The case involved a Greek Pentecostal man who targeted an intellectually impaired, vulnerable adult living in institutional care.
Greek courts consistently throw out standard proselytism charges due to ECHR precedence, but they will step in when someone exercises psychological coercion or takes financial advantage of mentally disabled or distressed individuals.
There is no attack on standard every day proselytizing.
Why do you need that law repealed? Why can't you just follow the reasonable law? It's not even enforced, except for the most extreme and perverted cases.
Paying the clergy is not a handout. During the 19th and early 20th centuries, the newly formed Greek state nationalized roughly 7580% of all church-owned agricultural land and monastic properties to resettle refugees and build national infrastructure. In legal compensation for expropriating Church wealth, the state signed agreements contractually obligated to pay clergy salaries. It was an eminent-domain settlement, not a favoritism subsidy.
They pay imams underneath a treaty with Turkey as part of an agreement to protect religious minorities in both countries.
Why in the world should Greece who outright rejects the incorrect theology of wacky American evangelicals or the worldwide evangelical alliance (whatever that is) that think they can proselytize to Greece better than Paul himself did.
Stop being a spoiled brat just because your broken version of Christianity isn't being accepted in one of the ancestral homelands of Christianity.
Ignorant and misguided post again on your part.
I guess keep slinging **** at the wall…
Greek courts consistently throw out standard proselytism charges due to ECHR precedence, but they will step in when someone exercises psychological coercion or takes financial advantage of mentally disabled or distressed individuals.
There is no attack on standard every day proselytizing.
Why do you need that law repealed? Why can't you just follow the reasonable law? It's not even enforced, except for the most extreme and perverted cases.
Paying the clergy is not a handout. During the 19th and early 20th centuries, the newly formed Greek state nationalized roughly 7580% of all church-owned agricultural land and monastic properties to resettle refugees and build national infrastructure. In legal compensation for expropriating Church wealth, the state signed agreements contractually obligated to pay clergy salaries. It was an eminent-domain settlement, not a favoritism subsidy.
They pay imams underneath a treaty with Turkey as part of an agreement to protect religious minorities in both countries.
Why in the world should Greece who outright rejects the incorrect theology of wacky American evangelicals or the worldwide evangelical alliance (whatever that is) that think they can proselytize to Greece better than Paul himself did.
Stop being a spoiled brat just because your broken version of Christianity isn't being accepted in one of the ancestral homelands of Christianity.
Ignorant and misguided post again on your part.
I guess keep slinging **** at the wall…