What do you want to know?Aggiebrewer said:
29,000 posts in this thread.
wish I would have followed along
What do you want to know?Aggiebrewer said:
29,000 posts in this thread.
wish I would have followed along
aggiehawg said:What do you want to know?Aggiebrewer said:
29,000 posts in this thread.
wish I would have followed along
More likely scenario: Obama planted the 'mafia kiss of death' on Renzi.aggiehawg said:
Interesting but I think some things get lost in the translation from Italian to English. So the news to me here is that Former PM Renzi is stepping down as head of his far left party just a few days after meeting with Obama.
Pay-off to be a fall guy?
Quote:
.....We know it to be true because Admiral Mike Rogers uncovered and exposed the underlying crime. It is not an opinion. It is a fact. From 2012 until April of 2016 James Comey specifically authorized 3 contractors working for John Brennan and James Clapper unfettered access to NSA surveillance systems, including Prism.
We have already seen and read the ruling to the Attorney General from FISA Court Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer who declared that of 40000 searches of the NSA databases between 2012 and 2016 that 85% or 32,500 were illegal......
There is currently enough evidence to put Spygate inside the Oval Office. Enough reason for Durham to want to interview Obama, who is now a private citizen. But consider the position into which such a request would put the Trump Administration?Rockdoc said:
It's unbelievable that Obama is gonna get away with whatever crap he is pulling. And the dems are happy with it.
the threads are parallels and sometimes seem to cross paths, but Q is not discussed here. This thread is more geared to verified news sources, court filings, and the like.Fishing Fools said:aggiehawg said:What do you want to know?Aggiebrewer said:
29,000 posts in this thread.
wish I would have followed along
Is Q real?
Short video. Former Obama DOD official.Aggiebrewer said:aggiehawg said:What do you want to know?Aggiebrewer said:
29,000 posts in this thread.
wish I would have followed along
just nutshell 29k posts. easy peasy
Interesting, it has been suggested that having books published is one way to launder payoffs. I used to think this was tin foil hat thinking, but ... well ... um ... seems some publishers really don't care how many books are sold. It would be enlightening to see who may be funding some of these books through publishers.VegasAg86 said:I hope they sell like Acosta's. Word is he is up to 6500 total books sold.aggiehawg said:
Holy crap!
Weismann's will be a complete smear of Trump.
The timeframe of 2015 is astonishing to me because the Dems had to either believe Trump was going to be the nominee, or they were serveiling all of the R candidates who still had a chance to win the nomination. I have a suspicion it's the latter.drcrinum said:
Nunes was just interviewed on Maria Bartiromo's show. He said there were 2 separate investigations into Trump. The first began in late 2015 to early 2016 by the intelligence agencies/FBI. The second was started in the spring by the DNC/Fusion GPS/Steele. They merged together into one, but when? Likely much earlier than what we have been led to believe in Nune's opinion. The video clip should be available soon.
Renzi just resigned as head of his party. He lost his reelection bid as Italy's Prime Minister.fasthorses05 said:
Why would it be beneficial for Renzi to resign? I doubt Obama told him to, unless Renzi being in office makes the gathering of damaging information easier. Not everyone will work to defend the almighty party of the Democrats, as few will fall on the sword for the greater good.
Welcome back, blindey. With a newborn, two others, and your own business operation, I'm surprised you have time to peruse Texags, not to mention reading and posting. Hope all is well.
I used to think that Hillary kept her server defenesless so the Russians and Chinese could access them for information as a quid pro quo for the $145 million, but now it might have been for access to these three contractos, in addition to the NSA information. I would LOVE to find out what happened to that NSA information, who in the contracting companies had access to it, how secure is it now, and what they did with it?
Somehow or another, maybe Hillary's server was tied into the Awan/Wasserman-Schultz fiasco, regarding access. While I don't believe all Dem judges to be corrupt, if anyone like Durham did a review of the Awan trial, there's got to be some technicality the judge used to basically allow a not guilty plea. Using the law as a means to serve the Dem partys goals is one thing, but that decision was enormous, even in DC.
My 2 cents for this morning.
If you think about it, the two investigations would make sense. The first one was just precautionary (in their view, doesn't make it right, though). Trump is still a long shot during that time frame. Everything changed in South Carolina when he took the counties that had been a Huckabee stronghold in 2012. Panic time.drcrinum said:
Nunes was just interviewed on Maria Bartiromo's show. He said there were 2 separate investigations into Trump. The first began in late 2015 to early 2016 by the intelligence agencies/FBI. The second was started in the spring by the DNC/Fusion GPS/Steele. They merged together into one, but when? Likely much earlier than what we have been led to believe in Nune's opinion. The video clip should be available soon.
