Today's the day.
And yes, for two reasons, this is a "spoiler thread" for the movie adaptation of a 3,000-year-old book...
1) Nolan's telling takes certain liberties in how the story is told, apparently jumping back-and-forth both in time and in plot-lines that are, surprise surprise, presented more elaborately than the book. Also, Nolan has added certain scenes, omitted others, etc. Thus, how Nolan tells the story can be considered just as much as, if not more of a spoiler, than the events of the book itself.
2) This thread is primarily for discussing the actual contents of the movie/plot itself, by people who have actually seen the movie, as opposed to culture war complaining/arguing. I'm sure the latter will inevitably come up, but there were multiple requests in the other thread for a fresh, movie-discussion-only thread, so here we are.
As for me, I'll see you guys back here Saturday night, after, at long last, I finally see this thing for myself...
And yes, for two reasons, this is a "spoiler thread" for the movie adaptation of a 3,000-year-old book...
1) Nolan's telling takes certain liberties in how the story is told, apparently jumping back-and-forth both in time and in plot-lines that are, surprise surprise, presented more elaborately than the book. Also, Nolan has added certain scenes, omitted others, etc. Thus, how Nolan tells the story can be considered just as much as, if not more of a spoiler, than the events of the book itself.
2) This thread is primarily for discussing the actual contents of the movie/plot itself, by people who have actually seen the movie, as opposed to culture war complaining/arguing. I'm sure the latter will inevitably come up, but there were multiple requests in the other thread for a fresh, movie-discussion-only thread, so here we are.
As for me, I'll see you guys back here Saturday night, after, at long last, I finally see this thing for myself...