It is, but it's what happens when you decide to follow the World and not the Word.dermdoc said:
This is so sad.
It is, but it's what happens when you decide to follow the World and not the Word.dermdoc said:
This is so sad.
Windy City Ag said:Quote:
Unfortunately UMC is taking a lot of assets with them.
At least in Dallas, many of the wealthiest and most financially sustainable Methodist churches are sticking with the UMC.
Highland Park United Methodist is probably the most prosperous, followed by Lovers Lane. They have been pushed by the UMC North Texas conference over the years to absorb or prop up smaller failing churches. St.Andrews in Plano did bolt.
White's Chapel out in Southlake has already bolted but for whatever reason avoid the GMC as well, trying its own separate approach. It is a mega-church so they can definitely get away with it. They style themselves as centrist.
I am not sure how Houston went. Maybe different there. I knew the Woodlands UMC was also pretty much a mega-church and disaffilaited.
And before that, PCPC broke off from HPPC because PCUSA wasn't conservative enough and HPPC didn't want to split at the time..The Chicken Ranch said:
That's interesting because Highland Park Presbyterian was an early mover to the ECO. They are probably the wealthiest Presbyterian Church in Texas.
Park Cities Presbyterian (PCPC) split from HPPC and went to PCA in the early-90s. While HPPC was one of the biggest conservative churches within PCUSA, many saw the writing on the wall.The Chicken Ranch said:
I'm not familiar with PCPC. I'm not from North Texas, so you'll have to spell it out.
Are they EPC or PCA? At some point the ECO and EPC will likely merge. We are already in covenant with each other.
The PCUSA was never conservative, but it had conservative churches. They became openly hostile to conservative churches, just like the UMC did. Hence the split. The UMC-GMC split is just 15 years behind the Presbyterians.
as did First Presbyterian Houston. Had to sue PCUSA in court to take all the property.The Chicken Ranch said:
That's interesting because Highland Park Presbyterian was an early mover to the ECO. They are probably the wealthiest Presbyterian Church in Texas.
Kingwood is also home to a very good and stable ECO Presbyterian Church.
St Luke's Houston stayed - it's now a liberal mess of a church. Sad because not 20 years ago it was a mainline tall steeple conservative congregation.Windy City Ag said:Quote:
Unfortunately UMC is taking a lot of assets with them.
At least in Dallas, many of the wealthiest and most financially sustainable Methodist churches are sticking with the UMC.
Highland Park United Methodist is probably the most prosperous, followed by Lovers Lane. They have been pushed by the UMC North Texas conference over the years to absorb or prop up smaller failing churches. St.Andrews in Plano did bolt.
White's Chapel out in Southlake has already bolted but for whatever reason avoid the GMC as well, trying its own separate approach. It is a mega-church so they can definitely get away with it. They style themselves as centrist.
I am not sure how Houston went. Maybe different there. I knew the Woodlands UMC was also pretty much a mega-church and disaffilaited.
The Chicken Ranch said:
That's interesting because Highland Park Presbyterian was an early mover to the ECO. They are probably the wealthiest Presbyterian Church in Texas.
Kingwood is also home to a very good and stable ECO Presbyterian Church.
AgLiving06 said:The Chicken Ranch said:
That's interesting because Highland Park Presbyterian was an early mover to the ECO. They are probably the wealthiest Presbyterian Church in Texas.
Kingwood is also home to a very good and stable ECO Presbyterian Church.
I'm somewhat surprised they didn't go independent. They are or were pretty big in size back in the day when I went.
But maybe they went GMC just to keep more unity with others.
MAROON said:as did First Presbyterian Houston. Had to sue PCUSA in court to take all the property.The Chicken Ranch said:
That's interesting because Highland Park Presbyterian was an early mover to the ECO. They are probably the wealthiest Presbyterian Church in Texas.
Kingwood is also home to a very good and stable ECO Presbyterian Church.
A lot of the actual believers at St. Luke's are at The Story. Their pastor Eric Huffman is awesome. And that church is thriving. We are thinking about joining. Our current church lost its youth pastor and that's a must for us.MAROON said:St Luke's Houston stayed - it's now a liberal mess of a church. Sad because not 20 years ago it was a mainline tall steeple conservative congregation.Windy City Ag said:Quote:
Unfortunately UMC is taking a lot of assets with them.
At least in Dallas, many of the wealthiest and most financially sustainable Methodist churches are sticking with the UMC.
Highland Park United Methodist is probably the most prosperous, followed by Lovers Lane. They have been pushed by the UMC North Texas conference over the years to absorb or prop up smaller failing churches. St.Andrews in Plano did bolt.
White's Chapel out in Southlake has already bolted but for whatever reason avoid the GMC as well, trying its own separate approach. It is a mega-church so they can definitely get away with it. They style themselves as centrist.
I am not sure how Houston went. Maybe different there. I knew the Woodlands UMC was also pretty much a mega-church and disaffilaited.
Yep. They are thriving. They bought Bethany Church next to Lamar High School. They will outgrow St Luke's in no time.MAROON said:
yes - they're no longer at St Luke's which basically evicted The Story from their property. The Story was essentially St Luke's contemporary service at one-time.
They fall all over themselves and still can't get it right.TresPuertas said:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C6gewzAtqAw/?igsh=cTNhY2NkcnVydXQ4
TresPuertas said:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/C6gewzAtqAw/?igsh=cTNhY2NkcnVydXQ4
Quote:
Alabama Supreme Court rules against 44 churches trying to leave the UMC
By Michael Gryboski, Mainline Church Editor Monday, June 03, 2024
The Alabama Supreme Court has upheld an earlier ruling against 44 congregations attempting to leave the United Methodist Church over the denomination's debate on LGBT issues.
In a per curiam ruling released last Friday, Alabama's highest court rejected a lawsuit by Aldersgate United Methodist Church of Montgomery and 43 other churches against the UMC Alabama-West Florida Conference.
At issue in the litigation was the procedure for which the churches could disaffiliate from the UMC, with the departing congregations arguing that the annual conference's process was unfair.
According to the state Supreme Court, the matter was centered on "ecclesiastical questions," and thus was outside the domain of secular courts to decide on, in accordance with the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
"The churches argue that the trial court erred in dismissing their suit for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because, they say, the case presents only 'civil and property issues,'" read the opinion.
"But the churches' central claims turn entirely on the interpretation of [paragraph] 2553 and whether their efforts to leave the UMC were consistent with that church law. Under existing First Amendment law and our precedent, that interpretive issue constitutes an ecclesiastical question that courts do not have jurisdiction to decide."
Quote:
John Wesley, the founder of the Methodist movement, kept the various Methodist societies and small groups bound together through covenants, shared practices (such as love feasts and night watches) and the model deed, or "trust clause." The model held all church property under a shared trust and ensured the various societies and bands used their assets and facilities to faithfully carry out Methodist practices everywhere.
Today United Methodists are still bound by trust clauses. No one trust holds all United Methodist property. Instead local church property is held by each annual conference under a common trust. This is in accordance with the connectional nature of the denomination.
Windy City Ag said:
Most definitely.... the legal entities that own everything are not independent of the larger UMC and can't just walk away depending on the whims of parishioners.
This was the whole reason for the creation of dissafiliation procedures. The final step of that process is the conference permitting the reassignment of deeds to property. Without that, the local churches have no claim at all. ….,Today United Methodists are still bound by trust clauses. No one trust holds all United Methodist property. Instead local church property is held by each annual conference under a common trust. This is in accordance with the connectional nature of the