snowdog90 said:

---

TCTTS said:

---

The Green Dragon said:

---

It looks like TCTTS and the others were correct. Child trafficking is malarkey.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/exclusive-bidens-doj-eliminates-language-child-sex-trafficking/

---

The ONLY reason I'm chiming back in is to shoot down - yet again - complete and utter bullsh*t like this, to the point of what I can only interpret as clearly intentional slander.

NO ONE here thinks child trafficking is "malarkey," nor have I once downplayed this tragedy in the slightest. I've said a thousand times in this thread that child trafficking is horrible, that more people should be made aware of it, and that I'm glad this movie is doing just that. In fact, you can find me saying as much on nearly every page in this thread.

All of these posts saying that I've "shown my true colors" or whatever other nonsense are so far gone, when what they really show are how desperately some of you need a villain, and how much you crave trying to absolutely eviscerate people who don't see the world *exactly* as you do.

I simply thought this movie would be better served without Cavielzel using QAnon talking points to promote it.

THAT'S IT.

Otherwise, quit f/cking painting me and others as people who excuse child trafficking or think it's "malarkey."

This is absolutely insane.

---

Good for you.

You're still wrong. Adrenochrome is not exclusive to Qanon. You can parrot what the liars at CNN said until Christmas and it won't make you or them any less full of *****

Caviezel and Ballard have explained that ad nauseum, and the movie has nothing to do with Qanon.

---

Name me some people who believe that adrenochrome horse**** that are not Q-tips and are not fictional characters.


And defending TCTSS, they never said the movie or message were bad, they just didn't like the jesus duder's talking points. Personally, I could care less what any actor says to help promote a movie.

I have not followed that Q crap at all, but the FDA was issuing warnings and shutting down clinics (including some in california) doing these adrenachrome treatments years ago. Forgive me for believing a trafficked young person might be exploited for more than just sex. People have been pursuing these treatments. This isn't fantasy. Old, horny rich people are capable of some weird **** in an effort yo get their rocks off and stay young.

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/statement-fda-commissioner-scott-gottlieb-md-and-director-fdas-center-biologics-evaluation-and-0

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna973266

"Taking young women and selling them into sexual slavery? Oh, that's totally common. Also taking some of their blood to do treatments that actually do exist? Get outta here you Q freak!"

Rich old people are capable of crazy ****

Thought this was applicable here….

TCTTS said:

---

The Green Dragon said:

---

It looks like TCTTS and the others were correct. Child trafficking is malarkey.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/exclusive-bidens-doj-eliminates-language-child-sex-trafficking/

---

The ONLY reason I'm chiming back in is to shoot down - yet again - complete and utter bullsh*t like this, to the point of what I can only interpret as clearly intentional slander.

NO ONE here thinks child trafficking is "malarkey," nor have I once downplayed this tragedy in the slightest. I've said a thousand times in this thread that child trafficking is horrible, that more people should be made aware of it, and that I'm glad this movie is doing just that. In fact, you can find me saying as much on nearly every page in this thread.

All of these posts saying that I've "shown my true colors" or whatever other nonsense are so far gone, when what they really show are how desperately some of you need a villain, and how much you crave trying to absolutely eviscerate people who don't see the world *exactly* as you do.

I simply thought this movie would be better served without Cavielzel using QAnon talking points to promote it.

THAT'S IT.

Otherwise, quit f/cking painting me and others as people who excuse child trafficking or think it's "malarkey."

This is absolutely insane.

---

You did seem to back amercer up when he was posting that child trafficking was a small issue and that we should be focused on other issues.

Which was a little off putting.

THERE'S 25 PAGES OF THIS *****????

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

TCTTS said:

---

The Green Dragon said:

---

It looks like TCTTS and the others were correct. Child trafficking is malarkey.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/exclusive-bidens-doj-eliminates-language-child-sex-trafficking/

---

The ONLY reason I'm chiming back in is to shoot down - yet again - complete and utter bullsh*t like this, to the point of what I can only interpret as clearly intentional slander.

NO ONE here thinks child trafficking is "malarkey," nor have I once downplayed this tragedy in the slightest. I've said a thousand times in this thread that child trafficking is horrible, that more people should be made aware of it, and that I'm glad this movie is doing just that. In fact, you can find me saying as much on nearly every page in this thread.

All of these posts saying that I've "shown my true colors" or whatever other nonsense are so far gone, when what they really show are how desperately some of you need a villain, and how much you crave trying to absolutely eviscerate people who don't see the world *exactly* as you do.

I simply thought this movie would be better served without Cavielzel using QAnon talking points to promote it.

THAT'S IT.

Otherwise, quit f/cking painting me and others as people who excuse child trafficking or think it's "malarkey."

