Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,754,517 Views | 49422 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Secolobo
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh good. Another, "Don't worry about anything we did! There are strict rules that are always followed. Nothing to see here!"
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

It was a MISUNDERSTANDING! Details in the article. Wipe Michael Caputo from your memory banks.
So, this anonymous government contractor now says he wasn't actually offering anything, just suggesting that the Trump campaign try to track down Hillary's deleted emails. Like that was such a novel idea no one had thought of it before. And said government contractor has nothing to do with intelligence agencies, nosiree. Which is precisely what government contractor(s) are instructed to say when they work with classified information.

Oh, and this: keep in mind that Halper was paid through the Department of Defense. Misunderstanding? Or is this article damage control??
Well, they obviously know who the unnamed government contractor was -- he was interviewed for the article. One point definitely in your favor: the government contractor claims he heard the business about HRC's emails during casual conversation, but he couldn't remember who it was that told him...convenient.
Must be a Clintonista
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GCP12 said:

Oh good. Another, "Don't worry about anything we did! There are strict rules that are always followed. Nothing to see here!"
Do they even make orange jumpsuits in Comey's size?
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:


Well he's confessing pretty much to doing it, now they will excuse lying about it to everyone, on necessary secrecy. I look at it as they are just trying to soften the crash they know is coming.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?



"Spygate" seems to be the new mantra.
coyote68
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's see.

He is saying they spied and I need to tell my grandchildren James Comey spent years in prison because he was a criminal.

We live in a Republic. The DOJ and FBI don't want to be supervised by the people's elected representatives, Senators and POTUS.


captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:

aggiehawg said:


Well he's confessing pretty much to doing it, now they will excuse lying about it to everyone, on necessary secrecy. I look at it as they are just trying to soften the crash they know is coming.
This means he 100% lied in his testimony
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:




ETA: That's an admission, for those following along at home.
Oh, I cant wait to explain this to the grandchildren.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The only people who've lied are the ones that are supposedly investigating Russian Collusion. The allege perps are the only ones that haven't been caught lying.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:

RoscoePColtrane said:

aggiehawg said:


Well he's confessing pretty much to doing it, now they will excuse lying about it to everyone, on necessary secrecy. I look at it as they are just trying to soften the crash they know is coming.
This means he 100% lied in his testimony
DING!DING!DING!

akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seems like they keep making sheet up to cover for their sworn testimony and it keeps backfiring.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

captkirk said:

RoscoePColtrane said:

aggiehawg said:


Well he's confessing pretty much to doing it, now they will excuse lying about it to everyone, on necessary secrecy. I look at it as they are just trying to soften the crash they know is coming.
This means he 100% lied in his testimony
DING!DING!DING!
How many crimes is this guy going to just blatantly admit to?

How could a man this stupid be our chief law enforcement agent in the country for so many years?

FFS
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He is desperate.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I know her hiring was discussed here at the time, but this is something to think about...
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/secret-fbi-team-that-coordinated-set-up-of-trump-was-pressured-by-cnn-guess-who-was-cnn-doj-reporter-at-the-time/
Quote:

Secret FBI Team That Coordinated Set-Up of Trump Was Pressured by CNN Guess Who Was CNN DOJ Reporter at the Time?

CNN Hires Valerie Jarrett's Daughter
CNN has assigned the daughter of one of President Obama's top advisers to cover the Department of Justice.

The network announced in a press release that Valerie Jarrett's daughter Laura would be one of four reporters to cover the Justice Department in 2017. The New York Post broke the news that Jarrett had been hired in September, though a formal announcement about her beat did not come until Thursday.

Jarrett has long wanted to work in television news, though being an objective reporter was not her original goal. She told Vanity Fair in a 2009 "Bright Young Things" profile that her chief ambition was to "work as a TV-news legal analyst." Her favorite cause was "promoting civil rights and social equality for women and minorities."
Sarge 91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stlkofta said:

FriscoKid said:

How long ago was it that a certain 3* poster kept using the laughing face on every single post talking about Russia?

He told us to just wait... He's got a sack of crows to eat around here.

The story is hitting the fan bigly this week.

That individual is waiting for the DNC talking points to arrive. Like other leftists on this forum, they have a distinct inability to engage in their innate ability to reason after Perez, Pelosi, and Shumer tell them how to think on all matters political.

