aggiehawg said:

---

MooreTrucker said:

---

And nothing is more fun than pissing off a bunch of whiny Democrats.

---

I seem to do it without really trying.

---

You GO girl! Keep on...keeping on. Nothing funnier than a PO'd democrat.

will25u said:

---

---

Deranged.

will25u said:

---

---

Bring it on, Nattering Nadler!

Jordan asked Nadler an important question, "Why don't you wait a week before voting on contempt and just ask the guy who wrote the Report?"

Funny thread about what is going on in the hearing. If you are interested.

aggiehawg said:

---

MooreTrucker said:

---

And nothing is more fun than pissing off a bunch of whiny Democrats.

---

I seem to do it without really trying.

---

We have a few Texags parishioners who have that special quality.

I'm 100% certain it's probably genetic with you, but you likely have a lot of professional experience with sharp comments! As long as I'm not in the way, and it continues to be Dems, then it's fine!

fasthorses05 said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

MooreTrucker said:

---

And nothing is more fun than pissing off a bunch of whiny Democrats.

---

I seem to do it without really trying.

---

We have a few Texags parishioners who have that special quality.

I'm 100% certain it's probably genetic with you, but you likely have a lot of professional experience with sharp comments! As long as I'm not in the way, and it continues to be Dems, then it's fine!

---

If a poster asks me a question, I usually try to answer it as fully as possible...until I realize their intent is to try to start a pissing match with me. After that, I just ignore them but that doesn't stop them from taking my posts in a reply to someone else to do a drive-by. My mere existence seems to irk them.

Everyone except the hardcore dim base knows this is ridiculous. This is purely about fundraising and preparing for indictments Barr brings. California billionaire dim Tom Styrer is obsessed with impeaching Trump and he has the ear of nadler and cummings - his money is likely influencing this stupidity, also.

Aw hell, I was just kidding!

However, I never really saw your writing/answers as very offending. DIRECT, on occasion, absolutely! I guess I just don't understand.

Speaking of taking things personally, for nearly all of my life, Nadler's actions today would leave me emotionally boiling! In this case, it's become such an everyday thing that I overlook the legal hyperbole of the day (kind of like Dick Durban---irrelevant), and keep on going.

It's amazing their base is demanding this!

I do have a question regarding "contempt" in the Legislature. If the House holds someone in contempt because they wouldn't break the law, isn't there some punitive procedure for those Dems who dreamed up the contempt?

Dems are really trying to tick him off. Barr probably has a criminal referral on more than one of them too.

Quote:

---

I do have a question regarding "contempt" in the Legislature. If the House holds someone in contempt because they wouldn't break the law, isn't there some punitive procedure for those Dems who dreamed up the contempt?

---

It gets a little muddy here as to how they proceed. DOJ could move for a motion to quash the current subpoena which would be granted as to the 6(e) grand jury material at the very least. Then there is the question of the Executive Privilege and how that will be addressed in the courts. So there's a few moving parts here.

But to answer your precise question, other than a tongue lashing by a judge somewhere in DC, no, there are no consequences for their inanity.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

I do have a question regarding "contempt" in the Legislature. If the House holds someone in contempt because they wouldn't break the law, isn't there some punitive procedure for those Dems who dreamed up the contempt?

---

It gets a little muddy here as to how they proceed. DOJ could move for a motion to quash the current subpoena which would be granted as to the 6(e) grand jury material at the very least. Then there is the question of the Executive Privilege and how that will be addressed in the courts. So there's a few moving parts here.

But to answer your precise question, other than a tongue lashing by a judge somewhere in DC, no, there are no consequences for their inanity.

---

No consequences unless they weaken the Presidency and suffer next time they hold the office. OTOH if the courts rule in Trump's favor it strengthens him. I think it's a no-win for the Dems.

Well, I was talking about "punitive" in the legal sense not political.

3 Toed Pete said:

---

Everyone except the hardcore dim base knows this is ridiculous. This is purely about fundraising and preparing for indictments Barr brings. California billionaire dim Tom Styrer is obsessed with impeaching Trump and he has the ear of nadler and cummings - his money is likely influencing this stupidity, also.

---

Maybe there will be an investigation into Tom Steyer's illegal campaign donations.