This is absolutely insane.

---

You did seem to back amercer up when he was posting that child trafficking was a small issue and that we should be focused on other issues.

Which was a little off putting.

---

Once again... complete and utter bullsh*t.

You're probably thinking of this post, which I didn't star, and showed no agreement with or support in any way...



I did, however, support this post on the next page, which had absolutely nothing to do with downplaying child trafficking, or painting it as a "small issue"...



Seriously. STOP. F/CKING. DOING. THIS.

What is it with the obsessive compulsion some of you have to KEEP lying about me downplaying child trafficking? It's one of the most sh*tty, bizarre, bad faith things I've ever seen on this board.

Journalists Stop By Shelter To Inform Trafficked Children They Are A QAnon Conspiracy https://t.co/mxYBSmB7lt pic.twitter.com/tI1U6WQIil

— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) July 12, 2023

SIAP

TCTTS said:

---

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

TCTTS said:

---

The Green Dragon said:

---

It looks like TCTTS and the others were correct. Child trafficking is malarkey.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/exclusive-bidens-doj-eliminates-language-child-sex-trafficking/

---

The ONLY reason I'm chiming back in is to shoot down - yet again - complete and utter bullsh*t like this, to the point of what I can only interpret as clearly intentional slander.

NO ONE here thinks child trafficking is "malarkey," nor have I once downplayed this tragedy in the slightest. I've said a thousand times in this thread that child trafficking is horrible, that more people should be made aware of it, and that I'm glad this movie is doing just that. In fact, you can find me saying as much on nearly every page in this thread.

All of these posts saying that I've "shown my true colors" or whatever other nonsense are so far gone, when what they really show are how desperately some of you need a villain, and how much you crave trying to absolutely eviscerate people who don't see the world *exactly* as you do.

I simply thought this movie would be better served without Cavielzel using QAnon talking points to promote it.

THAT'S IT.

Otherwise, quit f/cking painting me and others as people who excuse child trafficking or think it's "malarkey."

This is absolutely insane.

---

You did seem to back amercer up when he was posting that child trafficking was a small issue and that we should be focused on other issues.

Which was a little off putting.

---

Once again... complete and utter bullsh*t.

You're probably thinking of this post, which I didn't star, and showed no agreement with or support in any way...



I did, however, support this post on the next page, which had absolutely nothing to do with downplaying child trafficking, or painting it as a "small issue"...



Seriously. STOP. F/CKING. DOING. THIS.

What is it with the obsessive compulsion some of you have to KEEP lying about me downplaying child trafficking? It's one of the most sh*tty, bizarre, bad faith things I've ever seen on this board.

---

Calm down bud. You seemed to be coming to his defense and he was posting some off putting stuff in quick succession. If that wasn't your intention, no harm no foul.

TCTTS said:

---

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

TCTTS said:

---

The Green Dragon said:

---

It looks like TCTTS and the others were correct. Child trafficking is malarkey.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/exclusive-bidens-doj-eliminates-language-child-sex-trafficking/

---

The ONLY reason I'm chiming back in is to shoot down - yet again - complete and utter bullsh*t like this, to the point of what I can only interpret as clearly intentional slander.

NO ONE here thinks child trafficking is "malarkey," nor have I once downplayed this tragedy in the slightest. I've said a thousand times in this thread that child trafficking is horrible, that more people should be made aware of it, and that I'm glad this movie is doing just that. In fact, you can find me saying as much on nearly every page in this thread.

All of these posts saying that I've "shown my true colors" or whatever other nonsense are so far gone, when what they really show are how desperately some of you need a villain, and how much you crave trying to absolutely eviscerate people who don't see the world *exactly* as you do.

I simply thought this movie would be better served without Cavielzel using QAnon talking points to promote it.

THAT'S IT.

Otherwise, quit f/cking painting me and others as people who excuse child trafficking or think it's "malarkey."

This is absolutely insane.

---

You did seem to back amercer up when he was posting that child trafficking was a small issue and that we should be focused on other issues.

Which was a little off putting.

---

Once again... complete and utter bullsh*t.

You're probably thinking of this post, which I didn't star, and showed no agreement with or support in any way...



I did, however, support this post on the next page, which had absolutely nothing to do with downplaying child trafficking, or painting it as a "small issue"...



Seriously. STOP. F/CKING. DOING. THIS.

What is it with the obsessive compulsion some of you have to KEEP lying about me downplaying child trafficking? It's one of the most sh*tty, bizarre, bad faith things I've ever seen on this board.