The Obama Administration has an established record of using intelligence resources and/or government enforcement tools to intimidate or spy on political enemies.

This time there isn't a Holder or a Lynch around to serve as a firewall against oversight, investigation, and prosecution. There isn't a weak-kneed Main Street Republican around to quit on an investigation after a henchman pleads the 5th Amendment to protect her higher-ups. We have a POTUS who isn't a member of the McConnell/Boehner Surrender Wing of the GOP. This man is a street fighter...and those who rigged this up are about to understand that this guy isn't a member of the Bush/Rockefeller Country Club.

It is clear they were spying on the Trump campaign for political purposes...and I don't think Trump will end up being the only Republican candidate they were spying on. We're going to end up realizing that this was done to Cruz, Paul, and probably Bush as well. We may very well find out that these same mechanisms were put into play against Romney in 2012.

The Russia canard was merely cover attempting to prevent discovery of the true nature of the abuse of power emanating from the Obama Executive Office.
I am starting to seriously consider that this all traces back to Seth Rich. DNC 187's him, then has to cover his theft of Anti-Bernie emails and data with a Russian hacking narrative (this is why the server is never examined by authorities). In making the cover-up so big that it swallows the crime, they must foster the perception that the Ruskies had their fingers in the Trump campaign as well. No we are so far afield from the initial question of Rich and the DNC server. Mission Accomplished.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am completely baffled by Comey. I can't decide if he is an idiot or just arrogant beyond belief.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tailgate88 said:

I am completely baffled by Comey. I can't decide if he is an idiot or just arrogant beyond belief.
Yes.
FbgTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

captkirk said:

RoscoePColtrane said:

aggiehawg said:


Well he's confessing pretty much to doing it, now they will excuse lying about it to everyone, on necessary secrecy. I look at it as they are just trying to soften the crash they know is coming.
This means he 100% lied in his testimony
DING!DING!DING!


Nope. He was thinking about another matter. Didn't lie. Was mistaken.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pinche Abogado said:

He is desperate.
And stupid. I mean mind-numbingly stupid.

For all the grief that Trump gets for his tweeting, Comey's and Brennan's are far worse. Nothing like drawing a target on your chest with a criminal admission on twitter. Like criminals filming themselves committing a crime and posting the film on FaceBook.
mrad85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The "glue" (Obama admin) that was holding this bunch of idiots together has completely busted loose. They are each scrambling like rats from a sinking ship.

Only thing that is very odd to me is Comey. With Mueller being his mentor and pal, why is he not telling Comey to shut his pie hole? Unless, he's already cut the apron strings and given them to Comey to hang himself.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I am starting to seriously consider that this all traces back to Seth Rich. DNC 187's him, then has to cover his theft of Anti-Bernie emails and data with a Russian hacking narrative (this is why the server is never examined by authorities). In making the cover-up so big that it swallows the crime, they must foster the perception that the Ruskies had their fingers in the Trump campaign as well. No we are so far afield from the initial question of Rich and the DNC server. Mission Accomplished.
The problem is that the spying (or attempted infiltration) on the Trump campaign began before the alleged "hack" of the DNC computers. And who else had unfettered access to the DNC system? DWS' bestie, Imran Awan.

Did he frame Seth Rich? And get him killed in the process? That might explain Assange's involvement after Seth was murdered. Assange knew Rich was framed, perhaps?
FJB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mrad85 said:

The "glue" (Obama admin) that was holding this bunch of idiots together has completely busted loose. They are each scrambling like rats from a sinking ship.

Only thing that is very odd to me is Comey. With Mueller being his mentor and pal, why is he not telling Comey to shut his pie hole? Unless, he's already cut the apron strings and given them to Comey to hang himself.
Narcissistic folks can't help themselves
FbgTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I am starting to seriously consider that this all traces back to Seth Rich. DNC 187's him, then has to cover his theft of Anti-Bernie emails and data with a Russian hacking narrative (this is why the server is never examined by authorities). In making the cover-up so big that it swallows the crime, they must foster the perception that the Ruskies had their fingers in the Trump campaign as well. No we are so far afield from the initial question of Rich and the DNC server. Mission Accomplished.
The problem is that the spying (or attempted infiltration) on the Trump campaign began before the alleged "hack" of the DNC computers. And who else had unfettered access to the DNC system? DWS' bestie, Imran Awan.