Yeah. I actually watched that live and had to pick my jaw up off of the floor. How did that nut have a top secret security clearance at DOD??Adam Ag 98 said:
The look on her face after she stops talking, a few seconds before the video ends. She knew she F'd up.
aggiehawg said:Yeah. I actually watched that live and had to pick my jaw up off of the floor. How did that nut have a top secret security clearance at DOD??Adam Ag 98 said:
The look on her face after she stops talking, a few seconds before the video ends. She knew she F'd up.
She was near breathlessness after stupidly revealing incriminating actions from within performed. Her cohorts couldn't have been pleased with what she revealed.Prosperdick said:aggiehawg said:Yeah. I actually watched that live and had to pick my jaw up off of the floor. How did that nut have a top secret security clearance at DOD??Adam Ag 98 said:
The look on her face after she stops talking, a few seconds before the video ends. She knew she F'd up.
Like Rice, she could be counted to spew whatever they wanted her to say but it looks like in this case she wasn't given talking points ahead of time, likely because many of the main players were scrambling and in panic mode.
Quote:
The plan was for Italian Intelligence to hack into these servers, plant classified emails from Hillary's servers inside these servers on American soil, and then alert the FBI.
This is rich.Quote:
As part of the "investigation into the investigators," U.S. Attorney John Durham's team reportedly wants to talk to at least one senior CIA counterintelligence official and a senior CIA analyst who examined Russia's role in meddling in the 2016 election.
The review is not a criminal inquiry, but should Durham find criminal activity he can take prosecutorial action. Top CIA officials are said to be anxious over the federal prosecutor's efforts.
Michael Morell, who was deputy director of the CIA during the Obama administration, said Durham's interest in speaking to a CIA analyst concerns him.
"I see no problem with a DOJ review of whether the CIA and other intelligence community agencies lived up to their legal and regulatory responsibilities related to how they handled any information related to U.S. persons U.S. citizens and U.S. nationals," Morell told CBS News, where he is now a senior national security contributor.
First, Barr started out at CIA. He is versed in the differences between counter-intel and criminal probes.Quote:
"Having said that, I see a DOJ review of whether or not the intelligence analysts made the right call as wholly inappropriate. I cannot ever remember a DOJ review of analysis," Morrell added.
"[Durham] and his team have no experience with, or knowledge of, the process of intelligence analysis," Morell said. "He and his team could well impose a law enforcement standard in coming to a conclusion a much higher bar than exists in the intelligence community for analytic judgments."
Perhaps a "chilling effect" would be a good thing, no? Keep you guys from going off the deep end and putting the American people through two and half years of what was a tin foil hat conspiracy theory cooked up by boys and gals at Langley?Quote:
Siding with Democrats, Morrell said he feels "strongly" the Justice Department has "NO business" doing a follow-up review of the intelligence community analysis. "It does not have the knowledge & expertise necessary to get the right answers and it could well have a chilling effect across the analytic community," he said in a tweet.
I don't watch enough CNN to know who the lady in pink is but my read of her expression is '(I can't believe you are saying this)'. The camera never went back to her even though her voice is heard. Would loved to have seen her expression when the comment about leaking was made.aggiehawg said:Yeah. I actually watched that live and had to pick my jaw up off of the floor. How did that nut have a top secret security clearance at DOD??Adam Ag 98 said:
The look on her face after she stops talking, a few seconds before the video ends. She knew she F'd up.
Sorry...I deleted the post shortly after posting it. I thought the post blamed the various Ukrainians too much for this whole thing. While there was plenty of involvement and influence coming from that direction, the U.S. intel community was a huge problem.fasthorses05 said:
I was going to reply to your comment before it went away.
I was going to say don't forget the $$$$$$$$$ some of these folks could have commanded from the Clinton administration for keeping their mouths shut. Whomever the Clinton's have used for 45 years as "silencer" is extraordinarily skilled, but even the Clinton's wouldn't be able to "sllence" all of the folks involved. I guess they could use the NSA information to black mail, or just leak information to the talking heads in the media to discredit these folks.
And Hawg, Morrell has always confused me. I thought he was corrupt as hell, then seemed to be candid about the O administration, and now just seems to be another "chosen one", among many, who served for "the greater good" in that WH.
They were under huge pressure by the Obama Administration. Biden threatening to withhold a billion in aid unless they fired a prosecutor investigating the company on which his son had a lucrative board seat and forbidding any investigation of Soros' organizations operating within Ukraine.Quote:
.I deleted the post shortly after posting it. I thought the post blamed the various Ukrainians too much for this whole thing. While there was plenty of involvement and influence coming from that direction, the U.S. intel community was a huge problem.