---

You did this to yourself

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

TCTTS said:

---

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

TCTTS said:

---

The Green Dragon said:

---

It looks like TCTTS and the others were correct. Child trafficking is malarkey.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/exclusive-bidens-doj-eliminates-language-child-sex-trafficking/

---

The ONLY reason I'm chiming back in is to shoot down - yet again - complete and utter bullsh*t like this, to the point of what I can only interpret as clearly intentional slander.

NO ONE here thinks child trafficking is "malarkey," nor have I once downplayed this tragedy in the slightest. I've said a thousand times in this thread that child trafficking is horrible, that more people should be made aware of it, and that I'm glad this movie is doing just that. In fact, you can find me saying as much on nearly every page in this thread.

All of these posts saying that I've "shown my true colors" or whatever other nonsense are so far gone, when what they really show are how desperately some of you need a villain, and how much you crave trying to absolutely eviscerate people who don't see the world *exactly* as you do.

I simply thought this movie would be better served without Cavielzel using QAnon talking points to promote it.

THAT'S IT.

Otherwise, quit f/cking painting me and others as people who excuse child trafficking or think it's "malarkey."

This is absolutely insane.

---

You did seem to back amercer up when he was posting that child trafficking was a small issue and that we should be focused on other issues.

Which was a little off putting.

---

Once again... complete and utter bullsh*t.

You're probably thinking of this post, which I didn't star, and showed no agreement with or support in any way...



I did, however, support this post on the next page, which had absolutely nothing to do with downplaying child trafficking, or painting it as a "small issue"...



Seriously. STOP. F/CKING. DOING. THIS.

What is it with the obsessive compulsion some of you have to KEEP lying about me downplaying child trafficking? It's one of the most sh*tty, bizarre, bad faith things I've ever seen on this board.

---

Calm down bud. You seemed to be coming to his defense and he was posting some off putting stuff in quick succession. If that wasn't your intention, no harm no foul.

---

I don't mean to overreact, but this continues to happen, where people KEEP outright saying or insinuating that I'm either pro child trafficking or downplaying child trafficking. And in a thread with *literal* Q believers and the like, it legit makes me nervous that one of them is going to believe that narrative, and take things too far. It's not like certain posters haven't done that in the past on this site, whether it be doxxing people they hate, contacting someone's work to try and get them fired, or worse. Adding gasoline to the fire are posts like the above ("You know who doesn't like movies about pedophiles and human traffickers? Pedophiles & human traffickers.") and all the ingredients are here for the *potential* - as unlikely as it is - for someone to truly cross the line.

Dude. How many times are you going to say the exact same thing on this thread?

Please tell me you understand that people are just trying to get a rise out of you at this point, because you're letting them.

TCTTS said:

---

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

TCTTS said:

---

BoydCrowder13 said:

---

TCTTS said:

---

The Green Dragon said:

---

It looks like TCTTS and the others were correct. Child trafficking is malarkey.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/exclusive-bidens-doj-eliminates-language-child-sex-trafficking/

---

The ONLY reason I'm chiming back in is to shoot down - yet again - complete and utter bullsh*t like this, to the point of what I can only interpret as clearly intentional slander.

NO ONE here thinks child trafficking is "malarkey," nor have I once downplayed this tragedy in the slightest. I've said a thousand times in this thread that child trafficking is horrible, that more people should be made aware of it, and that I'm glad this movie is doing just that. In fact, you can find me saying as much on nearly every page in this thread.

All of these posts saying that I've "shown my true colors" or whatever other nonsense are so far gone, when what they really show are how desperately some of you need a villain, and how much you crave trying to absolutely eviscerate people who don't see the world *exactly* as you do.

I simply thought this movie would be better served without Cavielzel using QAnon talking points to promote it.

THAT'S IT.

Otherwise, quit f/cking painting me and others as people who excuse child trafficking or think it's "malarkey."

This is absolutely insane.

---

You did seem to back amercer up when he was posting that child trafficking was a small issue and that we should be focused on other issues.

Which was a little off putting.

---

Once again... complete and utter bullsh*t.

You're probably thinking of this post, which I didn't star, and showed no agreement with or support in any way...



I did, however, support this post on the next page, which had absolutely nothing to do with downplaying child trafficking, or painting it as a "small issue"...



Seriously. STOP. F/CKING. DOING. THIS.

What is it with the obsessive compulsion some of you have to KEEP lying about me downplaying child trafficking? It's one of the most sh*tty, bizarre, bad faith things I've ever seen on this board.

---

Calm down bud. You seemed to be coming to his defense and he was posting some off putting stuff in quick succession. If that wasn't your intention, no harm no foul.

