getting pretty disgusting.

---

Preach.

This thread is extremely informative and important. Let's cut down on the worthless chatter.

---

Friend, this thread is about Strzok and Page, despite whatever it has morphed into recently.

The fact these two scummy people were likely humping says a lot about their lack of character. Then again, they're liberal and you'd have to have low character to even entertain liberalism.

50,000 was over two years.

Cepe said:

---

https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/fbi-lovers-texted-every-four-minutes-during-those-missing-five-months/

Quote:

---

COULD YOU TEXT SOMEBODY EVERY FOUR MINUTES FOR FIVE MONTHS? That's what those FBI lovers, Counter-Intelligence agent Peter Strzok and bureau lawyer Lisa Page, did during those now-formerly missing five months. Think about that for a moment:

• There are 12,960,000 seconds in five 30-day months.
• 12,960,000 divided by 50,000 equals a new text message every 259.2 seconds.
• That means Strzok and Page texted each other on average every 4.32 minutes.
• Every day of every week of every month for five months!
• Give or take a few here and there, of course.

---

---

we paid them to text each other. How could they ever work? Did they text while together?

Cepe said:

---

https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/fbi-lovers-texted-every-four-minutes-during-those-missing-five-months/

Quote:

---

COULD YOU TEXT SOMEBODY EVERY FOUR MINUTES FOR FIVE MONTHS? That's what those FBI lovers, Counter-Intelligence agent Peter Strzok and bureau lawyer Lisa Page, did during those now-formerly missing five months. Think about that for a moment:

• There are 12,960,000 seconds in five 30-day months.
• 12,960,000 divided by 50,000 equals a new text message every 259.2 seconds.
• That means Strzok and Page texted each other on average every 4.32 minutes.
• Every day of every week of every month for five months!
• Give or take a few here and there, of course.

---

---

The assumption though is that no other parties were included in the texts. If there were group texts, say among a 'secret society', multiple people could be texting with S & P. Remember, we have only been exposed to a small number of texts so far.

Cepe said:

---

https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/fbi-lovers-texted-every-four-minutes-during-those-missing-five-months/

Quote:

---

COULD YOU TEXT SOMEBODY EVERY FOUR MINUTES FOR FIVE MONTHS? That's what those FBI lovers, Counter-Intelligence agent Peter Strzok and bureau lawyer Lisa Page, did during those now-formerly missing five months. Think about that for a moment:

• There are 12,960,000 seconds in five 30-day months.
• 12,960,000 divided by 50,000 equals a new text message every 259.2 seconds.
• That means Strzok and Page texted each other on average every 4.32 minutes.
• Every day of every week of every month for five months!
• Give or take a few here and there, of course.

---

---

Jesus Christ! I wish people would pay attention to the details of the stories. 50,000 texts exchanged over a two year period minus the formerly "missing" five months.

NOT 50,000 in five months. Not to mention if they were "missing" how would anyone know the number?

Sheesh!

By my estimated math that's about 85 a day. That's pretty high. If we assume he didn't text around his wife that's about 8 an hour. Assuming 8 hours of sleep and four with the family.

backintexas2013 said:

---

By my estimated math that's about 85 a day. That's pretty high. If we assume he didn't text around his wife that's about 8 an hour. Assuming 8 hours of sleep and four with the family.

---

Oh it was a lot. Not disputing that but the wrong number has been repeated enough now that no one is questioning it. Hell, I've even heard people on FNC say it. Bet that makes Catherine Herridge grind her teeth since it was her story and quite specific about the "over a two year period" point.

I actually don't think it's that bad when you break it down like I did. A little over the top but seen much worse.

aggiehawg said:

---

Can we get back on topic please ...

---

Soooo ... maybe Sessions and Wray are both concerned the 'premature' release of the Congressional memo may jeopardize their action after the IG investigation is released? I'm hopeful both are laying low waiting for the IG report to give them political cover for a major house cleaning. No doubt the Congressional memo will be painted as partisan ... therefore by extension, any action by Sessions or Wray resulting from the memo would also be painted as partisan... not so much if their action results from the IG report.

Remember, both Sessions and Wray have departments to run after the imminent DOJ/FBI bloodbath ... better the bloodbath result from the IG report rather than a 'partisan' Congressional committee memo.

benchmark said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Can we get back on topic please ...

---

Soooo ... maybe Sessions and Wray are both concerned the 'premature' release of the Congressional memo may jeopardize their action after the IG investigation is released? I'm hopeful both are laying low waiting for the IG report to give them political cover for a major house cleaning. No doubt the Congressional memo will be painted as partisan ... therefore by extension, any action by Sessions or Wray resulting from the memo would also be painted as partisan... not so much if their action results from the IG report.

Remember, both Sessions and Wray have departments to run after the imminent DOJ/FBI bloodbath ... better the bloodbath result from the IG report rather than a 'partisan' Congressional committee memo.

---

That's a fair point. Optics aside there could be a more practical consideration...they haven't gotten the "Big Cheese" target yet. If underlings are being squeezed and the prosecutors are going up the food chain in obtaining indictments, some immunity deals, more indictments, rinse, repeat.

They could be putting the final evidence before the grand jury and are almost ready to have them begin deliberations (or maybe they are in deliberation already and issuing bills or no bills going through their work). Grand juries are not sequestered, as a rule.

We'll see.

So you think they did nothing wrong by using a document with false information and other unverified claims to help get a warrant to spy on a political enemy.

Didn't do anything wrong with Lynch and Comey?

Comey didn't do anything wrong in his handling of Clinton email?

Peter the Cheater is just some guy who happened to send a few inappropriate messages to his mistress but it's not a big deal?

Care to wager that you are completely wrong?

Did Russia push the #releasethememo hashtag and that's why it was trending

Lot Y Tailgate said:

---

Deats said:

---

Lot Y trolling again

---

Trolling is thinking the FBI and DOJ is about to be ripped apart, or maybe that is getting trolled, by 4chan.

---

Seems to me, with the release of the "We, the DOJ, found the texts that the FBI could not" news today, that the FBI and DOJ are not on the same team...

I think there's an increasingly good chance the the DOJ is going to turn the FBI upside down...

People have already been demoted and/or are leaving (retiring or going into private sector). It's alreasy started.

Actually many people have corrected the number. Please try and keep up.

backintexas2013 said:

---

People have already been demoted and/or are leaving (retiring or going into private sector). It's alreasy started.

---

I think today's text message discovery is the first sign that the FBI has been isolated...