Didn't that go away for a while? I swear there was a period it was Male and Female Actor.double aught said:
I'm a little surprised the Academy still uses the terms Actor and Actress. You guys should still be on board with them for that reason.
Didn't that go away for a while? I swear there was a period it was Male and Female Actor.double aught said:
I'm a little surprised the Academy still uses the terms Actor and Actress. You guys should still be on board with them for that reason.
TCTTS said:Max Power said:
The wikipedia entry for Emilia Perez is just incredible.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emilia_P%C3%A9rezQuote:
The film was positively received in the United States and Europe, earning praise from both territories for its direction, music, performances, and themes. Internationally, it polarized critics, especially in Mexico, who criticized its cultural representation, songwriting, use of stereotypes and Spanish dialogue. The film has also been criticized by LGBTQ critics, who called out its transphobic tropes, reductive storyline and cisgender perspective about transness, with media monitoring organization GLAAD calling it "a step backward for trans representation."
So basically liberal white Americans and Europeans (aka Academy voters) praise the film while the people it portrays all pan it...you can't make this stuff up.
The insane far left in a nutshell.
It's basically "Latinx" in movie form. A term most hispanics hate but white extreme liberals still insist on using because of how good it makes them feel and what it virtue signals to other white extreme liberals.
double aught said:
I'm a little surprised the Academy still uses the terms Actor and Actress. You guys should still be on board with them for that reason.
Get ready for an unforgettable movie experience! Experience the Oscar nominees with your fellow movie fans at one of the #AMCTheatres Best Picture Showcase Marathon events. Get 🎟 now!⁰https://t.co/kk6SYI7aLo pic.twitter.com/kf7mnpzLXw
— AMC Theatres (@AMCTheatres) January 24, 2025
Sapper Redux said:
I was wondering if we could make it out of the first page before it became political. We could not.
+1. I watched this movie last night without knowing anything about it other than it got a lot of Oscar nominations. I want to preface this by saying I'm typically not a fan of artsy Oscar type movies, musicals, and Im definitely anti woke and pro Trump. And I still really enjoyed this movie and my girlfriend did too. We both talked a lot about it afterward.veryfuller said:
I think movies can get lost in the awards campaigns that get built around them when they weren't made for that to begin with. This is a movie made by a French director that premiered at Cannes. Not your typical Hollywood Oscar bait. It won awards and acclaim there (which often does not translate to US success or acclaim). Netflix saw it was successful there, bought it, and has been campaigning for it HARD ever since.
Look I'm not saying Emilia Prez is GOOD, but….but…it is compelling in a watching a train wreck kind of way. It's one of the weirdest movies I've ever seen and mashes up genres in a creative, if scattered, way.
The performances of Saldana and Gomez are actually really impressive. I think Saldana would be the front runner in the lead category if she had opted to go that route too, tbh.
I don't think it deserves ALL the awards chatter (as many noms as Titanic?), and it is baffling to me why it has this political element of support considering it's not really pro-trans in any way. It's just a story about a trans drug cartel leader and all the fall out from his choices, mostly bad.
BUT…if you watch the movie and try and drown out all that chatter and just take it at face value, it's entertaining in its own way. Like that clip from above…that moment is supposed to be absurd and weird in the movie. It's not like the tone of the movie is straight serious. It's very bizarre and that's kind of the point.
F16 is more normal than Hollywood will ever be.TCTTS said:
I call out the far left when it's warranted. The problem is, we're next door to one of the most far right echo chambers on the internet, the spillover from which has me defending Hollywood more than I'd like, from all kinds inaccurate insanity, making me sound to some people way less "normal" than I actually am.
If true that statement makes me want to kill myself.aTmAg said:F16 is more normal than Hollywood will ever be.TCTTS said:
I call out the far left when it's warranted. The problem is, we're next door to one of the most far right echo chambers on the internet, the spillover from which has me defending Hollywood more than I'd like, from all kinds inaccurate insanity, making me sound to some people way less "normal" than I actually am.
aTmAg said:F16 is more normal than Hollywood will ever be.TCTTS said:
I call out the far left when it's warranted. The problem is, we're next door to one of the most far right echo chambers on the internet, the spillover from which has me defending Hollywood more than I'd like, from all kinds inaccurate insanity, making me sound to some people way less "normal" than I actually am.
Belton Ag said:
Now this is the way to derail the thread.
FL_Ag1998 said:
Yeah, no actor or director can openly criticize a film that has anything to do with an LGBTQwhatever topic. And calling something a "singular experience" is laughably obvious code for "I have no genuine praise for this but don't dare criticize it".
This thread alone proves how wrong you are. Hollywood incorrectly pretends this movie is good while F16 correctly acknowledges that leftism is bad.Bunk Moreland said:aTmAg said:F16 is more normal than Hollywood will ever be.TCTTS said:
I call out the far left when it's warranted. The problem is, we're next door to one of the most far right echo chambers on the internet, the spillover from which has me defending Hollywood more than I'd like, from all kinds inaccurate insanity, making me sound to some people way less "normal" than I actually am.
They're both equal cosplay fantasy lands.
aTmAg said:This thread alone proves how wrong you are. Hollywood incorrectly pretends this movie is good while F16 correctly acknowledges that leftism is bad.Bunk Moreland said:aTmAg said:F16 is more normal than Hollywood will ever be.TCTTS said:
I call out the far left when it's warranted. The problem is, we're next door to one of the most far right echo chambers on the internet, the spillover from which has me defending Hollywood more than I'd like, from all kinds inaccurate insanity, making me sound to some people way less "normal" than I actually am.