---

I don't mean to overreact, but this continues to happen, where people KEEP outright saying or insinuating that I'm either pro child trafficking or downplaying child trafficking. And in a thread with *literal* Q believers and the like, it legit makes me nervous that one of them is going to believe that narrative, and take things too far. It's not like certain posters haven't done that in the past on this site, whether it be doxxing people they hate, contacting someone's work to try and get them fired, or worse. Adding gasoline to the fire are posts like the above ("You know who doesn't like movies about pedophiles and human traffickers? Pedophiles & human traffickers.") and all the ingredients are here for the *potential* - as unlikely as it is - for someone to truly cross the line.

---

So much this.

F16 far too often takes it too far.

Like the guy saying he would fire someone for their beliefs

Anyone remember Jorts?

Too many bad outcomes not to take TC's post seriously

He doesn't support child trafficking, full stop.

No one in this thread does.

Sure, Sapper's posts make everyone want to take a shower and bleach their eyes, but no one here is supporting child trafficking

Tibbers said:

---

Dude, please calm down. This is simply a message board. No one believes you support child trafficking. I certainly don't. Please calm down, take a breath.

---

He's way too defensive about this.

Ghost of Bisbee said:

---

TequilaMockingbird said:

---

Ghost of Bisbee said:

---

aTmAg said:

---

TCTTS said:

---

The Green Dragon said:

---

It looks like TCTTS and the others were correct. Child trafficking is malarkey.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/exclusive-bidens-doj-eliminates-language-child-sex-trafficking/

---

The ONLY reason I'm chiming back in is to shoot down - yet again - complete and utter bullsh*t like this, to the point of what I can only interpret as clearly intentional slander.

NO ONE here thinks child trafficking is "malarkey," nor have I once downplayed this tragedy in the slightest. I've said a thousand times in this thread that child trafficking is horrible, that more people should be made aware of it, and that I'm glad this movie is doing just that. In fact, you can find me saying as much on nearly every page in this thread.

All of these posts saying that I've "shown my true colors" or whatever other nonsense are so far gone, when what they really show are how desperately some of you need a villain, and how much you crave trying to absolutely eviscerate people who don't see the world *exactly* as you do.

I simply thought this movie would be better served without Cavielzel using QAnon talking points to promote it.

THAT'S IT.

Otherwise, quit f/cking painting me and others as people who excuse child trafficking or think it's "malarkey."

This is absolutely insane.

---

You going to go see the movie?

---

He said he would, no less than 10x

---

About as many times as he said he was done with this thread.

---

Why do y'all flame him so much for expressing his views fairly? Albeit verbose, he's entitled to his opinion.

---

He gets flamed because he keeps announcing he's leaving in a huff, then he's right back here a couple of hours later posting the same crap over and over again.

staff should have locked this ****show down a long time ago, since it spirals into bull**** and insults every other page.

rather telling they have not.

C@LAg said:

---

staff should have locked this ****show down a long time ago, since it spirals into bull**** and insults every other page.

rather telling they have not.

---

Pretty wild considering their normal hair trigger.

Sea Speed said:

---

C@LAg said:

---

staff should have locked this ****show down a long time ago, since it spirals into bull**** and insults every other page.

rather telling they have not.

---

Pretty wild considering their normal hair trigger.

---

that is my point.

they fly into a tizzy over nothing little posts, administering bans like one dollar bills at a strip club.

but THIS entire extended thread has been one car crash after another, where the driver wrecks, puts it in reverse, then accelerates and does it all over again.

rinse/

repeat.

and no bans. at all.

it really makes no sense; the inconsistency is frustrating and unfair.

Tibbers said:

---

Dude, please calm down. This is simply a message board. No one believes you support child trafficking. I certainly don't. Please calm down, take a breath.

---

Gaslighting much? You've been stirring the pot with TC for at least 10 pages

It's the entertainment board, and this is entertaining.

I appreciate staff treating posters like adults. More threads should be left open, like this one.

I don't doubt people said those things about you, but people here on both sides of this argument know that is just silly and would ignore it even if it was still up. Personal attacks are childish and uninventive. You don't have to defend that.

The attack angle the industry in general has taken against this film is also silly. The movie has nothing to do with the 20+ pages of arguments here and across the interwebs. The attacks that Ballard is doing bad or disingenuous work is as bad as people calling you names. The guy gave up so much to do what he thinks is right and his what he believes is his calling. He is making a difference in the world, especially compared to what most of us are doing. Taking down traffickers and pedophiles is noble work. Freeing people from slavery is a good thing.

I am just tired of it being right or left, liberal or conservative. Children are innocent and deserve that innocence. Why would we ever fight about this?

ETA: if anyone were to claim it was only liberals that participate in pedophilia or trafficking I would call that out too. If you sully a child's innocence you are unredeemable in my opinion.

A debate? Where you called TC a lightweight and made it uncomfortably personal over and over and over?

I've seen it all