Did he frame Seth Rich? And get him killed in the process? That might explain Assange's involvement after Seth was murdered. Assange knew Rich was framed, perhaps?
Yep. The Obama administration was unmasking (spying) on Republican candidates and their campaigns long before the Spring of '16.
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
While I think his comment is beyond stupid (and, arguably an admission), he will likely claim that the tweet is merely a description of FBI processes generally, not specific to the current investigation.
FJB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Pinche Abogado said:

He is desperate.
And stupid. I mean mind-numbingly stupid.

For all the grief that Trump gets for his tweeting, Comey's and Brennan's are far worse. Nothing like drawing a target on your chest with a criminal admission on twitter. Like criminals filming themselves committing a crime and posting the film on FaceBook.
And tagging the cops too!
Wildcat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Pinche Abogado said:

He is desperate.
And stupid. I mean mind-numbingly stupid.

For all the grief that Trump gets for his tweeting, Comey's and Brennan's are far worse. Nothing like drawing a target on your chest with a criminal admission on twitter. Like criminals filming themselves committing a crime and posting the film on FaceBook.

But who is going to prosecute these two?
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
mrad85 said:

The "glue" (Obama admin) that was holding this bunch of idiots together has completely busted loose. They are each scrambling like rats from a sinking ship.

Only thing that is very odd to me is Comey. With Mueller being his mentor and pal, why is he not telling Comey to shut his pie hole? Unless, he's already cut the apron strings and given them to Comey to hang himself.
Mueller has more on his plate than babysitting his bestie at this point. He's trying to keep his cases against Manafort and the Russians alive.

I think there might be a hearing scheduled in Judge Ellis' court today on Manafort's motion to suppress the evidence from the search warrants. Haven't seen confirmation of that, though. Just some rumors floating around the interwebs.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wildcat said:

aggiehawg said:

Pinche Abogado said:

He is desperate.
And stupid. I mean mind-numbingly stupid.

For all the grief that Trump gets for his tweeting, Comey's and Brennan's are far worse. Nothing like drawing a target on your chest with a criminal admission on twitter. Like criminals filming themselves committing a crime and posting the film on FaceBook.

But who is going to prosecute these two?
Huber, I'd expect.
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

GCP12 said:

Oh good. Another, "Don't worry about anything we did! There are strict rules that are always followed. Nothing to see here!"
Do they even make orange jumpsuits in Comey's size?
It's ok if it's tight in his crotch.
Can I go to sleep Looch?
Sarge 91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I am starting to seriously consider that this all traces back to Seth Rich. DNC 187's him, then has to cover his theft of Anti-Bernie emails and data with a Russian hacking narrative (this is why the server is never examined by authorities). In making the cover-up so big that it swallows the crime, they must foster the perception that the Ruskies had their fingers in the Trump campaign as well. No we are so far afield from the initial question of Rich and the DNC server. Mission Accomplished.
The problem is that the spying (or attempted infiltration) on the Trump campaign began before the alleged "hack" of the DNC computers. And who else had unfettered access to the DNC system? DWS' bestie, Imran Awan.

Did he frame Seth Rich? And get him killed in the process? That might explain Assange's involvement after Seth was murdered. Assange knew Rich was framed, perhaps?
Well the initial spying was taking place prior to July 10, 2016 (As early as March 2016 it has been reported), but how this has become so protracted and vitriolic makes no sense, unless it is to cover egregious conduct. I just get the impression that the Awan deal, the Rich murder, the e-mails on Weiner's laptop, etc are all being neglected while this circus keeps people distracted. I am not normally a tin foil hat guy, but I am starting to reach for the red pill.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:




ETA: That's an admission, for those following along at home.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You know, Bill Clinton was, and is, a superior liar, Comey, not so much.

Who ever said "Never miss an opportunity to keep your mouth shut"....................
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OldFashioned said:

Donald Trump and crew are under pressure because of moronic moves they've made themselves.

If Mueller finds evidence that holds up in a court of law, we might see an impeachment and jail sentence for obstruction of justice.

Looking forward to what comes next.

Day drinking again?
Hillary paid for warrant to spy on Trump.
McInnis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I am completely baffled by Comey. I can't decide if he is an idiot or just arrogant beyond belief.
It's sickening to even think of this, but what if there's a third explanation, i.e. that Mueller has given him blanket immunity, as Ms. Hawg has suggested is a possibility.
First Page Last Page
Page 403 of 1413
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.