They're both equal cosplay fantasy lands.
So you think that movie is "good'? You think men can become pregnant too?Sapper Redux said:aTmAg said:This thread alone proves how wrong you are. Hollywood incorrectly pretends this movie is good while F16 correctly acknowledges that leftism is bad.Bunk Moreland said:aTmAg said:F16 is more normal than Hollywood will ever be.TCTTS said:
I call out the far left when it's warranted. The problem is, we're next door to one of the most far right echo chambers on the internet, the spillover from which has me defending Hollywood more than I'd like, from all kinds inaccurate insanity, making me sound to some people way less "normal" than I actually am.
They're both equal cosplay fantasy lands.
You vacillate so perfectly between "clearly insane" and "clearly a bit" that it could be studied in psychology course.
I saw one critic call this the "strongest year in decades", and I'm wondering what films they've been watching. It was an awful, awful year.uujm said:
I'll probably just wipe my ass with my ballot and whatever gets picked gets picked. Terrible nominations this year.
aTmAg said:So you think that movie is "good'? You think men can become pregnant too?Sapper Redux said:aTmAg said:This thread alone proves how wrong you are. Hollywood incorrectly pretends this movie is good while F16 correctly acknowledges that leftism is bad.Bunk Moreland said:aTmAg said:F16 is more normal than Hollywood will ever be.TCTTS said:
I call out the far left when it's warranted. The problem is, we're next door to one of the most far right echo chambers on the internet, the spillover from which has me defending Hollywood more than I'd like, from all kinds inaccurate insanity, making me sound to some people way less "normal" than I actually am.
They're both equal cosplay fantasy lands.
You vacillate so perfectly between "clearly insane" and "clearly a bit" that it could be studied in psychology course.
And you call anybody else insane?
LOL.
Name them please. Hyperbolic reporting is great.BassCowboy33 said:I saw one critic call this the "strongest year in decades", and I'm wondering what films they've been watching. It was an awful, awful year.uujm said:
I'll probably just wipe my ass with my ballot and whatever gets picked gets picked. Terrible nominations this year.
I've got zero socks and this is the only account I have ever used.Sapper Redux said:aTmAg said:So you think that movie is "good'? You think men can become pregnant too?Sapper Redux said:aTmAg said:This thread alone proves how wrong you are. Hollywood incorrectly pretends this movie is good while F16 correctly acknowledges that leftism is bad.Bunk Moreland said:aTmAg said:F16 is more normal than Hollywood will ever be.TCTTS said:
I call out the far left when it's warranted. The problem is, we're next door to one of the most far right echo chambers on the internet, the spillover from which has me defending Hollywood more than I'd like, from all kinds inaccurate insanity, making me sound to some people way less "normal" than I actually am.
They're both equal cosplay fantasy lands.
You vacillate so perfectly between "clearly insane" and "clearly a bit" that it could be studied in psychology course.
And you call anybody else insane?
LOL.
So you have 6 socks I take it. I never said the movie was good. The reviews I've read and the plot synopsis sound like something I wouldn't enjoy even if it was a great movie in that genre. But your response is so clearly driven by your politics while you sit here and whine about the politics of Hollywood personalities. If you'd like to discuss the difference between sex and gender, I'm happy to discuss somewhere else.
LOL.Sapper Redux said:
Buddy, gender is very much a construct. How people portray and understand sex is by definition constructed. It is not locked in time or biology. It's a function of human society. Look up the history of high heels.
Karla Sofía Gascón is currently facing backlash for making dozens of social media posts that contain racist and Islamophobic comments.
— DiscussingFilm (@DiscussingFilm) January 30, 2025
She is currently nominated for Best Actress at this year’s Oscar’s for her role in ‘EMILIA PÉREZ’
(Source: https://t.co/kZoDPDXZ2h) pic.twitter.com/zuAn1Cw1mF
“Emilia Pérez” star Karla Sofia Gascón tweeted on Nov. 22, 2020: “I’m Sorry, Is it just my impression or is there more muslims in Spain? Every time I go to pick up my daughter from school there are more women with their hair covered and their skirts down to their heels. Next year… pic.twitter.com/Zsmj5vsrgY
— Variety (@Variety) January 30, 2025
In August 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Karla Sofía Gascón tweeted, “The Chinese vaccine, apart from the mandatory chip, comes with two spring rolls, a cat that moves its hand, 2 plastic flowers, a pop-up lantern, 3 telephone lines and one euro for your first controlled… pic.twitter.com/05Kn6ovwRT
— Variety (@Variety) January 30, 2025
it’s so insane that karla sofía gascón still has these tweets up. straight up have never seen tweets this racist from someone actively campaigning to win an ACADEMY AWARD. there are more than a dozen… pic.twitter.com/1rcNzkJXuo
— sarah hagi (@KindaHagi) January 30, 2025
I’ve really been trying to give Karla the benefit of the doubt, given what I knew she would be facing in contention this awards season, but this is beyond the pale. A terrible, hateful human being, the same type of person she claims to be fighting against. I’m done. pic.twitter.com/liJRoqjs1b
— Brandon Lewis @ Sundance 2025 (@blewis1103) January 30, 2025