- https://azdemsexposed.com/2018/05/16/smoking-gun-appears-as-former-employees-of-tom-steyer-led-campaign-come-forward/

Quote:

---

The controversial ballot proposal tied to California billionaire Tom Steyer is facing increased scrutiny this week after former employees came forward alleging illegal campaign signature quotas.

---

- https://shiftwa.org/pdc-overlooks-democrat-campaign-finance-violations-again/

Quote:

---

And, the PDC let extreme "green" billionaire Tom Steyer off the hook for an obvious campaign finance violation in 2013.

---

- https://shiftwa.org/hypocrisy-democrats-hidden-million-dollar-donors/

Quote:

---

In the last two weeks, both Politico and USA Today have lifted the veil on the political agenda of secretive Democrat donor Tom Steyer. Both articles outline how Steyer's extreme environmental agenda led him to invest millions this year in a U.S Senate primary in Massachusetts and the Virginia governor's race.
In fact, Politico did a second feature detailing how much money Steyer hid from public view in Virginia before the election.
Folks in our state are more familiar with Mr. Steyer as the California billionaire who got caught trying to illegally funnel millions of dollars into a Washington State PAC and then being let off the hook almost immediately by our state's suddenly quick-acting Public Disclosure Commission (PDC).

---

May he end up wearing an orange suit eventually.

ETA: Sounds like good enough cause to do a complete IRS audit for the last 7 years. An ex hedge fund manager wouldn't have anything Tom hide would he.

Short article about the Comey Memos. I have quoted the whole text and included the picture.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/05/07/court-filing-from-day-1-mueller-special-counsel-was-constructing-obstruction-case/

Quote:

---

On January 22nd, 2018, eleven months prior to the mid-term election, lawyers from the special counsel's office told Judge Boasberg in a sealed-courtroom why they needed to keep James Comey's memos from being released.

Special Counsel Attorney Michael Dreeben informed the court the special counsel was charged with investigating an obstruction case against President Trump from the beginning. President Trump was the target of their investigation from the outset.



The previously sealed court transcript was released today SEE HERE
Despite Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein and Special Counsel Mueller assuring the President and his lawyers he was not the target of the investigation, they were lying.

As soon as the court was told Trump was the target (hearing January 22, 2018) the court agreed to seal everything relating to the journal of James Comey. [BACKGROUND]

---

Guys, have to check out for a bit. Another tornado is coming!

Stay safe.

Stay safe!

Speaking of contempt...

Congress Dems' apparently headed towards an 'all out' war. Can only assume some of these jokers are willing to fall on their swords come re-election and have ignored the fact there will be 'pay back' some day when a D Pres sits in the White Hse.

whatthehey78 said:

---

Congress Dems' apparently headed towards an 'all out' war. Can only assume some of these jokers are willing to fall on their swords come re-election and have ignored the fact there will be 'pay back' some day when a D Pres sits in the White Hse.

---

I think they are trying like hell to manufacture some bargaining chips. They know they are going to need some

whatthehey78 said:

---

Congress Dems' apparently headed towards an 'all out' war. Can only assume some of these jokers are willing to fall on their swords come re-election and have ignored the fact there will be 'pay back' some day when a D Pres sits in the White Hse.

---

They never think that far ahead...just ask Harry Reid.

Whew! All clear, now. Helluva storm though.

Hawg, Nadler just said in the hearing that the subpoena was supposed to "start a dialogue"

That seems... Insane..

GCP12 said:

---

Hawg, Nadler just said in the hearing that the subpoena was supposed to "start a dialogue"

That seems... Insane..

---

Because it is. Barr warned them not to go there but they did anyway. Now for the consequences of their recklessness.

GCP12 said:

---

Hawg, Nadler just said in the hearing that the subpoena was supposed to "start a dialogue"

That seems... Insane..

---

That "start a dialogue" crap is Dem for "just kidding but not really, maybe". See Colin Kaepernick.

**** Richard Burr

GCP12 said:

---

**** Richard Burr

---

Here we go!

GCP12 said:

---

**** Richard Burr

---

IDK. Things might not be what they appear.

Yep agree.

If this is a "good thing" Burr and that committee has nothing to do with it and they're being played.

What exactly happens to Barr and Mcgann when they are "in contempt". What does that prohibit them from doing? Does that force them to do something they don't want to?

FriscoKid said:

---

GCP12 said:

---

**** Richard Burr

---

IDK. Things might not be what they appear.

---

What does your comment mean?